Did anyone have a CT or PET scan early on?
Comments
-
I was Her2+ and node positive and did not have any brain scan or CT scanning - I had an MRI prior to surgery and a PET prior to chemo. You will find that this type of diagnostic imaging is not universal from physician to physician, some do certain types of scans depending on diagnosis or symptoms - or based on whether or not it will change treatment choices. One of the reasons to determine nodal status prior to starting chemotherapy is that is that if you have positive nodes they may be more inclined to do additional scans - if your cancer is confined to the breast, possibly less inclined. KP is not the only practice that would only do SNB as part of breast surgery, it is pretty common, but as more practices adopt the TCHP regimen, and neoadjuvent chemo in general, the need for a SNB in advance to provide proper staging will become more apparent. You are stuck in a situation where changing attitudes about chemo administration have not caught up with the facility currently available to you.
-
SpecialK -- Thank you for that information! I was worried that I'd be totally screwed if I didn't have PET or MRIs or SNB before Neoadjuvent Chemo. Was thinking that KP's policies sounded like they hadn't considered neoadjuvent chemo (SNB only with breast surgery). It's a little reassuring to know that while this isn't IDEAL, it isn't going to be the worst thing to not have these extra tests or SNB pre-Chemo...
Of course... I'd prefer more tests because I just had mammograms totally fail to find my lump, and I'd been hearing that MRIs don't even find some things. Wow. It's be nice if better tests were come up with-- like being able to test blood for all those microscopic cancer cells! --Just to add to the ways to test and screen for bc and cancer in general. I guess people are working away at that... so hopefully tests will be more efficient for future people!
-
april - the one thing I would press for if you are going to start the neo chemo at KP is the TCHP regimen. If you stick with the MO who seems less than up to date on this maybe he can speak with the doc you saw at St. John's. I have seen others come away from a second opinion with a specific chemo regimen request and go back to the first opinion doc and institute the second opinion's recommendation. Maybe the St. John's doc can give the KP doc a convincing rationale.
-
I had a known positive node at dx (radiologist identified it on spot mammo and US so it was biopsied) so had follow up bone and CT scan in addition to breast MRI (which I did not find uncomfortable, just boring). BS was really great about looking at the scans together and discussing everything that showed up, but I will say that waiting for the results was tough, even though it was just a few days.
I'm scheduled for a repeat scan shortly to check stability of a couple of spots on one lung, and yes, that does concern me, but if there's anything happening there I'd rather know about it and deal with it than live on false optimism. On the other hand, if they're stable I will cross it off my list of concerns.
I think it's much more automatic to do those tests when there's known nodal involvement. Otherwise, the balance between risk and benefit may not be as clear.
Good luck, April.
-
CT spotted "2mm nodule on r. middle lobe and 2mm nodule l. lung" !!!
MO rec-- "CT scan does not show obvious cancer. will need to recheck CT in chest 3 months follow-up check small nodules in lung."
I am SO not reassured! Waiting for test results isn't as bad as waiting for tests that come AFTER chemo and after months--or not at all, at least for me.
-
april - these types of things pop up on a lot of scans and they turn out to be scar tissue or benign findings, try not to worry too much about them right now - particularly in light of not being obvious for cancer. They will keep an eye on them and will re-check later. These findings, anxiety producing as they are, don't change your treatment plan at the moment.
-
I had a PET scan 9 days after I was diagnosed. My oncologist didn't think the cancer had spread yet, but he wanted to be thorough before coming up with a treatment plan. My tumor had several aggressive characteristics: grade 3, luminal B, and high Ki-67 (45%). I was also diagnosed at the age of 23. Plus, I'm of African descent. Breast cancer tends to be more aggressive in younger populations and in African-American women. Anyway, several of my underarm lymph nodes lit up during the PET scan. We weren't expecting that. The tumor in my breast was small (1.2 cm at the time of diagnosis). Two weeks later, I had an ultrasound guided needle biopsy of one sentinel lymph node. The biopsy came back positive for cancer. I then started chemo 6 days later.
-
I was node positive but did not have any scans - oncologist said they do not do scans at my big city cancer center unless there are symptoms (because of false positives). They would not have done the MRI that I had either, but the community hospital oncologist had already ordered it. She had also ordered a bone scan that my city oncologist (second opinion, current oncologist) asked me to cancel... I did. part of me wishes that I had been able to complete the scan before switching oncologists! It would offer some peace of mind for all the skeletal aches and pains that I have now - hopefully due to Tamoxifen. I wonder if the real reason that they do not do scans is scarce resources.
-
April, your nodules are similar to what was found on mine - yours are smaller by a couple mm. They are also similar to what my brother's CT found a few years ago. His were nothing and I pretty much expect the same. I'm glad I had the scan done and will be glad to have the follow up as well but it's very unlikely to be anything worrisome.
I hope you can relax and focus on getting your treatment plan pulled together. Hang in there!
-
Thanks, Hopeful82014 and SpecialK for talking me down from my freak-out! I saw my MO today and he said if I was worried, he'd refer me to a Pulmenologist (sp).
He also agree with my 2nd Opinion to give a Bilateral Breast MRI and Brain MRI (but those are relatively cheap tests). He agreed to the PET, but talked me out of it (again!!!) saying how terribly bad the radiation was! I may get Bone scan--but that hadn't appeared on the orders yet... actually... I looked at what he wrote up and I think he may have forgotten it! He actually had that down to order last week, and didn't...! I also found another aunt and her daughter who had BC, so asked about Genetic tests, and MO said he'd OK genetic counseling.
I may insist on PET after all because the surgeon won't do an SNB without Breast surgery and I'm doing neoadjuvent chemo.
What do you all think? If I'm not getting SNB-- is a PET more important to get?
Wow. You really have to ASK for a lot of these tests! The 2nd Opinion oncologist was listing just about eveyr
-
Sorry for double-post. To top off everything--my landline phone is not working and I get internet through phone. I should stop cheaping out and get decent internet!
Thanks, Hopeful82014 and SpecialK for talking me down from my freak-out! I saw my MO today and he said if I was worried, he'd refer me to a Pulmenologist (sp).
He also agree with my 2nd Opinion to give a Bilateral Breast MRI and Brain MRI (but those are relatively cheap tests). He agreed to the PET, but talked me out of it (again!!!) saying how terribly bad the radiation was! I may get Bone scan--but that hadn't appeared on the orders yet... actually... I looked at what he wrote up and I think he may have forgotten it! He actually had that down to order last week, and didn't...! I also found another aunt and her daughter who had BC, so asked about Genetic tests, and MO said he'd OK genetic counseling.
I may insist on PET after all because the surgeon won't do an SNB without Breast surgery and I'm doing neoadjuvent chemo.
What do you all think? If I'm not getting SNB-- is a PET more important to get? I've got a HER2+, and it would be good to know if it has spread, rather than just relying on ultrasound! -- WEIRD that the CT they gave me was only abdomen/hips! Wouldn't you think they'd check my breasts? Or does CT not work for that???
Wow. You really have to ASK for a lot of these tests! The 2nd Opinion oncologist was listing just about every test imaginable because he was just ultra cautious. But now I think he did that so at least I'd get SOME of those tests, using his opinion as back-up!!!
-
April. Regarding KP, I would be very surprised if they do what you would like. When first diagnosed I had KP. While I loved my family practice doc I was very unhappy with the surgeon and not that thrilled with the onc. When I asked about a second opinion they said fine, but it would be in house. As it was november and close to open season for health insurance, I switched to a fee for service plan. However inthe time between leaving KP and the new plan I paid about 5k for an MRI and initial visit with the new surgeon. I am glad I made the switch, but now that I understand more about BC I would have waited another month and avoided paying for the MRI. My new docs did not suggest scans or further tests, so on that front the treatment plan was not too different from KP. However I did get a second opinion at a major breast cancer center.
-
riverhorse -- MY KP MO totally agreed to everything in the outside KP letter (I paid out of pocket for that 2nd opinion). MO seemed to infer that he HAD to have the letter with all the recommendations. So I think that makes it easier for the doctor to say, "hey, all those extra tests and procedures and treatments and drugs was NOT my idea! --There is a 2nd Opinion from a respected doctor affiliated with UCLA--he made sure to note that down in his write-up of the visit!--and maybe KP wouldn't refuse or get on his case!?! He also told me to get the letter to my surgeon and maybe she'd change her mind about the SNB! --so I suspect the 2nd opinion from outside is really good leverage to have! (Which is what SpecialK said in a post above.)
KP said they'd give me in-house 2nd opinions, but strangely enough, when I asked, there were no surgeons or oncologists who could see me!!!
Open Enrollment is going on. Before I got the go-ahead for most of the stuff I wanted, I was so worried that KP was going to fight me on everything, I signed up for a PPO! It's even a bit less than KP and is a Platinum level. If not for Obamacare, I'd have been screwed trying to change carriers what with all the pre-existing conditions AND because I've had an individual plan since 2008. Only group plans count for the HIPPA regulation that says they have to accept me because of continuous coverage...!
I am thinking I will pay the one month extra at KP in order to make the transition easier and set up things after Jan. 1. (I think that's legal since they are both individual plans... not like someone else is paying!)
And in the meantime, I'm getting at least SOME extra tests--MRIs of breasts and brain. Bone scan. Genetic test.
I THOUGHT about paying for it myself if I had to! So I totally understand what you had to do! It's best to try and get the type of care you need and want. I mean, this stuff is IMPORTANT. But really, the whole heathcare system is still pretty messed up. I really wish it wasn't so hard (and expensive) to get the right treatments and tests.
crazystupidbreastcancer -- Sorry that you had that diagnosis. But great that you got the tests and better treatment for that!
I am very uneasy not knowing if my lymph nodes are involved... but at least I'm starting Chemo next week!
-
SOP where I live (San Antonio, Texas) is we ALL get a PET scan upon diagnosis and pre-treatment so that we can devise the best plan. Some doctors will also give a "post treatment" PET scan but not all do this. I did not know that it wasn't done universally as it makes total sense. Perhaps the SOP changes regionally. Who knows..this all seems to be a guessing game to some extent. I would not worry about it now as you are doing good! But...I worry every single day...and I am 4 1/2 years out!
-
Welll!!! Between getting a Port Placement on Monday and First Chemo today, I paid for a PET on Tuesday--to squeeze it in right before Chemo!!!
My 2nd Op. Oncologist said it was very important, and my MO agreed to it, but my plan couldn't fit it in before Chemo today, so I just paid out of pocket.
Good news-- They didn't see any organ involvement or anything other than my one tumor... BUT... They found I had Coronary Artery calcification, "hardening of the arteries," I think! So now I have to see a cardiologist!!! The 2nd Opinion Oncologist, who got the PET results called me up just hours after I had the PET. He didn't say run right to a hospital NOW and do a stint or angioplasty, so I'm guessing it's not immediately life-threatening, just something that really needs to be taken care of--and he said it wouldn't matter to my chemotherapy, so first things first!
Most people die from heart disease... so I guess I have my pick as to what might get me!
Anyway--the PET was worth it! I am feeling a bit more positive about the cancer (may have spread--but it doesn't look like it from any of the scans--I had a CT abdomen/hip, too). But coronary artery disease--not good, but at least I can watch it and get it treated as well as I can now.
-
Hi and sorry we are meeting here. I had a PET/CT scan yesterday because of a lung mass (right middle lobe). Turned out to be encapsulated pneumonia which is shrinking since CT from November. No treatment necessary. Just CT follow up in 3 months. While the whole lung diagnosis took over a month the end result was a clear PET. I meet with my oncologist on Monday to discuss and hopefully start my BC treatment. Since my PET shows nothing, do I still have to have chemo and radiation? What is there to poison or radiate? I sure would like to just start hormone therapy since I am 99% ER, AND 90% PR, and HER2-. Anyone out there on this plan?
-
SweetHope -- I think they often do radiation if you do a lumpectomy. Even a mx might call for it under certain conditions, but usually not. But I'm new to this whole business, so I really don't know much about it. Your oncologist should be able to tell you if you need any chemo. I'm not sure what criteria they go by for that, but I know that it was recommended for me, no matter what. I'm probably having it all--chemo, surgery, radiation (maybe avoided by mx instead of lx, but maybe not), and therapy for years after...! Maybe it's the HER2+ ?
I'm glad your lung mass requires no treatment.
And I hope you can avoid some of the more drastic treatments if it's advisable!
-
I wasn't given any further testing past MRI of breast (biopsy) and chest X-ray) . Sure wish I had a PET...maybe some of those 50 lung nodules...nice word at my house for lung cancer....would have already been showing.
-
Beatmom - (((( )))). You do have to wonder, don't you? D....n this disease, anyway.
-
Beatmon -- Oh, no. Sorry about the lung nodules. Have you got them checked out? The CT scan I had found two tiny nodules on my lung! The docs said, "Oh, it's probably nothing! We'll watch it!" I guess it's better knowing... but, geesh...
-
I don't understand why PET/CT is not used more for diagnosis. I had to have a lot of other tests done before I could get the PET. After X-ray discovered the 3 cm mass, I had a CT scan, then referral to a Pulmunologist who did a bronchoscope under full sedation, then six weeks of waiting for cultures to mature, then finally the PET. Surely, the bronch cost more than the PET (there were five people involved in that surgery - only one for the PET). And, I read that radiation from it is no more than a CT scan.
Having the scan removed all my anxiety. And believe me, every time I would get a twinge somewhere, that little voice inside would ask "cancer?". The NED gave my whole family such a feeling of relief. Even if it showed some mets, at least we would know and could promptly get to work on treating it.
The procedure itself was so easy. Medicare approved it because of the BC dx. But they probably would not have without all the other tests beforehand. I would gladly contribute to a fund to help others get this procedure. April, how expensive was it? Surely, all these BC fundraising organizations could dedicate a piece of the pie for this.
-
P.S. Because PET only shows active cancer (and my PET Tech said it is very reliable), it doesn't show the patient all the little insignificant spots that our bodies normally carry. Lumps come and the majority of them go; and CT, ultrasound and X-ray can not distinguish between the 90% benign, or fungal or bacterial spots and those malicious little malignancies, but a PET can.
I know I'm a little wordy, but I hear your concerns and anxiety. Been there. My cancer journey is just starting, and this NED euphoria may only be temporary. So I think I will do some more digging and see if a fund could be set up, 'cause I might need it in the future. And I would love to contribute to your peace of mind.
-
I paid a bit over $1,000.00 for a PET. My healthcare would have done it--BUT they were dragging their feet and didn't approve it at first, then there were problems scheduling it--apparently they only did it on certain weeks or days and only under certain conditions! They wouldn't do it right after I got my Port, for instance (but the paid-for PET had no problem with that!).
I didn't want to delay my chemo any more, so I just paid for it, so I would have SOMETHING done before Chemo (I had an abdomen/hip CT before chemo and a MUGU, and that was the standard for my healthcare provider! -- no breast MRI, etc.).
My 2nd Opinion recommendations allowed my MO to go ahead with all the other tests--but it was already too difficult to do them in time. I'm STILL going to do as many as possible, even after chemo, just because! (I've been on a bit of a tear, trying to get stuff done thoroughly! And since I've got the go-ahead, I'm scheduling tests like crazy
The before-chemo PET was important because I'm doing Chemo before surgery and my surgeon wouldn't do an SNB without breast surgery (said it was company policy), so knowing if the nodes were involved, or anything else!, before Chemo disturbed them, was important to me and my 2nd Op MO...
Sweethope-- I was first diagnosed 11/19, but skipped surgery for preadjuvent Chemo first... but I didn't start treatment/Chemo until 3 days ago because of all the delays trying to get a treatment I thought was going to work, and trying to get tests scheduled. I know it can take longer between DX and treatment, but I just didn't want to wait any longer, so I just paid for the PET to get it done.
The idea of a fund for people to get PETs and other tests is a good one. I think most providers will do PETs, but only if you put pressure on them! And, in my case, outside PET was needed in order to get it done on time... so sometimes even when a prover agrees to a PET, it's still useful to have funds to get it done when the provider can't schedule it on time!
My provider highly discouraged PETs... The doctors and coordinators and nurses all kept saying "Oh, you don't want a PET! It's like doing 3,000 chest x-rays and can cause cancers!!!" I listened to them at first, but other doctors said definitely get one! So I figured it was worth the risk for the benefit of knowing a bit more!
-
According to the Mayo Clinic web site: "The amount of radiation you're exposed to is small, and the risk of negative effects from it is low." That certainly does not sound like thousands of X-rays! Please inform your provider that scare tactics like that are dangerous and will harm patients with such exaggerations.
-
I was very disappointed in my provider for taking that cost-saving, scare-tactic line! It made me hesitate to push for a PET until it was too late and I had to pay for it myself!
I'm switching heathcare providers in January, even though that will be a bit of an upheaval, and probably cost me much more. Hopefully it won't interfere with my treatment. I might have to pay more, but I'm going with the 2nd Op. MO who said I MUST get a PET before Chemo, and who pushed for all the tests I should have been getting. I don't want to be fighting to get every little thing when my hc provider is trying to cost-save! I mean, I understand that this is a business to them and that it's quite possible to do OK without all the tests, but it's also possible that not getting tests will mean poorer care. In my case, I found out that I have some coronary artery disease from the PET! It's important to know, so that can be watched (I still need to find a cardiologist!). So the PET was worth the money. --And there were no signs of cancer spread! I still want some other tests to make sure, but at least THAT fear has eased a little!
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team