Breast infection and "metal artifact" 2.5 years post-op

littleemmi
littleemmi Member Posts: 1
edited March 2016 in Pain

Hi everyone,

I had a bilateral mx with nipple sparing DIEP reconstruction 2.5 years ago. In the last few months I have noticed a red line on the side of one breast. 2 weeks ago I had dental work (crown and 2 fillings) in the span of 2 days. 2 days later I ran a high fever 103.2 with breast swelling/red streaks. 2 days later a inch long wound appeared around my nipple. I was treated for a breast infection which improved with antibiotics although not completely gone. I had an MRI which showed thickening in the skin of my effected breast with a "metal artifact".

So, I am questioning what is the metal in my breast. Also, is it something that should be there since it is only on one breast and if I should take antibiotics prior to dental work in the future.

Has anyone else had to deal with a breast infection long after surgery. Obviously, I am not breast feeding so it seems pretty bizarre to me. :)

Comments

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited March 2016
    Hi littleemmi, welcome to Breastcancer.org. We are sorry that the changes in your breast and worry about such have brought you here, but glad that you decided to join us and reach out. We're sorry we can't help you with this question, but we're sure you'll soon get responses from our incredibly welcoming, knowledgeable, and supportive members here!

    Best wishes,

    The Mods


  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited March 2016

    Hi littlemmi:

    I am sorry to hear this. I did not have reconstruction, and anyway have no knowledge about the materials, methods, and instruments used, but agree it seems suspicious in that it is seen in one breast only.

    Was the MRI that found the "metal artifact" performed at the same institution that performed your surgery 2.5 years ago? (Because if it were some sort of error, they may be less forthcoming due to concerns about liability.)

    BarredOwl

  • muska
    muska Member Posts: 1,195
    edited March 2016

    I think those are surgical clips that are intentionally left there to delineate exact location of removed tumor or auxiliary nodes. They should not cause any trouble. Have you asked your PS about this

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited March 2016

    Hi:

    Such clips have characteristic shapes and dimensions. Perhaps naively, I was thinking that the radiologist would use the term of art "clip" rather than "metal artifact", if that is what was actually seen.

    In your inquiries, you may wish to inquire: What are the dimensions of the "metal artifact" observed? Is it consistent with such a clip or not?

    I was under the impression that the artifact was in the breast, not the axilla, but perhaps I over-interpreted the description. In some procedures, clinically suspicious axillary nodes that are biopsied pre-surgery are marked by a clip to enable later removal in case the pathology shows malignancy. Such a marker may be left behind if the node biopsy result is benign (and the node is not later determined to be a sentinel node during SNB).

    In some axillary staging procedures (e.g., with prophylactic mastectomy), sentinel node(s) are mapped and marked with clip(s), but not removed unless invasive disease is found upon surgical pathology. If no invasive disease is found, the node(s) would be left in place, along with the clip(s). These would usually be located in/near the axilla.

    In contrast, during routine SNB concurrent with mastectomy, the sentinel nodes are removed upon identification. To my knowledge (and I could be wrong), the site of SNB removal (usually in the axilla) is not routinely marked. I was under the impression that if further axillary clearance were needed, it is not targeted by pre-placed marker(s).

    Surgical clips are also used during biopsies to mark the site of biopsy in the breast. A clip placed at a site found to be benign would not need to be removed. However, with bilateral mastectomy one would ordinarily expect all such markers to be removed (whether the biopsy was proven malignant or benign). My surgical pathology report refers to "silver metallic clips" present in the tissue removed.

    If you know that clips were placed during any procedure you had, you can check your surgical pathology report from bmx to see if they are mentioned and accounted for. Rarely, clip migration is observed, so it might theoretically be possible that a migrated clip was left behind in bmx. Please continue to inquire until you receive answers to your satisfaction.

    BarredOwl

  • besa
    besa Member Posts: 1,088
    edited March 2016

    Very smal titamium clips are routinely used to stop bleeding during surgery and are not removed.

    I have a DIEP reconstruction and an still monitored with mammograms (and have had MRIs of my reconstruction) Looking at the mammogram image I can always see multiple clips in my reconstruction. Multiple surgical clips are also left in the donor site and showed up on an x ray of my donor area. This is routine and normal and has never been flagged as a problem. I do not take prophylactic antibiotics before dental procedures or for any other reason .

    Have you talked to a diep ps about this current problem?

    I don't know if the metal "artifact" mentioned in your report is a titanium clip or clips. In my imaging reports, the clips seen are reported as "surgical clips" but the imaging facilities I have used are familiar with imaging tissue reconstructions.

Categories