cytology misinterpretation possibility?

Options
Supportive
Supportive Member Posts: 81

had a core biopsy 10 yrs ago that came up fibroadenoma. It was a very invasive one and i remember it being uncomfortable

I had the same lump rebiopsied 2 weeks ago and the result came back papilloma

A bit confused

Comments

  • MelissaDallas
    MelissaDallas Member Posts: 7,268
    edited February 2016

    I'm not sure what you mean by "invasive" because fibroadenomas are benign and not invasive. A fibroadenoma does not "change into" a papilloma. One is just denser "fibrous" breast tissue while the other is a "warty" type growth within a duct. There would be nothing to prevent two kinds of growths in the same segment of your breast though.

  • Supportive
    Supportive Member Posts: 81
    edited February 2016

    sorry i meant the biopsy was very painful the first time

    This is what confused me the first biopsy was more definitive being core and came back fibroadenoma

    Now they say pipalloma from an fna 10 years later and i am going in to get it excised there is only 1 lump

  • leaf
    leaf Member Posts: 8,188
    edited February 2016

    We don't know a lot about how different breast conditions evolve over time. So as far as I know, we don't know how a papilloma forms. We all want to know 'Why did this happen to me?'. Lots of times we just don't know. Its hard to live with this uncertainty, but I would guess that since we (probably) don't know how a papilloma forms, it would be more likely that the papilloma just happened rather than they mis-interpreted the cytology. Lots can happen in 10 years.

    The good news is that you're taking care of it now, no matter how or when it formed.

  • Supportive
    Supportive Member Posts: 81
    edited March 2016

    excised and result was fibroadenoma so it was not a papilloma after all that

    Guess goes to show that fnab does have small inaccuracies possibly

Categories