Her2+ and No Radiation?

Options
SugarCakes
SugarCakes Member Posts: 353

Anyone her2+ decide to skip radiation? Is there any data out there showing its effectiveness on recurrence? I'm finishing up neoadjuvamt chemo and consulting with BS and PS about surgery and reconstruction. Radiation throws a wrinkle (no pun intended) into implant reconstruction. I am told I am not a good candiadate for any FLAP reconstruction as I don't have enough body fat. Anywho, the PS was visibly disappointed when I pointed out that radiation was on the table. I'm planning to have a BMX, by the way.

«1

Comments

  • VioletKali
    VioletKali Member Posts: 243
    edited May 2015

    I decided that I would decline RADS even if it was "advised" d/t difficulty with reconstruction and skin issues, and my fear of long term effects. I am a Nurse, so I think a lot, and my lump was right near my heart. It is a very personal decision. I decided to do a BMX because I did not want to do RADS, and I admit I am vain and did not want my reconstruction to be affected by it.. It turned out that I was node neg, so it was not standard of care in my case anyway. If it was however, I would have declined.

    I decided that I was going to make the best choice for myself and have no regrets, no matter what happens next. We do the best we can.

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited May 2015

    I had node positive Her2+ and I asked about rads twice to both BS and MO - was told it was not necessary.  I had excellent margins and ALND.

  • LizA17
    LizA17 Member Posts: 159
    edited May 2015

    I was also like Special K. Told not needed by BS & MO. I had good margins and ALND.

  • SugarCakes
    SugarCakes Member Posts: 353
    edited May 2015

    SpecialK and LizA, I see you both were triple positive with DX. I wonder if you were told RADS wasn't necessary because of ongoing targeted hormonal treatment. I will definitely have a conversation with both the MO and BS about it.

  • SugarCakes
    SugarCakes Member Posts: 353
    edited May 2015

    VioletKali, mine is on the left as well. Something else for me to think about. I have an uncle who is a BS in Illinois. I will be asking for his opinion as well. He is one who feels their are two many unnecessary MX and BMX. Well, BMX is where I am HEAVILY leaning. Indontbknow hownhenfeels about radiation. It will be interesting as he has a younger patient with almost my exact same diagnosis.

  • SugarCakes
    SugarCakes Member Posts: 353
    edited May 2015

    I also see your tumors at DX were much smaller than mine. A thing about nodes, I am pushing for as little nose removal as possible. Only one was biopsied and it was positive. With ultrasound, 4 appeared reactive / enlarged. Size on that pathology report were all small. On CT Scan report, it states "several" nodes and has largest being 1.2cm. Thing is, I'm hoping for a pCR. BS says she will do a SNB and stop there iif free of cancer. If any nodes are removed, I would not want those areas radiated. That would increase my chances of LE. Still, that seems to be THE protocol.

  • Stephmoen
    Stephmoen Member Posts: 563
    edited May 2015

    I did not recieve a SNB and I still regret it to this day I did have a pet scan no nodes lit up but there could be micromets from my research my drs are sure there is no lymph involvement but you never know.I am also hoping for a pcR after 2 treatments I no longer feel my lump which is also over my heart.. I asked my oncologist about radiation because I wanted to do it and she said only if I did a lumpectomy but I plan on a mastectomy..due to my nodes not showing any cancer I will not recieve radiation unless something changes during surgery and I do happen to have a positive lymph node. I guess what I was wondering is if you did have cancer in a node and it shows no cancer during surgery is the cancer more likely to come back in that node I just want to do everything possible to keep this from coming back ever again so many what ifs

  • SugarCakes
    SugarCakes Member Posts: 353
    edited May 2015

    I also want to minimize chances of it coming back, which is why I am leaning heavily towards BMX vs. lumpectomy.  On the other hand, I don't know that I can handle being more disfigured as a result of the radiation and less than desirable reconstruction.  It's so much to consider.  I struggled first with the idea of BMX then became totally OK with the idea.  Then because of my response, they tell me LX or UMX is on the table.  So I briefly struggled with having the options.  Now it's the question of radiation.  I have been quite positive in all of this.  They keep telling me I look GREAT!  and I have the right attitude and that's half the battle!  Yeah, but I'm seriously worried about what happens if I truly hit a wall or something happens that I'm not equipped to handle at all.  And I'm sorry, but I fear ugly breasts might be one of those things.  I have been looking back at very nice pics I have of my body and breasts.  It's not about being physically attractive to others.  I want it for myself.  I know everyone is different.  I keep hearing that some do fine with radiation, their skin, and implant reconstruction.  I can't find any pictures, though!!!  Only pictures of problems.

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited May 2015

    sugarcakes - the rads decision for me was not due to being able to take anti-hormonals, but rather because I had ALND.  At the time I was treated more docs started to leave the nodes intact after a micromet in the SNB and radiate the axilla instead.  Even though I only had 20 IST (isolated tumor cells) in my SNB, so not even a micromet, both my SO and MO did not feel it was appropriate with Her2+ disease not to remove levels 1&2, which was done in a subsequent surgery five week later.  They were insistent that I have the remainder of the nodes removed, which to them, negated the need for rads.  It is important to note two things - my SO was one of the pioneers of SNB and did not regularly do ALND on all patients - in fact, does the opposite, this was specific to the Her2+ aspect and his experience with many other patients.  He has maintained a database with info for every patient he has treated in the 25 years he has been doing this, so has a personal statistical point of view for his decisions.  Also, they were correct about doing it, in my case, as they found a much larger node further up in the axilla, which is unusual, that may not have been eradicated by chemo/Herceptin/rads - his estimate was a 60% chance when we discussed it after it was found.  I also had great margins from BMX due to optimal positioning of my tumor in the middle of the breast tissue so they did not feel I needed rads to the breast either.

  • SugarCakes
    SugarCakes Member Posts: 353
    edited May 2015

    Thank You, SpecialK.  That is helpful. 

  • Stephmoen
    Stephmoen Member Posts: 563
    edited May 2015

    specialk your posts are very informative I have been reading many if them as I am triple positive and just started my cancer journey..you had a ALND what let you to this decision? I am afraid they will not take enough nodes out but don't wang any unwanted side effects for doing too much

  • Rmanmom
    Rmanmom Member Posts: 31
    edited May 2015


    Hi SugarCakes, I was in the same predicament as you, HER+, neo adjuvent chemo, not a candidate for impants due to rads being on the table and not enough body fat for BMX with DIEP.  In my case, rads were recommended due to tumor location, at the 12 o'clock position high up on the chest wall and kind of a "floater" close to the skin.  Both my BS and MO were concerned about the tumor being close to the superclavical nodes and a possible recurrence there.  I was also ER+/PR+ so Tamoxifen was calculated in the recurrence risk.  In the end I consulted with everyone on my team, and decided to proceed with a skin sparing UMX with DIEP.  I did have a pCR and 9 nodes removed and I was told if the tumor was in any other location I could skip rads due to the pCR.  Also mine was on the right and I was told if it was on the left a decision might also be made to skip them.  I had 28 rads to the breast and superclavical (none to the nodes, no boosts) with a bolus every 3rd day (which draws the rads to the skin).  My DIEP held up great, I kept up with the skin creams and I had absolutely no problems and my reconstructed breast looks great.  I did have a revision surgery to remove some scar tissue which was affecting my range of motion, it was a very minor outpatient procedure.  Also, due to the tumor location, my BS decided to keep my areola and I got a reconstructed nipple at the initial surgery.  She went in at the top and while there is a scar I can still wear low cut and strapless easily.  I would consult with your doctors to determine exactly why they feel rads are necessary, HER+ should not automatically means rads.

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited May 2015

    steph - it wasn't exactly a decision that I made - both my BS and MO were insistent and immovable.  I had already had BMX and SNB - my SNB was declared negative in the operating room, with post-operative pathology revealing the cancer in the SNB afterward - this happens infrequently. If I had refused the ALND I think it would have been likely that I might have had to find other docs to continue treating me, because I would have been refusing their very insistent recommendation.  I placed my trust in their judgment, which proved correct, as I had an additional large positive node further up that was the size of a stage 1 breast lump. If I had left it, and counted on chemo and rads to treat it - it would have been like leaving that size Her2+ lump in the breast, never removing it surgically, and hoping systemic treatment and radiation would be enough. 

  • Stephmoen
    Stephmoen Member Posts: 563
    edited May 2015

    thank you specialk wow that must have been frustrating to walk out thinking your nodes were clear just goes to show yoj these drs do know what they are doing just a question did youvhave any type of scan prior to chemo that would have showed hat lymph node being involved

    Rmanmom I am interested because my tumor was also towards the top of my breast and in the skin it was very palpable and moveable and thought if was a fibroid to be honest until I was diagnosed with cancer my surgeon said that it was a good thing that my lump was moveable but they didn't mention the super clavicle nodes at all would those light up in a pet scan I wonder something to ask my oncologist about

  • loriekg
    loriekg Member Posts: 263
    edited May 2015

    SpecialK--wouldn't they have discovered that large positive node at your BMX?

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited May 2015

    steph - I had a mammogram that did not show my larger than 2cm mass which was so palpable I could roll it between my fingers.  That negative mammo was immediately followed by an ultrasound that did show the mass, and that image was what prompted the radiologist to press for a biopsy.  After I was referred to a breast surgeon I did have a pre-surgical bi-lateral MRI which did not show the larger node.  I do not image well, I previously had a pelvic US in 2001 that failed to show a 3cm pre-malignant tumor in my right ovary, it was also found incidentally on post-op pathology - this is one of the reasons I chose to have a BMX - I just do not image well.  Lots of people show false positives on different types of scanning - I show false negatives.

    loriekg - during BMX the dye went to the sentinel, but no further.  I only had that one node removed on the cancer side which was declared negative due to the very small amount of cancer.  The exam in the OR is pretty cursory by the pathologist and 20 IST would have been easy to miss until the more thorough slide prep in the lab later.  The additional large node was quite a bit further up in the axilla and would not have been apparent, or even necessarily visible during surgery as it was encased in the fat pad and had no dye uptake.  I had several physical exams prior to the ALND surgery and nobody could felt any enlargement either.

  • SugarCakes
    SugarCakes Member Posts: 353
    edited May 2015


    Rmanmon, so the 9 nodes removed were negative?  And therefore, no RADS to those?  But superclavical nodes (I'll have to look those up!) received RADS because of proximity to your original tumor?

    My tumor in the mammogram was described as being in the 12 to 1:00 position.  Felt and looked more like 2 to 3 oclock to me.

    As I'm looking at pathology reports, it's also interesting that the mammogram had my tumor at 4.5 x 3.4 x 4.8 cm while the contrast CT scan had it at 2.6 x 1.9 cm.

    Mammogram/Us had largest node at 1.0 X 0.7mm while CT contrast scan had it at 1.5 x 0.9 cm

  • SugarCakes
    SugarCakes Member Posts: 353
    edited May 2015

    UGH!!!! I'm so pissed to the point of crying right now.  The MO called me back.  Well, he basically talked over me and didn't really answer my questions.  He said I was getting ahead of myself and that it would be better to talk when we had the pathology after surgery.  Still, he said Radiation is the standard of care because of a positive node regardless of my response and regardless of what nodes are or are not removed.  UGH!!!!!

    PS... he also say HER2+ isn't a part of this.  They basically treat me as if I had had surgery first, then chemo, then rads.  I kept asking "If that was the case, why rads with a MX?"  He talked over me and didn't answer that question.  Sigh...

    Can they give radiation to the nodes area without hitting the breast area???  I don't imagine so.

  • Rmanmom
    Rmanmom Member Posts: 31
    edited May 2015


    Stephmoen - it sounds as though we had similar type tumors.  Mine was very high at the 12:00 position, it was actually outside of mammo range.  Nothing lit up on the Pet scan, but due to the close proximity of the tumor to my collarbone, both the BS and MO were concerned that if there was to be a local or regional recurrence, that it might occur in the lymph nodes under the collarbone, which are basically inoperable.

    SugarCakes - yes, 9 nodes were negative, therefore no RADS to those.  The SN did look questionable on the Pet, but since I was getting chemo (TCH x 6, this was 2012 and pre perjeta) and RADS anyway, there was no SNB done.  The superclavical RADS were just done due to the location.  There was also some concern about the skin because the tumor was so close and I had skin sparring surgery, which my BS was comfortable with. 

  • Rmanmom
    Rmanmom Member Posts: 31
    edited May 2015

    SugarCakes - I would get a second opinion on that.  I have never heard of RADS being the standard of care with an MX due to one node, although HER+ is known to be aggressive so it is surprising your MO would say that was not taken into consideration.

  • SugarCakes
    SugarCakes Member Posts: 353
    edited May 2015

    What a difference a day and a consult with a different plastic surgeon makes!  So the guy I had already pretty much dismissed because of his youthful look WOW'd me this morning and sent me off practically singing.  He spent 1.5 hours with me and had a presentation complete with pictures to walk me through what he would do with my particular set of circumstances.  I feel much better with the plan of TEs followed by implants and likely radiation.  Also, he had some additional things already on the table like use of alloderm from the beginning and later fat grafting if needed to improve the appearance of the implant - things the other PS did not mention, even though I asked about possible fixes to some of the potential problems.  There was not this doom and gloom reaction to me having to have radiation.  He has worked with my BS and MO a lot.  He will have likely worked with the RO I'll eventually have.  He says my breasts look great now and he thinks we can achieve a reconstruction I will be quiet happy with. 

    I calmed down over the radiation questions that had me in tears yesterday.  It's really a conversation to be had after surgery and after the final pathology report. 


  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited May 2015

    sugarcakes - one of the reasons the PS may be feeling optimistic is that they can place the TE and fill more than usual right off the bat since you already have implants.  That is the problem with TEs and rads - the skin stretching.  If you can fill to desired size before rads starts you should be in good shape - having implants now gives you a head start.  I believe many use alloderm at the time of the first surgery - I definitely did.  I also think the final word on rads should actually come from a RO, to confirm what your MO is saying.

  • SugarCakes
    SugarCakes Member Posts: 353
    edited May 2015

    surgery set for July 6th. NSBMX with TE's placed.

  • Mardea15
    Mardea15 Member Posts: 65
    edited May 2015

    I'm having a SNB done 2 wks prior to BMX so the decision about need for rads can be made ahead of time. Has anyone else done this or had this suggested?. In my case, I want to have immediate reconstruction with DIEP flap, but if radiation is found to be needed will have TEs as placeholders in the interim.

    I'm just wondering how often a SNB is done ahead as a separate procedure.

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited May 2015

    mardea - it makes sense for an advance SNB in the case of immediate recon and the question of rads if nodal status is unknown, and I have also seen it done, and would encourage it prior to having neoadjuvent chemo.

  • Mardea15
    Mardea15 Member Posts: 65
    edited May 2015

    In my case, I just completed neoadjuvant chemo - last dose last Tues. My initial breast MRI prior to chemo last January, showed 1 axillary node involved (2 cm), but no SNB was done at that time. Now, after chemo, that node is no longer palpable, & I'm hoping for a PCR & no node involvement, & no rads, but am afraid to get my hopes up. The first BS never suggested a SNB prior to surgery, so I'm glad I got a 2nd opinion & can get this done prior to making a decision of which recon surgery to do at time of BMX.


  • loriekg
    loriekg Member Posts: 263
    edited May 2015

    Thanks, Patty, Amy and Marlene! It does feel good to be done…even better when I hear "it'll be a breeze compared to chemo" when discussing—well anything! LOL

    Amy…I'm glad I kept the tags on everything I bought! One maxi dress I got has fabric that may be too thin if the TE's turn out really lopsided!

    I do have a question about what kind of bra I'll need for right after surgery. Won't I be all bandaged up and not have to worry about a bra for a while? Just trying to plan what to bring to the hospital.

    Patty—I do still have those annoying eye twitches! This morning as I was trying to put my mascara on, it felt like I was putting it on hummingbird wings.

    Marlene…sorry you had to miss the party and hope you and your son can have your own celebration when you're feeling better. I saw on another board you're having a SNB prior to surgery? Makes perfect sense! I know I would want to be prepared going in to surgery what I was going to get, DIEP or TE's!

    --Lorie

  • SugarCakes
    SugarCakes Member Posts: 353
    edited June 2015
  • Mardea15
    Mardea15 Member Posts: 65
    edited June 2015

    Hi to everyone, I haven't written anything in these forums for awhile as there have been too many things going on for me to keep up. Since my DH is now working on a temporary job in Wash, DC area for approx 1 yr, I decided to have my surgery there so he could be with me during all of this. This required changing to all new providers, including MO (for herceptin), PS & BS. My new BS is wonderful. I also really like my new PS. I wanted a DIEP flap but don't have enough belly fat so for now am going with expanders & implants. I've also met with a RO, who it turns out also knows the RO I saw in AZ. Small world! I've been in the DC area for a little more than two weeks & have had so many appts my head is spinning & now it's only 6 days until surgery!

    Anyway, as to the radiation question - both ROs said if I had a pCR then radiation would be offered but optional. They said it would decrease the possibility of recurrence from about 10% to 3%. If I don't have a pCR then I will need rads for sure. I was hoping to have an idea of the answer to that already since I was originally scheduled to have the SNB 2 weeks prior to surg if I had a DIEP flap. Since that didn't pan out, the SNB will now happen on 6/29 when I have a BMX with expanders.

    I've spoken with 4 MDs (2 surgeons, 1 Internal Med/Hospitalist, & 1 Cardiologist) about the question of having rads with a pCR. They all agreed that the risk for cardiovascular complications in addition to lung complications years down the road was greater than the benefit of a decrease in recurrence rate by only 7%. Of course, like everyone else, I'm hoping for a pCR, and in that case I've pretty much decided against rads.

    Right now, I'm just trying to think about getting through surgery, and it's scary. I've had surgeries inn the past but none that would alter my appearance other than a scar! This feels very different. Ativan definitely helps to decrease my anxiety level. I just wish I knew what the new normal is going be like!

  • Beatmon
    Beatmon Member Posts: 1,562
    edited June 2015

    What is the pCR that is referred to in the above posts. The only thing I know it relates to is viral load of Hep. C.....which I'm sure is not what is being referred to

Categories