DCIS, lumpectomy done and no Radiation needed?

Scsa
Scsa Member Posts: 26

hi! My pathology report after lumpectomy for DCIS came back good - and I will speak to BS more in depth this week, but seems no radiation will be recommended. I'm 44. Has this happened to anyone else? I'm glad but thought Rx is typically recommended. Wondering if this good news happened to anyone else?

Comments

  • sandcastle
    sandcastle Member Posts: 587
    edited November 2015

    I, am the same stage as you and Grade.....5 years next month.....but I had a Mastectomy....No Rads .... No Chemo....No Tamax.......Only did a Complete Hysterectomy....Liz

  • Annette47
    Annette47 Member Posts: 957
    edited November 2015

    It is unusual at your age (traditionally if you were under 70, radiation was standard), but I think it is becoming more and more common as people start to address the “over treatment” of DCIS. For peace of mind, ask them for their reasoning on recommending it vs. not recommending it.

  • lane4
    lane4 Member Posts: 175
    edited November 2015

    I, too, would be interested to hear the reason behind not recommending radiation therapy. I didn't really want to do radiation, but my BS told me that if I was over 70, I could get a pass on that (I was 48 at the time). This was in 2009 and my BS had completed a breast cancer fellowship at Yale University, so I trusted his recommendation. The choices presented to me were partial mastectomy + radiation or total mastectomy.

  • louishenry
    louishenry Member Posts: 417
    edited November 2015

    I had DCIS in 2007 and radiation was not recommended. My DCIS was grade 1-2 with no necrosis and was about 4-5  millimeters . 

    It was removed in biopsy and the lumpectomy was negative for any DCIS. 

    It seems common now to have radiation not be recommended if your DCIS is under 5mm and have no necrosis. 

     Tamoxifen was optional but I took it for 5 years. It was not a big deal. 

    Good luck  

  • OldOakTree
    OldOakTree Member Posts: 173
    edited November 2015

    Hi Scsa,

    I haven't been here for a while and just happened to come by today and am glad I did for I saw your post. I wonder if you have seen your breast surgeon yet and how the appointment went.

    I was diagnosed with DCIS 12.5 years ago at the age of 49 (actually I was 48 when I had the lumpectomy and 49 a week later when I got the results, happy birthday!!! but when they looked back at my previous mammo they saw calcifications on that but no one noted, so in reality I had DCIS at 47, not much older than you). I had a lumpectomy only, it was a small area, right around 4 mm and my margins were very good. I saw 3 or 4 or 5 different doctors and they generally agreed I did not need radiation, but could have it if I wanted it. The radiation oncologist was the only one who felt strongly that I should have it. I was also given the option of mastectomy (but was strongly discouraged from going that route) and tamoxifen. In the end I chose the lumpectomy only, no radiation, and no tamoxifen. So far, so good at 12 years, but the worry of a recurrence is always there on the back burner.

    Have you read about the Van Nuys Prognostic Index - you get 1-3 points for 4 different categories (size of DCIS, grade, margin size and age) and calculate your chance of recurrence from that. Based on your score you are given treatment recommendations. In the orginal VNPI age was not one of the factors, it was added in later, some doctors still use the old formula without age. And there are some doctors who don't use this at all, they say everyone gets radiation. Here is one link to the formula https://sites.google.com/site/dciswithoutrads/van-nuys-prognostic-index. Also if you do a search on DCIS and Melvin Silverstein and Michael Lagios you wil get some great information. There is a lot of debate out there as what to do with a smaller low/medium grade area of DCIS. Do what you can to inform yourself before making any decision. I'd strongly suggest getting a 2nd or 3rd opinion or even more if you aren't comfortable with what you have heard.

    One book I read was great - Assess Your True Risk of Breast Cancer by Patricia Kelly. I liked this book because it was mostly about DCIS, something that is hard to find when looking for breast cancer books. Only problem is that is is slightly outdated. It was written in 2000 so when I was diagnosed it was fairly new, but now it it 15 years old. Regardless, it still has good info.

    Let us know how your appt with the bs goes.

  • Quirky74747
    Quirky74747 Member Posts: 16
    edited November 2015

    I am 47 and was diagnosed with DCIS this year. I had a lumpectomy in Sept. Path report was good...it was small and big clean margins. Intermediate grade, no necrosis. We did Oncotype DX test and my score was very low (10). My RO said he wasn't recommending radiation based on 3 things: the size of the tumor being very small, the size of the margins being very large, and the low Oncotype score. I was comfortable skipping radiation based on this info. My surgeon had recommended doing rads, hormonal treatment, or both...not to just do nothing. My MO agreed and I began tamoxifen about 6 weeks ago. So far so good...no side effects at all. Hope this helps.

  • Scsa
    Scsa Member Posts: 26
    edited November 2015

    thank you everyone for your replies. I met with my BS this week. She said radiation was not necessary due to the small size and clean margins. My BS is at memorial Sloan Kettering cancer center and she said they have a lot of research following patients and the risks of radiation and fact can only do once out weight the benefits. I was also told I am a good candidate for tamoxifen. Will need to meet with another dr for this. Anyone know how soon after surgery it is that you should start tamoxifen? Also recommended was a follow up with the BS, MRI and mammogram in 6 months.

  • OldOakTree
    OldOakTree Member Posts: 173
    edited November 2015

    Hi Scsa, I'm glad to hear good news about your appt. I didn't have tamox so I can't answer your question. I do want to say that I also alternated MRI's with mammos every 6 months for about 7-8 years. I liked that extra bit of security that the MRI gave. The doctor who ordered that retired and then her replacement retired. The next doctor I saw didn't think the MRI was necessary, she said "you don't want all that radiation." Grrrrr . . . . . MRI's don't have radiation!!! Anyway, I now get a 3-D mammo once a year, hopefully that will be enough to catch anything. Again, great new you received :)

  • Annette47
    Annette47 Member Posts: 957
    edited November 2015

    I did have radiation and waited until a month after that to start the Tamoxifen, so surgery was in December and I didn't start Tamoxifen until April. You probably wouldn’t need to wait that long but I'd give it at least a week or two so you have time to recover from one thing before diving into another.

    I’ve never had an MRI - no one recommended it at any point along the process. Apparently my breasts are relatively easy to read on mammogram? I dunno - sometimes I wonder about it.

  • JerseyRenee01
    JerseyRenee01 Member Posts: 221
    edited December 2015

    i just went for my 2nd opinion yesterday at Penn in Phila. Here is what I just wrote on another thread.

    image

  • Annette47
    Annette47 Member Posts: 957
    edited December 2015

    Well, if you go with the Penn recommendations you could always move up to the more aggressive treatments later if needed, but if you start with a BMX there’s no going back if it turns out they may have been overkill.

  • JerseyRenee01
    JerseyRenee01 Member Posts: 221
    edited December 2015

    Annette47:

    This is what my husband wants me to do. He wants me to try Lumpectomy first, get Pathology then go from there.

    I guess I hesitating as I trying avoid more surgeries, stress & anxiety. If did Lumpectomy I think I will worry if something more growing. Even though I know that can happen with BMX too. 1st BS at MD Anderson also pointed out I had dense breasts too so monitoring after lumpectomy be harder. Penn Dr yesterday said that wouldnt be his reason not to do Lumpectomy. Penn seemed more eager for me to do Lumpectomy.

    I just don't know!

  • Scsa
    Scsa Member Posts: 26
    edited December 2015

    JerseyRenee... I tend to agree with your husband. When I first found out about the cancer cells I immediately thought BMX but then I learned more about DCIS. every doctor I spoke to thought that was a drastic measure for the diagnosis and more of an emotional response. As my BS from MSKCC said, you can always go back in and do more surgery but you can't go backwards and put your breast back on. Based on the pathology report she concluded no radiation needed (save it for if I really need at another time in future - hopefully not) and take Tamoxifen to reduce chance of new cancer. Good luck with your decision. edited to add that my DCIS area was very small. Now that I am a few weeks post lumpectomy you can not even see there was anything removed.

  • JerseyRenee01
    JerseyRenee01 Member Posts: 221
    edited December 2015

    Scsa:

    You are very right & makes sense! I just hate not knowing that other area! He said it would then mean invasion & stage 1. I just want to hope it from the biopsy knowing MRI does pick up everything!

    Worst case would be if it is invasion & Radiation is needed I then can do BMX.

    It is so hard choosing what is the best choice for us individually! I know how stressed & worried I have been these past 2 months! I just want to be done with it.

  • Scsa
    Scsa Member Posts: 26
    edited December 2015

    JerseyRenee... It's definitely hard and stressful knowing what the right choice is individually. The BS that brought me to my Dx scheduled my lumpectomy without really talking to me. I didn't love that. So I went for a second opinion and was not rushed. I chose a different surgeon. I was told I could wait another month or so but I wanted it to be done with so I could move on and stop wondering if something else would be found during surgery in the pathology report. Best of luck making the decision you are most comfortable with.


  • ChiSandy
    ChiSandy Member Posts: 12,133
    edited December 2015

    Renee, my cancer was 1.3cm, invasive and Grade 2. Even before making my decision (which was first suggested by the radiologist who did my biopsy--she remarked “you’ll be able to keep your breast”) I decided I wanted the least invasive surgery that would be effective. Even before meeting with my bs, I did some research (Drs. Love’s and Port’s breast cancer “Bibles”) and decided that I could more easily handle an easy outpatient surgery with a faster recovery and then radiation than I could deal with a mastectomy, drains and possible reconstruction. (In my case, for symmetry’s sake it would likely have been bilateral). I was quickly disabused of the notion that mastectomies--even bilateral--absolutely prevented getting breast cancer again (especially in those of us already diagnosed). My bs had me participate in a Mayo Clinic decision tree study during which I would periodically watch videos and be surveyed about how they influenced my treatment plans. Though the video did show a 3% risk of recurrence with mx vs. 6% with lx and rads, the 15-year survival rate was exactly the same (without taking systemic therapy into account). Seeing as how I’ll be 65 in a month, that’d get me to 80, well into seniorhood and almost to my statistical non-cancer lifespan.

    Radiation was more of an annoyance than an ordeal--the inconvenience of having to go every day (rearranging my schedule) and drive 20-30 min. each way was the worst part. I think that having been “under” for 7 hrs. getting breasts removed, abdomen sliced open to harvest tissue for reconstruction, and then dealing with much more pain, incision & drain care, and complications (or having to deal with tissue expanders and then going back for a second exchange-for-implants surgery)--plus the possibility of a less-than-optimal result--would’ve been far worse than a few days of moderate rest and then a few weeks of short daily radiation treatments. Neither option avoids the necessity for adjuvant systemic therapy anyway.

    Surgery is no picnic. DH’s summer adventures in hemicolectomy-and-herniorrhaphy land proved that. And I’ve gone through two knee replacements, which are not exactly walks (limps?) in the park until fully rehabbed. When it comes to surgery, unless it’s a matter of life & death (like a Whipple for pancreatic cancer, multiple bypass for severe coronary occlusive disease, or debulking for advanced ovarian) my motto is “less is more.” I will add my voice to the chorus of those saying you can always go back in and cut out more, but you can’t reverse the process.


  • JerseyRenee01
    JerseyRenee01 Member Posts: 221
    edited December 2015

    ChiSandy & SCSA

    Thank you for all of your time writing that! I was having a bad night last night. I go next week for the gene test results, i guess that could make my decision.

    I need to turn turn the "cancer" switch off for now. Tonight we are having my daughters 14th birthday party. 12 girls sleeping over! 😁

    I keep thinking the worst! Not knowing my definitive diagnosis until surgery scares me. I just turned 42 so that is where I worry with LX as I fear it will recur. I just want my quality of life back. I also realize with MX it much moreof a surgery with lots of pain. I have a friend going through it right now & just had her first fill.

    I was also dead set on MD Anderson with this BS until the communication started to upset me & the rushing. So then sought 2nd opinion at Penn. It was hard as I am starting over & didnt really have names. Most of everyone I know use BS from here in NJ at Md Anderson & dont cross bridge to Phila to Penn. The Penn Dr has credentials at a well known reputable hospital & does research & trials with DCIS. When I had MRI done through MD Anderson it was 2 weeks before I got results & that was cause I got it myself. They told me on my initial visit their pathologist will read my biopsy, to this day heard nothing. Gene testing done Oct 28 , again on my own had to contact about my results & now going next week.

    Saw Penn Dr Tuesday & yesterday Nurse Prac calls me to tell me their pathologist read biopsy & said still seeing DCIS but questioning other area which could be from biopsy, so in 2 days they were on top of it & called me. On my visit Tuesday was never rushed! Nurse prac spent an hour with me then Dr spent additional hour with me. I feel like I being treated by my "individual" cancer at Penn where at MD Anderson feel being treated as a reg cancer case.

  • Mikesgirl17
    Mikesgirl17 Member Posts: 260
    edited December 2015

    I was diagnosed with dcis in 2007 at the age of 34. I had a double mastectomy so I wouldn't have to hear the words "breast cancer" again. No radiation was recommended. In 2013 I felt something. The doctor couldn't even feel it. Had a biopsy.....It was triple negative breast cancer :/ I feel like if I had radiation it wouldn't have came back. They said that one cancerous cell must have been released during the initial lumpectomy and logged in my skin. Lucky me. This only happens to 1 in 5 women. Good luck to you. Just keep checking your breast and let the doctor know if you feel anything.

Categories