Bilateral Breast Cancer

13567

Comments

  • Jazzygirl
    Jazzygirl Member Posts: 12,533
    edited September 2015

    That is an interesting article, thanks for sharing that. Lots of good info in there. Interesting that the left side is more commonly involved.

    Englishmumm-I hope you can encourage your sister to get a mammo when she has the time. Do you live in the same area as your sister? Could you possibly go with her to the first one? I think getting past that first time is so hard for most women.

    Here is what happened to me and my sister. She found a lump and went to have it checked by her PCP. She was immediately sent to imaging and then immediately to get a biopsy, all the same day. I knew it was not going to be good news. No one moves that fast without a big worry. She got the results the next day and was scheduled for chemo to begin three weeks later.

    That was June-July of 2012, I went in August of 2012 for my annual physicals and mammo. I had been doing mammos since age 39 and had had one biopsy previously (benign) after my baseline was dine and calcifications were found. When I went in that August, I felt I was looked at completely differently by my doctors with the knowledge my sister had been diagnosed. They were going over me with a fine-tooth comb!

    My films indicated a very small area on the left side that had been there for awhile (I had changed imaging centers that year), that in the other previous films did not look like anything of concern, but in the one that year, it was different, larger. The radiologist said "something has changed" and I knew right then it was cancer. We biopsied and it came up as DCIS/IDC and then the MRI on the other side found the other DCIS area. I was not surprised, although certainly not happy to hear this news.

    So if your sister goes, they may look at her closely. As we all know, the earlier this junk is found, the better the chance of successful treatment and continued good life. Early detection is key.


  • L2girl
    L2girl Member Posts: 113
    edited September 2015

    I got oncotype testing on both tumors. Left side was the larger cancer side, and score was 15, right side score was 9.

    I have only been tested for BRCA, and am negative, even though I have a strong family history of BC. I also have a relative who had bilateral BC.

    One of my aunts was 47 when she got BC, and I was also diagnosed at that age. A couple other aunts were in their early 50s.

    I have been wondering about getting additional testing, too. Mostly because of my daughter, who is 23. For those who have had it, how did you know which kind of testing to get done? Did your MO suggest it?

  • Jazzygirl
    Jazzygirl Member Posts: 12,533
    edited September 2015

    L2 girl- it has been my BS who has pushed for the genetics testing, not the MO. BRACA tests are pretty easy to get done and get paid for, the newer generations of genetics testing are tougher to get approved by insurance. The mistake I made was being pressured to do those tests right away in my follow up apts vs. saying "let me think about it." Now when it comes up, I say "let me think about it". My BS is doing a lot of research and teaching around cancer genetics, she is very cutting edge.

    I would ask whomever it is you do your follow ups with what the latest genetic panels are for BC and if you are a good candidate? With what you have shared, the strong family history, I think you should have no problem getting approved. Then you can go research those tests and bring those back here for more questions. Seems like there is a new panel of cancer genes to screen, that include Bc genese, every few years.

    Questions?

  • SummerAngel
    SummerAngel Member Posts: 1,006
    edited September 2015

    Thanks for adding your info, L2girl. My MO set up an appointment with a genetic counselor. I had already had the BRCA test done immediately after they found the first cancer (because of my age). When the genetic counselor went over my information and my family history she recommended the extended test. At this point my insurance STILL hasn't paid for it, though, they say they are waiting for information from my doctor. A little scary, looking at the $6,800 charge just sitting there.

    My family history isn't super-compelling, and I never even thought about it until I was diagnosed, but there are some key points: There are only 10 women in 4 generations of my dad's family, including myself. Out of the 10 women, 4 have had BC, 3 of the 4 in their 40's (41, 45, 45). So, 40% of the women on my dad's side. Interestingly, there is no other cancer on my dad's side that we know of. No ovarian, prostate, colon, nothing.

  • Jazzygirl
    Jazzygirl Member Posts: 12,533
    edited September 2015

    Summerangel- my last two rounds of genetics tests were like $7K each. Both times they were denied. Know that unless you sign something that says you want those tests outside of insurance, you are not obligated to pay for anything for them.

    Because my BS office did not bother to get the approvals on the last one, I got a bill for $7K too. I talked to the lab and they said they were still trying to work things out with the doctors office and insurance. I said "so I don't have to pay you?" and she said no. This is where you need to be careful, they will send a bill hoping you will pay it as they just want their money from somebody. They don't care who they get it from.

    I am glad you are going to see a genetics counselor. That is definitely the right way to go to get the support you need during the extended testing, so you can get info on how to advise your family in the future about any risks or tests they can do. I assume given your age, your girls are still pretty young.

  • Peabrain
    Peabrain Member Posts: 268
    edited September 2015

    I was diagnosed at 47, bilateral, triple negative tumor, no family history. Because of my age, the bilateral and triple negative tumor diagnosis and Ashkenazi heritage, I was sent to genetics counseling. According to the charts, I had a 22% chance based on those factors, but after all those weird combo of factors, I wasn't surprised when I came up BRCA1 positive. I think the family history is hidden by lack of women on my Jewish side of the family.

    Triple negatives are not tested for onco type. The only treatment is chemo.

  • Englishmummy
    Englishmummy Member Posts: 337
    edited September 2015


    Jazzy, thanks for sharing your story, it really presses home how this can work and yes, the sooner this 'junk' is found, the better. I am not near my sister, unfortunately. I now live in Colorado (I have done for almost 20 years) and she still lives in London. If I were there I would drag her to the nearest centre and get her looked at, but alas, I am not.....but I will keep working on her until she at least gets a baseline.

    L2, I was put in touch with a genetic counsellor due to my age and a bilateral diagnosis - in four generations we have/had plenty of girls in our family but so far only me with this horrid dx - and I am the second youngest girl, only my sister is younger. I would talk to a counsellor for sure although if I am honest, my worst appointments were with the genetics counsellor; I just did not jive well with her. She spoke in riddles and statistics and I left there feeling sad and fearful. She was so sure I would come out as BRCA, she even predicted BRCA 1. I totally get doing it for your children, that is the only reason I did it, otherwise it is a case of TMI for me, mentally.

  • SummerAngel
    SummerAngel Member Posts: 1,006
    edited September 2015

    I'm glad I can't be held responsible for that amount, that's good to know! I have received a number of bills from various places since my diagnosis that completely freaked me out and all turned out to be flat-out mistakes or cases like this, where they just punt the bill to me even though I'm not required to pay the entire bill (or any of it). I find the entire insurance thing to be incredibly frustrating and ridiculous. Nothing like getting a bill for thousands of dollars with no explanation attached!

  • Englishmummy
    Englishmummy Member Posts: 337
    edited September 2015


    That is good to know. Some of those numbers have a lot of 0000's. My GC told me that they have to call you, legally, if your contribution is to be over $100, otherwise that is all you can be out of pocket unless you have agreed to pay up front.

    I am so shocked by some of the bills that BC patients have to pay. Who needs added financial stress when dealing with the beast? I have been lucky; we have stellar insurance, but I also understand that is not the norm.

  • Englishmummy
    Englishmummy Member Posts: 337
    edited September 2015

    Wow! Peabrain, your cancers were completely different each side?That must be super rare? So, will you do hormonals when you are done with chemo?

    I read an article about how the author was not surprised when the lesions are the same on each side with ER+ BC; that he felt it was not hereditary when both sides were the same, as it makes sense that estrogen sensitivity would be the same or similar on both sides and that things would happen at the same time within the body.....just wish I could find it again....will keep looking and post when I do find it.

  • Peabrain
    Peabrain Member Posts: 268
    edited September 2015

    @English: Yes, two completely different types! I could not find statistics on how often this happens. Bilateral occurrence is about 10%, so maybe 1-2%? This diagnosis is nearly always associated with a genetic mutation.

    Since the left side was the tumor and Stage II lymph node involvement, all my treatment focuses on that triple negative diagnosis. My MO has said I will not have to take hormone blockers after. I will mostly be done after the chemo.

    I will have to remove my ovaries (50% chance of cancer there for me) and then get checked for cancer markers in the blood every year for the rest of my life (focus on metastasis of breat cancer, pancreatic cancer and melanoma).

    Overall, I feel incredibly lucky because the right side (Stage 0) was picked up on the mammogram, but the tumor on the left wasn't found until the follow up MRI. If the DCIS hadn't been caught, it would have been at least another year for the nasty aggressive tumor to be found on the next mammogram. Oof!

  • L2girl
    L2girl Member Posts: 113
    edited September 2015

    Thanks everyone for your input.

    The cost and fear of insurance denial is one reason I really haven't pursued genetic testing. Even though I have very good insurance, they still denied my PET scan ($8,000) and breast MRI ($7,000) when I was first diagnosed, saying they weren't "medically necessary." Well, if I hadn't gotten those tests, they wouldn't have found the Cancer in the opposite breast! I remember going though all that stress, making phone calls, etc. when I was supposed to be recovering from surgery. Eventually they paid, after the doctor had to submit some papers, etc. Cancer is stressful enough, without the added insurance stress!

    Anyway, I was also wondering what good would it do me, really, to know if I had a mutation? My daughter is obviously at higher risk because of me. The fact I am premenopausal and bilateral BC. So, what would knowing if there was a mutation really help? I am curious to know, but I'm just wondering what would it change?

    Any thoughts

  • Jazzygirl
    Jazzygirl Member Posts: 12,533
    edited September 2015

    L2- I cannot believe they refused to pay for your MRI. My MRI also found the DCIS in my other breast. Not medically necessary? It is standard of care to do that test after dx.

  • Peabrain
    Peabrain Member Posts: 268
    edited September 2015

    For me, testing positive meant that I had to more seriously consider a bilateral masectomy instead of lumpectomies. I did go with a BMX.

    It also meant that I will proactively remove my ovaries when I am done with chemo. I have a 50% chance of ovarian cancer in my lifetime and that cancer is difficult to detect early.

    Finally, testing positive has meant that my brothers are testing and will know how early they have to start screening for prostate cancer.

    For all these reasons, I am glad to know about my mutation.

  • Englishmummy
    Englishmummy Member Posts: 337
    edited September 2015

    Peabrain, Thank you for answering my questions, I admire your strength. It seems you got great counselling and a sound treatment plan. I did a bmx too but I am one that would have done it with a single dx - because I am such a worrier. Removing the ovaries makes complete sense to me. It really seems you have embraced your knowledge, and chose to use it to its maximum benefit, for you and your family.

  • SummerAngel
    SummerAngel Member Posts: 1,006
    edited September 2015

    As far as the reason for testing, I just want to help researchers learn more and hopefully help them eventually find a cure. I'm kind of like that, always have been willing to sign up for studies. If we all get extended testing done, the researchers will gain more information over time. Because of my family history I believe there is a genetic component at play, but definitely not one that's currently known.

  • Englishmummy
    Englishmummy Member Posts: 337
    edited September 2015

    Yes Summer, I agree, the pay-it-forward factor, for want of a better phrase, is reason and motivation enough for testing.

    I truly appreciate all the positives that you have all pointed out....not sure if it is the fact I see the onco tomorrow, the stupid VUS, or just plain ole fear but it's been a rough week,so far...mentally. Your perspectives help curtail it some. Thanks.

  • Englishmummy
    Englishmummy Member Posts: 337
    edited September 2015


    or perhaps it is my exchange surgery looming next Friday.....

  • SummerAngel
    SummerAngel Member Posts: 1,006
    edited September 2015

    Englishmummy, If your experience is anything like mine, the exchange surgery provides a very nice change! I couldn't believe how much better my chest felt, pretty much right away. I was able to sleep on my sides within a week of surgery, and just in general it was fantastic to have the hard TEs out. I hope you experience the same!

  • Englishmummy
    Englishmummy Member Posts: 337
    edited September 2015


    Ohhhh, I do miss sleeping on my sides and I will be pleased to get rid of 'lumpy and bumpy' even though looks wise they are not too bad. I have been reading how tired everyone was after and it is taking so long to recover....I can't stand recovery time:) How long before you were up and running again? I wanted it done under epidural but my PS just laughed like I was crazy! I am having Propofol/diprivan and am nervous about that too.....I am just neurotic this week, I can barely stand myself......

  • SummerAngel
    SummerAngel Member Posts: 1,006
    edited September 2015

    I had it done under general, but was only tired and sore for a few days. I was back at work full time in a week. My energy was low the first week but improved steadily after that. I felt completely fine and able to return to working out (lower-impact by PS' orders) after two weeks. I tend to heal quickly, though.

  • Englishmummy
    Englishmummy Member Posts: 337
    edited September 2015

    Thanks Summer, that is great to hear. I heal super quick too, infact I am bummed that he'll be cutting my nicely healed scars, they are almost colourless and so flat even after just 3 months....did you have the fat grafting at the same time? No working out for a few weeks, that is NOT cool. Oh well...

  • SummerAngel
    SummerAngel Member Posts: 1,006
    edited September 2015

    I did have fat grafting, he took it from my inner thighs. That was by far the area that hurt the most, my inner thighs turned dark purple-black for a couple of weeks. Besides that the area he injected the fat into (the upper pole area) was a little sore, felt a bit bruised. That was it, though! He's going to do more fat grafting when I have the nipple surgery in December, too. Not sure where he'll take it from this time.

    Sounds like you'll be fine, I wouldn't worry if I were you!

  • AndreaC
    AndreaC Member Posts: 220
    edited October 2015

    Peabrain, I have been reading your posts with interest...I too had two different tumours, triple negative on the right side and ER and PR positive on the left. I am awaiting genetic counselling/testing...I am in Canada and there is a 12-18 month wait list. I could have it done right away if I wanted to pay for it, but it's expensive so I would rather wait and have the government cover the cost. I want to do it because I have a daughter and granddaughter...

    I have an appointment soon with a gynaecologist to discuss having my ovaries removed. I am not sure I will do it, but I want to know the pros and cons in my situation.

    The crap we have to go through. Thanks, cancer.

    Andrea


  • Peabrain
    Peabrain Member Posts: 268
    edited October 2015

    Andrea - wow, that is a long time to wait! I have been following your progress on your Chemo April thread (you women are having too much fun bonding over there : ), but I didn't realize you were bilateral like me.

    Do you know if they will recommend hormone therapy for you after? My MO has said no for me, and I would be happy to get to skip it, but it confuses me a little bit. Probably it's because my positive side was still Stage 0.

    Do you have a guess on what your genetic results old end up? (Not that I was at all accurate.)

  • AndreaC
    AndreaC Member Posts: 220
    edited October 2015

    Peabrain - yes, I am going to start on Tamoxifen once I get home from my vacation (I am visiting my son in Ottawa at the moment). The tumour on my left side was ER and PR positive, and there was lymph node involvement.

    All signs point to me having some kind of genetic mutation...I have also had colon cancer. I am not sure it will be the BRCA gene though. There are other mutations that are linked to colon as well as breast cancers. I have a family history of all kinds of cancers, too.

    Yep, I love the ladies on the April chemo thread. They are awesome!

    Andrea



  • exercise_guru
    exercise_guru Member Posts: 716
    edited October 2015

    Thanks Englishmummy w for inviting me over to this thread


    I too have Synchronous bilateral cancer My left side is HER2+ but they thought the Right side was DCIS. Because it was throughout my breast they did a Biopsy of both. They felt the DCIS was to extensive to save my right side so I elected to have a double mastectomy. After my mastectomy they found that I actually had two tumors in the right side that were ER+PR+HER-. I am grateful to this day that I had the double mastectomy. Its very frusterating that the imaging is not that good yet. More frusterating that I was 42 when it was discovered.


    OH and I should mention that before I had my Double Mastectomy my first genetics panel came back BRCA- after I had surgery I found out I have PABL2.

    They are basically treating both Tumors as primaries since Left HER+ right ER/PR+ so

    Double Mastectomy

    Chemotherapy TCH

    Hysterectomy

    Aromatase therapy

  • Jazzygirl
    Jazzygirl Member Posts: 12,533
    edited October 2015

    Exercise- thank you for sharing your story. I know many women are ending up with ovaries removed these days. I ended up with a TAH right before my breast surgery for other reasons, but they took the ovaries knowing I already had the bc dx.

    Is the hysterectomy due to the genetics test that did come back positive? There is a great site for women who go through such surgeries called HysterSisters. Might be helpful with preparing for that surgery.

  • exercise_guru
    exercise_guru Member Posts: 716
    edited October 2015

    Jazzygirl Thanks I will check out hystersisisters.

    I have a lot going on with my diagnosis. My Breast MO feels that with all my factors Age-42, bilateral breast cancer and ER+ that Arimidex and ovary removal will help the most to prevent recurrence. also it allows me to get on Arimidex sooner a they won't have to wait for Lupron to kick in. The PALB2 Gene seems to worry my Gyno-Mo on the cancer team. He recommended Hysterectomy 4 weeks after chemo finished. He is concerned about ovarian cancer which is difficult to detect. Both told me that with PALB2 it might take 10-20 years to totally understand what the risks are.

    It overwhelmed me quite a bit because I thought I would be done after reconstruction. I am young I am worried about all the long term side effects from the surgery. Facing menopause and Arimidex. I am still debating getting second opinions but with all I have going on I find their logic sound.

    Regarding having double breast cancer I have read how they try to treat it. It seems like they use whatever tools they can. In my case Chemo/Herceptin and Hormone therapy. Ofcourse bilateral is rare so recurance and all of that are unpredictable.

  • Jazzygirl
    Jazzygirl Member Posts: 12,533
    edited October 2015

    Exercise- my doctors said the same during my treatment- we treat the worst of it. I don't think they have any better information than that. Bilateral cancer is rare.

    I hope you can have limited surgery with the hysterectomy. I had my TAH and breast surgery 6 weeks apart. Not something I would recommend to anyone. I am not surgery-oriented to begin with, and having that much so close together was tough. Mine played out that way because I had something show up in the CT scan after bc dx they thought was ovarian cancer but was something else. I hope you don't have to have open abdominal surgery.



Categories