The doctor works for YOU!! Thoughts on decision-making

pajim
pajim Member Posts: 2,785

Sorry this is a bit of a rant. A friend had been taking the Cleopatra regimen for a year. It drove her from near death to NED but she was having major neuropathy and other side-effects.

Then the onc said he wanted her to continue on carboplatin and she was crying about it. I finally lost it and said:

"The doctor works for YOU! Not the other way around!!"

(By which I meant, if it was intolerable and she wanted to quit that particular med that was her right so long as she understands the potential consequences.)

I realize I'm preaching to the choir here, but WE get to the make the decisions. Our oncs are the subject matter experts and we should listen to them, take their advice and come to a joint decision. This is impossibly hard to do.

I recently went through this waiting (or not waiting) to switch treatments. My onc kept looking at me to make the decision. I wanted him to tell me what to do, which is just not me (and he knows it). I finally figured out that what I really wanted was for someone else to make the decision so I could blame him if it turned out to be wrong. Maybe my onc is putting it on me for the same exact reason. Maybe I have to tell him if I want him to make the decision(s) for me.

Of course there's no right or wrong decision nor a right or wrong answer to this question. I'm starting to have to decide what is important to me. What side-effects am I willing to live with? I'm not required to live with anything I don't want to. I can switch treatments. As someone who is not introspective in that way, it's hard.

In hindsight I should have said to my onc "what you do recommend?" "Why are you recommending that?" Then if needed I could discuss it with my husband and decide whether or not to go along.

Are there other ways of thinking about this? Approaching the decision-making? I assume this will come up with each progression.

Comments

  • zarovka
    zarovka Member Posts: 3,607
    edited June 2016

    I am a very strong personality, used to being in charge. I had a hundred people working for me before this hit. I make the decisions. I have 4-5 different oncologists and other specialists advising me in MY decision. They all understand that I have assembled a team and they are part of a team. They respect that. I have not listened to any one doctor 100%. Doctors have no problem with informed patients calling the shots. It's about risk and specifically the risk that I will die. And how my body feels is a key part of the equation.

    The key word is informed. That is why you constantly hear the wise people on this forum tell everyone to get a second, third or fourth opinion until you feel comfortable with your treatment. That said, on a couple of issues, I listened to none of my doctors.

    Which brings up the second key word, comfortable. I can't imagine a treatment working if we are not comfortable with it. If your mind and your body is fighting the treatment, I don't see how it will work.

    All that sounds reasonable. The problem is that we are asked to make these decisions and take charge of our care when we are emotionally raw and drugged out of our minds. We are in a weak position. I feel deeply for your friend who seems beaten up by her treatment and probably to weakened by the treatment itself to speak up for herself.

    I was surprised at how far I went along with the initial recommendation of my oncologist when I was first diagnosed, even though it had some clear logical flaws. I was just a wreck. But I kept hearing people say "get a second opinion and get a third opinion" and so I wondered like a zombie to 3 more doctors and eventually found a better path and the one I am on now.

    This is where taking a break from treatments and the support of friends and family could make a difference. One of the (many) cancer books that emphasizes the value and power of functional medicine might give her the courage to back off the Cleopatra regime at least long enough to clear her head and think this through. The principle of functional medicine is that you strengthen the body's own ability to heal. It's a challenge for all of us to find the right balance between our wellbeing and the side effects. But it seems like your friend is in tears because on some level she understands her body and her wellbeing have been sidelined.

    The great thing is that we have so many options and no decision is permanent. If she goes of the Cleopatra regime for a bit and then regrets it, she can go right back on it. If she is beyond the first line treatments, there are so many interesting clinical trials going on. Time for a second opinion.

    >Z<


  • artistatheart
    artistatheart Member Posts: 2,176
    edited June 2016

    Pam, I think Z's response is very well thought out and spot on. I am a bit like you where I want an expert to clearly assert their opinion on what I should do. Hence my second opinion yesterday. I think I just wanted a 2nd person to tell me that I was doing the right thing. After speaking with her she made did ease my mind by concurring with my Onc but also made it clear that if I was unhappy or uncomfortable with any of my Onc's decision on Tx I was perfectly capable and welcome to discuss it with her. Although as Z also so eloquently expressed, we are in a compromised condition in many ways, mentally and physically. Adding this kind of pressure to the mix is incredibly taxing. I think the suggestion to take a brief break just to clear her head while she has time to think is a really great suggestion.

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited June 2016

    Hi Pajim,

    It sounds like there are several things converging here at once:

    Your friend's doctor more focused on treating the disease than the patient (assuming her wheel is squeaking loudly);

    Your friend's own communication with doctor and deference to "doctor's orders";

    Your own frustration over her differing coping and medical decision-making styles.

    Pajim, you're right - many (most?) of the bco members I've met share similar approaches to our medical care - informed, engaged, collaborative, willing to work with a team or get a second opinion. Some will pursue the most aggressive and possibly far-fetched treatment options (conventional and/or althernative), while others just want to get back to normal life.

    Yet, in my personal life I've known several much less informed patients who are happy to give all the decision-making power to their priests physicians. Medicine is sorta like a religion - we put our faith in different gods and their priests. And sometimes we see others' religions styles as not as good as ours.

    I've very strong opinions about my own care, but when others make very different choices, I do my best to listen, understand and support their faith. If they are questioning it, I'm also willing to explore that together. My goal is to support the other person.

    Right now, I have several beloveds choosing very aggressive, risky treatments with unwanted effects that they want to complain to me about.

    Listening with an open mind and heart is a challenge!

    Loving and letting go is my lesson. I am learning how to stay connected in spite of our different approaches.

    No real answers, just resonated with your post, because I too am in similar situations with my loved ones.

    warmest healing regards, Stephanie

  • gramen
    gramen Member Posts: 179
    edited June 2016

    Stephanie, your post are enlightening...listening with an open mind and heart is indeed a challenge but I'm trying.

    I've been such a know it all for as long as I remember. Now people judge me as a patient, as a person, from the most critical decisions to what I order at a restaurant.

    Thank you for sharing your experiences, your thoughts, opinions...

  • gramen
    gramen Member Posts: 179
    edited June 2016

    Pajim,

    I hear you! My hubby and i are engineers and this stage iv medical world is driving us nuts. We don't like uncertainty, guessing, trial and error, and we are used to trusting each specialty contractor, they know best! None of that applies here...

  • pajim
    pajim Member Posts: 2,785
    edited June 2016

    Thank you all. I realize I didn't give you the end of the story. Sorry -- at the time I was thinking about this I was so frustrated both on her and my behalf.

    Her onc, who is at a major cancer center, went to the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium and somehow figured out there that Cleopatra is only supposed to be given for a year. (I'm still shaking my head.) Anyway, she's been off carbo for almost five months now and looks fabulous. All her hair came back, she's filled out some, etc. Still some issues with her feet but they are getting slowly better.

    Her relationship with her doctor is her business, and up to her to manage. No one can do it for her.

    In general I like making my own decisions. And I ask lots of questions (which my MO appreciates). These decisions, however, are hard to make. And they're going to get progressively harder to make. Maybe with experience it'll get easier. I keep feeling like there must be a "right" answer, where with MBC there is no "right" answer -- just the one that's right for you.

  • pwilmarth
    pwilmarth Member Posts: 235
    edited June 2016

    From what I'm reading, I think we have some confusion about the CLEOPATRA study. It never included carboplatins. The study design was docetaxel, Herceptin and Perjeta. There was never any conclusions about stopping this regimen in the metastatic setting. There isn't an oncologist out there who can tell you whether it's safe or not safe to stop this treatment.

    In this particular treatment regimen, the drug that is most responsible for neuropathy is docetaxel. And I developed neuropathy on that drug. But the goal isn't to stay on that drug forever, just 6 doses. The hope is that your nerves will recover after the docetaxel is stopped. My nerves got better, but it's been over a year and I still have neuropathy. Some days are better and some days are worse.

    Since the release of the results of the CLEOPATRA study, oncologists have looked at using Herceptin and Perjeta in other treatment settings, including the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. In these cases they would use a carboplatin and the goal might be 12 months of treatment. But the risk of neuropathy is strong with the carboplatins.

    If my oncologist were to recommend that I start a carboplatin, I would be reluctant to do so because I would not want to reinjure my already damaged nerves. And I would be asking why? The neuropathy can get worse, causing a definite negative impact on the quality of my life.

    It's never wrong to discuss your concerns with your oncologists. They know that some treatments aren't tolerated well by their patients, and, in fact, this is one of the major reasons that certain treatments are stopped.

  • Longtermsurvivor
    Longtermsurvivor Member Posts: 1,438
    edited June 2016

    Wanted to report back on today's interactions with two of my friends.

    One friend let me know through a mutual friend how much my love and support mean to her during this difficult time (she has a big surgery this coming week). I had to inwardly know that I couldn't get closer by following every twist and turn of an often difficult journey, because I'm very involved with my own now.*

    The other friend and I had a 45 minute phone conversation with mostly her talking, but my reflecting back to her using her own words, examples from her life, the stories she'd shared that illustrate her basic wisdom and self-knowing. She's 2 weeks into a monthlong treatment stay at a hospital far from home. Her different doctors swirl in everyday with opinions that differ from one another's and even their own of the day before. Her way is difficult in a different way.

    A good dose of empathy goes a long way!

    I AM judgemental about what works for me, but I do my best to see others' choices in the context of their lives. And to support their own inner knowing/choices.

    much high regard and loving kindness, Stephanie

    * Right now my own hospice journey feels like I'm in the river narrows. The current is swift and deadly. I must focus on letting go of much and relaxing to go with the flow. It's a good time, just requires more of me, more different ways of being with the unfolding process. So glad I'm here to enjoy the ride. They say anxiety is excitement without breathing - taking it one breath at a time.

Categories