ILC-Specific Questions in Making Treatment Decision

12357

Comments

  • Nanka
    Nanka Member Posts: 97
    edited November 2015

    Hi Nash, the doc said that you may recur in your chest wall b/c of the location of the tumor...was the tumor way back in the breast? They got clear margins, didn't they?

  • nash
    nash Member Posts: 2,600
    edited November 2015

    Nanka, the original tumor in 2007 was up against the chest well. I had PLCIS growing into the pectoral muscle (on the MRI it looked as if I had extensive chest wall invasion, but it was PLCIS, not PILC), and the surgeon removed a layer of muscle to get clean margins. So, yes, the margins were clean, but it didn't matter in my case since I had a local recurrence in the scar tissue anyhow.

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited December 2015

    Yes, I wrote about the RATHER project including the POSEIDON trial and eight other clinical trials (including SANDPIPER trial) that involve Taselisib (the PI3K inhibitor) in the "ILC Clinical Trials" thread here.
    Ignore the "aggressive" comment.

    It appears many don't follow the "ILC Clinical Trials" thread, so I'll repeat myself here. No worries ;)

    We're at the point where the needle of progress for ILC is finally moving forward, as evident by these recent developments:

    - The TCGA ILC working group announced results from the ILC molecular analysis revealing three subtypes.
    [reactive-like; proliferative; immune-related]
    - This European based "RATHER" consortium may be a good source of potential ILC targeted therapies.
    - RATHER has their Phase 2 ILC trial evaluating a PI3K inhibitor (~50% of ILC has PI3K pathway activation) by using Genetech's (Roche) PI3K inhibitor called Taselisib (GDC-0032). There are 8 clinical trials utilizing the PI3K inhibitor, Taselisib (GDC-0032). Click here to see them all. The Stage 4 SANDPIPER trial is included.
    - The University of Pittsburgh has launched the ILC Biomarker trial. We need "newly diagnosed" patients for this.
    - The Derkson lab, an ILC research lab in the Netherlands, developed the first working ILC mouse model, which will be useful to ILC scientists.
    - The first international ILC Symposium will be happening next year (September 29-30, 2016) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

  • fizzdon52
    fizzdon52 Member Posts: 568
    edited November 2015

    I don't know where all this "aggressive" talk is coming from. I have been told by my Doctors it's not aggressive and is in fact slow growing!!! I think I would rather listen to my Doctors over those who are scare mongering!!!

  • Leslie13
    Leslie13 Member Posts: 202
    edited November 2015
    Fizzdon52, my ILC started out aggressive. I had a Ki-67 of 44% in one of my tumors. Also, it often becomes aggressive after a long period of slow growth. Femara took mine down to 3% and I've since had a BMX, but not out of the woods.

    After my lymph node disection where 4 had micromets, and was told I needed standard chemo, I decided against it. I'm borderline, but also don't believe it's the best treatment for ILC. After much research, I decided that I needed a second opinion from the University of Pittsburg. They're the only research facility that has a good Lobular program (thanks John). The American Cancer Society helps cover some of the travel costs. I'm in Oregon so it's a big decision, but I also have family in the area. They wouldn't teleconference, unfortunately.

    I read the rather project website and asked if there was any way a U.S. Citizen can participate in a clinical trial.

    Being at the juncture of whether to do chemo or not has me very concerned about the next decisions. And I'm doing what I need to, to feel comfortable before I decide to take down my immune system.

    Thanks everyone for all the great resources.
  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited November 2015

    Regarding the rather scary quote a few posts above, "The RATHER project focuses on finding new drug targets for two types of breast cancer - invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC), an aggressive cancer that does not respond well to current treatments, and triple negative which lacks the ER, PR and HER2 receptors - common and effective drug targets in other types of breast cancer. These cancers account for one quarter of all breast cancers, and have a very poor prognosis." That sounds off to me, too. I wonder how knowledgeable the person who wrote the press release is. First, I have never seen ILC described as aggressive in general, although there can be exceptions. Second, from what I have learned, ILC responds well to letrozole (though it is suspected that a subset of ILC does not respond well to tamoxifen). Third, I think there may be a writing problem here, and that the last sentence is meant to describe only triple negative. My research (and I am not an expert) indicated that long-term DFS survival, say after ten years, was somewhat poorer for ILC than IDC with the same receptors.

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited November 2015

    Whoa, hold the phone! JohnSmith, what is this about "The first international ILC Symposium will be happening next year (early May 2016) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania"? I just noticed that line on your post. Can you provide a link to anything about this? I didn't find anything by searching. This needs its own thread. I think I would attend this.

  • Chloesmom
    Chloesmom Member Posts: 1,053
    edited November 2015

    I would attend too if patients can go. Live in PA and would live to be involved with anything they do there either research or symposium.

    My diagnosis was 12 months ago this week and I have had treatment so unfortunately wouldn't be a new case that they would track

  • fizzdon52
    fizzdon52 Member Posts: 568
    edited November 2015

    I would like to actually see the page where you got that quote saying Lobular is aggressive. I have never read that and that bothers me because it goes against everything I have ever read or been told about Lobular. I think the agressive part of that should go after the triple negative part, not the lobular part. It is possible someone has got it mixed up? I have also been on the RATHER web site and couldn't see it???

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited November 2015

    Fizz. Follow my "ILC Clinical Trials" thread, here. I more or less plagiarized the website news release which contains the "aggressive" comment. I included the original links, so you can go straight to the source. Again, I wouldn't worry about it. The takeaway here is that someone is finally doing an ILC specific trial.

    Pony & Chloes. The Univ of Pitts is in early stages of organizing the first international ILC Symposium, scheduled sometime after May 2016.
    My initial thought was that it's for researchers only, but now told that it is likely open to patients/advocates too.
    I jumped the gun on announcing this news since there isn't a public announcement yet.

  • fizzdon52
    fizzdon52 Member Posts: 568
    edited November 2015

    Well I wonder if a non-english speaking person might have written that up, because I think they've got that part back the front or are using aggressive instead of invasive, unless everything I have been told by experienced Breast Surgeons and Oncologists is incorrect. I know you say don't worry about it but it pisses me off, are they trying to scare people? Sheesh!

  • grandma3X
    grandma3X Member Posts: 759
    edited November 2015

    I've just been diagnosed with ILC - sheduled for MRI on Friday. I have an appointment with 2 breast surgeons to discuss treatment. I have read through a lot of these posts and they are very helpful but I was wondering if you could give me advice on what questions (ILC-specific) that I should be sure to ask when I talk to the surgeons - are there any questions that you were glad you asked and are there any questions that you wished you had asked

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited November 2015

    bumping for grandma3x

  • ShetlandPony
    ShetlandPony Member Posts: 4,924
    edited November 2015

    Grandma3X, I think the MRI is the proper next step. If it turns out there is only one tumor and it is too big for breast-conserving surgery, you could ask about neoadjuvant hormone therapy to shrink it, if you are interested in bcs. You might also ask if the sentinel node biopsy pathologist has experience with ILC and its growth pattern, and what is the latest thinking about snb for ILC. (Sometimes I wonder if my isolated tumor cells on ihcwere really an ILC micromet. In that case I might have chosen more aggressive hormone therapy since I was premenopausal.)

  • Smurfette26
    Smurfette26 Member Posts: 730
    edited November 2015
  • Marmie
    Marmie Member Posts: 9
    edited November 2015

    New here but have been lurking for weeks trying to read posts. Many have been so helpful and informative.

    Diagnosed via stereo-static biopsy with PLCIS 10/12/15. Lumpectomy revealed ILC, PLCIS, LCIS, and hyperplasia on right side 10/28/15

    Awaiting results of genetics tests due 11/19 to determine course of further surgery - bmx w node testing , right mx w node testing, or another lumpectomy w node testing. Family history breast and colon.

    It's hard to know what to do but in reading post after post, it seems some of you who initially opted for lumpectomy w treatment later had a recurrence and faced mx anyway.

    Some times I feel confident in my decisions and other times, not so much!

    I don't really have a question for anyone. Just wanted to say hello



  • artistatheart
    artistatheart Member Posts: 2,176
    edited November 2015

    Hello Marmie, I think all of us second guess ourselves on everything. There is so much to learn and so many contradictions. Just one day at a time and I hope you have a great Onc who you trust and invests a lot of time researching options.

  • Smurfette26
    Smurfette26 Member Posts: 730
    edited November 2015

    Wishing you well Marmie.

  • Chloesmom
    Chloesmom Member Posts: 1,053
    edited November 2015

    I second definitely want to get an onc you trust. The surgeon is a short term connection. The onc will be for years. If you don't connect check another out. You'd shop for a house or car and this is your health.

    Go with your gut. Every choice has its pluses and minuses. What can you live with. For me I couldn't live with the possibility of more surgery and the uncertainty and stress of future mammograms. Plus I had a weird sensation on the"good" side. But that was m

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited November 2015

    I thought "aggressive" was determined by grade, not simply by type (IDC, ILC, etc.). Unless, of course, aggressive means "hard to detect", because that's ILC, for sure. I let my Nottingham score determine whether the particular version I had was classified as aggressive or not.

  • Lily55
    Lily55 Member Posts: 3,534
    edited November 2015

    I find the more I find out the less I really know.......I have been frequently told high risk of recurrence, aggressive and non aggressive......I hear high risk of recurrence every Onc appt but one I trust told me it was not particularly aggressive......so who really knows.  I can only cope with it by becoming fatalistic.

    More concerning news is that national newspaper today reported that 70% of women with ER positive breast cancers recur and get mets and die within a short time frame as the aromastase inhibitors stop working...........seems to be good news week,.............not

  • Marmie
    Marmie Member Posts: 9
    edited November 2015


    thank you chloesmom, smurfette, and artistatheart. I have yet to speak to an oncologist. I have been working with a breast specialist. He has been my doctor for years and I trust him implicitly.


    I am assuming that he will refer me to an oncologist eventually and I will ask at my appt this Thursday the 19th!!


    I have had a triple negative survivor going with me to appts. She has 1 year post treatment so she's been a good source of information and support. Based on her recent experiences , she and I seem to be on the same track of treatment so far. In the beginning, it all moves so slowly until the doctor gets the 'big picture'.


    My personal leaning is for bmx. If going through the hassle of that once means not seeing the doctor every 6 months for mammograms and doing all of this again in the future then so be it. i already know from the pathology report that my right breast is full of ick! And I know that same ick is probably lurking in the left!


    Getting the results of genetics test Thursday (I hope it's back !!) so I'll know more then. Thanks so much to all.

  • Leslie13
    Leslie13 Member Posts: 202
    edited November 2015

    Hi

    Hi Marmie & others,

    I believe I've already written that my ILC had become aggressive. It had a KI-67 rate of 44%. I had trouble with my right breast for years with mammograms with ultrasounds, cyst aspirations and other fibrocystic changes. I learned to not get excited if I felt a lump. I was told the ILC had likely been with me for years and something triggered it.

    I chose a bi-lateral MX and glad I did. If there's mets, then I hope my immune system does it's job.

    I had a breast surgeon, and oncologist from the beginning. I added a Plastic surgeon near surgery. A regular gyno isn't normally trained in breast surgery or chemo management. I didn't see that you were on any endocrine therapy, which you should be placed on right away. And you want specialists in Breast cancer. I've had excellent results because I chose some of the best in my area. If you're not near a larger metro area, consider going to the closest research or major clinical center like Mayo. American Cancer Society has a great program for help with travel expenses.

    It's very different than Ductal cancer. However when only 10-15k women get diagnosed per year in the U.S. it's hard to get researchers. Things are changing, but not fast enough for many of us

  • Marmie
    Marmie Member Posts: 9
    edited November 2015

    hi leslie13. My surgeon is a breast specialist and the hospital is partnered w MD Anderson. The radiation, chemo therapies, and surgeries take place there in their women's center.

    Our stories are similar in that I have also had numerous years of cyst aspirations, biopsies, Fibrocystic changes, and one surgery to remove ductal papillomas.

    I knew going in to my last appt that I would have another cyst aspirated because it was large enough to feel through my bra. After mammogram, however, Doctor pointed out the micro calcifications in a completely different area that ended up being the PLCIS and ILC.

    It was a shock after having so many benign conclusions in years prior. The last 6 months have been extremely stressful for me so if stress acts as a catalyst for crazy cell growth, then I gave the cells their fuel !

  • JerseyGirl22
    JerseyGirl22 Member Posts: 342
    edited November 2015

    Marmie, are you @ MD Anderson Texas or Camden?

    Just got confirmation on my surgery date... December 7th... now on to getting things lined up for when I'm laid up... Having BMX with sentinel node and axillary node removal. Any tips for after care and recovery would be appreciated.

  • Leslie13
    Leslie13 Member Posts: 202
    edited November 2015

    Marmie,

    MD Anderson is one of the best, as you know. Sounds like you're in great hands.

    They are finding that all those breast conditions we thought were benign, aren't so benign after all. Taking HRT after menopause was the worse thing I did, already having a diseased breast. I too was shocked when I didn't have another aspiration, but was told I had cancer in ultrasound instead. I'm glad to see yours was caught earlier than mine, so your best prevention is taking care of yourself. That's what I'm trying to do.

    JerseyGirl22,

    Looks like you've had a ton of chemo. Were they trying to shrink your tumors? Also being Her 2+ is a game changer.

    I just had BMX surgery 6 weeks ago. Mine was nipple sparing straight to implant, which meant I got all 475 cc at once. For 3 weeks I was very sore, but it is better now. Make sure you have button up shirts and/or Pjs. You'll likely have drains for a few weeks and can pin them to your shirt or top of bottoms. I got some cheap cotton button up nighties from Amazon about knee length which were easy to put on, and hid everything when I went out. You won't be able to pull things over your head.

    Small pillows to go under your arms, especially where you have ancillary lymph node disection. Drives me crazy to have my breast touch my inner arm on the side I had done. I was prescribed a camisole too, but because my incisions were underneath, I can only handle zip up long length running bras. That's not going to change for awhile.

    Clean house well, and have someone to clean for a month, or better two. Stock up on a lot of easy to eat foods. You won't want to cook. Keep a stash of cash for people who run errands. Most friends don't know what to do, but asking them to shop is something tangible. I have a very hard time asking for help, but learned my friends felt better when they could. People gave me candy, cookies, soups and other things. I haven't lost weight.

    Those are the main things. I'll let u know if I think of more. You'll want the baby pillows for sure. Trust me on this! :

  • JerseyGirl22
    JerseyGirl22 Member Posts: 342
    edited November 2015

    Leslie13, thank you! I did have 2 big chemo guns and then the target hormonal drugs... yes, they were trying to shrink the tumor, and they did. it was 6.7cm to start, no around 2.5cm... still, since it's ILC, I need the mastectomy. I'm not taking any chances with this thing... I want it out, want it all out, and to reduce my chances of either having a recurrence, or a new one in the other breast. I'm not doing reconstruction. So that'll aide my recovery in one sense... I'll be getting a "breast" camisole for after the drains come out... I did hear about the "pin your drains to your shirt" thing... Thank you again for all of your advice!

  • 614
    614 Member Posts: 851
    edited November 2015


    Dear Marmie:

    Your situation sounds similar to mine.  I had so many excisional biopsies, core biopsies, and 1 cyst aspiration over the years.  (13 total not counting the lymph node surgery.) When I was diagnosed with breast cancer, I actually said to my RO, "You're kidding, right?!"  I had become so complacent because I always had lumps. In fact, I still have lumps everywhere.  I never thought that I would get breast cancer.  I guess that it was good that I stopped worrying because when my daughter had to have an excisional biopsy when she was 17, I didn't worry at all about her regarding her lump.  Thank God that her lump was a giant fibroadenoma and not a malignancy.

    Good luck to everyone on this thread. I wish all of you the best.

  • Marmie
    Marmie Member Posts: 9
    edited November 2015

    leslie13 and jerseygirl22 - I am at Piedmont in Atlanta. They are an affiliate of MDAnderson. As I couldn't leave for Texas this was the next best thing😊

    Just learned today that the genetics test that I have been waiting for is not back yet. I am going ahead with appt on the 19th tho to discuss surgery options anyway.

    My Ilc was caught very early, Leslie13, and for that I am grateful. You offer some very good tips for recovery, especially how to deal w friends who want to help!

    Jersey girl- good luck w your surgery. I'm wanting mine scheduled around that same time so I can be feeling better by christmas.

    Thanks so much!


  • Chris13
    Chris13 Member Posts: 254
    edited November 2015

    Leslie, a point from my past. I was diagnosed with ILC and went on anastrozole for two months before my mast/DIEP surgery. Part of the reason was a long-planned anniversary trip and more so in the doctor's eyes... my "slow growing" ILC. (They were surprised I did have a positive node.) So two months of hormone treatment and then the surgery. I recall my BS saying the tumor had shrunk... I didn't ask her for more details ( I should have) but I think this adds to your point how hormone responsive ILC is.

Categories