Lumpectomy Lounge....let's talk!

1508509511513514947

Comments

  • Melclarity
    Melclarity Member Posts: 388
    edited April 2016

    HH - You're gorgeous!!! Ive missed out on lots happening with you all!

    Dorothy - Just looking at your information, sounds like youre talking of the Stage not the grade when you say it is small, so that is one factor, its the Grade it seems that is more of how they arrive at your treatment. We don't do Oncotype testing here, I asked my MO about it, and apart from $4,500 said it doesnt give him honestly more information than what the pathology gives him. Grade 3 is automatic chemo generally here, depending on other factors. so youre a 2?? you wouldnt have chemo here plus the small size of it and if there is no node involvement either. Hope that helps. My MO said the fact my turmor was 2.5cm and grade 3 he has no doubt IF I had the oncotype test it would have come back high, based on grade 3.

    Hey Moondust! Peachy! JCLC! Molly! Sloan! Peggy! 614! Chisandy! MLP! LTF! Peggy! Poodles! Gosh sorry if Ive missed anyone...hugs to you all, will try and keep up!

    LTF - I agree with you, everyones relationship with their Mum is so different, and they dont all work, and its OK. I think youve done an amazing job through all this! One very strong woman!

    All of you ladies are, dont ever forget that!

    Peggy thank you!!! I am equally inspired by everyone here, very strong, inspirational women!!! All of you!

    HI to all you New Comers!!! I'll try catch up on all your stories x

  • LovesToFly
    LovesToFly Member Posts: 1,133
    edited April 2016

    thank you Melclarity. Glad to see you back here, I've missed you!

  • Melclarity
    Melclarity Member Posts: 388
    edited April 2016

    LTF - How many infusions do you have left? Think you're doing so so incredibly well, it really is a roller coaster on every level, just keep nurturing you as I know you do...body and mind.

  • LovesToFly
    LovesToFly Member Posts: 1,133
    edited April 2016

    I've got one more, on April 19. The week after that I'm meeting my radiation oncologist, and I guess I will start radiation mid-May. I've actually done pretty well, my last cycle was very bad, but it was because I got a horrible cold right when I should've started feeling better. This one was much better! My chemo week was rough, but it passed and buy a seven I was ready to go back to work and feeling pretty well normal again. I feel really lucky that Ive felt so normal through so much of my chemo, and been able to maintain working two out of every three weeks ( The time I spent at home reiterates to me that I did make the right choice to work when I can, I'm OK being at home and I'm not feeling well but I still do get quite lonely and depressed, I can't imagine being home all the time when I am feeling pretty well. I'm so lucky I work somewhere that has given me the accommodations I need, and being flexible with the time I need off).

  • Lovinggrouches
    Lovinggrouches Member Posts: 530
    edited April 2016

    probably a stupid question, but what is LVI?

  • Melclarity
    Melclarity Member Posts: 388
    edited April 2016

    LTF - Thats great news! you're nearly there!! and yes I think things worked out perfectly for you. The balance of work and home when not up to it. Im enjoying my balance now nearly 4 months on, 3 days work 4 home, and I get to concentrate on running the house, my kids and putting time into me and getting physically better. Really is a silver lining after I was so so ill. I think you honestly have gotten through it with such an admirable strength, it isnt a picnic, and I found the key was to remember its not forever and step at a time. Youve got this!

  • Grazy
    Grazy Member Posts: 373
    edited April 2016

    Lovinggrouches - LVI is Lymphovascular Invasion, or as my path report stated Lymph-Vascular Invasion

  • blamoms
    blamoms Member Posts: 113
    edited April 2016

    Grazy and Dorthy I'm in Durham region.

  • Lovinggrouches
    Lovinggrouches Member Posts: 530
    edited April 2016

    Thanks Grazy!!!

  • Lovinggrouches
    Lovinggrouches Member Posts: 530
    edited April 2016

    I'm kind of wondering why I haven't been started on tamoxifen yet? Is there some reason why they don't have me take it until after radiation is done? I know they won't before chemo, but in my mind, I'm thinking that even though they think they got it all with surgery, I'm picturing any cells left behind as growing with all the estrogen from my body. It's been on my mind and I didn't ask because I don't want oncologist to think I'm questioning them too much lol!

  • Sloan15
    Sloan15 Member Posts: 896
    edited April 2016

    I just read an article that talked about women with dense breast tissue and who had kids around age 30+ have more precancerous breast cells with higher ki67 markers. (Harvard study) It could be a predictor of breast cancer like BRCA 1 and 2. I'm just curious: Who had dense breast tissue, kids around age 30, and a high Ki67 pathology for your tumor? If this is the case, I wonder if we should have mastectomies. Dana Farber Cancer Ctr wants to study this.

  • Sloan15
    Sloan15 Member Posts: 896
    edited April 2016

    Moondust - Let's see if there are others like us. I'm going to call Dana Farber Ctr and see if anyone will call me back. Then, I'm going to ask my (our) surgeon about this. Did you consider a mx?

  • Moondust
    Moondust Member Posts: 510
    edited April 2016

    Sloan, can you post a link to the article? I never considered mx because it was never recommended. At the time my surgery was being planned, I was a total breast cancer newbie trying follow the path of least resistance. I was hearing ER+, PR+, small tumor, Stage 1, grade 1, etc etc, and thought, oh good, I just have a run-of-the-mill low risk tumor. Even if I had known my Onco score in advance, I doubt if I would have had mx because lx plus radiation is supposed to have the same outcome. I wonder if they have uncovered a new mechanism by which tumors start. The reading I have done says longer exposure to estrogen causes a higher chance for cancer to start. That's the reason (supposedly) that starting periods at a young age, having kids late, having fewer or no kids, late menopause and HRT all increase cancer risk. Dense breasts decrease early detection rate, which increases risk also.

    So does the article say that dense breasts plus late kids will increase your risk even past menopause? Now you've got me curious! By all means see if you can find out more info from Dana Farber!

    Lovinggrouches, they don't want the tamoxifen to suppress the cancer cells while they are trying to kill them off with radiation and/or chemo. If the cancer cells are suppressed, they might behave more like normal cells and the treatments won't kill them as well.

    Mel, it's okay if you don't keep up all the time - it takes a big effort to stay current with this group!! It's great to hear from you!

  • Italychick
    Italychick Member Posts: 2,343
    edited April 2016

    let's see, I started period at 14, had first child at 16, second at 19, breastfed, have no breast cancer other than two great aunts who got it in their 70s, and bam, here I am. My risk for breast cancer was estimated at 5%. Breasts are labeled 25-50% dense, daughter who is 37, same density

    So either the data is incorrect, or I am one of the lucky 5%.

  • Melclarity
    Melclarity Member Posts: 388
    edited April 2016

    Like my MO said, sometimes too much research is worse. Honestly, if you trust your MO talk direct, every case is so individual. Its quite natural for women to have dense breasts under 50, think thats why they dont usually recommend a mammo til after that. I have 1 relative only my Mum, no history of any sort of cancer in the family. I havent met the criteria at all in terms of what 'they say' risk of breast cancer at all. Nor medically can they explain a recurrence AFTER Rads and 4yrs of Tamoxifen. I trust my BS implicitly after my 4yrs of constant care and he's been soo right every time my MO only came into play in July last year. He said theres no way of predicting at all another recurrence, I was unlucky in the 5% awww. But honestly, truly Id just talk to the MO. I'm only going to do Mx because Ive had a recurrence and the MO BS and I all agree its the only thing left I can do. :)

  • ChiSandy
    ChiSandy Member Posts: 12,133
    edited April 2016

    I lost my mom to the combination of CHF and COPD called "cor pulmonale," or "heart affected by lungs." She had been a 3-pack/day smoker for 50 years and quit cold turkey 15 years. But though the heart recovers by 10 years post-quitting, the lungs may improve or at least not get worse but they usually continue to decline--taking the heart down with them. She had her first and only mammogram at 83, and it was negative.

    My ER was about 75%, my PR 97%, my HER2 +1, which is considered definitely but not too strongly negative. I suspect that had my ER been higher (or the ER & PR %ages been reversed) or my HER2 been 0, my Oncotype score would have been at 10 or below, rather than 16. I was 64 when diagnosed, have asthma and allergies to most antibiotics, and my family medical history is a cardiovascular train wreck. Had I been 10 years younger, and/or lacked those comorbidities, my MO & I might have considered chemo with an Oncotype of 16. But it is what it is, and the risks would likely have outweighed any benefits. BTW, my MO definitely circumscribes her "turf" and insists that anything not directly related to cancer therapy be handled by my PCP.

    I'm posting something else here and not in the Alternative & Holistic forum because I don't want those folks jumping down my throat. I subscribe to a blog by online vocal coach Jeannie Deva, who had hinted at some very questionable beliefs (verging on junk science) as to nutrition and medication vis a vis singing. Tonight I got an e-mail blast from her webmaster that she passed away "from cancer" (type unspecified) in January, and that she had "used conventional medical treatments for years" without success and that by the time she was willing to entertain alternative therapies, she was too far gone for them to work. (Or perhaps those practitioners didn't want her case messing up their statistics). Then the blog's webmaster goes on to give a link to Ty Bollinger and his quack site "The Truth About Cancer," which he has decided to release for free starting this Tuesday.

    Now, don't get me wrong: I'm all for complementary medicine, and for trying alternative remedies when it is clear that conventional ones' efficacy have been exhausted. But Deva's people are intimating that she should have ditched Western medicine soon enough to have given alternative therapies a fighting chance. (This smacks of the herbalists and naturopaths who insist their patients avoid conventional medicine lest it conflict with alternative therapies). The opposite scenario is far more true: I can't help but think of the example of Steve Jobs, who ignored conventional medicine that could have cured his rare form of far-less-aggressive pancreatic cancer and opted instead for self-devised wackadoodle fruitarian diets, yoga and meditation. He lived for five years--but had he had timely surgery, chemo and radiation he'd probably still be terrorizing his employees and wowing consumers today.

    Why am I so worked up about this? As a longtime member of the creative arts community, I have typically encountered intense enmity for Western medicine and pharmaceuticals. (Those who do use licensed practitioners often use chiropractors as their PCPs). Maybe it's because artists tend to have less disposable income and are thus far more susceptible to suspicions that any commercial or industrial entities are out to callously make a buck off them wholly without regard to the merits of the products & services they're selling. I fear that many more of my fellow singers will be tempted to blow off conventionally treating their cancers (or refuse to have them diagnosed) in favor of woo-woo and placebos--and feel more justified in their decisions.

    Sciencebasedmedicine.org has loads of dirt on Bollinger. The only reason Quackwatch doesn't is that Stephen Barrett is pretty much retired from running the site.

  • Melclarity
    Melclarity Member Posts: 388
    edited April 2016

    Chisandy - I actually have to agree with what you are saying. I am a Holistic Practitioner and NEVER EVER would I say it should be used solely. I am a HUGE advocate for conventional medicine and it CAN be used with lots of other complimenting therapies if people desire. As for those people saying it was TOO LATE for the alternative therapies to work?? Disagree, its never too late for any alternative therapies, but people must realise they should be used in CONJUNCTION WITH medicine. Unfortunately, it was just too late for this dear person in terms of the illness, very sad indeed. Nothing to do with medicine or alternative therapies.

  • PontiacPeggy
    PontiacPeggy Member Posts: 6,778
    edited April 2016

    Chipsy, the abbreviations ARE confusing. However, BCO has a very helpful section called "Help with Abbreviations." Scroll to the top of this page. On the left a little bit down is a bar with just those words. And VOILA! Now you are in the know! :)

    HUGS!

  • PontiacPeggy
    PontiacPeggy Member Posts: 6,778
    edited April 2016

    On having children late and menopause late. I had my first period at 13. First child at 24, second at 27. Breast-fed both about 12-18 months. Menopause at 45. I was on birth control pills until I was 35 or so (can't remember - DH had a vasectomy). I did do 2-3 years of HRT because my doctor THOUGHT I should (before all the studies came out against it). My breasts were dense prior to menopause and still are. No breast cancer family history unless you count my paternal grandmother's sister's daughter (it metastasized and she had chemo, whiskey, repeat, for years - she also smoked like crazy). So I think I don't fit that profile either but here I am. First mammo at 40.

    I'm not into alternative medicine at all. With a boatload of allergies, including antibiotics like Sandy, I'd just be adding to my woes with "natural" remedies. If it works for you, good - that's your choice. But for me, I'll stick to Western medicine though I might consider acupuncture. And there's certainly no harm in adding yoga or meditation to reduce stress which can depress your immune system. We all have to decide what is best for ourselves but for me, I'll treat my BC with Western meds.

    Melclarity, as Dr Susan Love points out, a 5% chance of recurrence is meaningless except as a statistic. If you get a recurrence, it's 100%. So it's either 0% chance or 100% chance of recurrence for each of us.

    HUGS!


  • Grazy
    Grazy Member Posts: 373
    edited April 2016

    Hi Sloan - for your informal study here -- I had my kids at 36 and almost 39; I breastfed both for about six or seven months; I was almost 16 when I got my first period. I do have very dense breast tissue and have had yearly mammograms since I turned 50. No history of breast cancer. I went into menopause about 4 - 5 years ago (around age 52) and I have said repeatedly that it has absolutely kicked my butt, especially over the past two years! Lack of sleep over these few years has really taken a toll, for sure. I can fall asleep on a dime - anytime-anywhere, it's the staying asleep all night long that no longer happens. I've noticed a change in my body within the last two years as far as softening of the skin/flesh and do notice a loss of strength. In other words, I really feel that hormones have wreaked havoc with my body and feel that has contributed to my BC - I feel as though my wires are crossed.

    I'm going to look up the article you were referring to.


  • HappyHammer
    HappyHammer Member Posts: 1,247
    edited April 2016

    Sloan- info for your informal study- started period at 13-ish, first child at 29, second child at 35. No history of breast cancer in family. Dense breasts. Had ovaries removed in 2013 due to repeated issues with cysts. Cancer found during routine mammo. I have been overweight for years and am trying to get more of the weight off to reduce estrogen storage. I'm going to look up your study as well. Please keep us posted on what you find out from DH.

  • LovesToFly
    LovesToFly Member Posts: 1,133
    edited April 2016

    I got my period around 15, had my first child at 29, second child at 35. They were both breast-fed between two and three years. No history of breast cancer in my family except one second cousin who got it in her 60s. I was overweight on and off for about 13 years, lost a lot of weight into thousand and 10 and have kept it off since then have been very active the last five years or so. I believe my breasts are dense. Bc diagnosis at 41.

  • Lovinggrouches
    Lovinggrouches Member Posts: 530
    edited April 2016

    I guess I'm in trouble lol! 6th woman on moms side of the family to get breast cancer. Great grand mothers 2 sisters had it, 2 of grandmother's 2 sisters and a 2nd cousin. Started period at 13, have never had children. I have struggled with weight ALL my life! Had d and c about 7 years ago and had ovarian cyst at the time. Went on 1300 calorie strict diet, walked 2 miles a day and went to the gym for 2 years and never got below 190 pounds. I gave up and have gained 22 lb back in the last year. Now having menstrual problems AGAIN and paranoid about female cancer because of the palb2. At least now that I've recovered from the surgeries and can exercise again, my stress reducer is going walking every day about 2 miles. I hope I can still do that during my radiation. I only had the one mammogram, didn't read anything about dense breast tissue. Thanks all for the advice. Yale don't know how much I have learned from reading all your posts!!!

  • chipsy83
    chipsy83 Member Posts: 19
    edited April 2016

    Sloan-- here is different look. I was not diagnosed with cancer. I start my period at 10years old. I had my first kid at 27 and second at 30. Breast fed both for about 8 months. My right breast is normal and left is dense. My tumor was found on the left breast. My mom and her cousin had bc.

  • Molly50
    Molly50 Member Posts: 3,773
    edited April 2016

    I started menses at age 17. First child at 22. Only breast fed him for a few weeks due to a uterine infection. Second child at 31, breast fed her for 19 months. Third child at 37 breast fed him for 7 months until he became critically ill. Very dense breasts even after surgical menopause. Used HRT for 3.5 years of estrogen only after Hysterectomy. Family hx of breast cancer. My sister had modified radical mastectomy at age 24 or so. Maternal uncle had BC in his 40's and maternal Aunt in her 70's. We have a recently discovered genetic mutation.

  • PontiacPeggy
    PontiacPeggy Member Posts: 6,778
    edited April 2016

    Wow. You can sure tell that there is no one profile that says you'll get BC!

    For those of you who haven't participated, please consider doing the Health Of Women Study. it is trying to figure out common denominators for BC among other things. It's part of Dr Susan Love's Foundation.

    HUGS!

  • Moondust
    Moondust Member Posts: 510
    edited April 2016

    How true, Peggy! Cancer does what it wants, apparently, despite what we do/don't do.

    Sandy, I sympathize with your frustration at the anti-western medicine stuff invading your music space! I totally agree with your western medicine outlook. I do take a few things that haven't been conclusively proven to give benefit, such as glucosamine/chondroitin, but I won't claim that it is helping my joints because I really don't know. The SFSBM podcast and Skeptic's Guide to the Universe podcast are two of my favorites!

    Here's my history: menses at 11, two miscarraiges at age 35 & 36, first and only child at almost 39. Breastfed (and/or pumped) for six months. Dense breasts. No family history. Overweight my entire life until a few years ago. Highest wt 200 in college, average in the 160's-170's. Now I'm 124 with about 19% body fat and intend to stay that way! On "the pill" since age 16. At that time it was the higher dose pill. The only time I was off the pill was during my mid-to-late 30's while having a child. My periods never stopped into my late 50's. Finally at 59 my obgyn took me off the pill for a month to get a decent hormone reading and said I was in menopause. After a few weeks of hot flashes, I went on HRT until the day after my 61st birthday when I received my biopsy result.

    Recently the lovely country singer Joey Feek passed away from cervical cancer at age 40. She is another example of someone who let God be her pathologist. God does many jobs well, but not that one!

  • mustlovepoodles
    mustlovepoodles Member Posts: 2,825
    edited April 2016

    Wow, it seems like I had all the risk. First period at age 15 , first child at 30, last child at age 40, overweight 4 15 years, dense breasts, menopause at 57, fifth on my dad's side to have breast cancer, third on my mom's side to have breast cancer, 1 sister with breast cancer. PALB2 and Chek 2 mutations. Seems I was destined to get BC. The only wonder is that I didnt get it before now.

  • PontiacPeggy
    PontiacPeggy Member Posts: 6,778
    edited April 2016

    Moondust, when I started on the pill at 18 back in 1963/64 all we had was Enovid 10s. Then came 5s. Then a whole bunch of different birth control pills. I never did as well on the new ones as I did on the Enovids which seem to disappear. I'm amazed at how many of us here seem to be entering menopause so late in their 50s. Obviously being 45 didn't help me in that respect.

    Poodles, I can see why you are surprised you waited this long to get BC. The odds certainly were stacked against you from Day 1.

    HUGS!

  • Sloan15
    Sloan15 Member Posts: 896
    edited April 2016

    Here's the link. The thought is to screen all biopsied breast tissue, not just cancer tumors, for ki67. People with higher ki67 in normal breast tissue have a higher rate of cancer later on.


    http://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2016/04/new-...


    (On my phone so I hope link works)

Categories