Marijuana prevents breast cancer metastasis?

1246789

Comments

  • ChiSandy
    ChiSandy Member Posts: 12,133
    edited September 2016

    My information came from my MO, explaining that as one reason why she would not sign my MMJ application. She only signs them for patients losing dangerous amounts of weight on chemo, or for Stage IV patients--and only for pain.

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited September 2016

    I think your MO is probably refusing to read up on the latest studies ChiSandy. All docs have their biases. :)

  • Wendy3
    Wendy3 Member Posts: 1,012
    edited September 2016

    So I've had three CT scans now that show no new growth and in the existing cancer more shrinkage. I am taking Faslodex and medical marajuana

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2016

    Lisey, the problem is that what happens in a petri dish may turn out to have no bearing once you put the substance into a human being. So, kayb is absolutely right that the science to support cannabis as cancer treatment is not there yet. Since we know that cannabis DOES have effects in the body, there is also the possibility that it could have detrimental effects. We simply won't know until large-scale human studies are done. People are studying this, so hopefully we will know more in the near future

  • Wendy3
    Wendy3 Member Posts: 1,012
    edited September 2016

    I can't wait I'm trying it all out for myself so far so good😊

    Wendy

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited September 2016

    Momine, the DEA refused to declassify MMJ as a contraband narcotic (see here: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/72c81d4b32234510b1e410ac85774264/marijuana-remain-highest-drug-classification over the summer. With such, most labs/groups do not have government approval to even start studies. And this classification actually PREVENTS studies because pot is designated as having no medical value. I'm sorry, but the government is in cahoots with big pharma to refuse to reclassify and actually study MMJ for it's capabilities.

    Q: WHAT OTHER DRUGS ARE IN THE SAME CATEGORY?

    A: The DEA has categorized a variety of drugs as Schedule I, including heroin and peyote. Chuck Rosenberg, the acting head of the DEA, said not all of the drugs in that category are equally dangerous, but none has an accepted medical use. Cocaine, for instance, is listed as a Schedule II drug because it can be used for medical purposes in some cases.

    ________________________

    RESEARCH IF THE DEA WOULD RECLASSIFY:

    Cannabis research on human subjects would become easier. Currently, researchers must navigate an onerous bureaucratic system that since 2010 has approved on average just eight to nine cannabis studies per year. And, many people complain that the approval process is biased towards anti-cannabis studies.

    Rescheduling, however, would not remove all barriers to research that are afforded to other clinical drug studies that would be required for cannabis products to become approved by the FDA. The DEA and National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) have a monopoly on cannabis production. Critics argue that the monopoly limits supply; predictably, the DEA disagrees.

    ________________________

    If you think people are even able to create people studies on MMJ, you are mistaken. Many scientists have been told their university / lab is not allow to even begin a study - because MMJ is SO DANGEROUS. The government doesn't want MMJ explored. Big Pharma would lose.

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited September 2016

    Here's a great article describing the DEA issue. http://www.livescience.com/55765-new-medical-marijuana-policy-hinders-researchers.html

    Medical research on marijuana probably won't get any easier, experts say, despite a new government policy aimed at boosting the supply of the drug for medical studies.

    That means the types of studies that are needed to address the safety and effectiveness of the drug as a medicine could still be a long way off.

    Marijuana's legal status as a "Schedule I" drug, which makes it an illegal drug on the federal level, "severely constrains the access and the number and type of people who can do research with cannabis," said Ryan Vandrey, an associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine who studies marijuana. "The unfortunate result of that is that we're now in a situation where you have literally millions of people using a drug for which we don't have established safety or efficacy data," Vandrey said.


  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    I live near the heart of N. California's MJ country. Now that MMJ has been legal for 20 years, I've observed the trends among members of my community, cancer folks, the local MJ pharmacies and local growers.

    The local MJ pharmacies, producers and growers have increasingly focused on innovative approaches like high CBD strains and formulations; topicals and suppositories and mind-bending candy and even a bag of chex mix. (this last makes me crazy, what's a kid to think seeing a glitzy, crackly, bag of chex mix? eat me?)

    The medical science for marijuana use in cancer quoted by many locals is indeed dubious and the tremendous amount of money, crime and environmental degradation in the MJ trade are soul-sickening.

    IMHO, part of the criminal culture around MJ and MMJ has ben forced by the feds refusal to reclassify the substance and allow actual medical research instead of pushing so many into the underground economy - from true crime lords to casual growers and users to needy patients. Like the earlier alcohol prohibition in this area, many are forced to choose between being law-abiding and being lumped with criminals.

    I've seen MMJ be good medicine for many and am sorry that we live where it is socially acceptable, but often criminally controlled and federally prohibited. So many are caught between a rock and a hard place.

    This makes for unnecessary suffering, but I don't have a good solution or options to suggest. Legalization of MJ is on California's state ballot again this year. Last time, it was fought by much of the MJ industry that has much to lose by its passage.

    Just noodling, Stephanie

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    Hi KayB,

    As realtors say, "location, location, location."

    Living where I do in N. California's MJ & MMJ territory, I have a totally different impression than others living further from this particular center.

    20 years after California's legalization of MMJ, it seems like almost everyone has a MMJ license to drive - I know many grannies, great grannies and even a great-great granny who've incorporated what they call "my medicine" into their daily lives. I can't sit in judgement of their choices or even critique their reasoning. From their perspective, that would be unwanted meddling. I prefer to maintain good relations whenever possible.

    KayB, from my perspective, I'd personally prefer MMJ to the morphine, methadone, zofran and reglan I'm dependent on for pain and nausea control, but I've not tried any MMJ formulations that do it for me...so big pharma it is for now. :)

    And yes, there are many dark sides to the local trade from murder to sex trade to arrests to illegal grows to environmental degradation to belief in the oddest medical-scientific "evidence" about the effectiveness of MMJ. Proof of efficacy has an Alice in Wonderland quality here.

    I'm interested to see the outcome of the upcoming election to legalize MJ in California, but doubt I'll live so long.

    Ours is an ongoing saga that may outrun the longest running TV soap operas.

    warmest healing wishes, Stephanie

  • Fallleaves
    Fallleaves Member Posts: 806
    edited September 2016

    I had a MMJ card in WA state, but my dispensary got shut down, by the big money marijuana purveyors. I can still get marijuana, it's just not cheaper for me anymore. I wish I could warm up to it, but I just haven't. I actually tried it to help me relax and to wean myself off of drinking alcohol in the evenings (fingers crossed that the resveratrol in red wine will outweigh the acetaldehyde, cause I'm still drinking the wine!) I haven't done that much research on anti-cancer effects from marijuana, but there is plenty of evidence of alcohol being a carcinogen, so I thought making the switch would be better.

    I've read several articles about Israel being a leader in MMJ research (can't find the best one, though). Apparently they've been researching it since the '60s.

    http://observer.com/2016/03/what-gives-israel-the-...

    http://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-1.7272...

    I wish we would allow more research on MMJ in this country! There is synthetic marijuana that is approved for medical use, but I have read some really scary stories about that stuff. Wouldn't touch it with a ten-foot pole.


  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    Hi FallenLeaves,

    Sorry to hear you lost your MMJ source. I'm afraid that will happen in my region too - all the smaller growers and producers will be forced out by big industry.

    FL, since you're good at research and finding reputable sources, I encourage you to look into organic, biodynamic and sulfur-free wines.

    I'm smack dab in the center of N. California's wine country, as well as MJ country, and these are important distinctions to consumers and the industry in both wine & MJ worlds. Seriously, people are juicing and sprouting MJ for its purported health benefits - a sorta meld of raw-food and MJ approaches. :)

    I don't imbibe or inhale, so I'm more of an observer than a participant in local sub-cultures.

    warmest healing wishes, Stephanie

    This reminds me, the counter-culture folks are growing and rolling their own tobacco too. Human ingenuity never fails to amaze!

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited September 2016

    The whole point is the federal government REFUSES to actually allow for true studies of MMJ to occur. By classifying it as a 'non-medicinal dangerous super drug" they limit good scientists who want to test ideas out. We simply DONT know if MMJ works or not / and when / where it works fully because there is a roadblock to studying it courtesy of the U.S. Gov.

    And if people don't think the U.S. Gov isn't in cahoots with big pharma and large companies who can't profit on MMJ, I have some beach front property for you. Our politicians are well known to pass pork laws, get offered jobs by lobbyists for 'when they leave' offer, pass major bills of donor companies, and basically do the beck and call of big industries.

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    Just this morning, I told y'all N. California is a different state of mind - here's fascinating news from nearby:

    California Hospital Considers Allowing Patients To Use Medical Marijuana

    excerpt:

    Since smoking is prohibited in hospitals, the medical marijuana would be delivered to patients in other forms, such as edible products.

    Public health advocate Larry Cohen, executive director of the Prevention Institute in Oakland, said hospitals would be ideal for supervising use of medical marijuana.

    "It's far better for the medical staff to know what people are using and to ensure the right quality and the right fit with other medications, so this is probably smart," Cohen said. "One of the biggest disadvantages of edibles has to do with unsupervised risk related to children, and clearly this is far less of a concern in a medical institution."

  • abigail48
    abigail48 Member Posts: 1,699
    edited September 2016

    edible much stronger, less waste, no toxins from smoke

  • Fallleaves
    Fallleaves Member Posts: 806
    edited September 2016

    Stephanie, I should definitely look into biodynamic wines! My husband and I did a wine tasting trip near Healdsburg by bike a few years ago and two of the vineyards were biodynamic. I was really impressed. I love California, and would love to do another wine/bike trip. Right now I mainly buy Fetzer wine because it is an environmentally friendly company, but biodynamic is even better. We have a lot of wineries here in WA, but I don't know if any are certified biodynamic.

    And I think that is so cool that Marin General Hospital is looking to make MMJ use easier! Ought to be like that everywhere.

    Lisey, I'm with you in frustration over the DEA keeping marijuana classified as schedule 1 and blocking much needed research. But then I think much of the War on Drugs is a huge waste of resources...I think we should go the way of Portugal and ease up.

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    Hi FallenLeaves,

    Yes, this region is an epicenter of bicycling and tourism, as well as wine and MJ. :)

    Very beautiful area and each industry comes with its own pluses and minuses.

    I don't mean to whinge on about the dark sides of these industries. I love nature, am a foodie and support local farms - farmers may grow & tend food, vineyards or hidden MJ plots.

    The industries support my habits and constantly raise the bar on fresh, local, organically grown and seasonal food.

    As the great plant scientist Luther Burbank said, " this is the chosen spot of all this earth as far as Nature is concerned."

    His work typifies the creativeness and love of the land, natural and cultivated, that make this a beautiful place to live and visit.

    warmest wishes, Stephanie

    There are many biodynamic wineries, here's one of the originals:

    http://www.freywine.com

    Look what happened here last week:

    http://theheirloomexpo.com


  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2016

    Longterm, I am aware of the classification issue. However, the article you posted also says: "The decision means that pot remains on a list of drugs that have no medical purpose. But the Drug Enforcement Administration did open the door to more research on the drug and its possible medical uses.".

    Here is a full explanation of what that refers to: http://www.laweekly.com/news/dea-ends-mississippis...

    From the article:"The implications of this are twofold. Licensing additional growers means scientists might not have to wait as long to get their product. But more important, adding new growers to the mix means researchers will finally have access to different strains of pot, which could impact what kind of research scientists will conduct moving forward."


  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2016

    Lisey, of course big pharma can find ways to make money from MJ. If research finds that specific strains and ratios of active ingredients can, for example, have an effect against cancer, then precise doses and extraction processes etc will be needed and big pharma will get involved. Of course big pharma will probably get into a fight with the dispensary industry, which has already spent a lot of money on positioning itself. Where there is product, there is money to be made

  • ChiSandy
    ChiSandy Member Posts: 12,133
    edited September 2016

    Biodynamic wines are an example of technological knowledge wed to traditional wholly organic & natural agriculture. You might conjure up an image of a tiny winery run by either aging hippies or a cranky old winemaster--but it can be incredibly cutting-edge while safe for the consumer & the environment. When we were in Tuscany in July, we visited a winery near Terracioli (sp?) called “La Spinetta” (rhino). 100% biodynamic, and as high tech as a NASA lab and cleanly designed tasting room as some trendy restaurants. The landscaping was breathtaking. And the wines? Let’s just say that the shipping and customs fees for the two cases we ordered were well worth it.

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    Hey Sandy, our aging hippies are selling their homegrown biodynamic wineries for a pretty penny:

    Family-owned Benziger Winery sold

    I've no doubt that the local MJ industry from growers, hybridizers to pharmacists and distributors contains very well-organized business communities along with the mom, pop and all the kids family enterprises.

    But, not to worry, the local hippies are still hard at living the good life!

    The Permaculture Convergence this weekend in Hopland, another epicenter of our homegrown intoxicants industry.

    So much paradox and nuance in the conversation. Very little black and white.

    Warmest healing wishes for all, Stephanie

  • Wendy3
    Wendy3 Member Posts: 1,012
    edited September 2016

    that's it Lisy totally agree because MJ is a natural substance big pharma can't make money on something that already exists in nature. Canada is set to legalize MJ in November for medicinal use (I know Justin has been a little slow but he's cute so I forgive him) and it will be legalized all round so for recreational use in the spring. I for one can't wait for some decent trials and an end to this speculation.

    Wendy

  • Fallleaves
    Fallleaves Member Posts: 806
    edited September 2016

    Momine, thanks for posting that article. I didn't realize the DEA was allowing expanding research on MMJ. My governor (WA state) was one of the petitioners who requested rescheduling of marijuana, and I looked at the letter from the head of the DEA in response to Gov. Inslee which said,

    "Research is the bedrock of science, and we will - as we have for many years - support and promote legitimate research regarding marijuana and its constituent parts. For instance, DEA has never denied an application from a researcher to use lawfully produced marijuana in a study determined by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to be scientifically meritorious. In fact, during the last two plus years, the total number of individuals and institutions registered with DEA to research marijuana, marijuana extracts, derivatives, and tetrahydrocannabinols (THC) has more than doubled, from 161 in April 2014 to 354 at present. Some of the ongoing research includes studies of the effects of smoked marijuana on human subjects. Folks might be surprised to learn that we support this type of research. But, we do. "

    "Further, in December 2015, we waived certain regulatory requirements for researchers conducting FDA-authorized clinical trials on cannabidiol (CBD), a constituent part of marijuana. These waivers, when granted, enable researchers to modify or expand the scope of their studies more easily. Currently, there are 90 researchers registered with the DEA to conduct CBD research on human subjects. We have approved every waiver application that has been submitted by these researchers - to date, a total of 47."

    https://www.dea.gov/divisions/hq/2016/Letter081116...


    Also, ChiSandy---I want your life!

    Stephanie, Benzinger is one of the one's we toured! I was so impressed.

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    Not to belabor the point about location too very much, but everywhere I go in my region of N. California, I see people self-medicating and self-prescribing MMJ.

    Yes, there's a good, but expensive MD experienced with MMJ for cancer

    Dr. Jeffrey Hergenrather | Medical Cannabis Consultant

    www.drjeffhergenrather.com/

    But most folks I meet self-treat or rely on the less-than-reliable clerks at the MMJ center. Most MMJ doctors meet with patients only once to begin and annually to re-recommend, so nobody really knows the effectiveness of ineffectiveness or unwanted effectiveness of what can be a powerful substance.

    It's going to take decades to move from in-vitro studies of MMJ to animal models to small phase 1 human clinical trials evaluating safety to larger phase 2 l trials evaluating effectiveness to phase 3 trials generating reliable statistics and data.

    It's a logistical nightmare already and those doing self-experiments and comparing notes with other patients will be the state of the art for some time to come. Of course, the growers and medicine producers will have a say too - the speed at which new strains are developed (high CBD/THC ratio) and new formulations created are phenomenal, especially compared to the slowness of "big pharma" and FDA processes.

    Wish I felt more optimistic about the timeline to generate reliable clinical data, but I don't.

    California has allowed MMJ for 20 years, nearly a generation, without controlling for safety, effectiveness or reliable data.

    Oh well, I really wish MJ weren't a Schedule I substance (wikipedia entry).

    And recent news - U.S. affirms its prohibition on medical marijuana.

    healing regards all, Stephanie


  • Fallleaves
    Fallleaves Member Posts: 806
    edited September 2016

    Stephanie, I share your frustration at the slow pace of research, and the waste of valuable information that could have been gathered in CA from those using MMJ the last 20 years. I do feel that there is a national shift going on with marijuana, similar to the one that happened with same-sex marriage. There are 25 states that have MMJ, and 4 where recreational use is legal, and this November 5 more states will look at legalizing it for recreational use (including CA). I think we will get to a point where the critical mass has shifted, and total legalization will happen, very soon.

    I have no idea why the DEA won't at least downgrade marijuana to schedule II, for use with a prescription (although I would rank it a lot lower). If you look at the news, legal and illegal opioid abuse is a HUGE problem in this country. And apparently medical marijuana might be one of the solutions: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/0...

    But illustrating Lisey's point, "In a sign some drugmakers might be worried about marijuana's impact, the company behind the powerful painkiller fentanyl recently poured half a million dollars into the campaign opposing full marijuana legalization in Arizona, one of the biggest-ever single donations to an anti-legalization cause."

    (Edited to add: I was typing as you were posting Kayb. You gave a good explanation on why the DEA didn't downlist!)


  • Charlene1
    Charlene1 Member Posts: 72
    edited September 2016

    Wendy,

    Medical use in Canada was legalized on August 17th with recreational use to be legalized in April 2017.

    Although they are not legal (per say) we have a few dispensaries open here now, there have been a few news items on them but they are leaving them alone. I visited one last week I could not purchase or see the price list and showroom as I did not have my script. but now I have it I can purchase from there, but I have applied to Health Canada to grow my own just waiting for the paperwork to come back. I can grow up to 10 plants indoors or outdoors and make my own oil and butters etc.

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    Local MD & MMJ researcher who promotes MMJ raw juice, among other concoctions.

    Takes green smoothies and wheatgrass juice to a whole new level!

    CANNABIS INTERNATIONAL .org

    Official Site of Kristen & William Courtney, MD.

    Human ingenuity is amazing and knows no bounds...okay maybe natural law, but the transhumanists are working on that. ;)

    Gee, my mind is making illogical leaps today...ignore my leads, if you wish. They amuse me, but probably nobody else.

    best healing regards, Stephanie

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2016

    I do think a lot more preliminary research could be done by culling and collating practices and experiences of actual patients. Susan Love's research foundation is making some baby steps in that direction, by having people fill out lifestyle questionaires, for example. Thanks to computers it is now completely feasible to collect and analyze large data samples, even fairly messy ones

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2016

    More on pain killer industry lobbying http://www.news-herald.com/general-news/20160916/p...

    Not related to the cancer aspect of the issue, but goes to the issue of blocking further development of medical MJ, in this case for pain relief, where the evidence does exist to back it.

    The lobbying in the US is a general problem, and is not confined to the pharma industry

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited September 2016

    This is a wider, global view of medical pain management told through videos, links and quotes (in italics):

    From A Better NHS in the UK,

    How doctors respond to chronic pain

    In her essay, The Art of Doing Nothing, Iona Heath explains that, "in medicine, the art of doing nothing is active, considered, and deliberate. It is an antidote to the pressure to DO and it takes many forms." Too often when confronted by patients which chronic pain, we "do something" in order to get rid of them, we send them for another investigation or another opinion or we prescribe more drugs. I don't doubt that this partly explains why the rates of deaths from prescription pain-killers are so high. Another reason for "doing something" is because chronic pain traps us in the present and destroys a sense of progress. "Doing something" sets us in motion again, even if we're only going round in circles.

    "Doing nothing" needs to be qualified, it is far from passive and far from easy. Heath wrote her essay at the end of a long career distinguished by exceptionally deep and considered reflection. Instead of "doing something" we should learn again how to listen, think, acknowledge and bear witness.

    Listening to stories about chronic pain makes doctors feel helpless, exhausted, anxious and at a loss for words. Paying close attention we might recognise that this is because the restitution narrative is inadequate and that we are trapped in chaos. I've explained how to listen for these different narratives in a recent essay about forgiveness: it's both a warning and a ray of hope that we might be stuck in chaos for a long time (in the case I discuss, it's 18 years). Recognising this is in itself a therapeutic opening. As a doctor I must resist the temptation to push toward this opening prematurely. The chaos narrative is already populated with others telling the ill person that "it can't be that bad", "there's always someone worse off", "don't give up hope"; and other statements that ill people often hear as allowing those who have nothing to offer feel as if they have offered something.

    xxx


    more cuts from this documentary about documentary at:

    https://www.youtube.com/user/LifeBeforeDeathMovie

    And the website & free viewing at:

    http://www.lifebeforedeath.com

    xxx

    Global State of Pain Treatment

    Access to Medicines and Palliative Care

    Human Rights Watch

    Every year, tens of millions of people around the world with life-threatening illnesses suffer unnecessarily from severe pain and other debilitating symptoms because they lack access to palliative care, an inexpensive health service that aims to improve the quality of life of people with serious health conditions.

    We found enormous unmet need for pain treatment. Fourteen countries reported no consumption of opioid pain medicines between 2006 and 2008, meaning that there are no medicines to treat moderate to severe pain available through legitimate medical channels in those countries…

    Some of the world's most populous countries have very poor availability of opioids for pain relief. Consequently, in each of China, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Russia, and South Africa, at least 100,000 people die from cancer or HIV/AIDS each year without access to adequate pain treatment. The combined suffering due to lack of opioid pain medicines worldwide is staggering. Our calculations confirm that more than 3.5 million terminal cancer and HIV/AIDS patients die each year without access to adequate pain treatment, a very conservative estimate that assumes that all opioids are used to treat this patient group.

    image

    Please look at this report, if you really are interested in pain relief.

    xxx

    The United States makes up only 4.6 percent of the world's population, but consumes 80 percent of its opioids From ABC news in 2011

    And no real change to those figure in 2016

    http://www.cnbc.com/2016/04/27/americans-consume-a...

    So, while the links between addiction, prescription painkillers and medical pain management are huge issues in the USA, it's also worthwhile to shift focus from a global panorama and see how the different people in different places have different problems.

    Think global, act local, as the bumpersticker reads.

    toward the easing of all suffering everywhere, Stephanie

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2016

    That is one of the crazy things, by the way. 10 million prescriptions in Ohio last year, and yet end stage cancer patients often get too little pain medication

Categories