Perjeta and recurrence rates

Options
Countrygirl80
Countrygirl80 Member Posts: 26

I understand that Perjeta has only been used to treat early-stage HER2+ breast cancer for a couple/few years. So, there aren't any large, scientific studies out there on how it is helping recurrence rates.

But, has anyone's oncologist given any anecdotal evidence or provided insight as to how they're anticipating it to help with recurrence? There is no doubt it is helping melt away my tumor - but my worry has now shiftedfrom initial diagnosis to the dreaded "r" word.

My diagnosis came in June of 2016 (found a lump when I was breastfeeding my 4 month old). I am 2/3 of the way done with chemo (TCH-P) - six rounds, three weeks apart. Herceptin will be my only cocktail post surgery (early November).

Comments

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited September 2016

    First, welcome Countrygirl80 to our community. Not sure that this is helpful, but here is a link to some of our content on Perjeta. Hoping the rest of your TCH-P chemo goes smoothly. It must be very difficult to be managing all this with a baby! Hang in there, and we are thinking of you!

  • Countrygirl80
    Countrygirl80 Member Posts: 26
    edited September 2016

    Thanks, Mods - was looking for more numbers on how having it alongside Herceptin is affecting recurrence numbers...will just have to wait a couple of more years probably for larger studies to share this info

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited September 2016

    Hi Countrygirl80:

    The accelerated FDA approval of pertuzumab (Perjeta) in the neoadjuvant setting was based on improvements in pathologic complete response (pCR), the primary endpoint of the Neosphere trial (see also, results from the neoadjuvant TRYPHAENA trial). In May-June 2016, some additional results from the Neosphere trial at 5-year follow-up were published, with some important caveats:

    Gianni (2016) (Neosphere): http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(16)00163-7/fulltext

    "[S]econdary endpoints reported here are 5-year progression-free survival (analysed in the intention-to-treat population) and disease-free survival (analysed in patients who had surgery). Secondary and exploratory analyses were not powered for formal statistical hypothesis testing, and therefore results are for descriptive purposes only."

    It seems that the trial was not powered statistically to detect differences in progression-free survival ("PFS") or disease-free survival ("DFS") between groups, and indeed the observed Confidence Intervals ("CIs") were large and overlapping ("Progression-free survival and disease-free survival at 5-year follow-up show large and overlapping CIs . . .")

    Elsewhere, the lead author stated that the results show a trend, but were not statistically significant.

    The results of the Phase 3 APHINITY trial (NCT01358877; Adjuvant Pertuzumab and Herceptin in Initial Therapy in Breast Cancer) in the adjuvant setting, including its primary endpoint of Invasive Disease-Free Survival (IDFS) Duration, are thus eagerly awaited:

    Clinicaltrials.gov entry: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/study/NCT01358877?view=results

    BarredOwl

  • Countrygirl80
    Countrygirl80 Member Posts: 26
    edited September 2016

Categories