Is it actually better to be Her2 positive than not?

For the person who can't handle Herceptin, encouraging, cause the first time around it was extremely toxic to my heart. My EF dropped about 23 points in 4 months. Now that I'm stage iv, not stage 1a, I have to have Herceptin to live. With prayer, I believe for sure, I am doing well on Herceptin/Perjeta along with hormone blockers (shots). In fact, before starting Herceptin again this time my EF (after 2 yrs) went up to 56 (normal). I just had another echo and my EF is back to 65. It is doing fantastic.

I did have a lung biopsy, nodes too, all is HER2+ ... HORMONE POSITIVE, GRADE 3...ALL BREAST CANCER.

The biggest concern about being HER2+ is that this type of cancer tends to go to the brain and with the bbb (blood brain barrier) it is almost impossible to treat. Because I didn't know for the last two years, my grade 1a was actually in the hiler lymph nodes that I probably was stage 3. The whole time I had a bomb in my chest. The HER2+ moves fast, and when it exploded shrapnal everywhere...liver, lungs, bone, spine, and now brain. I felt good, and thought with the mastectomy and 5 months of Herceptin I was ok until recent mammo on good breast and PET scan. HER2+ cancers I read even for stage 1 can be sneaky and dangerous.

I am Stage IV (liver, bone mets) right from the start.   I have been NED now since June of 2008.  My Path is very slightly ER+ (<5%) and strongly HER2.   Herceptin has been a miracle drug for me.  Although I have been getting infusions every three weeks since May of 2008, it continues to keep my cancer not active.  In the case of mets, being HER2 + is a definite plus especially since my heart tolerates the Herceptin and it seems to still be working for me.  

Jennifer

Here is a copy of the article from MD Anderson.

http://www.mdanderson.org/newsroom/news-releases/2...

kayG have you heard when they will be opening up phase 3 of the trial?