breastcancer.org's Mission.... or not?
Rather than post this in the thread where the Moderators commented, I thought I would start up this thread here, because this is a broader topic than what is being discussed in that particular thread.
Moderator quote from Topic: how to treat an ulcerated (breast) tumor :
"So many women have breast issues, anxiety regarding breast
cancer, and/or a genetic predisposition, and end up on our site looking for
information, guidance and comfort, even when not diagnosed with a cancer. We
are there for these sisters, men, daughters, mothers, and other concerned
individuals to provide information and support to them. We are here to help women, their family and friends make sense
of the complex medical and personal information about breast cancer, so that they
can make the most informed decisions for their lives."
Mods, that's very well put. And I agree.
So here's my confusion:
- I
don't see how encouraging someone who has diagnosed herself with breast
cancer, without medical confirmation, is supporting her in making an
informed decision. How can anyone make an informed decision if they
don't even know what their condition is?
- Nor
do I see how it is helpful or supportive to reinforce the concerns of
someone with breast cancer anxiety (but who is not high risk) by
encouraging them to stick around a breast cancer website where they
continually engage in discussions about the very thing that causes them
anxiety. Most women at some point or another will have a "breast
issue". Most of those breast issues will turn out to be nothing serious
at all. These women, who remain normal risk, are 3 times more likely
to die of heart disease than breast cancer. These women are almost
twice as likely to develop some cancer other than breast cancer. I fail
to see how we are helping these women by supporting their breast cancer
anxiety.
The thrust of recent Moderator comments seems to be
that if anyone dares suggest that self-diagnosis is maybe not the best
way to get to the right information about treatment options (including
alternate treatment options), or that it might not be best for someone
with breast cancer anxiety (but who is not high risk) to stay around
this site and wallow in breast issues, we are not being supportive. I
don't understand that. I think it is a whole lot more supportive, and
leads to better, more informed decisions, if we are able to get someone
to confront and deal with the truth, rather than cheer them on as they
to continue down a dead-end or misdirected path or encourage them in
their anxieties.
If someone refuses to see a doctor or have
tests done, but needs a doctor's diagnosis in order to know how to treat
a medical problem, it is okay to support their refusal to see the doctor and have the tests?
If
someone needs surgery and/or other treatments to have a chance of survival but is afraid of
the surgery/treatment, is it okay to encourage and reinforce that fear?
If
someone is perfectly healthy but has breast cancer anxieties, is it okay to
urge them on in their desire to have more and more tests and medical procedures and even
surgeries?
In an effort to be everything to everyone, and to not offend anyone, has breastcancer.org lost sight of it's mission? "Our mission is to help women and their loved ones make sense of the
complex medical and personal information about breast cancer, so they
can make the best decisions for their lives." In my three examples above, how are we helping women "make the best decisions for their lives"?
I really appreciate the efforts that the Mods have been making to manage and control the board, and I like some of the recent changes to forums. But the overall direction of the board seems to have shifted and I no longer feel comfortable offering what in the past I thought to be good advice and good information. Am I missing something here?
Comments
-
As always, Beesie, you are spot on.
-
"... If someone refuses to see a doctor or have tests done, but needs a doctor's diagnosis in order to know how to treat a medical problem, it is okay to support their refusal to see the doctor and have the tests?
If someone needs surgery and/or other treatments to have a chance of survival but is afraid of the surgery/treatment, is it okay to encourage and reinforce that fear?
If someone is perfectly healthy but has breast cancer anxieties, is it okay to urge them on in their desire to have more and more tests and medical procedures and even surgeries?..."
Thank you, Beesie. As always, you've nailed it.
I agree the tone of the board has shifted and not for the better. It's not about good information, support and resources anymore, it's about a small group who persistently attacks, bullies, ridicules, and cries foul when opinions- and concerns do not mesh with theirs and who perceives prejudice- and persecution when nothing of the sort is going on. To question is not to attack nor is it inherently disrespectful. To plead with someone to please see a doctor when they persist in posting how awful their situation is (whether or not that situation is all in their head or not) is not disrespectful and unreasonable, nor is it "bullying".
Being supportive is not just about reinforcing- and enabling decisions- or behaviour. It is, also, about providing additional help, information, and assistance when someone is, obviously, floundering.
-
the mission was repeated yesterday in the thread recruiting mods in Australia. I think the new recruit would be puzzled by some of the threads given the job description in that recruitment thread.
-
bessie - controversy on a website, in this media environment, often generates more "hits" which is good news for getting advertisers. The internet version of the old print media "If it bleeds, it leads." Trying to keep the "pablum" acceptable, the answer to your OP question:
In an effort to be everything to everyone, and to not offend anyone, has breastcancer.org lost sight of it's mission? YES
Truth - this is a place for "discussion" -"camaraderie," and women trying to help women, not the best source for info re:bc. Pablum, as you said.
In an effort to be everything to everyone, and to not offend anyone, has breastcancer.org lost sight of it's mission?
This org pays HUGE salaries to part time people, and that has to be funded. Remember when the salaries at bco.org were published a few years ago, they certainly haven't gone down.
-
All patients have the right to refuse treatment. We cannot force or persuade anyone to do anything. Neither would we want to exclude or isolate them at such a difficult time.
This is a support forum, not a place to harrass women.
-
Could someone help me and define "patient." If I self diagnose and decide I have a particular disease, does that mean I am a "patient."
I think blessings labeled this particular situation correctly.
But this doesn't address the valid question the OP asks.
-
I am a relative newcomer here, so please excuse me if there's something I'm not getting, but my thought is that whether or not someone has been traditionally diagnosed (or diagnosed at all) seems beside the point. Should we now have to submit our pathology reports in order to join? Everyone has the option of deciding whether to read or comment on a particular thread, or direct comments to a particular poster. If reading what a poster says is that disturbing, why would one continue to read it, and especially why continue commenting? It does read as harrassment to me.
It isn't my intention to offend anyone. I am so glad to have found this site, and am grateful for all the information I've found here, and for all the kind (and patient!) responses I've received. I think that's why I have been so taken aback by some of the comments on Abigail's thread. It doesn't fit at all with what I've experienced. I can understand not agreeing with someone, not choosing what they choose, but what I read seemed to go beyond that. People have the right to choose whatever treatment (or lack thereof) they want. If it isn't what works for someone else, that's ok. I just don't understand continuing to beat the horse.
-
As almost always Beesie, you took the thoughts right out of my brain and managed to put them into writing. Very, very well stated.
Joy, this is not about denying someone the right to refuse treatment for themselves. There are many members here who make choices about their treatments everyday, some choose to decline chemo or radiation for example. But, these are informed choices, based on a diagnosis, and based on information about recurrence risks, and so on.
This is about the issue of encouraging turning a blind eye to someone's self-diagnosis. How often on here do members and even mods discourage people who are waiting from test results or pathologies from turning to Dr. Google, but then in another thread where a member has not even bothered to see a doctor and is self-diagnosing, or has been told by doctors they only have benign conditions yet still is trying to "self-diagnose" or pursue more testing, members are attacked for discouraging self-diagnosis by Dr. Google?
Yes, someone can refuse medical care. That is their right, but if they refuse medical care, it is misleading for them to purport to have a "diagnosis" and a "treatment" for that diagnosis. It can also be dangerous to themselves.
aunt-paula, as for why someone might keep commenting...because those words remain in that thread forever, well, as long as the internet does. Because new, vulnerable, and scared women and family members coming onto these forums might not know the backstory, might not know that the poster is NOT diagnosed. Similarly I see it happen in the high risk threads at times someone say "I am high risk as my great-aunt had cancer". Well, having one relative have cancer, and nothing more, does not make someone high risk, and I can't let that pass by as not only do I worry about that posters own assessment of her risk, I worry about all those other people who might stumble across that thread and now think THEY are high risk as a relative had breast cancer. So yeah, I cannot just ignore that. I do the same thing where I see someone say they chose mastectomy because they worried about distant recurrence and thought that would prevent it, and so on. I am concerned that misinformation gets passed around, and others accept it as truth, because there is already enough misinformation accepted as truth out there as is!
-
Patient, person who is having symptoms, what's the difference? Ask any doctor, nurse or paramedic and they will all have had the experience of a person refusing to be examined, diagnosed or treated and it is not ethical to continue trying to persuade them once they have clearly refused. That doesn't mean being kind and respectful to them is in any way encouraging them in their decision not to be treated.
We cannot drag them to a health care worker even if we were their sister. Therefore we can only support them as best we can. Any attempts to persuade them is harassment and will drive them further into their resistance. Basic ethics. Basic psychology. Any health care worker can confirm this.
Yes it hurts to see them losing their health and knowing the pain they may go through, but that may have happened anyway or they may pass away with another ailment first.
Blessings to all. Let love fill all our hearts and peace be our companion.
-
Dear Members,
Our mission is to help women and their loved ones make sense of the complex medical and personal information about breast cancer, so they can make the best decisions for their lives. We believe that the mission has expanded in recent times to include those who are not diagnosed but worried, dealing with on going benign conditions, etc. We do not feel that we can exclude those who are dealing with some degree of concern. We appreciate those who reach out from prior experience to offer support and to calm associated anxiety but we offer caution to not become invested in the decisions that others make and how others choose to use the boards.
We believe that there is a way to disagree and offer experience without judging and with respect, for example, “I am concerned for you that you have not sought medical advice. That is not what I have done. I don’t feel as though I can encourage you in that direction but I wish you the best and realize that it is your decision to make." In other words you can offer perspective from your own experience without getting tangled in a disagreement about what is the right decision. We are not here to prescribe treatment whether it be medical treatment or emotional treatment. We can only do our best to offer our own experiences. Everyone is free to make one’s own decision.
We continue to suggest that if you are having increased stress, anxiety, confusion or some level of emotional discomfort as a result of your experience with the community then it is your responsibility to either block individuals / topics that seem to influence such states. You are the best judge as to what is helpful and meaningful for you.
As always we appreciate your passionate interest in and care for this community.
The Mods
-
From where I'm sitting, over 5 1/2 years on bco, I've learned that some women just want smoke blown up their ass and a pat on the back for posting. They don't want "advice" or recommendations or our experience. They only want the chance to tell you what they feel. They obviously have no intention of taking care of their health, mental or otherwise, or they know darn well that they aren't even "sick" in the first place and are just wanna-bees.
The issue is NOT that she wants to go alternative - the issue is that she doesn't even know if she HAS breast cancer! It's like going to a doctor and saying take out my lung, I think I have lung cancer and he does it. You don't treat a disease you are not sure is there. Though, she did cure herself of AIDS twice I understand....maybe she's on to something.
-
I guess my question is, then why engage at all? It's clearly not because there's an expectation that it will make a difference. So why continue to push it? There, for me, is where the line between offering information and giving someone a hard time for their choices just because one can (whether seen as legitimate or not) lies.
-
I felt like joining breast "cancer" dot org put me in a community where we all had a very common experience. It felt tight.
Now that the mission includes breast "issues" it feels vague, wishy washy and too big to manage. It is not tight.
I guess I can either adapt or leave and join one of the many other sites on the web that don't narrow down a topic...something to ponder.
-
I'm going to be blunt and say that as long as there's a website, there will always be trolls and we can choose to feed the trolls or ignore them in hopes they move on. I am dismayed that this site seems to be moving into "breast health and breast issues". In my opinion conforming and modifying is feeding the trolls. This site is about breast cancer for heavens sake, look at the URL.
Amy
-
hmmm.....so perhaps Mods, you should consider a "rebranding" of the site, if it has now expanded to the world of "breast issues and benign conditions"?
I agree, there is no place for bullying on a site such as this, and blocking posters or threads that are upsetting may be the best way to maintain a broad scope of conversations.....but....It has always been my understanding, that this is a breast CANCER forum. Certainly, this is a good supportive and informative site for women awaiting dx, but from what I have read from "inquiring members posts"....they ARE undergoing testing and/or awaiting dx to confirm the presence or absence of BC. Posts that list symptoms and concerns, and seek self or "on-line" dx, are advised by responsible members, INCLUDING you, mods, to seek a medical opinion.
Everyone has the the right to share their personal choices of tx, sx, conventional or alternative tx, without being judged. But.....the value of these threads are that it is BC that is being discussed. The member "in question" could well be dealing with advanced melanoma, given her description of what is going on, yet her self-diagnosed and self-prescribed alternative tx are most likely being read by women seeking alternative ways to fight breast CANCER. She is obviously dealing with some type of significant health issue, and has decided, for HER PERSONAL REASONS to follow the path she is on. But it is not ethical, (granted, in my opinion) to be encouraged to post on a breast CANCER site, without her knowing that is the beast she is dealing with....given her repeated statements of never intending to verify her condition with any type of tissue biopsy, testing, etc. I wish her well, but I share concerns of others, that supporting her declaration of breast cancer is potentially harmful to other "anxious or mis-informed" breast ISSUE women, and is insulting to women who have been truly diagnosed with breast CANCER.
Currently, this site is branded as breast CANCER. org.....perhaps having expanded it to become relevant to breast issues and benign conditions, is what lead to the acceptance of supporting fundraisers like "Baubles for Boobs"??????? Do you now inform donors to BC.ORG, that they are now contributing to more than BC causes, but also self diagnoses, "issues and benign conditions"????
Are you as mods informing us by the "back door" that this site is becoming more about breasts in general, than about breast cancer?????
-
some wonderful, thoughtful posts, but I think they are actually doing what aunt paula has so wisely expressed - it's a PRIVATE website, and "they're" gonna do whatever they want to do with it - remember, THINK GREEN ( money) and pink ( anyone is welcome to a Phuque Pink T shirt) so while I appreciate bessie's OP, it's really a waste of time. Like trying to get someone who has "Munchausen's By Internet***" to listen to sound medical advice.
Just use what you need, and let the rest go, where ever it goes. I'm thinking along the same lines as wrenn
eta:**** blessings, you're so right!
-
I think it is sad and insensitive that BC.org doesn't get the difference between cancer and non cancer.
-
....and i have felt attacked by some of those people, with benign breast conditions, where i went one fateful day, to the topic that used to be" waiting for test results" to offer support, and found women who had been around a long time, without breast cancer getting mad at me for showing up there, when i simply asked why so many of them where there for so long, looking for more tests-basically looking for non existant trouble. And they have been spotted by many members on many other threads up to and including stage 4 only threads, "encouraging' women there, with no info on there tag lines, to indicate what their own dx was. i call them cancer groupies, they called me a cancer snob. not at all, i told them i would switch places with them anytime, for the peace of mind of benign. where i would go off happily until if and when i had a dx, whether or not i chose to be treated.
-
breastcancer.org, breastissues.org, breastconcerns.org, selfdisgnosedbreaststuff.org, imaginarybreaststuff.org, breastsonunicorns.org...
-
when a biopsy showed a suspicious nodule and I was scheduled for a hemi thyroidectomy last year I went to a thyroid cancer site to compare notes on Bx. After surgery pathology showed the tumour to be benign i wished the women well and left (because I didn't have cancer).
I don't attend 12 step meetings either.
-
Endless threads because "I'm gonna die of my fibroid or cyst or pimple, doncha know" with dozens urging her on to more & more tests & hysteria...yep, thats comforting & supportive.
-
imaginarybreaststuff.org that's funny!!! Thanks Caryn for offering some humor.
-
Oh barbe, you always say it like it is.
IMHO, not being dx and continuing to 'believe' you have a life threatening disease, is a disease in its self. It also belittles the emotional and physical experiences of that those us with cancer.
-
oh god. i just got the best laugh ever, thanx bronx, i reeaaallly need that! cracked me up seriously! ...imaginarybreaststuff.org... then ... hahahahaah, im still laughing
-
"It also belittles the emotional and physical experiences of that those us with cancer."
Yes, that's what bothers me most about self dx. I think that because I'm stage IV, and have lost too many sisters here, I am especially sensitive to this.
Caryn
-
maybe we should just go and start our own diagnosed members only website, where you DO have to show your path report, or a note from your doctor. then we could have a test only section. REALBREASTCANCER.whatever.
wrenn, that was exactly the point i had used with one of "those" ladies, that i do have a nodule in my lung. i aint on lung cancer sites, bugging them for answers, or supporting them either, or even educating myself about lung ca, just incase, someday, ya never know. if the docs ain't worried, then neither am i.
-
nihahi, and all those who seem to agree the website has lost its' mission and focus, I come back to a point no one is even addressing - MONEY.the wider the audience, the more "hits" and the more "hits" the more advertising - it's about MONEY. Many of you were posting when there was a thread about the amount of money the "founders" ( part time, it seems) of bco were being paid - then, a few yeas ago, it was more than $250,000. - and who does what attracts the readers - THE WOMEN POSTING & ANSWERING QUESTIONS. If we weren't here, there wouldn't be a Forum or "members" - which really, is deliciously funny when ya think about it ;-)))
Just look at this: which is on every page:
We are 146,354 members in 75 forums discussing 116,150 topics.
I mean really, does ANYONE believe those are 146,354 EXISTING individual people ( no duplicates, no what we used to call "sock puppets" but don't use that word anymore or we'd get banned) who are active on this site? REALLY! Do you suppose it includes women who were banned? Or just posted once & got fed up?
Ya just gotta get what this is about, and the kicker, is, really, the reason anyone signs on is to ask OTHER WOMEN for information. If we weren't answering questions, there'd be no site! Ala the model of Huffington Post, no one posting there gets paid anything, and if they didn't post, there would NOT be a Huffington Post.
Get a grip - nothing is gonna change, just use want you want, and ignore what you don't. As I've said before, if anyone asks me about this site, I tell what is the truth for me. And, of course, as we all are free to "express our own opinions & be respected for it" yada, yada, yada....
-
There is scary content on this site. Why would someone without cancer issues want to read it or even spend the time?
People who have not had cancer cannot possibly understand what it is like to have or have had it.
-
I started this thread in this forum because I wanted to raise a broader
concern and not just focus on one individual who has self diagnosed.To the Mods post, I understand that women come here with all sorts of
concerns, and all sorts of understandings - or misunderstandings - about their
breasts and breast cancer. Everyone should be welcome, and their concerns
should be respectfully addressed.I understand that in the end everyone will choose the path that is right for
them - and I wouldn't want it any other way. I have maintained years long PM
relationships with women who have chosen a very different treatment path than I
would have chosen, but I respect them for their decisions and support them
along the way.I also understand that some women come here just to participate, and have no
interest in learning any more than what they already know (or think they know)
or listening to other opinions. I'm pretty good at ignoring those women.I have no issue with who is welcome here. My issue is with what has become
acceptable and unacceptable in terms of how we support those who arrive here and
how we encourage those who do not have breast cancer or breast cancer risk to
stay.If someone comes here misinformed or with assumptions that may be incorrect,
these days it seems that the only acceptable way to support them is to
encourage them on. To ask questions, to suggest that they get more information,
to provide information that differs from what they believe, to suggest that
they take the advice of their doctors, to suggest that they see a doctor (and
sometimes, not a breast specialist but a dermatologist or someone to help them
deal with their anxiety) - no matter how nicely it's done, today it's all too
often seen as not being respectful of or supportive of someone's concerns or position or opinion. If someone
who is average risk and has no more than annoying fibrocystic breasts arrives
here having decided to have a PBMX, is it wrong to suggest that perhaps she
should learn more about her risk level before heading down that path? Apparently it is wrong, because I’ve been
sharply criticized for suggesting that. No, what is “supportive” is to urge her on and
offer advice on how to get a surgeon to agree to the surgery.When did breastcancer.org become a website where everyone is encouraged to think
that they may have breast cancer – whether there is any indication that they do
or not? We used to tell women with good results to go off and live their
lives; now we have women who encourage them to stick around, reminding them
that an ‘all clear’ on follow-up screening or a benign biopsy result could be
wrong, and even if it's right, that doesn’t mean that they might not be
diagnosed with breast cancer in the future.We can block anyone we don’t agree with and all the threads that annoy us,
but that doesn’t change the fact that the direction of the board has shifted. My concern is not just that the focus is
moving away from ‘breast cancer’, although I think that’s unfortunate. My concern is with the type of support that is
being encouraged and how it’s becoming more difficult to offer accurate,
reliable advice and information without being criticized. Ultimately
breastcancer.org get to decide what this board is all about, however I don’t see how these changes are helping
women “make sense of the complex medical and personal
information about breast cancer, so they can make the best decisions for their
lives.”Over and out.
-
Bravo Beesie!
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team