palbociclib (Ibrance), letrozole and Pembrolizumab (keytruda)

Options

So, once again my doctor is suggesting I enroll in this clinical trial. I am currently on Ibrance and letrozole, with stable bone mets. They want to add keytruda to see if the stable mets will disappear on the new protocol. Here is my dilemma.

1. I currently already drive for one hour in each direction every four weeks for labs and my xgeva shot. Now I would have to go every three weeks. Keytruda is an infusion that takes thirty minutes to administer.

2. My side effects are currently tolerable. Not perfect, but I certainly don't want to deal with MORE possible side effects.

3. I've been on this combo for 18 months (I think 22 months is the average time to fail). I've never been NED on this combo, although I have been NED in the past. So,my time may be running out on this protocol. Adding an immunotherapy could potentially give me a nice boost.

4. I do have the option of radiating a single bone met, which could also potentially take me to NED, but radiation has its own side effects, and it won't help me systemically.

5. I COULD wait until I have some progression, and then decide to try it. I believe the trial will continue enrolling for another year. But, of course I would rather not progress.

I would love some input from my community. Here is the link to the trial.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/results/NCT027...


Stefanie



Comments

  • ABeautifulSunset
    ABeautifulSunset Member Posts: 990
    edited October 2016

    I guess nobody has anything to say about this.

    As an add on, my CEA did jump up quite bit, even though scan showed stable. It's been an indicatorthe past of something happening, so I also have that to consider.


  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited October 2016

    Hi Stephanie,

    Sure, are you kidding?! Now that I see it, hell ya, I'm interested in this trial too! However, the write-up indicates that it is for metastatic patients with stable mets who are NOT responding to Ibrance- Femara, did I read that correctly? Seriously, I think we all should get immunotherapy ASAP, before tumor burden gets too high and there have been too many previous treatments, the immune system can be working on the cancer for years. If you do get in the trial, I would add the probiotic Align (bffidobacterium) because that strain of bacteria was shown to synergize with immunotherapy drugs, in fact immune cells need this particular bacteria in the gut to be activated- here is a link about that:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26541606

    I am excited to consider a trial, and will ask my MO about this Monday, any other info about it? your oncologist sounds very good?..

  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited October 2016

    another point is that there are many immunotherapies out there, not just other checkpoint inhibitors in the same class as Keytruda, but targeting other parts of the immune system, and so I would jump at the opportunity to start with one, knowing that it does not interfere with my ability to take other combo immune therapies down the road, as more information come out about them.

  • ABeautifulSunset
    ABeautifulSunset Member Posts: 990
    edited October 2016

    thank you for your input.

    The NOT responding to Ibrance/letrozole it seems can also mean stable mets. I have stable mets that have NOT improved as a result of the combination. Not gotten worse, so I haven't exactly failed it, but not improved. They'll be able to see if adding the keytruda will entice improvement, see if it can get me to NED. That's the idea, I think.

    I have a lot of questions for my ONC before I get on this train. I'll keep you posted.

    Stefanie

  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited October 2016

    Hi Stephanie,

    I think the primary advantage of this trial is more is mostly that its an easy way to see if you are a 'responder' to immunotherapy, rather than achieving the ever-elusive NED status. ER-positive disease does not generally respond well to single agent immuno, whereas triple-negative does better, however in the science literature the luminal B subtype of ER-positive (PR-negative, hiKi67) responds about as well as the triple-negative cancers. As Z points out, there are many trials underway or in preparation stages to try different ways to get immuno to work on many more patients and more types of cancer, so the thinking on how and when to jump in will change in coming years.

    A study was done where they tested 97 FDA-approved drugs to see which ones would help responses to immuno, and the top hit was HDAC inhibitors, and so trials are underway combining immuno with HDAC inhibitors, however for those trials you have to be off of Letrozole/Ibrance.

    A paper was just published in Science which shows that immunotherapy-boosted T cells eventually become 'exhausted' and so although the effects are very durable they may not be perpetual, and so again the hunt is underway for agents that improve that, again the suggestion being to try the HDAC inhibitors so the cells can reprogram.

    http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2016/1...

  • JFL
    JFL Member Posts: 1,947
    edited October 2016

    Stefanie,

    This sounds like a great opportunity. I am monitoring some NIH immunotherapy studies and would ultimately like to do one. The one I have the most interest in requires that I first fail a chemo. I am on Xeloda but it is still working for now. One factor to consider is that I have heard that immunotherapy is more effective when the immune system is strong (before it is beaten down by more mets and extensive treatments). Another factor is that I have heard that's many of the immuno studies will rule out people who have previously been treated with immunotherapy, meaning one should choose wisely which immunity study to try. I haven't looked into this to confirm if it is true though. I read it in article about advances in immunotherapy over the last few years. Good luck determining whether to proceed. The good news is you are stable with a minimal tumor load! I hope that lasts for a very, very long time, regardless of whether you do the trial.

  • ABeautifulSunset
    ABeautifulSunset Member Posts: 990
    edited October 2016

    Thank you all. I've decided to wait at least a month, perhaps two, so I have a lot of time to think about all of my options.


    :)

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited November 2016

    Cure-ious you make a good point when you note that once you do one immunotherapy trial, you probably are not eligible for another one. It's important to pick your trial. This one looks to me like someone said - hey Keytruda is FDA recently approved and Ibrance is recently FDA approved, I wonder i they work together? It was easy to get approval for the trial, since the two drugs are already FDA approved. The drug companies were likely happy to go along. But I don't see disruptive science behind the combination.

    I too wonder if Keytruda and Ibrance work synergistically, but I would not use my one opportunity at immunotherapy on that logic.

    There are interesting questions of strategy when it comes to getting yourself into trials generally and immunotherapy trials specifically. Vaccines seem to work better when you have little or no disease. They work slowly and don't seem to be able to penetrate tumors, but they can control micro metastasis. Other kinds of immunotherapy strategies seem to work better on advance cancers that have been mangled into something that the body recognizes as Other. But even so, established tumors are hard for the immune system to infiltrate. What stage is the best stage for getting into an immunotherapy trial is something I trying to figure out.

    One issue for me with immunotherapy is that the brightest minds don't see ERPR+ as low hanging fruit at the moment. There are currently very few trials for immunotherapy on ERPR+ breast cancer. As long as the standard therapies are working, that is another reason to wait and see.

    That said, I do spend a lot of time reading up on what my options are next. If letrozol and ibrance fail, they will put me on faslodex. Possibly with Ibrance. Unless I push a different plan. The question is do I push to get on a next generation therapy early through a trial, or do I take the current line of treatments as far as they will go before I put myself in a trial. Not sure.

    There are very few trials for anything that will accept me until my first line of treatment (Ibrance/letrozol) has failed so that happily delays the question, perhaps indefinitely.

    Interested in everyone's thoughts.

    >Z<

  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited October 2016

    I agree with JFLs point that immuno may work best on an immune system that has not already been beaten down with harsh chemo, also it needs time, preferably a lot of it, to work. To the point that you may only have one shot at immuno, surely that is not the case?, I've read of people who failed to respond to Keytruda but then in a later trial responded to combined immunotherapies, such as checkpoint and CTLA-4. Immuno is qualitatively different from trials that test drugs, in that sense, and there isn't really a reason I can think of that should exclude you based on prior exposure, its not like your cancer has developed an immunotherapy resistance, is it?- I haven't read the exclusions for these trials regarding this point, and it could be that researchers want to exclude people who may not be responders, but its worth checking if this is true. A bigger concern may that that there will be more trials of promising therapies that might be perfect for us than we could hope to have the time to participate in..

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited November 2016

    You raise good points as always Cure-ious. I looked through three clinical trials watch list and noted some relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. I've seen trials with strict exclusions regarding prior immunotherapy, but those exclusions are not there in the trials on my short list.

    Keytruda/Ibrance/Letrozol

    Inclusion: Stage IV metastatic ER+HER2- breast cancer

    Inclusion: Presence of measurable disease meeting the following criteria: at least 1 lesion of > 10 mm

    Inclusion: Patients must have been undergoing treatment with letrozole and palbociclib for >= 6 months with SD per RECIST version 1.1 and have tumors that have ceased to decrease (up to 20% of tumor growth allowed)

    Inclusion: Received 1-3 lines of previous therapy including endocrine and/or chemotherapy in advanced setting

    Exclusion: Previously received pembrolizumab or other anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy

    Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes

    Inclusion: Breast and Ovarian cancer patients must be refractory to both 1st line and 2nd line treatments and must have received at least one second line chemotherapy regimen.

    Inclusion: At least one lesion that is resectable for TIL generation

    Exclusion: no exclusions related to prior immunotherapy

    Vaccine Therapy (STEMVAC) Trial

    Inclusion: Patients with stage III-IV HER2 negative breast cancer treated with primary or salvage therapy and now have: No evidence of disease (NED), or Stable bone only disease

    Exclusion: no exclusions related to prior immunotherapy



  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited November 2016

    Excellent trials, please save this list!Maybe we can crowd-source the most promising ones, since there are so many to sort through

    In addition, it is always possible that ER-positive tumors could mutate to triple-negative, esp for cancers like mine that are PR-/Her2-

    For triple-negative, there are already phase III trials underway, which could be the first ones to get FDA approval for breast cancer

    I don't follow this area so don't know which are best, but one that combines atezo (immuno) with nab-paclitaxel/abraxane strongly increases the effect of each treatment, and they are getting 67% response in first line treatment, and find that the response drops when it goes to second and third line, etc

    http://www.onclive.com/conference-coverage/sabcs-2015/atezolizumab-nab-paclitaxel-combo-shows-high-response-rates-in-tnbc?p=2

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited November 2016

    Cure-ious - The IMPassion trial that you refer to is for TNBC, like most of the immunotherapy breast cancer trials right now. It seems that TNBC finally caught a well deserved break. For ERPR+ HER2- there are mostly new flavors and combinations of chemo. But there are a few transformative trials. Let's do keep an eye out for them. In the meantime we have the trifecta of CDK 4/6 inhibitors (ribociclib, palbociclib and abemaciclib) and a lot of tried and true A/I. I expect many of us will hold out for a long time with the drugs we have and a lot of broccoli.

    That said, with PR- cancer I think the TNBC research will likely benefit you. Keep an eye on it.

    >Z<


  • Cure-ious
    Cure-ious Member Posts: 2,626
    edited November 2016

    Hi Stefajoy,

    Did you decide whether or not to join this trial? I mentioned it to my MO, and to my surprise she was for it! She has limited experience with Keytruda, but thinks it does better prolonging targeted therapy rather than acting alone. And she said by 4-6 months it should be obvious if I am going to be a responder to this type of immunotherapy. She also likes incorporating it rather early into treatment, when the immune system is better able to respond, and early enough so that if I do respond it has time to work. I have to look into it and consider it further, because for me it would be a several hour drive to the treatment site, and of course would have to give up my MO. But regardless, I am inclined to give it a try, if I am eligible..

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited November 2016

    How interesting Cure-ious. Please keeps us informed on your decisions and experience.

    >Z<

  • ABeautifulSunset
    ABeautifulSunset Member Posts: 990
    edited November 2016

    I'm on hold. Waiting for my next blood tests. If the TMs are still on the rise, then I'll get an MRI and I have a decision to make.

    1. Join the trial OR

    2. Radiate the met on my sacrum (I'm oligo, so currently it's the only met that we can see).

    I'm leaning towards radiating first. I won't be eligible for the trial after that... at least not until such time as another measurable met appears. If I start with the trial, and it works, then I'm stuck with the infusion route indefinitely.

    Cure ious, keep me posted. I'm at COH all the time. My MO is there.

    Stefanie


  • Lovemymom69
    Lovemymom69 Member Posts: 14
    edited July 2017

    My mom has ER+PR+HER- stage IV Mets to bone, brain and questionable spots on adrenal. She's had a pretty rough time very little moments of good news. Was told there is many may options for treatment. She was on let letrozole then ibrance and now these shots (can't recall the name) 2 shots in the bottom. All which has failed the NP said Xeloda or comfort care which has me baffled and upset because this doesn't sound like loads of options to me and her brain Mets is stable and all other areas are fairly stable or very small. I asked about the keytruda option and was told that isn't an option for er+pr+her2- breast cancer patients. I asked about other immune building options along with treatment and she acted like there wasn't any. I see your cancer is same as my mom's any advice?

  • ABeautifulSunset
    ABeautifulSunset Member Posts: 990
    edited July 2017

    i ended up progressing on Ibrance and letrozole and am now doing very well on Xeloda. It's a good option. There should be a few other options as well. Unfortunately Keytruda and other immunos have not shown to be very helpful, except for in the cases of triple negative. So, no immuno therapies for us. BUT, your mom should have a few other oprions still. Xeloda being a very good one.

    Good luck to her.

    Stefanie

Categories