Hormones after breast cancer: Not fuel for the fire after all?

Options

Comments

  • farmerlucy
    farmerlucy Member Posts: 3,985
    edited July 2014

    Very interesting! I sure have been reading a lot about adding testosterone. Thanks cp!

  • wallycat
    wallycat Member Posts: 3,227
    edited July 2014

    I would be happy to be the lab-rat for this one!

  • dlb823
    dlb823 Member Posts: 9,430
    edited July 2014

    Oh, it's just so hard to know.  I was on a couple of hormones post-bc (testosterone and DHEA; bioidentical, low dose), RX'd by my ND.  She wanted to put me on estrogen as well (after extensive hormone testing), but when I asked me local onc, he made a comment like, "Sure.  Go ahead.  And then you can sue her when you have a recurrence."  My UCLA onc told me quite emphatically on another matter (testing bc cells with therapies prior to using them) that results you get in petri dishes or even in mice don't always translate to the same result in our bodies, just b'cuz we are so complex and there's is so much going on besides that one interaction.  

    So, I would personally tread very carefully with this.  I think it's a different matter if you've never had bc and your hormones are analyzed by a competent hormone doc prior to starting BHRT and carefully monitored while you're on them.  But even then, there could be genetic factors at work that are not accounted for in this research.  JMHO...

  • besa
    besa Member Posts: 1,088
    edited July 2014

    This work seems to be published in an endocrinology journal with a relatively low impact factor which makes me wonder about the strength of the research. ( Usually researchers will aim to publish in the highest impact journal possible. If they are rejected they generally resubmit and move to a lower impact journal. )  

Categories