ER positive and recurrance risk- new trial results

LM070917 · August 2016

Hey,

I just came across this if anyone is interested. My BC was multi focal, makes sense. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/1608...

doxie · August 2016

Interesting and disturbing. We would like to know that our pathology was completely correct, rather than something more and different lurking that would adversely affect outcome.

Meow13 · August 2016

I do like the idea of trying AI and see how tumors will respond.

Nancy2581 · August 2016

this is why my onc insisted I do chemo even though I am grade 1. I had said to her that I had heard grade 1 tumors don't respond well to chemo and she said we don't know the entire make up of your tumor.

Nancy

KathyL624 · August 2016

I thought post surgery the entire tumor was examined? What about small tumors (like less than 1cm)? I always assumed the whole thing was examined by pathology

Carlsoda · August 2016

very interesting, thank you for sharing

Artista928 · August 2016

Wow. So a grade 1 tumour may have some grade 3 in it that could be missed. Makes deciding on getting chemo if you are grade 1 that much more difficult.

ER positive and recurrance risk- new trial results

Comments

Categories