Recurrence after bilat mastectomy?

Options
1242527293038

Comments

  • OceanSky
    OceanSky Member Posts: 165
    edited June 2018

    MinusTwo, Did your MO order an ultrasound before the PET scan? If so, what did the ultrasound show? It seems most MO's don't order a PET scan before doing other investigative tests prior. It's great though that you got the PET scan! I know of one woman who had BC, had a PET scan a few years later and it showed cancer in her thymus gland. It was completely unrelated to the BC, but a very difficult cancer in itself.

    The radiologist who examined my ultrasound scans and then came in and did an exam and ultrasound himself told me that he could have a surgeon 'feel it' but his opinion was what I already shared. He said he couldn't see 'anything' on ultrasound or in the mammogram so he felt good about it.

    Chostrochondral cartiledge does not show on ultrasound. My lump is still there but I'm comfortable with his explanation, even though it's odd. It's confusing to me why I and the MO would be feeling cartiledge under the implant. I'll ask her about it when I see her.



  • MinusTwo
    MinusTwo Member Posts: 16,634
    edited January 2016

    Ocean Sky - I've actually had 5 PET/CTs through out the process. Original diagnosis was with ULS biopsy, then the original mastectomy. Recurrence was again diagnosed with a ULS & ULS biopsy 2 years later (4 months after a totally clear breast MRI), and he sent me right to the PET/CT before starting neoadjucant chemo. I then had a PET half way through that chemo & at the end of the first chemo before ALND surgery. Since I didn't have a pCR with the first chemo, I did some more rounds of other chemo drugs, then another PET after that. And finally one last PET after I finished the year of Herceptin. I loved my MO, but he retired in Dec 2014. He told me I'd probably have to fight to get any testing done. Yup - I'm arguing with the new one about why I want another follow up PET 2 years later. Throughout the process there have been several CT scans and MRIs, but they were to target specific areas for treatment that were identified with the PET.

  • 4My3kids
    4My3kids Member Posts: 34
    edited January 2016

    My BS and Oncologist are also both very anti-test.  My BS believes the ultrasound is a very good tool but I worry that it can't view the muscle and other aspects of the reconstruction.  I have had two breast MRIs in four years (had to beg for) and the reports are negative.  Having said that, my original cancer was completely missed on all imaging and the only clue was my persistent pain.  If my BS didn't trust my gut and do an open biopsy that I actually drew the line where the pain was...I have no idea when the imaging would have demonstrated the cancer.  It's exhausting having to stay 10 steps ahead of this beast (disease).  My heart breaks for women denied testing due to their insurance or lack there of.

  • 4My3kids
    4My3kids Member Posts: 34
    edited January 2016

    Oceansky, it's impressive the radiologist came out and personally evaluated your concern.   That has only happened once in the almost six years I have been dealing with this.  It's hard to have total confidence in the technician when it's not their naming signing the report.  My oncologist who wins all the awards and acknowledgements in the city says ultrasounds after mastectomy would almost certainly demonstrate something sinister.  

  • OceanSky
    OceanSky Member Posts: 165
    edited June 2018

    MinusTwo, I had to Google ULS biopsy. So you had an ultrasound and they did a biopsy after the BMX & before the PET scan? Amazing they did one 4 months after a clear MRI? Very impressive, don't you think in retrospect or not? I'd really like to hear more if you care to share how that happened. Meaning about the process. It's hard for me to remember all the steps of my original DCIS dx and surgeries, and I realize your journey has been a long one. I don't want to probe too much...Am trying to follow your journey.

    4mykids, yes, I was happy the radiologist came out and did the exam himself, (I was very glad he actually used his hands and not just imaging) but I must share that I'm seen at a cancer center in a large city. The radiologist is only seeing breast cancer patients, so am guessing this is more common than not in this facility. The MO there felt the lump herself and noted it as a 'palpable mass' so that's a good reason for a oncology radiologist to present himself when the tech doesn't have a finding.

    He used the word 'inflammatory' and I said 'I feel inflammatory'...I'd also reported severe rib pain on the cancer foob side. Rib pain is also found in non-cancer patients and is an imflammatory condition known as costochondritus. I'd reported that to the MO and am guessing it was in her notes. That's what I meant by feeling 'inflammatory...the rib pain'...Not the lump.

    Bottom line...I'll be watching this cartilage lump. As the radiologist said, 'we can have a surgeon look at it'...But the fact that it was not 'seen' on ultrasound or mammogram (I didn't even know they did mammograms of implants!) was significant to me.

    I'll also be reading more about other peoples experience. That's been a great teaching guide.


  • MinusTwo
    MinusTwo Member Posts: 16,634
    edited January 2016

    Ocean - A yearly mammogram led to the first biopsy. The biopsy was an ultrasound guided biopsy to get a firm diagnosis, which was DCIS, which led to surgery #1. Two years after the original BMX & the later reconstruction & clear MRI, I found a lump under my collar bone. The MO wanted to do another MRI. I voted for an ultrasound (ULS) and they did an ultrasound guided biopsy right then & diagnosed IDC. The first PET/CT after that time was to determine if I the cancer had recurred only in my lymph system, or if it was a chest wall recurrence, or if it had already metastasized to other areas of my body so they could address a treatment plan. That led to chemo, surgery, more chemo, radiation & Herceptin for year. Luckily - so far I'm still NED - again. (NED = no evidence of disease). Because it was a recurrence & I didn't have a complete response to chemo, that's why they kept checking. You're not probing too much & I'm am sorry I didn't make it more clear.

    BTW - none of my docs do mammograms on implants, but every doc is different.

  • OceanSky
    OceanSky Member Posts: 165
    edited June 2018

    Makes sense. That's how I was dx with IDC. I had a core biopsy,and it was also ultrasound guided. I just wasn't familiar with the acronym ULS.

    I didn't realize that mets to lymphs was stage 111B, I assumed any mets was stage 4.

    Radiologists don't usually do mammograms on implants, but as I said this is a large University cancer center with 5 MO's who treat BC patients only. They do a mammogram on a breast implant if they find a lump and are having trouble imaging it on ultrasound. They put a marker on the skin surface and put very light pressure on the implant as a secondary way of imaging. They said they do it 'all the time', so it's nothing like a regular mammogram and they certainly don't do yearly mammograms on implants after BMX. Just another form of imaging without advancing to CT or MRI.

    Hope you're doing well now and feeling good!


  • KBeee
    KBeee Member Posts: 5,109
    edited January 2016

    I have had mammograms with implants. I had one after my biopsy to make sure hte clip was in place. They also did one after my recurrence was found. It does not squish well,but they do the best they can.

    Lymph node mets are not necessarily stage 3. A small tumor with just 1 or 2 nodes involved will still be stage 2. Stage IV is when it has spread to distant sites.

  • MinusTwo
    MinusTwo Member Posts: 16,634
    edited January 2016

    LBeee is correct about the staging. I am Stage 3C for a number of reasons. The new cancer in the lymph nodes was finally called a recurrence (even though I no longer have breasts) and not mets

  • AmyA
    AmyA Member Posts: 70
    edited January 2016

    Hi Jules. Thank you for your post.

    I too am very curious about my Tamoxifen metabolite levels. My now fired medical oncologist refused to even think about doing the test. I have a meeting with a new one on Monday. I have been the exception to the rule over and over in my cancer journey. Your words hit home.

    Thank you.


  • Bcky
    Bcky Member Posts: 167
    edited January 2016

    I had a micromet in my lymph node. I was still considered Stage One. The micromet was so tiny they considered it a negative node.

  • mysunshine48
    mysunshine48 Member Posts: 1,480
    edited January 2016

    Anyone ever heard of a stitch granuloma? I have a small lump at 3:00 on my right breast and went today to my BS to see what he thought about it. He did an ultrasound in the office and thinks it is a stitch granuloma from where the PS put in the alloderm for my implants. He was not too concerned and is having me come back in 3 months to see if it changes. If it does, he will do a fine needle biopsy. I sure hope he is right!!!

  • KBeee
    KBeee Member Posts: 5,109
    edited January 2016

    I think they are common. It's where an internal stitch does not dissolve completely, so your body makes scar tissue around it.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2016

    I was just diagnosed with a recurrence after a double mast. The biopsy said NO, but when the lump was taken out and sent to Pathology, I was called back to the surgeon today and found out it was cancer after all. It sucks.

  • Mommyathome
    Mommyathome Member Posts: 1,111
    edited January 2016

    barbe1958,

    Was your cancer before invasive or Dcis? Lcis

  • MinusTwo
    MinusTwo Member Posts: 16,634
    edited January 2016

    Oh Barbe - I'm so sorry. I remember reading your posts before my own recurrence. Hope it's a minor recurrence (WTH - that sounds dumb but you know what I mean).

  • OceanSky
    OceanSky Member Posts: 165
    edited August 2016

    Uggg Barbie, am so sorry you're dealing with this.

    Am glad that they removed the lump when the biopsy said 'no cancer'. Can't imagine why the biopsy didn't show it, but it goes to show that anything can and does happen.

    Sending good thoughts...

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2016

    It's often said here that the best lump is the lump in a jar!

    I asked if it was in situ and the surgeon said no, invasive. In fact, there was dirty margins and he has to go back in and scoop more out but he wants me to get a CT and bone scan first.

  • Mommyathome
    Mommyathome Member Posts: 1,111
    edited January 2016

    was ur original diagnosis in 2008 invasive

  • KBeee
    KBeee Member Posts: 5,109
    edited January 2016

    Sorry you are dealing with this again.

  • jill47
    jill47 Member Posts: 351
    edited January 2016

    Barbe - I so remember you when I first joined the boards you were so helpful and encouraging, It breaks me heart to see you recurred. Correct me if I'm wrong but I remember you saying that you had lots of bumps and lumps after bmx b/c of scar tissue and they didn't really seem to bother you, what was it about this "lump" that lead to a biopsy? Did you go straight to bx or did u/s or mri read the lump as possible cancer? Hugs, Jill

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2016

    I actually got those "lumps and bumps" removed and sent to pathology about 3 years ago as there were just too many. This lump seemed to grow up between 2 ribs and grew quickly. I first found it in October and called my doc but he was away so I had to wait a couple of weeks. Then when I called they said I had to see the nurse instead! Then I had to wait for ultrasound...sigh. Then had to wait for a surgeon who ordered the biopsy to know whether he was going in deep or easy. When the biopsy came back benign he took the lump out with local freezing only and I got to see it. He said I didn't have to see him again. My husband took the call for me to come in this week and I "knew" but my DH said it was only a follow-up and didn't believe me. He was blind-sided and pretty upset after the benign biopsy! Now I have to get a CT and bone scan and further surgery to dig deeper. Then an oncologist to see if radiation is needed or not.

    My first cancer was Papillary Carcinoma and though I had "dirty margins" it was considered stage 1 and "kind of in situ". Now it's not.

  • MelissaDallas
    MelissaDallas Member Posts: 7,268
    edited January 2016

    Hey Barbe! Nice to see you, but not for this reason

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2016

    Hey Mel!!!! How are YOU doing?? I thought I was done with you guys! LOL

  • MelissaDallas
    MelissaDallas Member Posts: 7,268
    edited January 2016

    Good, good. You been making anything interesting lately? I'm finishing up hand piecing a LeMoyne star top & getting ready to start a La Passacaglia English paper pieced one. I have officially lost my mind...it will probably take me ten years..

  • jill47
    jill47 Member Posts: 351
    edited January 2016

    Barbe - thank you so much for letting us know what happened up to your new diagnosis. I feel like getting all my lumpy scar tissue removed like you did 3 years ago, just so it's gone and peace of mind. Gosh I hope your tests and more surgery come up with nothing, just knowing it's back is enough.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2016

    Jill, I had 4 lumps total taken out. It was one in my abdomen that caught their attention the most, so I had them all taken out with just local freezing. Strangely all 4 had DIFFERENT pathologies! Most docs will just say "lipoma" and blow it off, but none of my 4 were that. Don't even remember what they were, but all benign. This new one they tried to say "scar tissue" but I've been dead flat for 7 years and knew this new lump was different. I don't check all the time and did it casually and was surprised to feel a difference. I had my DH check without saying anything first and he felt it, too.

  • Lucy55
    Lucy55 Member Posts: 3,044
    edited January 2016

    Barbe.. So sorry you are going through this again (Hugs)

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited January 2016

    Thanks Lucy. I still have a long way to go to find out how far it's spread. The biomarkers aren't even in yet to find if they have changed. What is frightening me a little bit (okay, a lot!) is that I've had vertigo for about 6-8 weeks now. Enough that I can't shower, I have to bathe.

  • bevin
    bevin Member Posts: 1,902
    edited January 2016

    Dear barbe

    So sorry for your recurrence. Im glad you sought attention and pray its contained and your scans are clear.

    For tour vertigo, I know you will mention but be sure to please advise tour onco. Could be a simple ear or sinus infection but good to mention it.

    Good luck and keep us posted.

Categories