Younger women with ILC?

124

Comments

  • BlueKoala
    BlueKoala Member Posts: 190
    edited March 2016

    I start chemo tomorrow. My surgeon and oncologist both want me to do chemo first then surgery. The surgeon doesn't think the tumour will shrink, but I could get lucky, but mostly they are concerned about my age and want to attack it as aggressively as they can.

    I'm feeling pretty down about it all today. I've cut off all my long hair, had a port inserted which is feeling sore and uncomfortable still, and about to start the whole treatment regime and am scared that it won't work anyway and I will be dead in a few years. I'm not worried about dying, just about my kids not having their mother.

    It's all pretty overwhelming.

  • Krista21
    Krista21 Member Posts: 16
    edited April 2016

    I was 31 when diagnosed with ILC, I decided on a lumpectomy along with radiation which I am in the middle of now. My onco score was 17 and they didn't offer me chemo, since it would only be a 2% benefit I started tamoxifen before my radiation. There hasn't been a day that goes by that I don't think about cancer hopefully that changes after time

  • MFalabella
    MFalabella Member Posts: 176
    edited April 2016

    I am 44, and still considered young. The cutoff according to my MO is 45.

  • WifeMomTeacher
    WifeMomTeacher Member Posts: 42
    edited April 2016

    I am 29 and just given the diagnosis of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma. I don't know anything else yet. Just that it was sent away for further pathology. I'm sick. I'm terrified.

  • BlueKoala
    BlueKoala Member Posts: 190
    edited April 2016

    I'm really sorry, WifeMomTeacher.


  • Dawn41
    Dawn41 Member Posts: 54
    edited April 2016

    I am 41 and just diagnosed about a month and half ago.

  • lulud471
    lulud471 Member Posts: 89
    edited April 2016

    45 at ILC diagnosis premeno.

  • ALH49
    ALH49 Member Posts: 17
    edited June 2016

    BlueKoala -- Sorry to be chiming in so late but it it good that you have been researching ILC and are questioning the recommendation of neoadjuvant chemo. I had neoadjuvant chemo because docs thought it best to "shrink the tumor" first and they figured they could figure out if it was working by following with regular MRIs throughout treatment. The MRIs misled them into thinking the tumor was gone. But when I went into surgery five months of chemo later the tumor was still there, right where it was from the beginning -- abutting my pec muscle -- and just as big. I'm being told to this day that the neoadjuvant chemo was still helpful because it made the tumor more "operable" but if that were truly the case it wouldn't have taken three surgeries (including BMX as surgery number 2) to get clear margins. Not saying you should refuse the neoadjuvant chemo but definitely worth questioning to what extent they really feel it will be helpful, if for no other reason than to manage expectations.

  • BlueKoala
    BlueKoala Member Posts: 190
    edited June 2016

    ALH49, I still went with neoadjuvant, and I am past halfway. I can't actually feel the tumour anymore, and what my breast surgeon said before I started was that even if it shrunk to nothing she would still be expecting to do a mastectomy because it is so extensive.

    I have no idea whether it was the right way to do it, but I decided I felt happy to trust my doctors.

  • sunsetcity
    sunsetcity Member Posts: 12
    edited June 2016

    I am 46 yrs old. Diagnosed with ILC at the end of May. Some consider that young, some don't.

    I found an almond shaped, flat, stiffness/thickening during a self a breast exam. At first, I wasn't too concerned. It was neither shaped nor sized like a pea, nor was it hard. I thought it would just go away. A few months later, since it was still there, I brought it to the doctors attention during my annual exam. She thought perhaps it might be a cyst, Doc suggested diagnostic mammo and and ultrasound. US showed cause for a biopsy, biopsy showed invasive lobular cancer. Oncologist gave me the option of mastectomy or lumpectomy - I would like a lumpectomy. but the oc wanted to do a Breast MRI. MRI showed several smaller cancers branching from the biopsied tumor. Now, not sure if lumpectomy is an option. We also did genetic testing. My mom had breast cancer as did 2 of her aunts. In addition, stomach cancer runs on her side of the family and there is known link with a genetic mutation between a specific type of stomach cancer (Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer) and lobular breast cancer. Still awaiting genetic results.

    I am finding that waiting for results, is so incredibly difficult as my brain processes and over process scenario's. At times I am consumed with thoughts about how this will be treated and what that looks like for me and my life. This stinks!


  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited June 2016

    Sunsetcity,

    Welcome to Breastcancer.org and thanks for posting! Many members here can sympathize with you and the "not knowing" as you wait for test results. Just know that no matter what the results of your genetic testing, and the treatment plan that is to follow, we're all here for you to help you through!

    Please continue to post and engage in our wonderful, supportive Community! We look forward to hearing more from you!

    --The Mods

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited June 2016

    sunsetcity, I know how you're feeling. sometimes I felt it was helpful to overprepare in case of bad news, because I could visualize how I'd react to it and how I'd move forward. but sometimes it just scared the crap out of me. consider yourself lucky that you found this thing and that you are getting it treated and taken care of so you can move on and live a very long life. chances are even if you have a genetic disposition to c, you'll now be aware of it and can take steps to prevent it much more than you might not have if you didn't have the knowledge. keep posting on the discussion boards; the "just dx" thread is very active, more so than this ILC one.

    Hugs

    claire in az

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited June 2016

    Sorry you had to join this group.

    Any cancer diagnosis is challenging. ILC offers even more challenges since it is chronically understudied. As science continues to drill down at the molecular level, it's clear that Lobular is fundamentally different than Ductal, the most common subtype. It's also clear that Lobular is poorly understood compared to other breast cancer subtypes and frustrating that ILC patients (almost always Estrogen Receptor positive, ER+) get the same protocols as IDC.

    Given the family history, genetic testing is wise. As you pointed out, there can be a mutational link between ILC and gastric cancer (HDGC). That mutation, CDH1, while generally rare, does increase the chances of ILC and/or HDGC. If a deleterious mutation is found, you'll be armed to make better decisions.

    The hallmark of ILC is the lack of a sticky protein called "E-cadherin" (Ecad), which is encoded by the CDH1 gene. Without Ecad, the cells grow diffusely and can spread out like a spider web. This causes much trouble for surgeons to get "clear margins" (removing all of the cancer) and lumpectomy re-excisions are common. Because of this, many patients opt for a mastectomy. Surgical choices are complex and you can spend hours weighing the pros and cons of each choice.
    It should be noted that recent studies presented at the 2015 SABCS revealed that mastectomies do not offer any survival advantage over lumpectomies, so this could cloud the surgical decision even more for ILC patients (yet I often wonder if ILC vs. IDC subtype analysis was done in these Mastectomy vs. Lumpectomy studies).

    Like you, my wife was diagnosed at a younger age. Regardless of age, all ILC patients are living with a cloudy future for a variety of reasons. The population of younger patients face the most uncertainty since there are essentially no premenopausal ILC studies and none on the horizon. A daunting thought for obvious reasons.

    If you live near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, please consider seeking a second opinion at the University of Pittsburgh (Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC). They are the only facility in the United States that has a small Lab of ILC researchers. They are also running the only clinical trial in the world that is specifically focused on better understanding ILC. In fact, that clinical trial, link here, is specifically designed for you - Newly diagnosed patients that have not had surgery yet.

    The good news (if there is any good news), in general, ILC tends to be indolent and early-stage patients often have many years of Progression-free survival (PFS) when compared to other subtypes. But please, stay vigilant and be your own advocate. Out of 10 patients, you're probably the only one with ILC. Make sure you question your Oncologist since they tend to operate with the "one-size-fits all" approach.

    Best of luck

  • sunsetcity
    sunsetcity Member Posts: 12
    edited July 2016

    I am a couple hours away from Pittsburgh. Being seen at OSU James Cancer (Stephanie Spielman) Center. From my understanding it's one of the best in the country and feel fortunate to live close. However, the clinical trial you mentioned does interest me and I did just read about it.

    I have asked my oncologist several questions already...but none about how ILC is different, treated differently, or how it "acts" differently than IDC. I may question her regarding this. I am a detailed person. I like to know specifics. I want to be as knowledgeable as possible about this particular type of cancer, since it affects me. And also to make the wisest decision possible.

    The oncologist did say the survival rate is similar regardless of a lumpectomy vs mastectomy. However, after they found what they think are other smaller cancers on the MIR she indicated that a lumpectomy would not be possible due to distance between them. An MRI biopsy would confirm the furthest spot was indeed cancer. An MRI guided biopsy does not sound appealing.

    Thanks for the support everyone. I will check out the just dx thread. I was looking for one specific to ILC.



  • cparis16
    cparis16 Member Posts: 4
    edited July 2016

    I was 41 when I was diagnosed. It came as quite a shock. No family history and then I learned that it is something normally found in older women. I have not come across many women that have been diagnosed with Lobular. Most people I have met were Ductal.

  • Smurfette26
    Smurfette26 Member Posts: 730
    edited July 2016

    sunset city my ILC was multi focal. I had 4 cancerous tumours. Lumpectomy was not an option for me.

    Wishing you well. Donna.

  • Lab-girl
    Lab-girl Member Posts: 25
    edited July 2016

    This probably has been covered before but have any of you had or are considering oophorectomy or suppression so you can take an AI? I'm 44 andI had both ILC and IDC and am taking tamoxifen and doing fine (no SE) but given the recent but maybe preliminary studies comparing the two I'm wondering what the thinking is and what your oncologists say. Mine seems to think AIs have a slight edge but not substantial. Thank you.

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited July 2016

    Lab-girl. There's been a couple threads dedicated to this topic. This one stands out: "Changing to AI/OS from Tamoxifen after reviewing SOFT study?"

    As some are aware, the SOFT clinical trial results revealed that doing Ovarian Suppression (or an Oophorectomy) and switching to an AI proved to be beneficial for the young (age <35) and high risk (Lymph node positive).
    But those results were based on a trial that was heavily weighted with IDC women. With your mixed histology (ILC & IDC), that may be a moot point though.

    ILC women still await the IDC vs. ILC subtype analysis from the SOFT clinical trial. It's been 18 months since the 2014 SABCS trial announcement and still no data. When the data emerges, it could have relevance for ILC women.

    Fwiw, the BIG 1-98 clinical trial revealed that the AI, Letrozole (Femara) was better than Tamoxifen (Tam) for ILC, although that trial focused only on postmenopausal (postM) women. Although, the 2015 study, "The molecular landscape of premenopausal breast cancer" revealed genomic signatures that differentiate preM ER+ breast cancer from postM ER+ breast cancer, suggesting different therapeutic strategies, so again, there's really no clue if this Big1-98 data is relevant for preM ILC.

    As I alluded to above in a earlier comment, there are zero studies for premenopausal ILC.

  • Lab-girl
    Lab-girl Member Posts: 25
    edited July 2016

    John,

    Thanks so much for your helpful reply. I hope the subtype data from the SOFT trial sheds some light I'm kind of holding off on oophorectomy to see how some of these studies and the upcoming ILC symposium shake out. I have a PMS2 mutation so have a small increased risk for ovarian cancer anyway but it is a big step when you can't take estrogen.


  • LizM
    LizM Member Posts: 963
    edited July 2016

    Lab-girl,

    I did just that in 2006. I was diagnosed with stage II mixed ILC and IDC in 2005. I was 49 and premenopausal. My oncologist at Hopkins expected me to take Tamoxifen for a few years and then switch to an AI when proven to be menopausal. I decided to remove my ovaries immediately after my treatment in order to take Femara since studies at that time were indicating Femara was slightly better. I will be finishing up my 10 years of Femara in a couple of weeks. An OBGYN oncologist at Hopkins thought it was a reasonable decision to remove my ovaries as a treatment for my breast cancer. I have never regretted that decision. My oncologist still jokes with me every time he see me and asks, did I recommend you do that. I tell him no that I did it for my own peace of mind. I cannot express how important it has been for me to make decisions that are right for me and give me peace of mind. My oncologist has supported my decisions every step of the way, even though he was probably thinking it was a bit of overkill.

  • Lab-girl
    Lab-girl Member Posts: 25
    edited July 2016

    LizM,

    Thank you so much for sharing your story.  After much deliberation I think I am going to go for it too.  Even with the side effects of menopause, I want to be able to say I did as much as I could.  I had a second opinion yesterday with an oncologist and he said that there will likely never be any studies of premenopausal women with ILC (tamox vs. AI) because there are so few.   


  • Jesus_girl
    Jesus_girl Member Posts: 28
    edited August 2016

    wife mom teacher can I ask what symptoms you had that lead to to your diagnosis? And how were you diagnosed? So so sorry to hear of your shocking news x x

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited September 2016

    This excellent 2015 study is relevant for all premenopausal (preM) women. It illustrates the differences in treatment response between preM and postM women.
    Titled, "The molecular landscape of premenopausal breast cancer", it was authored by researchers at the University of Pittsburgh, one of the few Labs dedicated to studying ILC.
    https://breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13058-015-0618-8

    As I've expressed in other threads, the therapeutic options for preM ILC women are limited. In terms of adjuvant hormonal therapy, preM women are treated with a "one-size-fits-all" approach. Imo, "Precision Medicine" is essentially nonexistent.
    With the first ever international ILC symposium upon us (Sept 29-30, 2016), hopefully robust discussions will be dedicated towards this issue.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2016

    I had chemo before surgery. It was not done to achieve a lumpectomy. It was done because the cancer was locally advanced and the docs wanted to knock it on the head right away. The concern was that doing surgery first would delay chemo, and if there are any complications from surgery, like infection, the delay can be fairly long. I think the surgeon may also have been concerned about achieving safe margins and therefore wanted to shrink the tumor before surgery.

    So I had staging scans and biopsy on the 9th and started chemo 10 days later (after we got the path report from the biopsy and a fish test to confirm HER status). My surgery came after 4 rounds of chemo and was followed by 4 additional rounds plus rads, then ooph, then femara. I will be on femara indefinitely

  • Lab-girl
    Lab-girl Member Posts: 25
    edited September 2016

    Pathology parameters and adjuvant tamoxifen response in a randomised premenopausal breast cancer trial

    http://m.jcp.bmj.com/content/58/11/1135.full

    "The tamoxifen response appeared to be impaired in the relatively few lobular carcinomas studied, but larger studies are needed to investigate this issue"

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2016

    Lab, there is solid evidence that AIs are more effective than tamox in ILC. That is why my srgeon fully supported my choice to remove my ovaries so I could go straight on an AI(I was pre-meno at DX). The biggest study on this was basically a sub-crunching of stats from a larger study looking at hormonal treatment for BC. The results were published almost 5 years ago, can't remember the acronym of the study

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited September 2016

    Liz, my onc also thought it was overkill, but surgeon was all in favor since he had worked on the study you refer to. I have no regrets, especially with both ovarian and uterine cancer in my immediate family. Good riddance to faulty equipment. Instant menopause is not fun, but cancer treatment in general isn't exactly a good time.

  • RyansMomma
    RyansMomma Member Posts: 18
    edited September 2018

    I realize this is an old topic, but I decided to chime in. I'm 19 (going to be 20 in November.) And I was just recently diagnosed with stage 3 ILC in both of my breasts. No family history or gene mutations either and I'm beginning to wonder how the heck I got ILC, let alone BC at this age! From what I have researched since my diagnosis, ILC is quite rare in premenopausal women and super rare in women my age. It has been a huge shock to me and everyone else. I feel like I have no one to turn to right now. I am going to throw everything I can at this beast. I have a 6 year old cat I need to be there for. This is very upsetting to me. Will I still be able to have children? Will chemo make me infertile? So many questions. I am so glad that I found BCO.

    P.S I want to go to medical school soon to become a scientific researcher on cancers and many other types of diseases. Maybe someday I can help find the cure, I would hope so. That would be great!

  • Georgia1
    Georgia1 Member Posts: 1,321
    edited September 2018

    RyansMama, welcome and I am so sorry to hear about your diagnosis at such a young age. I didn't get breast cancer until I was 59, but I was diagnosed with melanoma at 25 and remember how very alone I felt. Eventually I got through the surgery, then the five years of annual exams, and I have no doubt you will make it through as well. Please start a new thread any time you need help and we'll be here. ((HUGS))

  • RyansMomma
    RyansMomma Member Posts: 18
    edited September 2018

    Georgia1: Thank you for the welcome. Yeah it came as a shock, but I kinda figured things weren't looking too well. When they told me I had cancer I was like, "But how?" Since I am so young. But in my heart I just knew. I'm still trying to look for ways to figure out how I got it, but I am trying not to blame myself too much. Cancer is a crap shoot, really. It took awhile for doctors to take me seriously at first, because of my age. I persisted though because in my gut I felt that something was wrong. I'll probably share my story here soon. (Any idea where I can make a topic like that?) Oh wow! I'm glad you got through it. I appreciate the hope, It's going to be tough, but I think I can make it.

Categories