Am I too fat to survive BC?!

SSInUK
SSInUK Member Posts: 245
edited April 2017 in Stage III Breast Cancer

I'm in one of those cancer radio times, and having put on 18lb since starting an AI a year ago (and probably eating too many anxiety pies let's be honest) I went looking for the influence of weight on recurrence. Grim reading. I suddenly wondered if you longer term survivors who inspire us all are universally slim and fit? Am I carrying my saddlebags all the way to mets? Either answer works for me - if you're not a perfect BMI that's comforting - if you are, well it's a clue as to why you may be doing well and kicks my ass to do something about it! I do realise that weight and fitness is one treatment option that's in my own hands - no prescription no cost. Full disclosure, I had a BMI over 30 when diagnosed, lost weight till I was a few pounds over healthy, now on the upper limit of overweight borderline 'obese' (i.e. BMI 30). Its not visually obvious, especially since DIEP - but I don't spose its my eyelashes tipping the scales...

«1

Comments

  • mustlovepoodles
    mustlovepoodles Member Posts: 2,825
    edited February 2017

    im not stage 3, but to my understanding most BC is just bad luck. Sure, obesity is a factor, but it's not the only factor. Obesity is not an automatic ticket to BC, nor is normal BMI totally protective. There are many, many factors that influence who gets bc and who doesnt.

    I have 3 sisters and a brother. I also have 2 gene mutations known to cause BC. Only one sister had developed DCIS. Why?our family health history is terrible--19 cancers, lots of breast cancer in both sides. Why haven't all 5 of us had BC? Luck of the draw.

  • Freya244117
    Freya244117 Member Posts: 603
    edited February 2017

    I thought I had a low chance of getting cancer, never had any weight issues, always active and played a lot of sport, healthy diet, non smoker, blah blah blah. I had bone mets 18 months after original dx, and just dxd with liver mets.

    We just don't know enough about what triggers cancer. You have enough to deal with without beating yourself up. I did find that exercising helped me get through treatment physically and mentally, and as strange as it may sound, the more exercise I did, the less fatigued I felt.

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited February 2017

    Don't let anyone blame you for getting cancer. I was the perfect bmi and healthy I got cancer. I exercise everyday I eat, for 1 hour aerobic. Still got cancer, they don't know why.

  • ErenTo
    ErenTo Member Posts: 343
    edited February 2017

    I'm slim and fit, have always been. But look at me!

    Actually, most BC patients that I've come across in real life have been slim. I wish being slim reduced my anxiety on recurrence, but it doesn't. Not to be fatalistic, but a lot of this is too random and so many variables are at play that are still unknown to us. In the big scheme of things weight may only be a small part for some patients.

  • hopefour
    hopefour Member Posts: 459
    edited February 2017

    Great advise above!! No guilt. But, I will share that MD Anderson told me that my Als would work best if my weight is kept within my BMI. I was two pounds over and encouraged to lose it.

  • Sam2U
    Sam2U Member Posts: 233
    edited February 2017

    Hopefour--I wonder if MD Anderson actually had any scientific data to back up that claim?!?

  • SSInUK
    SSInUK Member Posts: 245
    edited February 2017

    thank you ladies for your replies. That was exactly my anxiety Hopefour - I read that AIs are less effective if you're overweight. It scared me as I have hoped AIs would be my magic bullet, since no other treatment seemed to do its job. I had lots of residual disease after NAC and more cancer found in IM nodes 9 months after mastectomy, chemo rads. I understand AIs are stopping your body fat making estrogen and presumably the more body fat you have the less completely effective they are. Gulp. Of course the anxiety makes me want to hit the valentines chocolate. Not helpful..

    Btw I have read some studies about estrogen levels of women on AI's and BMI but a couple of pounds over weight is outside the scope of the literature I'd say. Blimey. That's hardly overweight in my books, given the damn hormone therapy itself can make weight a problem.Harsh!!

  • Lily55
    Lily55 Member Posts: 3,534
    edited February 2017

    We make oestrogen from fat after menopause, that is why being a healthy weight is important.........the more fat we have the more oestrogen we créate........my BMI is just over 25 and I cannot get it under so all my records state I am overweight, even though I do not look it at all..........so there is a reason to keep to a healthy weight if you had a hormone driven breast cáncer...

  • Jenwith4kids
    Jenwith4kids Member Posts: 635
    edited February 2017

    Lily55 beat me to it. She's right, estrogen is stored in fat cells - especially those around our organs and therefore in our middles. The other part of that is exercise - the reason that is so important is that endorphins act like AI's.... The more endorphins, the lest estrogen.

    See if you have a Max Challenge in your area. Best thing I've done for myself since treatment ended. www.themaxchallenge.com

    Jen

  • SSInUK
    SSInUK Member Posts: 245
    edited February 2017

    is anyone doing ok without having cracked this? Are any longer term survivors horizontally challenged? I do understand that estrogen is produced by fat hence the anxiety that I'm not good at managing my weight. I eat a pretty healthy diet since diagnosis but the smallest variation and I put on weight. You'd be surprised if you saw me that I weigh what I do but it's not about appearance it's about health of course

  • ck55
    ck55 Member Posts: 346
    edited February 2017

    I am 10 years out since Nov 9th. I was close to the obesity BMI of 30 when diagnosed in 2006 and stayed that way until I joined Weight Watchers (great program btw) last year. I have lost 35 lbs and am very close to my goal weight of 125 (I'm 5'3"). Feeling great - lighter and more energetic. I made it close to ten years at my heavier weight, so I am guessing my weight didn't cause me any problems. Hoping losing the weight give me an added advantage and maybe another 10+ years? 🙂

    Cyndi

  • IAmElaine
    IAmElaine Member Posts: 87
    edited February 2017

    I am stage 3B and am now out 13 years next month. I have been in a study for the past ten years that is looking at the impact moderate exercise and healthy weight have on recurrence. My onc explains to me that exercise lowers circulating estrogen. Also, the less fat on our bodies the better. Yes, it is true the AI's don't work as well for those of us who are over weight.

    I have never had a weight problem but was still diagnosed with ILC. I do cardio one hour a day, five days a week. I eat a low carb diet. This also lowers my blood sugar which is very important for bc patients. At my fittest, my BMI was about 19. That is where my onc wants me. However, right now it is hovering around 20. I am 5'7 and weigh 130.

    There are many studies that suggest moderate exercise lowers our recurrence risk substantially. I am involved in a group of survivors who are using the Paleo diet with great success.

    Hope this helps.

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited February 2017

    It is great that you think a healthy bmi will prevent cancer but if that was true why did I get cancer? You know I don't doubt that healthy bmi is good for your overall health but I don't think it helps prevent cancer.

  • Kicks
    Kicks Member Posts: 4,131
    edited February 2017

    Yeah - I've always been very active, never overweight, never smoked anything, good diet, no known cancer history on either side of family for 4 generations. Do not need to lower my blood sugar as I can be hypoglycemic at times.

    I do agree that it is much better for our overall health to be active and not obese or aneortic as while they are on the exteme ends, both can be deadly. There are no simple answers.

  • IAmElaine
    IAmElaine Member Posts: 87
    edited February 2017

    I'm sorry if I didn't clearly state the reason for my post. As I said, I am involved in a 10 year long study looking at the effects of moderate exercise, healthy diet and healthy weight as it affects our recurrence. I am followed pretty closely so it keeps me motivated. This is just one of many studies. So far, the results look very promising.

    I too was always very active and always well within the "normal" BMI range. When I was diagnosed I had none of the risk factors they look at except I had breasts.

    The reason my onc is very concerned about the efficacy of the AI's is, they are prescribed as "one size fits all", and that makes no sense. How can my 2.5mg of Letrozole possibly be effective in a person weighing 130lbs vs 250lbs? Is someone getting too much or someone not getting enough? This question drives me crazy and my onc cannot answer it for me. He tells me the trials were done with 4mg, then 3mg and they settled on 2.5mg. This sounds like a crap shoot to me.

  • Sam2U
    Sam2U Member Posts: 233
    edited February 2017

    I was looking for actual studies.

    I have seen studies with mixed results, a couple that show higher rates of estrogen in post menopausal women treated with AI's over non/obese(both overweight and normal weight). However I saw one that said that survival rate on AI's was higher for obese women over normal weight women. All of the information I have seen has been on very small sample sizes, which could skew results either way.

    It's all so confusing. I guess that the answer is we are all individuals and it's not a one size fits all disease or treatment.

  • dtad
    dtad Member Posts: 2,323
    edited February 2017

    The question that comes to mind is how we we know? Very few MOs test estrogen levels while on aromatase inhibitors. I will never understand this and feel its a huge gap in our care. Good luck to all navigating this disease...

  • NancyD
    NancyD Member Posts: 3,562
    edited February 2017

    I think most of it is just bad luck, excluding any known genetic component. I was pretty fit when I was diagnosed—had just trained for and did a half marathon 8 months before. But I've always had a high BMI. I have never looked as heavy as I actually weighed. Even now at 195, I look more like I'm around 160. "Solid" is the word that comes to mind.

    So far, so good on an AI. Yes, it's added some weight and I should exercise more than I do, but I eat healthily, don't smoke, and watch my alcohol intake. The development of some osteoarthritis in my hips/lower back is the primary culprit for the aversion to exercise.

  • sugarplum
    sugarplum Member Posts: 318
    edited February 2017

    I'm almost 11 years out and am still mystified why I got BC at age 50. I've been 5'2" & around 110 lbs my entire adult life & have been exercising regularly since 1985. My paternal grandmother died of BC at age 56 (but I'm BRCA negative), I never had children, and was on birth control pills for 6 years - those were my only known risk factors.

    My onc refused to renew my Arimidex this year as he says 10 years is long enough, but I'm terrified of using up my last few weeks of pills. I agree: it's all a crap shoot...

    Julie

  • Freya244117
    Freya244117 Member Posts: 603
    edited February 2017

    Elaine, I understand your point about the 2.5mg dosage and patients different weight. Chemo drugs are prescribed on your height and weight.

    I will ask my MO when I see her, it is something I have never thought about before, now curious myself.

  • emiliasdance
    emiliasdance Member Posts: 7
    edited February 2017

    I was diagnosed with stage 3 IDC er/pr- Her2/nue +++ nearly 13 years ago. I was obese then and remain obese now. I feel like I can pretty confidently say that I survived.

  • LM070917
    LM070917 Member Posts: 323
    edited February 2017

    It's impossible to say exactly what causes cancer from one person to another, but research does show that up to 80% of cases are down to lifestyle choices whether that's being overweight, smoking, drinking too much, stress, sugar and chemicals. I think if you'v had bc cancer and are PR/ER positive, then minimising any of the risks mentioned above (which can cause weight gain and increase estrogen production) and introducing exercise is a good way to go.

    Sure there are people who will get cancer regardless and who may have a genetic mutation and disposition to it, but I'd rather know I did everything i could (the second time around) to prevent it from coming back. Especially because if you have had it once, then we know the body is capable of creating that same dynamic again given the right conditions.

    Admittedly it is hard to stay on the healthyfood wagon, but if I do have a treat, then I am way more committed to burn it off these days.

  • cliff
    cliff Member Posts: 290
    edited February 2017

    many things trigger cancer, I actually found what triggered mine, between 65 and 70, mens body fat somehow starts turning testosterone to estrogen and up pops breast cancer. tamoxifen is the treatment, and its working. women are a little bit different, so I don't know much about whether that goes for them. for men that's just the body's way of saying "long enough" I suppose..

  • dtad
    dtad Member Posts: 2,323
    edited February 2017

    Freya...there are no studies to back up a lower dosage or a dosage that is weight related so thats why the standard is prescribed . I agree it doesn't make any sense!

  • Denise-G
    Denise-G Member Posts: 1,777
    edited February 2017

    You know, having struggled with my weight my entire life, I get SO ANGRY when I read those obesity studies

    BECAUSE I have literally talked with THOUSANDS of breast cancer patients over the last 5 years through my Blog.

    The majority are women who have been normal weight. We all come in different shapes, sizes and backgrounds - yet guess what? We have breast cancer in common.

    I'm not letting anyone blame me for breast cancer hell. See, there goes my anger!!

    It was very healing to me when I had genetic testing and discovered I had the Chek2 1100 C mutation. My oncologist said,

    "Now you know why you got breast cancer."

  • hopefour
    hopefour Member Posts: 459
    edited February 2017

    I want to be clear. MD Anderson very much stated that their research shows ALs works best within a patients BMI. They also stated exercise was important. Both these recommandations where in regards to recurrence rates!! NOTgetting BC. Due to my background and where I grew up they think probable cause for my BC was my excess exposer to DDT. I would like to also share MD Anderson is extremely concervative in stating recommendations, treatments or expressing an option with out research to back them. I also see Dr. Block, a BC specialist in Fort Worth, my MO in my home town and a Doc in New York with a PHd from Harvard specializing in BC as well as MD Anderson. Each gives me insight and knowledge in regards to BC and all mention the need for keeping my weight down…no easy task and by far not the only action I take to stay hopefully in remission, but one I believe in and totally understand if others don't.

  • Meow13
    Meow13 Member Posts: 4,859
    edited February 2017

    This stuff makes me more than angry My weight exercise diet all ideal. I never had a genetic pre disposition to breast cancer. I just want to grab people by the ears and shake them. It is nothing we do that causes this disease.

  • IAmElaine
    IAmElaine Member Posts: 87
    edited February 2017

    Hopefour, thanks for sharing your information from MDA! I appreciate it when I find more information that validates what I have had preached to me for the past 13 years by my Onc.

    Freya, if you get any answers about the "one size fits all" AIs, please let us know! I believe it is a big, unaddressed elephant in the room.


  • SSInUK
    SSInUK Member Posts: 245
    edited February 2017

    thanks all for your contributions, by and large I consider my ass kicked - the majority of you are healthy weight and here you are on these boards doing ok. CK55 were you on AIs or tamoxifen? There's evidence tamoxifen is better for heavier women but as I had a 'recurrence' I was moved off onto an AI. I have a PET scan Friday hence cancer anxieties to the fore. Bu if there are not bigger things to discuss (gulp sweat) I will ask my Onc about this. He's a UK superbrain. He did mention gently at one point to limit alcohol and watch weight but didn't push it. But visually you wouldn't look at me and think there's a problem. Hopefour id love a pointer to mD andersons research. I respect them too but haven't seen their work on this only small confusing studie

  • ck55
    ck55 Member Posts: 346
    edited February 2017

    SSInUK, I was on Femara for 5 years and then switched to Tamoxifen for the last almost 5. Too many personal side effects (dryness/UTI's) with Femara. Now I am able to use the estring and feeling great and things are greatly improved. I will stay on Tamoxifen forever if she wants me to.

    Cyn

Categories