Cancer free but high risk

Options
daisymay55
daisymay55 Member Posts: 9
edited December 2015 in High Risk for Breast Cancer

I was diagnosed with breast cancer in august and had a lumpectomy October 16th. Due to the size of the lump, I am considered stage 2 but there was no sign of cancer in the lymph nodes the doctor removed. I am waiting for confirmation as there was a mixup on my pathology report but it would appear the I am HER2 receptor positive which puts me a high risk for recurrence. The oncologist is recommending chemotherapy, radiation and then hormonal therapy.

I am very confused. I have had three different doctors tell me I am cancer free but because of the HER2, the doctor wants to give me drugs that will potentially make me sick to minimize my chances of getting sick? He couldn't really tell me if or when the cancer would return, but did say that it would be incurable if or when it did. He also couldn't tell me for sure that it wouldn't recur with the chemotherapy treatment he was recommending.

Has anyone been in this situation. What would you do?

Comments

  • marijen
    marijen Member Posts: 3,731
    edited December 2015

    I would insist on a new pathology report with a new specimen if that's possible?

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited December 2015

    Hi daisymay:

    Assuming any confusion about the pathology report and your ER, PR, and HER2 status is cleared up to your satisfaction and the findings confirmed as hormone responsive (ER+ and/or PR+) and HER2+, Stage II, purely node negative (N0), then a recommendation for lumpectomy + radiation, chemotherapy plus trastuzumab (HERCPETIN), and hormonal (endocrine) therapy seems reasonable.

    The surgery and radiation are "loco-regional" treatments, directed at removing cancer from the breast. I think your doctors are saying that after the lumpectomy (plus radiation) and negative nodes, they feel that they have successfully removed the local cancer. However, even with node negative invasive disease, there is a risk that before the surgery, some cancer cells already escaped the area and moved to distant sites via the blood or lymph. Your team views this risk as placing you at high risk of distant recurrence. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy (trastuzumab for HER2+ disease) are systemic treatments and are designed to address the risk that some cells moved to distant sites.

    If you are Stage II and purely node negative (N0), then size-wise, the tumor must be greater than 2 centimeters. Please advise if that is not correct.

    For hormone receptor positive, HER2-positive, node negative (N0) ductal (IDC) or lobular carcinoma (ILC) where the tumor is greater than 1 centimeter, the consensus guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) (Professional version 1.2016) provide the following treatment:

    "Adjuvant endocrine therapy + adjuvant chemotherapy with trastuzumab (category 1)"

    The recommendation you received is in line with consensus treatment guidelines.

    However, if you have doubts, or would like additional input and discussion, you may wish to seek second opinion from a medical oncologist at an independent institution. You could also discuss any issues with the pathology report with the second opinion, and get input on whether they have been adequately resolved, or if not, what steps may be needed to be certain of the pathology.

    This "high risk" thread is more for people at high risk of getting cancer, as compared to those already diagnosed with Stage II HER2+ disease (at higher risk for recurrence). For more input from other HER2+ members, please try a new thread in the HER2-positive forum:

    https://community.breastcancer.org/forum/80

    If you are triple-positive (ER+ PR+ HER2+), try this thread:

    https://community.breastcancer.org/forum/80/topics...

    BarredOwl

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited December 2015

    Daisymay:

    Was your initial biopsy also HER2-positive?

    BarredOwl

  • windingshores
    windingshores Member Posts: 704
    edited December 2015

    Daisymay,

    The doctors say we are "cancer free" when the surgery gets all the tumor out with adequate margins. However, this does not necessarily mean we are cancer free. There might be cancer cells floating in our system somewhere that could cause trouble later, and HER2+ makes that more of a potential problem. ER+ and PR+ are good though, giving you the tool of hormonal therapy after the other treatments.

    I had conflicting HER2 results between biopsy and post-surgery pathology. If you have any doubts, find a doctor who will retest. They can retest with more cells, in a more thorough manner.

    If you have other health problems, you might be able to adjust your treatment somehow, but right now this is definitely the best way to go: radiation, chemo, Herceptin and hormonal therapy.

    None of us KNOWS we are cancer free. I wish the MD's would be careful how they put things sometimes!!


  • 614
    614 Member Posts: 851
    edited December 2015

    Dear BarredOwl and Windingshores:

    You both answered Daisymay55's question so eloquently and informatively.  You both have a wealth of information.


     

  • daisymay55
    daisymay55 Member Posts: 9
    edited December 2015

    I am not really sure. I don't recall the surgeon saying anything other than it was early stages and the prognosis looked good.

  • daisymay55
    daisymay55 Member Posts: 9
    edited December 2015

    The tumour was 3.5 centimeters. The oncologist is saying chemo first than radiation?

  • daisymay55
    daisymay55 Member Posts: 9
    edited December 2015

    Thank you all for your information. I am terrified of having chemo!! It seems that now the pathology report has been cleared up, there seems to be some urgency that I get started with the chemo. The oncologist wanted me to start this week, but I need to talk to him again first because I still have so many questions. I just can't wrap my head around needing to go through what seems to be quite a tiresome regiment, not really knowing what will happen on the other side. I have been healthy my whole life. It all seems like such a crap shoot. Perhaps the chemo, etc will help, perhaps it won't? If I opt out of treatment, than what?

  • 614
    614 Member Posts: 851
    edited December 2015

    Please do not opt out of tx.  The cancer will grow and spread if you are not treated.  The treatment sounds scary but it should save your life.  Tx is much easier the earlier that you have it and survival rates are high with no lymph node involvement. Don't let fear get in your way.  No one knows what the future holds.

    I am sending you prayers for strength, courage, and healing.  Good luck.

  • mustlovepoodles
    mustlovepoodles Member Posts: 2,825
    edited December 2015

    And I just want to jump in here and encourage you. I have found chemo not to be the Big Terrible that I imagined it would be. Sure, there have been some side effects. My hair fell out on Day 17, so now i wear hats and a cute wig. Things taste pretty weird for the first 14 days after chemo. I have had enough diarrhea that I take something every day to keep it in control (no accidents~!) The fatigue has been pretty tough at times. I've had to go to the ER a couple times for high fevers, and got antibiotics. But for the most part, my life goes on pretty much normally.

    The big thing for me has been the fatigue. When it hits, I could lay down right in the road. But I'm not sleepy. Just bone weary. It has affected me during this holiday season because I just don't have the stamina to really cook like I normally would. Most Christmases, I'm in the kitchen every day making cookies and pies. This year, Pepperidge Farm is making my cookies. Just as well--cookies taste weird to me right now. I've been fortunate to have friends who have brought in meals from time to time, especially during chemo weeks.

    Anyway, that's my way of trying to say, hang in there. None of us wants to have chemo, radiation or surgery, but here we are. My particular cancer is moderately aggressive, plus I have 2 gene mutations, so my MO is being VERY aggressive with my treatment. Do I love it? well, no. But I want to give it all I've got, because as my MO told me, if it comes back it will be incurable. I can't control whether it will recur or when, but by golly! I'll do everything in my power to NOT have to go through all this again, if at all possible!

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited December 2015

    Hi Daisymay:

    Thanks for confirming the size as 3.5 cm. Size-wise only that is "T2" size tumor, and (as N0, M0) is Stage IIA. What I said above is correct.

    The radiation is required as part of the local treatment (radiation plus lumpectomy).

    For Stage IIA, ductal or lobular carcinoma, hormonal therapy and chemotherapy with trastuzumab (also known as HERCEPTIN) is standard of care for hormone-responsive, HER2+ disease.

    The hormonal therapy can help prevent the development of additional cancers in the breast. In addition, because it is a systemic treatment, hormonal therapy can help somewhat to limit the growth of cells that may have escaped to distant sites.

    Chemotherapy and trastuzumab are systemic treatments that can kill or cause killing of cancer cells that may have escaped to distant sites. Trastuzumab also inhibits growth of HER2-positive cells. Their major benefit is in reducing the risk of distant recurrence.

    Trastuzumab (Herceptin) was specifically developed to target HER2-positive disease. It is an antibody molecule and seeks out HER2-positive cells specifically. So it is tolerated pretty well, in general. It has changed the landscape for HER2-positive patients in a dramatic way. Today, the vast majority of patients with HER2-positive disease greater than 1 cm receive this treatment.

    As your doctor explained, without chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, you are at high risk for a distant recurrence. Such a distant recurrence would be Stage IV disease, which as you doctor said is incurable. Stage IV patients undergo treatment until their disease worsens ("progression"), requiring a different treatment, and so on. Unfortunately, many do not survive very long. Chemotherapy plus trastuzumab can potentially prevent this. I agree with 614 that the risk/benefit analysis with HER2-positive disease weighs very strongly in favor of treatment.

    My understanding is that chemotherapy is generally done before radiation. However, please introduce yourself and ask this question by posting a reply in the discussion at this link, where you can meet "triple positive" (ER + PR+ HER2+) patients like you:

    https://community.breastcancer.org/forum/80/topics...

    That you are healthy in general is good, and you may tolerate treatment better. Today, there are many supportive treatments that help patients tolerate chemotherapy, such as very effective anti-nausea drugs. Patients work closely with their treatment teams to monitor symptoms, and address them as proactively as possible. But your best resource for this are the other "triple positive" (ER + PR+ HER2+) patients, many of whom have already completed these treatments and can support you and provide you with good information based on their personal experience.

    My best to you,

    BarredOwl

  • daisymay55
    daisymay55 Member Posts: 9
    edited December 2015

    To all of you who replied and provided more information, I thank you. I saw the doctor again today and he answered some questions. I will be starting chemo on January 5th. The oncologist advised today that the test results from my initial biopsy at the end of August were HER2 positive (I thought it was my path report after my surgery). But because of a "clerical error" and I guess the report not read thoroughly enough, the results showed negative. So, up until about three weeks ago, I believed all was good and I would be able to get by with radiation - chemo would not likely be necessary because of the good test results, no lymph node involvement and clear margins. It was quite a shock to go from that thinking to knowing that I am at high risk for recurrence. I am just hoping that with all the time that has gone by, I have not left it too late. I did have a chest xray and bone scan - both clear. So now we carry on and take one day at a time

  • mustlovepoodles
    mustlovepoodles Member Posts: 2,825
    edited December 2015

    It'll be okay. I'm sure it's disconcerting to go from one treatment plan to a new, more aggressive treatment plan. But I think that just knowing what comes next is kind of a relief from the not knowing-waiting game.

    Glad you can get a break over the holidays and then you'll be ready to get going on this. Good luck!

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited December 2015

    Hi Daisymay:

    I am glad you were able to get answers to your questions.

    Do you have copies of all of the pathology reports from biopsy and surgery, plus any addenda or supplemental pathology reports (often contain HER2 test results)? If not, please request copies of all as soon as possible and confirm what they are telling you.

    As you can see from windingshores reply, both her biopsy and surgical samples were tested for HER2.

    So, do you mean that your surgical pathology showed HER2+, which at first appeared inconsistent with the biopsy results. But when they went back and checked the pathology from the biopsy, they found it was actually also HER2+. So, both biopsy and surgical pathology are consistent and indicate HER2+.

    BarredOwl

  • 614
    614 Member Posts: 851
    edited December 2015


    I am so glad that you will be getting tx.  Good luck and happy holidays.

  • flaviarose
    flaviarose Member Posts: 442
    edited December 2015

    Just to chime in - Herceptin is a game changer - Her2 tumors previously had a very bad prognosis, now, with Herceptin, they have a very good prognosis. The problem is that they give Herceptin with more toxic drugs - I had the TCH combo. The Taxotere and Carboplatin were the things that gave me the terrible side effects. When I was on Herceptin alone, the side effects were negligible. I ended up needing the T and C at reduced dosages for my 4th - 6th treatments because I couldn't tolerate higher doses. If I had to do it over again, I would have asked for very minimal T and C doses. Apparently studies have shown that Herceptin works better when combined with the nasty stuff. Good luck to you!

Categories