Fibroadenoma

Options
temiller78
temiller78 Member Posts: 8
edited April 2016 in Benign Breast Conditions

I got my results and it is a fibroadenoma. Question, are these normally removed? I saw in ladies over 40 they are and I'm almost 40.

Comments

  • MelissaDallas
    MelissaDallas Member Posts: 7,268
    edited March 2016

    It kind of depends on how big it is and if it bother you or not. It is a trade-off: Occassionally other stuff might grow later and hide behind and not show on a mammogram, but having them removed creates scarring in your breast that makes future mammograms harder to read.

  • temiller78
    temiller78 Member Posts: 8
    edited March 2016

    That makes sense. I have a mass underneath it that they also believe to be one as well. I go back in 3 months for an ultrasound and if the bottom one grows, I have to go through another biopsy. There seems to be the same pros/cons.

  • Supportive
    Supportive Member Posts: 81
    edited March 2016

    only removed if it continues to grow

    Most doctors have a wait and watch

  • teriberibin
    teriberibin Member Posts: 2
    edited March 2016

    I battled fibroadenomas from the time I was 17. I am now 61. At first, all of my lumps were excised. As time went on, we attempted to just monitor them for growth. If they grew, they were removed.

    A total of eight were removed bilaterally. One had infiltrated my chest wall. We were erring on the side of caution because my grandmother, her sister, and two second cousins had or died from BC. The problem with removal is the scar tissue.

    By age 59, after losing my mom to OC, my uncle to prostate cancer, and unable to have an MRI with contrast, I decided it was time to take the BRCA test. I knew in my heart it would positive and I was correct: BRCA 2 positive (my daughter tested negative, thank goodness). I had a double prophylactic mastectomy and oomphectomy/salpingectomy (already had my uterus removed). I finished reconstruction in Oct 2015, with nipple tattoos by Vinnie Meyers.

    So unless you have a family history of BC or have tested positive for BRCA, I would try to monitor any fibroadenoma, after a confirming core needle biopsy, as the scar tissue from excision can make it difficult to be followed. I had five core needle biopsies in one day because I could not have an MRI and there was so much "junk" showing up on the ultrasound and mammogram. So my next step was clear as I was too hard to monitor.

  • portia369
    portia369 Member Posts: 1
    edited March 2016

    I'm glad that you posted this.

    When I was 17, I had my first fibroadenoma removed from my right breast. About 6-7 years later, I discovered another lump but this time, it was in my left breast. Subsequently, I've noticed 3 more plus a newly formed one in the right breast. I've been delaying getting them checked out because I've just kept assuming that they were all fibroadenomas and harmless. Your post has made me realise that I need to make a doctor's appointment asap. So thank you! I hope everything works out for you.


  • alroughto
    alroughto Member Posts: 1
    edited April 2016

    Hello, Im 18 years old, Ive just been told I need to get ultra sounds because they think they have found Fibroadenomas on my left breast, my doctor said they seem very firm, so I'm worried but they are very painful, the pain radiates up into my arm pit aswell.

    Im very confused as to what might be going on, and need a but of help wrapping my head around everything. I know it say they may not become cancerous, but what if they do?

    thanks.

  • MelissaDallas
    MelissaDallas Member Posts: 7,268
    edited April 2016

    alroughto, I'm sorry you are worried, but fibroadenomas are very common in teens and young women. They are benign-they don't turn into cancer. 60% of women have fibrocystic breasts, so more do then don't

Categories