CYP2D6 ability to metabolize tamoxifen and recurrence

Options
11315171819

Comments

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited July 2016

    Shep, congrats on the good news!

    Sassy, I went back and on page one you reference a different drug (probably not a 'prodrug' like Tamox) and say Poor Metabolizers need LESS of the medicine, and EMs need more - which started my confusion.

    Then on page 3 ,

    hope wrote: I am an intermediate metabolizer. My Dr suggested 40mg daily Tamoxifen for 5 yrs.

    Kayb replied: ccording to the info at the YouScript site, poor metabolizers need less of a drug, high metabolizers need more. If you're an intermediate metabolizer, my understanding is that you are one step below a normal metabolizer

    SAS wrote: I'm confused, an intermediate metabolizer dose should be reduced not increased. I'm a 3A4 intermediate metabolizer. We metabolize slower. If given a usual range dose, it's a relative overdose, even though a drug is in the usual dose range .... ... Methinks your doc has it reversed. i.e.that you should be given twice the usual dose as an intermediate metabolizer versus half the dose.

    SAS wrote: Hey kayb, I'm with you. Do you think I'm correct in thinking that her doc thinks she should have twice the drug versus half the drug.

    Hope wrote: My understanding is if you are an intermediate metabolizer you do not get Tamoxifen metabolized to endoxifen (active metabolite)to the same level as extensive metabolizer does . So you are not getting full benefit of the drug. Need higher dose to make up for it. My concern is the side-effects with a higher dose. The poor metabolizer do not get any benefit, intensive metabolizer gets full benefit.

    And it goes on from there... That's why I was confused when Solfeo was doing what Hope did.. because both you and Kayb insisted it was the opposite.


  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited July 2016

    Lisey that's how I remember it - a whole conversation. When I originally read it before I was posting on this thread, I thought about clarifying that Hope was correct, but it was years old at that point so I didn't bring it up.

    Thanks for sharing your good news shepkitty - you're one of my role models of how to live if the news is not what I want to hear.

    Some of you who have known me for awhile know that I live in a place where excellent medical care is is simply not available. I never say where because I have paranoia about people I know IRL stumbling onto my posts and recognizing me by my location. No one in my life knows most of the stuff I share here. But suffice to say it is very different from the rest of the country. Every single step of the way since my dx I have had to deal with the same kind of incompetence, misunderstandings and mistakes that I am dealing with now. If I don't double check everything everyone else does it's guaranteed something will be missed and I'm afraid these people are going to kill me eventually.

    That is still going on right now so I had to just go get the x-rays and sports medicine doc's report and read it for myself to see what the hell he really said. I wanted to do that with my oncologist in the room but I couldn't wait anymore because they scheduled me for the MRI in 3 hours, after I told them I wasn't taking any more steps until someone explained this stuff to me. Man it was scary opening that envelope, but there is NOTHING in this report about erosive changes of the clavicle!! It says "cortical hypertrophy of the clavicle (the overgrowth he mentioned to me), minimal osteoarthritis of the AC joint, and right biceps tendinitis. The MRI is truly to rule out metastisis because of my history, not a strong suspicion that it is definitely cancer.

    It appears sports medicine guy told me the truth, but made the error when writing the MRI order. I have been trying to get that cleared up since Monday morning, not a single call has been returned. Eases my mind quite a bit, although I know there is still a chance it is cancer because we all have that chance. But I'm able to go in there tonight hoping for the best, and mean it.

    Sorry for hijacking this thread with my personal problems but since I started it here I didn't want to have to answer a bunch of the same questions on a new thread. I keep saying this, but what would I do without the ladies of BCO?

  • Fallleaves
    Fallleaves Member Posts: 806
    edited July 2016

    Solfeo, so glad you at least know the sport's doc is not suspecting the worst! That must be a huge relief. Hoping you get good news from the MRI very soon.


  • grainne
    grainne Member Posts: 245
    edited July 2016

    that is good to know, solfeo. Good luck with mri.

  • live_deliciously
    live_deliciously Member Posts: 346
    edited July 2016

    Solfeo. We get it. were here for you.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2016

    Lisey ~ Thank you :)

    This is a report from October 2015 that would support the idea that CYP2D6 allele status makes no difference in Tamoxifen effectiveness. Information was taken from several sources, which are all cited. This also confirms my thoughts as to using our tests for guidance and not as an absolute, final indicator of how our meds will work for us.

    Tamoxifen Metabolism and CYP2D6 Overview of the Action of CYP2D6

    "In an attempt to settle this issue, investigators assessed data from the large, prospective Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination (ATAC) and Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 trials that, in combination, had randomized more than 9000 patients to tamoxifen or to anastrozole or letrozole, respectively.[10, 11] "

    "In both assessments, CYP2D6 allele status had no effect on any outcomes, including disease recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival.[12, 13] In addition, because it was thought that the presence of hot flashes might be an indicator of metabolic activity of tamoxifen, BIG 1-98 investigators also looked at whether the presence or absence of hot flashes might correlate with CYP2D6 allele status. Again, no difference was seen between the groups.[13] "

    "some have suggested that all of the current data may be suspect because of the poor understanding of the metabolism of tamoxifen and endoxifen within the cytochrome P450 pathway.[14]"

    "Ongoing studies of patients with metastatic breast cancer that are incorporating genetic testing will add more information to the debate,[16] but it is unclear whether they will fully resolve the question of how and whether CYP2D6 allele status influences outcomes from tamoxifen therapy given in the adjuvant setting."

    We need more research! There is absolutely no reason for any of us to go blindly into treatments; Tamoxifen, AI's, chemo's........ The tools are all there, but there isn't a proper manual to go along with 'em :(

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited July 2016

    Thank you Shep! Honestly, if they'd just give us the endoxifen test at least once, say 6 months in, we'd know if our body is processing the Tamox. I appreciate the rebuttal and link.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited July 2016

    Lisey ~ I go to follow up with my MO and Oncology-Neurologist tomorrow. I have a LIST of questions. The Onc-Neuro likes talking the sciency stuff.......anything I should ask?

    Labelle ~ Hey you! How's Tubby Kitty? Yikes, your Tamoxifen SE's were awful. I was just fat, sweaty and grumpy. I lost 10lbs within a few weeks of switching to Femara. My hot flashes got much better too. Some say I am still grumpy..........

    Solfeo ~ Yay! Told ya the MRI was no big woof. I have never had the phrase "role model" applied to me in a positive way - thank you sweetie :) (hush Sas, let me have my moment!)

    As for your chitty medical services......

    The American Cancer Society offers transportation, including airfare, for treatment in or out of your area. They also have very nice hotel accommodations that are free to stay at while being treated. They will pay for someone to accompany/stay with you as well.

    Find Support & Treatment Topics

    American Cancer Society Hope Lodge.

    Here is the link to The National Cancer Institute. Use their guide to find an NCI designated cancer center

    There are also other links for resources on the NCI site.

    Check with your insurance company as to which centers they will cover. If you do not already have one, request a Case Manager via your insurance company to help you navigate your treatment processes. The Case Manager is an RN who can advise medical situations, refer to local support sources and help to push through necessary pre-approvals.

    My center here in SC is NCI Designated. Should something happen to my MO or if I need treatment someplace else I have two other hospitals on my "standby" list.

    Try for Charleston. IMO they are the best. The Hope Lodge is not even a block away and is in a beautifully renovated old Southern home. And I will come visit you :)

    Bestbird and Sas had links with a ton of info on available resources. I'll post them here or I'm sure Sas will.

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited July 2016

    Shep,

    You are wonderful! Can you find out more about the BluePrint Test that is a sister to the Mammoprint test? Genetics is a huge solution to a lot of questions IMO.

    I am pushing to get that added to my mammoprint (heaven help me on the expense of both of these tests)... But I think it's truly important in making decisions, See here for the details: http://www.agendia.com/response-and-long-term-outcomes-after-neo-adjuvant-chemotherapy-pooled-dataset-of-patients-stratified-by-molecular-subtyping-using-mammaprint-and-blueprint


  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited July 2016

    Shepkitty - you certainly are a role model! I don't care what sassy says LOL

    The Big 1-98 study has been criticized by some experts for using breast tumor tissue rather than germline DNA (from the blood) to determine CYP2D6 status. The results can be different a good percentage of the time (I want to say around 20% of the time, but that is from memory so don't quote me). There were also some other inconsistencies noted at the link I posted yesterday upthread.

    Besides genetics the other obvious issue is tamoxifen resistance. You can have enough of every metabolite you need and the cancer just finds a way around it. That is a possibility with any treatment but may be more prevalent with tamoxifen. I say "may" because it's just something I picked up from reading and I can't cite a source. If anyone knows otherwise please correct me. This is why I don't understand this push to extend tamoxifen therapy to 10 years. The longer you take it the more likely the cancer is to become resistant. If I was more than 5 years away from menopause, it would be my choice to switch to an AI+OS or oophorectomy after the first five years on tam. My original plan was 2 years on tamoxifen then switching to AI alone (assuming my menopause was complete), although I was given the choice to stay on tam as long as I wanted if I tolerated it well. My reasoning was that the more serious side effects become more likely after 2 years.

    MRI went well, although there were still some miscommunications between what sports medicine doc and MO had ordered. I tried straightening it out but it was 6pm, the docs offices were closed, and I finally just had to say screw it and hope for the best. I have the images, but heck if I can tell if anything looks abnormal. Both doctors should be getting the reports at the same time, and neither has called so I guess the results are not posted yet.

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited July 2016

    Solfeo:

    Fingers crossed for totally benign findings.

    BarredOwl

  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited July 2016

    NO METS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    I have five other diagnoses that might be disheartening on any other day, but today it's like somebody gave me a big bag of money!

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited July 2016

    CONGRATS!!! ( i knew it.. !)

  • Fallleaves
    Fallleaves Member Posts: 806
    edited July 2016

    Awesome Solfeo!!! So happy for you!!!

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited July 2016
  • sas-schatzi
    sas-schatzi Member Posts: 19,603
    edited July 2016
  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited July 2016

    You know what, though. After reading the whole report they freaking didn't even evaluate the hypertrophy of the clavicle, which is why I was there!! So I really don't know for sure.

    I knew miscommunications were happening so I talked to everyone I could about this and the discrepancies between what sports med doctor and my MO had ordered. They had technical problems and couldn't upload the xrays for comparison. I left the disc with them but heaven knows what happened to it after that, because there is no mention of comparing the MRI images to the original x-rays in the report. I shouldn't have given in and trusted them to do the right tests just because it was after business hours and there was nothing I could do to change anything. I should have turned around and walked out and insisted on that appointment with my MO before any tests were ordered. Turns out he didn't even get any of my emails - his MA intercepted them and handled everything, with me thinking the Dr. was directing behind the scenes. The MA is the one who rushed me in there last night.

    Now I've told everyone mets have been ruled out when that is not the case. I kind of think they would have noticed if it was something obvious, but it also could have been missed if it wasn't blatantly obvious since that isn't what they were looking for.

    The MRI supervisor is looking into it for me and trying to see if we can get an amended report from the radiologist.

  • grainne
    grainne Member Posts: 245
    edited July 2016

    I've edited this post to reflect your last post, which somehow i didn't see first. That is disappointing but I'm sure you are right. .. they just would not have missed mets. Hope you get definate and good news soon.

  • Fallleaves
    Fallleaves Member Posts: 806
    edited July 2016

    Solfeo, I really hope you are getting complete clarification today. What the hell was the report about if they didn't even mention your clavicle issue??

  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited July 2016

    I finally had enough of this BS and broke down and had a few cocktails to de-stress last night, which I don't normally do. Then the freaking MO called while I'm sitting there buzzing, so I couldn't answer it. Would you believe that this kind of stuff happens in almost every medical situation I find myself in? It's like living in a third world country where I live.

    They only looked at the shoulder joint because the MA only put down "pain in shoulder joint" as the indication for the MRI. Hypertrophy of the clavicle was nowhere on the order. I tried to prevent this from happening but it was still not straightened out when I got there, and as I said, it was after normal business hours and there was nothing I could do about it. How visible the relevant area is in a shoulder MRI, I don't know, but there needs to be some commentary by the radiologist on the specific issue of clavicular hypertrophy.

    I have sent one last clarifying email to my doctor, with strict instructions that he should read it personally to avoid further miscommunication. Hopefully this will get cleared up today before the weekend.

  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited July 2016

    I think I can see my clavicle in some of the images, although it is not the focus of them. I like to think that it was so unremarkable that the radiologist felt no need to comment, since she didn't think she needed to for shoulder joint pain. I feel like it's probably going to turn out OK but it does need to be specified. I have a strong aversion to slipping through the cracks.

    I wish I knew more about MRIs.

  • Fallleaves
    Fallleaves Member Posts: 806
    edited July 2016

    Good luck, Solfeo, hope you get a definitive answer from your doctor today.

  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited July 2016

    Just got back from the MO's office with the radiologist's amended report. Still no mets! MO really didn't know any of my concerns from the emails I had been sending the last few days. Even asked me if I was seeing a shoulder guy. Well, duh. His MA was very nice and tried to be helpful but having her as the middle person meant a lot getting overlooked. That won't be happening again.

    The only discrepancy remaining is that the sports medicine doctor wanted the MRI with contrast, and MO's assistant ordered it without contrast. I won't know how much that matters until I see sports guy on Monday. The bad news is that my shoulder is really messed up and I'll be needing physical therapy for awhile, but I'll take that over mets any day.

    Thanks all! Now back to your regularly scheduled programming...

  • grainne
    grainne Member Posts: 245
    edited July 2016

    solfeo, have you seen the sports guy now and are you completely reassured?

  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited July 2016

    Hi grainne - Thanks for asking! Yes he hadn't even noticed that the other doctor had ordered the MRI at a different facility. It was like I was telling him for the first time, but he said he didn't think it was a problem that there was no contrast. Completely reassured? Enough not to worry, but it does bug me that these doctors never seem to be on top of their own stuff. The pain is certainly explained by the rotator cuff tear and 4 other problems so there is no reason to suspect mets if no one can see any, and all 3 doctors agreed. I need physical therapy 3x/week for the next 6 weeks. He was already talking surgery if PT doesn't help, but I'm not having anymore surgery. It doesn't hurt as bad as it could for everything that is wrong with it. He said ligaments don't heal well at my age (52!) but as long as it doesn't get worse I can live with whatever improvement we can achieve in PT.

  • Fallleaves
    Fallleaves Member Posts: 806
    edited July 2016

    Ugh on all the shoulder issues, Solfeo. Hope the PT works wonders.

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited August 2016

    Well son of a bitch, I got my Kailos results. Turns out I'm a Rapid Metabolizer of CYP2D6... which is really weird because I'm as Irish/causasian as they get and I know Rapids are typically middle eastern / mediterrianian...

    In any case, I'm not sure what being a rapid metabolizer means because I have NO symptoms from the Tamox... I've been on for 3 weeks. Also, I have horrible pain intolerance and codeine doesn't help much. Don't you think if I"m a Rapid Metabolizer, codeine would turn to morphine quickly and I'd feel it?

    I'm just astounded here trying to make sense of what being a Rapid means.

  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited August 2016

    Hi Lisey. I don't want to reply in depth until I refresh my memory on ultrarapid metabolizers. It means you have more than 2 copies of the CYP2D6 allele. You're a mutant! LOL! Do they list them and say how many? That might make a difference.There have been people with over 10 alleles described in the literature, but I don't know how common the larger numbers are. I'm guessing the higher it gets the more difficult it would be to maintain the desired endoxifen level, but you might be OK if you only have 3 because tamoxifen has a long half life. I just can't remember without doing some reading so I'll have to write more later.

    I don't think the correlation between side effects and effectiveness/endoxifen is clear cut. I'm still not having that hard of a time even after over a month on the doubled dose. Studies, as you know, have had conflicting results, but it does take tamoxifen a couple of months to build up in the system and side effects can be delayed. Regarding codeine, it could be that you have another gene that makes you less susceptible to its effects.

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited August 2016

    Solfeo, I get the report tomorrow morning. Kailos gives it to my oncologist 48 hours before they will release it to me. The Onc nurse just told me over the phone that I'm a UM for 2D6. As soon as I get the report I'll post it. I'd love some help dissecting it, if possible...

  • solfeo
    solfeo Member Posts: 838
    edited August 2016

    Quickly, here's what YouScript says about ultrarapid metabolizers. The possibility of better outcomes is mentioned, which is good, but so is increased risk of adverse effects. It's only the truly dangerous ones that I would worry about but you can always adjust your dose based on your endoxifen tests. We can dig deeper into your specific situation when you get the report. I'm off to the cardiologist to find out if I need heart meds, which is going to be another CYP2D6/tamoxifen ordeal. Hope she's going to be open to the information.

    Effects

    Summary: A correlation between CYP2D6 polymorphism and tamoxifen levels has been established. Tamoxifen is a pro-drug metabolized by CYP2D6 to endoxifen, which is 30-100 fold more potent.

    I. Pharmacokinetic Studies

    N/A

    II. Pharmacodynamics/ Clinical Outcomes

    Although no published literature was identified specifically for CYP2D6 ultra rapid metabolizers (UM) and tamoxifen, a case study concluded that CYP2D6 UMs may have improved outcomes, but increased risk of adverse effects when administered tamoxifen.1

    A clinical study found that CYP2D6 UMs were more likely to develop two or more side effects to tamoxifen and had an overall increase in the median number of side effects compared to CYP2D6 IM/NM and PM patients.2 This may be due to increased plasma concentrations of the more potent endoxifen metabolite.

    Management

    The Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group makes no therapeutic dose recommendation.3

    Consider increased monitoring for tamoxifen adverse effects such as thromboembolism, irregular vaginal bleeding and hot flashes and adjust therapy accordingly.

    The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) do not recommend CYP2D6 testing as a tool to determine the optimal adjuvant endocrine strategy.4,5

Categories