Anyone on Tamoxifen after double mastectomy and clean nodes??

Options
2»

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2015

    Hi Tryinghard... did your doctor really prescribe 10 years of tamoxifen off the bat? Your diagnosis seems much "less" than mine (smaller tumor, lower onc score, older at diagnosis) and my ONC is still saying I'll be done after 5 years. Just surprised to hear they might be prescribing 10 to everyone? My ONC did say that I certainly could continue on another 5 years if I wanted to, but I just really don't see the point subjecting my body to increased toxicity being such an early stage and only maybe having a 1% benefit?

  • jessica749
    jessica749 Member Posts: 429
    edited May 2015

    Susan interested in my own edification as I puzzle over statistics all the time. How does your onc figure your benefit of 5 more years T is 1% ? Mine said last time (I think) that I didn't need to take it more than 5 yrs but could if I wanted to. Didn't really discuss it. I know I want it for 5 more. I figure that my SE are minimal and if it is known this could be a benefit why not? I do not have any risk of uterine as I 've had a hysterectomy. Also, I do not particularly believe in statistics. As I came up on the short end re my cancer initially. If my risk is only 5% for recurrence, well then I full well know it's entirely entirely possible for me, albeit statistically 'small'. That was the case with the initial cancer, right? Probably less than 5% that I'd get it before 50.

    I completely get that you appear to be at the lowest risk of recurrence, but how do they figure the benefit - however small it is in years 10-15 as evidenced in the study, as a percentage of one for you?

    Just call me deeply suspicious of everything.


    Also, I am curious as to the toxicity of T that you refer to. Do you mean increased risk of uterine cancer or other blood clotting, the regular known risks?

  • Jest
    Jest Member Posts: 9
    edited May 2015

    hi ladies,

    just celebrated my 39th birthday. was dx with stage 2a BC last apr, had  bilateral mastec surgery with clean nodes, 4 sessions of chemo from may to jul and started on tam in sep. Dr has offered option to remove my ovaries. Am comtemplating whether to go for it, since it could mean me facing a new set of issues with menopause..

  • 3bears
    3bears Member Posts: 254
    edited April 2017

    Just thought Id startup a more current discussion here for ladies in 2017.

    My MO wants to put me on tamoxifen too. I was stage 1 bmx, no nodes, etc. I understand it will probably be beneficial as it's not just about the breast area but for distant recurrance as well.

    I do feel they should provide more info to us . I have a 15 minute appt coming up with my MO. That's really just post chemo appt. I know other people who talked to their MO for an hour about Tamoxifen. I hope he's prepared for my list of questions.lol!!

    I wonder if our age has anything to do with wether they prescribe 5 or 10 years. I'm 48 and they are saying 5 years for me.

  • Herculesmulligan
    Herculesmulligan Member Posts: 175
    edited April 2017

    I'm in a similar situation....BMX for invasive carcinoma on one side and dcis on the other. My nodes were clean and I didn't need chemo or radiation. Since I'm premenopausal my oncologist recommended tamoxifen for 5 years. At that point I'll have blood work to see if I'm in menopause . More than 5 years on tamoxifen seems to increase risk of other cancers to an unacceptable level.

    I've been taking it for two months now and I've noticed some side effects like heat intolerance and weird periods. I'm also tired but maybe that's the stress of the situation as well. I find myself blaming tamoxifen for everYthing which I'm sure isn't ac

  • KathyL624
    KathyL624 Member Posts: 217
    edited April 2017

    I am a Stage 1, Grade 1 with bilateral too. Definitely sticking with anti-hormonals. Willing to do anything for even the smallest risk reduction.

    3bears--did you do chemo because of oncotype? Mine was low do no chemo, so I really feel like the drugs are my only protection.

  • Herculesmulligan
    Herculesmulligan Member Posts: 175
    edited April 2017
  • WIhockeymom
    WIhockeymom Member Posts: 9
    edited April 2017

    I am 40 (diagnosed when I was 39) and was told 10 years. I had a double mastectomy (clean nodes) and 8 rounds of chemo. I expect to be having the conversation with my MO very soon about starting Tamoxifen. I am nervous about the side effects, but does it out weigh the risk of not taking it???

  • Herculesmulligan
    Herculesmulligan Member Posts: 175
    edited April 2017

    Wlhockeymom: it seems with the knowledge we have now it is less risky to take the tamoxifen. I guess as research rolls on that answer could change or new meds could become available. I haven't had any intolerable side effects. The tissue expander bother me more than the tamoxifen to be honest

  • WIhockeymom
    WIhockeymom Member Posts: 9
    edited April 2017

    Herculesmulligan- That's good to hear... I am anxiously awaiting my exchange surgery coming up in June... These tissue expanders have worn out their welcome.

  • EastcoastTS
    EastcoastTS Member Posts: 864
    edited April 2017

    I'm also stage 1/grade 1, no nodes, BMX, and was told 10 years of Tamox. However, in 5 years, who know what new will be on the horizon. I'll ask for the breast index text in 2-3 to check and would perhaps change to AIs depending upon what else we learn and how Tamox. works for me. I haven't started it yet. :) Next week or so. Another MO appt next week.

    Agreeing with Hercules -- TEs probably more bothersome than Tamox! At least here's hoping!!!! But TEs not going to be ten years worth of bother...


  • Lokos
    Lokos Member Posts: 12
    edited April 2017

    yes i have been on tamoxifen almost a year. i just returned from my breast surgeon (check up- one year after bmx) and he said my chances of getting breast cancer are less than 1%. better than people who never had it. so why do i still have to take tamoxifen? is it really worth all of the side effects?

    he also said there was another drug, toremifene that can work better than tamoxifen with less side effects! you should ask your onco!

  • BarredOwl
    BarredOwl Member Posts: 2,433
    edited April 2017

    Hi Lokos:

    Your breast surgeon is probably talking about the risk of local recurrence, which is typically quite low in patients with node-negative disease and adequate surgical margins after bilateral mastectomy. Please confirm it.

    However, if you had invasive breast cancer (e.g., IDC, ILC), then there is an additional risk of distant (metastatic) recurrence.

    Bilateral mastectomy is a local treatment only. With invasive breast cancer, it is possible that some cells escaped the breast before the tumor was removed. Tumor cells may have travelled to distant sites through the blood stream or the lymphatic system. This may have occurred even in patients determined to be node-negative. Surgery is not an effective treatment for cells that have already moved to distant sites.

    Unfortunately, the presence of a few rogue cells or clusters of cells at a distant site(s) is NOT detectable by conventional tumor staging procedures (lymph node biopsy) or whole-body scans. To address the risk that such cells may persist and grow, leading to recurrent metastatic disease, systemic treatments like Tamoxifen are recommended.

    In those with node-negative invasive breast cancer treated by bilateral mastectomy, the main benefit of Tamoxifen is in reducing the risk of distant recurrence. The benefit of Tamoxifen is proportional to individual recurrence risk. Therefore, do not hesitate to consult with a medical oncologist to request an estimate of your distant recurrence risk with (a) 5-years of Tamoxifen and (b) without Tamoxifen.

    BarredOwl

  • arby
    arby Member Posts: 126
    edited April 2017

    Careful with the Effexor. It relaxed me so much when I took it to calm hot flashes (which it did so well!) but I fell asleep at the wheel. Luckily my husband grabbed the wheel and got me back on my side of the yellow line, avoiding a head on accident. It was so weird because my reaction was so lackadaisical...that's when I knew I'd be weaning myself off it within the week. I did and no bad SE's Radiation had somehow messed with my body and caused intolerable hot flashes. a dozen a day and sweating it out at work was not an option. Hope you have resolved some of the issues you've had since this is an old post. BUT everyone BEWARE of the overuse of pharmaceuticals.

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited April 2017

    I'm in for at least 5 years, probably 10. I highly suggest y'all at least try it. The majority of women have little or no side effects... most of us just never comment. I'm 9 months in and not one side effect- it's like a sugar pill to me. I'vE maintained my weight with little exercise. I feel 100% back to normal all on Tamoxifen. Tamoxifen reduces your recurrence rate by half on the oncotype score, so my percentage said 13%, which means without it, I'd be at 26% chance of recurrance. A huge difference!

  • dtad
    dtad Member Posts: 2,323
    edited April 2017

    Lisey...I'm trying not to be argumentative but you called me out when you didn't like what I had to say. I'm thrilled that Tamoxifen is like a sugar pill to you and I'm certainly not against anti hormone therapy. However it's just not true that the majority of women have little to no SEs on Tamoxifen. IMO we should be making informed decisions about our treatment options and knowing the facts is very important. Good luck to all navigating this complicated disease.

  • Lordhelpmetoo
    Lordhelpmetoo Member Posts: 197
    edited April 2017

    Hercules, I lumpectomy first with idc, no nodes. My tumor was a bit shy of 1cm. But onco suggested 4TC with no radiation. I will be having BMX next month. Tamoxifen following surgery. My onco dx was 20. As for the tamoxifen, not sure if she'll want me on 5 or 10 years. Some have been saying it's now recommended for 10yrs

  • Lordhelpmetoo
    Lordhelpmetoo Member Posts: 197
    edited April 2017

    Kathy what was your oncoDX? Mine was 20. Onco recommended chemo to prevent distant recurrence. I just finished 4Cytoxan and Taxotere.

  • ivettemik
    ivettemik Member Posts: 1
    edited March 2019

    HI Kady, I know your post is from 2015 and it's 2019, so hopefully you'll find this. I'm just like you, I've done a lots of googling and came to the same conclusion. I had bilateral mastectomy in 2015, no chemo, no rad, my oncotoest was low, I'm 4 years on tamoxifen, no side effects, but I"m constantly questioning if I'm saving my life or filling somebody's pockets. I looked through a lot of studies tamoxifen vs placebo, tamoxifen vs Arimidex and I'm laughing at the results as well. Not only were the studies partially funded my the makers of the drug, but the difference is so minimal it could be also attributed to other factors like change of diet for example. When they did those studies and followed the women for 10 years, they didn't ask even once if the women changed their lifestyle. Wouldn't that be kind of important when you compare 2 drugs or drug and placebo? It seems to me as if the studies were flunked. My oncologist wants to switch me to Amiridex since Tamoxifen has stopped my periods, but I'd rather stay on Tamo or just nothing at all. I think my plant based diet could be just enough.

  • Sunandsweets
    Sunandsweets Member Posts: 5
    edited April 2019

    hi,

    My oncologist also has advised I’ll start tamoxifen after I’ve healed from my double mastectomy.

    My nodes came back clean (they looked at 5) but because of my age they are still recommending chemotherapy.

    Did anyone do chemo before hormonal? Does it really make a difference? It sounds like the hormonal therapy will help prevent reoccurrence and I’m really not sure I want to put my body through both...

  • Sunandsweets
    Sunandsweets Member Posts: 5
    edited April 2019

    Hi,

    Just read your post - my doctor is recommending

    Chemo to be extra preventive (did a double mastectomy, it hasn’t spread in lympnodes) and then hormonal therapy but I think I may decline the chemo...I feel the hormone therapy might be enough..did you get any recommendations for chemo too?

  • Via
    Via Member Posts: 55
    edited April 2019

    am in the same boat as you! I don’t understand why am taking this medication with so many side effects. I removed both breast so why take it? This medication is messing with me an am staring on my 3rd week. Is causing me to have anxiety, lost my period, nausea, confusion... I ask other why we are taking this and no one can really give me a good answer other than it prevents cancer. But, I don’t have breast!!! What are they talking about! I have talk to two people on it and it seems they can’t really explain why we take this pill!

    My lymph nodes came out clear so why take this pill? Am confused as you are but I want answers from my doctor.


    Vi

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited April 2019

    Via, even if you don't have breasts, that doesn't mean your cancer is gone.  Science is discovering we all have cancer cells floating around our bloodstream and Tamoxifen is what will prevent them from getting our estrogen to grow.  When I started Tamoxifen I had mild join aches, but it disappeared after a few weeks.  I've been on for 3 years and have no real symptoms other than some mild hair loss (I had a ton of hair so no one can tell but me).   I suggest continuing on it if you can, especially if your cancer is highly estrogen positive. 

  • Lisey
    Lisey Member Posts: 1,053
    edited April 2019

    Sun and Sweets,   Did you get the Oncotype or Mammaprint?   I was only 40/41 when I was diagnosed.  Due to those two tests, I did not get chemo.  If I had been grade 1 and Luminal A with 100%ER / 100% PR I wouldn't have even needed the tests to know that chemo wouldn't be effective.  Be careful about jumping into chemo just based on age alone.   Some studies show chemo can make Luminal A BC more aggressive and spread.   

  • Salamandra
    Salamandra Member Posts: 1,444
    edited April 2019

    Hi Via,

    It sucks but there are plenty of doctors who are good at medicine but not so good at education/communication. I wonder if your medical center has a nurse navigator or a social worker or something who could help find the information and sit and work through it with you.

    Lisey's explanation matches my understanding.

    Doctors know that even women with clear lymph nodes can get metastasis. That means that the cancer gets out of the breast not only in measurable ways through the lymph nodes but in other ways as well. As soon as they see invasive cancer (as opposed to in situ, like DCIS), they assume that it has gotten out of the breast and into the body.

    Radiation/mastectomy are local treatment. They don't do anything for cancer that is already out and about in the body. (And mastectomy does always leave some breast tissue behind too).

    Tamoxifen is the systemic treatment, like chemo, that treats the whole body. It seems to keep some cancer cells dormant. Like Lisey said, they don't get what they need to grow and become metastasized cancer. It's not 100%, some can take tamoxifen and still get metastasis or recurrence, but general estimates say that it improves your odds of staying cancer free by about 50%.

    It can be a very hard drug to take for some people, though I'll second that you can't go too much by the early weeks. I'm struggling myself. I'd really like to stay on it though, so trying different brands and different times of day to take it.

    No matter how poor of a communicator is, your doctor should at least be willing to sit with you and try to explain his rationale, or share resources with you so that you can make your own informed decision.

    Good luck!

  • DesertPup
    DesertPup Member Posts: 53
    edited May 2019

    I am. BMX with clean nodes and good ONCHO/No chemo but prescribed Tamo for 10 years :( (boo)

Categories