misdiagnosed as b9 cancer sat for years

Options
Jojo0529
Jojo0529 Member Posts: 193

Hi ladies,

I am doing well, with the exception of the voice in my head that tells me I should not be. I wonder if I am truly an anomaly, or if anyone else has a similar situation. I had a large tumor (2.5cm) that lay in my breast for years ( either misdiagnosed as b9, or turned cancerous). I am so sick of hearing about early detection. Money and resources need to go toward preventing, or healing recurrence/mets. Anyway, my lymph nodes were negative. I am er/pr strongly positive. Onco 17, Miotic rate of 1, scary ki-67 of 25. grade 2/3. I am thrilled with the negative nodes, but I obsess over how it could sit and not spread, when some women have a tumor for a few months that spreads. Has anyone else had a tumor for a long time?

Comments

  • muska
    muska Member Posts: 1,195
    edited January 2016

    Well, I was monitored for a dozen years for what appeared to be b9 changes. Eventually, was diagnozed - see my profile below - and the doctors told me the cancer most likely had been there for 6-7 years prior to diagnosis.

  • Jojo0529
    Jojo0529 Member Posts: 193
    edited January 2016

    hello muska,

    thank you for the reply. I am so angry that my tumor sat. Why did I listen to the doctor??? I guess that is what is meant by hindsight is 20/20.

  • mustlovepoodles
    mustlovepoodles Member Posts: 2,825
    edited January 2016

    I strongly suspect that my tumor was missed for as long as 2 years. It was located high in the breast, nearly under my arm, so I think they just didn't see it or that the tissue may not have made it into the mammogram pic. Anyway, they found it this past July and it was 1.8cm, so about the size of a lima bean. To me, that's a decent size tumor to miss, considering that my sister's BC was a mere 2mm. Am I mad? Not really. Perhaps a leetle put out. But given the location, I can see how it could have been missed.

    I can't spend a lot of energy dwelling on this. The tumor was there, the lumpectomy and re-excision got it out. Now, on to the next thing.

  • Jojo0529
    Jojo0529 Member Posts: 193
    edited January 2016
    • hello mustlove, thank you for the reply. mine was high also. my primary said it was not breast tissue and was b9. Maybe this was meant to be my journey. I need to stop obsessing over thefact that it was just sitting there on my chest. I have heard that cancer is sometimes very slow. Mine started to change and I was finally diagnosed and treated. I need to copy your attitude :)
  • Optimist52
    Optimist52 Member Posts: 302
    edited January 2016

    I will admit to a certain amount of bitterness and resentment towards the private breast clinic where I have been going annually for 12 years. Each year mammograms and ultrasounds missed my 4cm ILC tumour that was found by me in June last year. Only an MRI could see it. The thing that has really pissed me off is that I had a previous ILC at age 40 in 2003 (again found by me). Why didn't anyone tell me that these are often not seen by mammogram and US and arrange for me to have regular MRIs? I also had some clinical symptoms which I mentioned to the breast physician in 2014 which were ignored. I put my trust in them and was let down. We have to be extremely proactive with this disease.

  • Nancy2581
    Nancy2581 Member Posts: 1,234
    edited January 2016

    I strongly feel my 2.8cm tumor was missed. I faithfully every year did my mammograms. How then did I end up with a 2.8cm tumor (grade 1, mitotic rate 1) with one lymph node involved. Even when I was diagnosed it wasn't really seen on my mammogram. My ob/gyn felt a lump and the ultrasound is what showed it. So yeah, I'm a little peeved and I don't trust mammos. I insist on an ultrasound every 6 months.

    Nancy

  • marijen
    marijen Member Posts: 3,731
    edited January 2016

    MLP 1.8 cm is .70+ inches or nearly 3/4 of an inch.

  • Jojo0529
    Jojo0529 Member Posts: 193
    edited January 2016

    thank you for the reply... My lump was obvious but I was told it was definitely benign ... Wish I would have gotten a second opinion 4 yrs ago... Mine was high and close to the skin... Also, I had dense breasts. I guess the manis were useles

  • grammakathy
    grammakathy Member Posts: 407
    edited January 2016

    My 2cm tumor was seen in a mammogram the year before my diagnosis of BC but dismissed as not a problem, while what ended up being a cyst received an ultrasound that year instead. I received the standard "come back in a year" letter and didn't know to ask to see the report written by the person who reviewed the mammogram. There it was. Nothing would have changed but I wouldn't have delayed my call back appointment in 2013 if I had known they had seen something the previous year. I was expecting it to be another false alarm.


  • Jojo0529
    Jojo0529 Member Posts: 193
    edited January 2016

    thank you... Sorry it was missed, but it is nice to not be alone

  • BethL
    BethL Member Posts: 286
    edited January 2016

    3 years ago I had a 3d mammogram. Radiologist said there were new calcifications that needed to be biopsied. I transferred to where I was previously treated because of insurance issues. The radiologist there said she didn't see anything to biopsy. I had an MRi and one every year since. Then last February I was called in after the MRI showed "something". That biopsy came back b9, fat necrosis presumed from previous radiation. Then in August, a drop of blood came out of my nipple. Had another MRI, mammogram, ductogram and ultrasound - all said no sign of malignancy. Since it was bleeding they did a ductal excision to relieve the bleeding. Guess what? IDC, DCIS and Pagets. I feel if I had followed up with the 1st place I may have gotten diagnosed before idc developed. Thank goodness there was nipple discharge, otherwise I would have gone another year,

  • Jojo0529
    Jojo0529 Member Posts: 193
    edited January 2016

    thank you Bethl. Sorry it happened to you, but thank you for helping me realize it happens... I wish I would not have listened to the first dr. I guess it is easy to listen when the news is good

  • sandcastle
    sandcastle Member Posts: 587
    edited January 2016

    It, happened to ME!!!  Results of biopsy was B9......the Breast Doctor said all was FINE??!!! But my Mamo was Level 6.....my Gyno kept questioning this.....the Breast Doctor was one of the BEST??!!!  Then six months later the Mamo was OK??  but the radiology dept at the hospital said I needed a MRI......the Breast Doctor said NO!! This is not Cancer.....here we go down the road and I Fired the Breast Doctor and moved on.....new Breast Doctor did a Excisional and we did a MRI....THERE it was......So when I hear girls that are jumping up and down with B9!!! I wonder......always keep an opened mind.....Liz

  • Jojo0529
    Jojo0529 Member Posts: 193
    edited January 2016

    thank you sandcastle.

  • car2tenn
    car2tenn Member Posts: 515
    edited January 2016

    For sure count me in the group that has some bitterness. I had 3 mammograms in 5 years. The last one was after the gynecologist said she felt "something". The radiologist found nothing. Unfortunately I found a lump 8 weeks later- stage 4. I don't care if it is hard to find, that is their job and they should refer more of us for Breast MRI's instead of sending us home until it spreads. And so it goes, many many things wrong in the breast cancer field.

    Carolyn from Music City

  • Jojo0529
    Jojo0529 Member Posts: 193
    edited January 2016

    I agree.. My lump was obvious... Dr didn't refer for a biopsy...

Categories