ILC with or without genetic testing?

Sinclair
Sinclair Member Posts: 12

I have just been diagnosed with ILC and have decided on a bilateral mastectomy. My MD is pushing for genetic mutation testing to determine whether or not to take out the rest. I am pretty certain I am OK with hysterectomy and ovaries removed at this point. Can anyone see any benefit to doing the testing? I am 40 so obviously something went wrong!

Comments

  • Holeinone
    Holeinone Member Posts: 2,478
    edited September 2014

    If your insurance will pay for it & especially if you have a daughter, I would go for it.  I did not qualifying, even though my 2 aunts ( only aunts I have ) both had bc, & my mom died of cancer. 

    I was only interested to know for my daughter, other genetic tests will be used in the near future, from what I have been told.

  • lekker
    lekker Member Posts: 594
    edited September 2014

    Sinclair - I'm sorry about your diagnosis.  I strongly encourage you to talk with a certified genetic counselor before allowing your MD to order any genetic tests.  The GC will take your family and personal history (so be prepared with any and all medical information you have for your grandparents, parents, siblings and children) and discuss with you what, if any, tests he/she recommends.  The GC will also be able to explain to you what your options are if you do test positive for a harmful mutation.  

  • Lojo
    Lojo Member Posts: 303
    edited September 2014

    Hi Sinclair,

    I would definitely consider genetic testing before you decide to do a hysterectomy/oopherectomy. From what I understand, the BRCA mutations are the ones that increase your chances of ovarian cancer - there are other mutations that increase breast cancer risk -- some of which have been identified and can be tested for, others of which have not been identified. Having breast cancer does not necessarily mean you're at higher risk for ovarian cancer - again, a qualified genetic counselor can look at your family history and make some suggestions even prior to testing. 

    I clearly have some sort of genetic pre-disposition to breast cancer (pre-menopausal BC in both me and my mom), but there is no ovarian cancer in my family that I know of. I did the BRCA1/2 test, and I am negative, and so for now, have kept my ovaries. I did not do any more extensive testing (I also had a double MX, one prophylactic). I will reconsider an ooph/hysterectomy in the future if evidence comes out that it is really beneficial - or possibly ovarian suppression, but it is not a procedure to do lightly from what I understand, as the sudden, surgical onset of menopause sounds like it can be pretty rough. 

  • JimmieBell
    JimmieBell Member Posts: 147
    edited September 2014

    My original tumor was sent for genetic testing by Foundation One, and that is guiding my treatment now. I do not know how that relates to removing the ovaries, but it has been very useful for me.

  • JohnSmith
    JohnSmith Member Posts: 651
    edited September 2014

    What type of genetic testing are you referring to?

    If it's simply BRCA1 / BRCA2 genetic testing, then definitely do that.  If it's more extensive genetic testing beyond the BRCA mutation, that is a different conversation. I'd imagine your doc is not referring to the more extensive testing though.

    In terms of insurance, everyone's coverage is different. Some plans cover BRCA testing at 100%, while others only cover a portion. Despite this, knowing your BRCA status is important when deciding on a oophorectomy.

    This breastcancer.org link for Genetic Testing may be useful. 

  • lekker
    lekker Member Posts: 594
    edited September 2014

    JimmieBell - FoundationOne looks for specific genetic mutations in your tumor cells to see if certain medications might help.  I'm glad that information has helped guide your treatment.  Sinclair is asking about the kind of genetic testing that looks at the DNA that's in every cell in your body.  JohnSmith - I have to disagree with your statement to "definitely" do BRCA testing.  Unless an individual already has a deep understanding of genetic testing, a session with a counselor is very important.  While BRCA is the most well known, there are situations where an individual should be tested for other mutations first.  Or maybe an individual shouldn't be tested at all.  Most MDs - even oncologists - know very little about genetics so that's why I always recommend talking with a GC if possible. 

  • Pamela614
    Pamela614 Member Posts: 1
    edited September 2014
    Hi Sinclair, I had already had a total hysterectomy 4 yrs ago due to endometriosis and had been on HRT since then. My grandmother died from BC and I have other relatives that were diagnosed with other types of cancers at a relatively young age so when I was diagnosed with ILC my doctor also suggested that I at least go talk to a genetics counselor. I did and decided to go ahead and let them do the testing. I gave some blood, it tested 21 genes for mutations and I actually had a mutation of a gene that they call NBN. It does carry an increased risk of 30% for breast cancer and an increase risk for prostate cancer so good info for my kids to know should I have passed the gene to them. They would just need to start screenings at a younger age at this point and stay up to date with the findings regarding this gene. If you do decide to do genetic testing after talking to the genetics counselor, then make sure your insurance covers it because the panel they tested on me was quite expensive.
  • Sinclair
    Sinclair Member Posts: 12
    edited September 2014

    well I have declined BRCA testing and other genetic testing for now. With my family history, it is obvious to me that something is wrong. My dad was diagnosed with stage IV colon cancer at 52, my mother DCIS stage II at 49, my grandmother with breast CA (don't know what kind) in early 60's, my sister has had multiple colon polyps removed and she's only 41. I had cervical Cancer at 26, a genetic disorder pregnancy at 35, and now breast cancer at 40. After much thought and research, It seems like a waste of resources and time to do the testing. I am just going to assume there is something there and react accordingly. 

  • ljpj427
    ljpj427 Member Posts: 3
    edited October 2014

    My mother was just diagnosed with ILC, grade 2. She had a breast MRI on Friday and we are waiting for those results so we don't know a stage yet. She is 57, post menopause and my grandmother had IDC. I am trying to help her navigate through all of the information and have spent the last week reading these boards. 

    They recommended the genetic BRCA testing. How do the results of this test affect the treatment plan? And should I also have the genetic testing considering my mother and grandmother have both had BC?

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited October 2014

    Welcome to the BCO community ljpj! We are sorry to learn of your mother's diagnosis but hope that you will find support and information within this compassionate and knowledgable group of others. It sounds like you have already been doing a lot of reading. Be sure to check out information about ILC and Genetic Testing on our BCO site. Keep posting and let us know how things go for both of you. The MOds

  • Jenny456
    Jenny456 Member Posts: 3
    edited December 2014

    as for the foundation one testing. Is this a proven help or is it trial

Categories