How Significant is % Estrogen Receptor Positive

Options
2»

Comments

  • wintersocks
    wintersocks Member Posts: 922
    edited October 2014

    kayb,

    thank you, yes that's enormously helpful. I am thinking  then that I am Luminal A type. I never knew this.

    Devine, it is all very confusing isn' t it? If it reassures you chemo was do-able for me. What is scaring so?  

  • Devine16
    Devine16 Member Posts: 11
    edited October 2014

    Hi think I'm Luminal A but then I'm grade 3 really confusing. I am gonna be going to my workplace for treatment. It feels a bit too personal. That's why it's scary. 

  • MsPharoah
    MsPharoah Member Posts: 1,034
    edited October 2014

    Hello all, I wanted to respond to the question in this thread.  I am highly ER+ and just barely PR- (but negative just the same).  My onco explained to me that every breast cancer is individual.  There are lots of combinations of factors.  In my case I have a moderate K167 of 17% and Grade 1 tumor.  So I know that ER+/PR- tumors are not always fast growing tumors.

    What was explained to me is that the hormone receptors put the cancer on a spectrum with highly positive ER/PR tumors most favorable, ER/PR  positive tumors next,  and Highly ER+/PR- next....etc.  My onc believes that the % of hormone positivity matters....but she wouldn't fail to prescribe hormone blockers even if there was slight positivity.    I think that the data about who benefits from hormone blockers and by how much is still unknown.  There is some research that states that PR- interferes with Tamoxifen in ER+ patients, but there have been no changes in treatment based on this research yet.  

    The other reason that I believe that % of positivity matters is that part of the calculation of the Oncotype DX recurrence score includes the % of both ER and PR positivity.  While the oncotype DX test tries to answer the question about whether you would benefit from chemo....it assumes that you will be taking a hormone blocker for 5 years regardless of your positivity.  It makes sense to me that lower % of positivity would contribute mathematically to a higher recurrence score for both ER and PR.

    MsP

  • jojo2373
    jojo2373 Member Posts: 662
    edited October 2014

    KayB and MsP i appreciate the extra info as I have done my own share of research to understand my cancer.  My MO explained mine to me that yes it shows as ER+ "on paper" but being grade 3 there is "something else" driving the car that is undiscovered at this time.  Given that, our best course for the long haul is hormone therapy until more is known.  My drive for knowledge comes from the fact my mother had the exact same cancer, same breast, same area in the 90's and passed after trying all that was available to her at the time.  I had a all clear mamm and US 5 months before i found the 2+cm tumor that was already in my nodes so mine grew scary fast.

  • Devine16
    Devine16 Member Posts: 11
    edited October 2014

    hi Kay B thanks for that but I'm still uncertain as my tumour was also 100% progesterone positive. Still can't understand how it's grade 3

  • Nancy2581
    Nancy2581 Member Posts: 1,234
    edited October 2014

    what is considered low for progesterone positive?  Just curious.  I am 100% ER positive and 58% PR positive

    Thanks

    Nancy

  • lyzzysmom
    lyzzysmom Member Posts: 654
    edited October 2014

    My tumor was Grade 2, 80% ER+ and PR- on pathology. On oncotype it was ER+ and PR+ (low but positive I guess). My oncotype score came back at 12. I was put on tamoxifen for  2 years even though post menopausal and having ILC,  before future switch to AI for 3 years due to me currently having thin hair and to reduce possibility of bone loss. I guess only time will tell...

  • doxie
    doxie Member Posts: 1,455
    edited October 2014

    Nancy2581,

    I don't know that there is a definitive answer to what is low PR+.  Mine is only 5% and showed up negative on the Oncotype results.  I suppose that is one guide.  I've read research studies that have set it at less than 5%, 10%, or 20% either based on criteria or results.  

  • zha-an
    zha-an Member Posts: 31
    edited October 2014

    devine

    look at your pathology rept in the histology section. It shd say something about a Nottingham Scale and show 3 values...they look at the differentiation of cells, nuclear pleomorohism, and mitotic rate. Each is assigned a value from 1 -3. Then the total score is added up and a grade is assigned based on that total number. In my case my tumor had intermediate scores on the first two and a very low mitotic rate which was later supported by the Ki67 proliferation study. This scoring put me at the top end of grade 1 with a score if 5. My Er,Pr was highly positive at 99%. Hope this info is helpful.

    zha-an

  • Nancy2581
    Nancy2581 Member Posts: 1,234
    edited October 2014
  • Devine16
    Devine16 Member Posts: 11
    edited October 2014

    thanks for that my histology shows Score 3,2,3 which gave me 8 so grade 3. Just still confused as to how it can be with such high hormone receptor status. We have limited info here in uk and oncotype DX is not available to us. Had my first chemo on Tues and was an inpatient for two days following due to extreme nausea and vomiting. 

Categories