I simply cannot support F Amy R
Comments
-
TB90- Sorry you got so upset about these posts. I for one do have the time left or energy to go out and garner Hollywood attention. As far as the word " twit " , that is a pretty benign word . I don't condone the use of foul language but in this case she did not spell it out as I have seen in other threads.
As for BC awareness. Tired message everyone has heard and donated for, fir years. Lets find some better Rx for Stage IV , and tell us about that and stop telling women their cured for life.
-
Celebrities are just that. I can't take any of them seriously (except for Angelina Jolie and I really mean that). Anything anyone of them says just slides off me like teflon. They always have an agenda, and for the most part, it's for attention; not to make the world a better place. I could care less what she said. What really disturbs me however, is the way some women fill their posts with sarcasm, belittle, and make fun of others right here on this board and nobody even bats an eyelash. Very weird world...a celebrities' statement gets danders up, but some of the unfreakinbelievable posts on this board go unnoticed.
As for what she could have said and done to not offend, as per a post above.....easy. Celebrate your brains out in the joy that you've finished the recommended treatment, go on about it on tv if the mood strikes you, but perhaps add that now all you can do is hope beyond hope that it never comes back. I'm pretty sure her oncologist (if he was any good at his job) probably told her the same thing. Maybe she heard it differently or chose not to acknowledge it. I'd live with my head in the sand too, if I still could.
-
I wonder how many women who are going thru cancer treatment felt when they heard the just be strong crap. Particularly the ones who are experiencing all the side effects of treatment. I was knocked down by it and its taken me 5 years to recover, but I have. It just took a long time. I have no idea what the future may hold but I'm happy today. If I had heard this tough business when I was in treatment I would have felt like a failure.
Thank you Beesie for your invaluable words.
-
# ONE RULE OF JOURNALISM - never, never, never report on yourself, your friends, your relatives, etc. This is the perfect example of why doing so is the biggest journalistic mistake ever. The story becomes personal - the criticism becomes personal and nobody actually gets any information that is useful. The problem here is not AR, nobody here would begrudge another woman having a 'good' chemo experience. The problem here is that the was no actual 'reporting' done. No looking into the differing types of BC or differing types of chemo that are undergone (or not). The 'story' stank as a news story. The journalism sucked. At MOST what could have been done with the show was to take this experience as one of many.
For women who have had much worse experiences, who didn't 'beat cancer', who are not somehow 'tough' enough even though they KNOW they are going to DIE of this shit, and who are in PAIN AND writing their wills and telling their children goodbye, and having their brains radiated and have no money left because every cent has gone to this crap.... really? They can't say FU .. they are not saying it to HER personally, they are saying it to a media that ignores them, they are saying to a news organization that is completely INEPT in its coverage. And they are maybe in some small way saying it to somebody, and somebodies, who have exploited the actual pain pain pain pain pain pain that SOME people with this disease have for what is, really,nothing more than an easy buck.
-
Well stated Ziggy!
-
F U media, F U pharmaceuticals, F U pink whatever it is . . . That makes sense to me. That is what should have been said and that is exactly my point. If I named any one person here and then said, do not take it personally, I would deserve a smack to the side of the head. It is personal when you single someone out. May be that we all actually agree here but I think some people really do need to take more responsibility for how things are written and stated.
-
I just watched the video and the whole time I'm thinking, she's finishing her 8th round and looks that good? What a disservice that is to people, it's just not that realistic. I'm currently going thru TAC and I feel like shit, seeing someone like her looking so good makes me wonder wth is wrong with me?I don't like the comment at the end.....the implication being that if you are just strong enough you will beat it! Guess what, its BS.
I personally don't know you would leave BCO because of another person's thread venting. We are ALL entitled to vent and be pissed, sad, glad, mad...any damn way we want to be. I read the thread and no one was attacking another person on this board. Amy R put herself out there and made her story public and that means we are able to make our opinions about it.
IDK, I'm not normally one to come on here and do this, but I've had a bad week. I have wanted to quit my tx's so bad, I just want this to end. I've been told "be positive" you'll get thru this!! The Amy R thing just rubbed me the wrong way too.
-
Well said Zigster! Hi Tang!
-
Well; I've read all of this. I can really understand the Stage IV ladies being upset about a public figure making it seem as though it's a breeze if you're "strong". I don't think my dear friend TB90 is against this feeling, only because it is Amy's experience, and she feels all experiences should be honored. TB90 has a lot of integrity. I do have to say, though, that probably Amy didn't feel she had a choice but to keep this "positive", if she wanted to keep her job. She's probably scared, too, I'm sure her docs have let her know about recurrence chances. I'm also sure that if she had stated more real things, she would not have a job, and it would not have aired, and she knew that. Shame on her for not putting herself under the bus in the interest of telling the whole truth, and I'm not being sarcastic. Still; if one knows their career is going to go away if another perspective is voiced, and one is already scared to death about their own chances, well, anyone might do that. Yes; more so a TV personality. TB90 clearly stated that she thinks "Hollywood" is involved, and she's right. I think she was only thinking about the best for the Stage IV ladies, and also feeling for Amy's position, and the whole thing upset her, as it should. I'm seeing a lot of anger and frustration coming from the Stage IV ladies, which I have not seen before, and GOOD. You (and I can't imagine being you, though I am clearly aware I may be someday) are amazing, and I'm glad you got a chance to voice your feelings. I think TB90 just wished that could have been done less angrily, but maybe that could not be so. What is it you are all saying, about the Susan Komen bullshit, and the pink myth, and the early detection being crap? I was kind of hoping my early diagnosis wa good, but maybe not? I would like the truth. - P.
-
I do have to say, I thought Beesie's comment was spot on. Public figures are called to a higher standard, as they influence things. Still; I wouldn't like to be Amy, right now. -
I agree with you Percy. I think that's exactly why she came across like little Miss Sunshine...she has to. They are all perky and happy and smiling...they have to. We all know she is scared just like the rest of us but what would have been served if she went into detail about chances of recurrence, etc. I could make a case for either side. I agree with the fact she made it sound like a walk in the park and on the other hand I think she had her game face on. She has to. I don't wish her ill will at all and calling her a twit just doesn't seem offensive to me. You can note like her or her attitude you are entitled and vice versa for those who do. We can all agree to disagree. We are after all entitled. Diane
-
Thank you. My dearest friend, TB90, is not saying anything against the very important outrage from the Stage IV ladies. Maybe I know this because I know her. I am now, still, wondering about the "myth" of early detection. I would still like some info about this. I'm trying to know where to put his, for me. Could not have an Oncotype test at my small micro, but wish I could. Let's forget about why Amy felt she had to do this. She could be a B**** or she coud be a victim. That's done; we dont' know. But. Back to us. Is it true that early detection isn't reliable? Please tell me more. I thought I was cured. Am I wrong (not withstanding the increased chance of a possible fututre new BC)? -
Oh Percy, you so make me smile and realize how much pleasure women on these boards can bring. But I am so sorry that these discussions have unearthed your confidence in your cure. Early detection is not always possible and does not always ensure a cure. I am pretty certain that is what is meant (correct me if I am not reflecting others' comments accurately). But you were diagnosed very early and have an excellent chance for a cure. I say chance because I do not believe there are every any guarantees with bc in particular. Which is why we all feel so vulnerable. But your chances for a favourable outcome are about as good as they get for bc.
Hopefully others will comment as well. And to change the focus of this discussion would be very welcome.
-
Thank you so much, my Friend. We're all scared. xx -
I hesitate to add any fuel to this fire because both sides have made their points well. But the post about following the rules is nagging at me. I am posting below what we all read before clicking in to the stage IV forum. I do believe we are all in this together. We have ALL suffered, including AR. Certainly we all wish the best experience possible for everyone. I wish every day that my path could be as easy as some others and know that it has not been as bad others still. That does not mean that I want anyone else to have my experience just so they could understand. There is a great amount of shoulder shrugging that I have to so every day when people in my life make naive comments. I know they just don't get it. I think that is why the stage IV forum is supposed to be segregated. So that there is a place for those who have a better understanding of each other but at the same time so that others, who are not walking in those shoes, don't become offended or stricken with fear by what you see there.
Stage IV and Metastatic Breast Cancer ONLY
A place for those managing the ups & downs of a Stage IV/metastatic breast cancer diagnosis. Please respect that this forum is for Stage IV members only or those posting on behalf of a Stage IV patient. There is a separate forum for Stage IV Caregivers/Family in "Support and Community Connections".
At times I went lurking seeking information in this forum before my stage IV dx, but I knew I should not be there and would never consider judging anyone there for an opinion or comment that they had when I was not walking in their shoes. We all have risk and do all live in fear but there is a difference between fear and reality. As much as anyone's world changed when their dr first uttered the word cancer to them is as much as it changes when you hear them say metastasis.
As for Amy, we don't know how she felt through chemo. Yes she looked good but that is her job and she has a team of people to help her look good. I tolerated my treatments well. There were still many days that i felt like crap but put in makeup and a smile and went to work anyway. It offended me at times when my boss asked how I felt and I said terrible, and her response was but you LOOK good. I would have to remind myself that she doesn't get it. I began always responding to the question of how I felt with fine or good. It is a weakness to feel bad and that's not something many people can afford at work, especially in amys case. However, her comment on being tough WAS a twit thing to say. Being a public figure and a "journalist" she has to consider her words carefully. Therefore we can only assume that this comment expresses her true feelings/naivite. Yes it's offensive. People commenting on how this makes them feel about her isn't bullying. She chose to be a public figure and open herself up to public comments.
-
I agree with you, totally. And I think it's crap that Amy pretty much had to put a good spin on things or it would not go well for her. Enough about Amy. She did what she (unfortunately) felt she had to do, I guess. I can't even begin to believe she did it entirely willingly. If so, more bad on her. What I am glad about, however, is that the Stage IV ladies have had a chance to educate we (so far) early stage girls. So much love, and respect, to you, my amazing girlfriends. -
maybe amy is a celebrity who believes the hype about perky, happy people that the bosses of her show promote. Maybe she said what she did because she has bought into that hollywood fluff mentality that is part of the culture. If so, i hope her delusions serve her well.
-
I'm sorry that the thread upset some of you, and I hope that you'll reconsider leaving the forums completely over it. They are a wealth of information and support and incredibly caring people that you are unlikely to find anywhere else.
To clarify, I did not criticize AR for how well she seemed to deal with chemo. I stated quite plainly (I thought) in more than one post that I was jealous of her. I don't criticize or begrudge her feeling and looking good through chemo... I wish I had her luck!
But yes, her "tough" comment made my blood boil and I went to the stage IV forum -- the one place where I can feel safe enough to say the things that really upset me, because the others there GET IT -- and I vented my anger and frustration at AR's words. I didn't blast it throughout all the forums here. I didn't go and rain on AR's parade on her Facebook page with my bitter angry comments. I vented my feelings here, in the stage IV forum, in my safe place.
I'm terribly sorry that the letter F upsets you... but being told on national tv by AR that I am dying of breast cancer because I'm simply not as tough or brave as her... well, that upsets me. It upsets me that my children will see that tv clip and wonder why I wasn't tough enough to stay with them. It upsets me that AR gave millions of viewers the green-light to tell me and others like me, to our faces, that we just need to be a bit braver or a bit stronger to "kick cancer's butt."
I apologize to you for any hurt my thread caused you. And that's all I have to say about that.
-
kebab, my friend, you are lovely. Your apology is gracious, however IMO, you haven't a thing to apologize for
Caryn
-
You know what.. i am not here to teach anyone anything...
even if i agree with the original Op... and even if i agree with Bessie...
Are you all missing the f'ing point???
The ONLY reason that title and that rant is acceptable by this community is cuz you agree with it..
heres a story i heard from an old wise man in Africa while i was there ... a couple decades ago..
There was a teenager in a community causing lots of trouble..
(i'll skip the long parts)
Parents tried everything.. so the wiseman of the community told the child that everytime she did something wrong... mispoke to another or disrespected her elders... she had to go hammer a nail into the wodden fence..
after a month..the community gathered...and the child and the old man was there to...the fence was covered in nails
the little girl broke down.. cried and begged for forgiveness after she saw all the nails..
So the wise man said.. now i want you to do good deeds... and every time you do.. REMOUVE a nail..
she was happy to do so..
and when qall the nails were gone...the community gathered again..
they all rejoiced as the girl had changed her behavior and was now a productive and happy member of the community..
as everyone sang with glee... the wise man was silent..
the little girl asked him what is wrong...
he asked her to look at the fence and tell him what she saw...
she looked up and down the fence.. and saw all the holes..left by the nails..
she broke down and cried...the old man held her...
So... i guess im saying... that we dont need this kind of energy publicaly... no matter how good it feels to let it out... tyhe effect is deep and forever.
ALSO...it breaks the rules... NO HATE FUL COMMENTS...
and as for... rules dont apply to everyone... you got to be kidding me...
are you saying stage 4 can break the rules...but others cant??
sigh..seriously ladies... i expected a lot more from you all..especialy you bessie
very dissapointed...sigh
MOds? any comments ont he rules being broken...or you just gonna make an exception..again...sigh
-
Sorry to be a disappointment to you, Celine. I guess we are not all so very enlightened as we should be.
Beesie, loved your post - no surprise there.
Tang - I felt like hell going through chemo too & like you I sometimes felt like there must be something wrong with me or I was just a wimp because my SIL worked through most of her chemo & after the first 2 rounds I literally had to crawl to the bathroom some days. This is one reason that 'reporting' rather personal stories are so necessary. If a story on BC and its treatment had been done, the public would be educated on the fact that there are differing chemo combinations - some which are much more toxic and that are likely to produce much greater side effects than others. In a funny way I was almost relieved when I was so sick that my MO took one look at me and at my bloodwork and put me in the hospital, because I felt like it made it clear to me and others that I wasn't exaggerating my chemo induced illness as a ploy for attention or sympathy. I think that this is one of the troublesome things about the AR 'story' is that because she is presented as getting through chemo with very little difficulty, then those of us who don't somehow think we should be able to. I am quite sure her chemo was CMF - which causes many of the same side effects but usually in a much milder form & is generally used only for women who are low risk for mets (minimal lymph node invasion for instance). You are having TAC - which seems to be the hardest for most people.
I don't like the 'f' word or letter, but it is very easy for me to understand why women who know they are going to die of this thing would use it in relation to somebody who goes on national television and (probably not realizing it) basically tells the world that they are dying of cancer because they are not 'tough' and that if they were only a little 'tougher' they would be like her and would have beat it.If we are being told that we should forgive her for making this remark, then certainly we should also forgive (if we feel they need to be forgiven) those who are so hurt and angry about this comment that they lash out with a use of the f-word. If we look at actual damage caused - it seemsthat leading thousands and thousands of people to be complacent in their misinformed beliefs about BC and potentially causing many others to accept this misinformation is quite the larger damage than a few women on what is supposed to be a thread for them to be able to address their concerns getting mad at her for doing so.
-
to DeliriumPie and kebab. And kebab, I agree with exbrnxgrl - you have nothing to apologize for.
I was not going to comment any further on this topic, but since Celine has specifically called me out, I will respond to her latest post and comments. First, to Celine's comment:
Are you all missing the f'ing point???
The ONLY reason that title and that rant is acceptable by this community is cuz you agree with it..
I will respond with a very emphatic, NO, I AM NOT MISSING THE POINT. I am not so narrow-minded that I only support the feelings of those I agree with.
If someone on this board has the same surgeon as me, a surgeon who I think is absolutely terrific, and if this individual is angry at the surgeon and if she posts a thread entitled "F... Dr. Xyz", I would most certainly not agree with her opinion about Dr. Xyz, but I would have no problem with her post or her rant. We are all entitled to our opinions, whether others agree with us or not, and on this board, where everyone is dealing with a breast cancer diagnosis, we are all entitled to our rants. There are rules about how we engage with each other, but if we want to swear at our doctors or the system or our treatments or a public figure who says something really stupid, I don't see anything wrong with that. Even when I disagree with the rant.
Edited to add: Even if someone were to start a thread entitled "F... Beesie", I'd be okay with that too, even though it probably would violate the board rules. Some here would no doubt post in agreement while others would post to say they disagree. We probably all occasionally say things that anger or frustrate others, and if I do that, I'd rather have it out in the open. It would be better than some of the PMs that I've received and better than the years of subtle stalking that I went through with one member. And better too than some of the posts I've seen directed at other members here. Maybe that's why I don't have a problem with the Stage IV thread about Amy R. I'm against bullying and I have seen things on this board that have gone too far, but that thread actually doesn't seem to me to be anything more than a normal, rather colorful, rant.
Celine, if I have disappointed you, my suggestion is that you block my posts.
-
I just looked at the video clip of Amy Roback. I do agree with Ziggy and others, that A R should be taking this opportunity to explore BC in more depth, in terms of the types of chemo, side effects, long term issues, metastasis, fatality, etc. I hope that will happen, but I'm not optimistic. The true BC story ain't pretty and it doesn't sell to advertisers and boost ratings. A R did state that her chemo experience wasn't entirely rosy, and she did prefer to keep most of it private, suggesting that it might not have been a bed of roses. As far as her physical appearance on the show, we can't really tell anything. She has a full team of make-up artists and hairstylists. If she lost her eyebrows and eyelashes, they can both be artfully replaced with make up and false lashes. Who knows what the story was with her hair. She probably used cold caps, and she could be wearing a wig or a hairpiece of some sort. The statement that tough people overcome tough challenges was unfortunate, and understandably irritating (enraging for some). She was quoting someone else in that part of the segment. The entire thing was staged and scripted, either by her or her team.
-
I worked as paid staff in politics most of my working life, And I can assure you that public figures take an awful beating all the time. Don't go into public life unless you have a thick skin and are ready to stand up or apologize for what you say.
This was a public statement on national TV. As I reflect on it more, I think Amy was trying to say, I am not damaged goods, I am ready to continue my career (is she engaged?) just trying to put on a good face so she is not considered over.
Apparently, there is no love loss between Robin and her. We know what Robin went through. She probably felt trivialized too. As someone noted, Amy could have had a fabulous wig, painted on eyebrows and false eyelashes. I am not defending Amy. She owes an apology to cancer victims for the self serving appearance she made on TV. If, indeed, that is the case.
-
OK Fucking enough! I am brokenhearted and sick to my fuckiing stomach. Just stop everyone.
This has become the very thing that I was trying to address that is very wrong with some of the participants on BCO.
I am going to a place where I can safely discuss my feelings and be kind to others.
Moderators, please make forum iv threads invisible to others. Please take away their headings for us to see. I agree that they need a place to say whatever they want to say. I am totally in support of that. But as that is not the case right now, then please don't let any one person, even a public figure, be ostracized for the very human quality that everyone else here is displaying so vibrantly.
I am going back to my safe little world where the children call name calling bullying.
I am going back to my world where I try to understand and support others, no matter how I feel.
I am leaving a place where I feel sickened and saddened.
-
Now THAT felt like bullying. ^^^
-
TB90,
Well, clearly it's not the F word that upset you. This forum is no different than the real world and it's naive to think we can make it into some utopia. With over 100,000 members from all over the world, all of us will run into things that make us uncomfortable, upset or even offend. However, the solution is simple; do not read threads that upset you, block topics or members that upset you. I do it as needed and it works like a charm. If this is still too much for you, then, indeed, a parting, temporary or permanent will lower your stress over this issue.
-
Kebab: I did not mean to single you out and obviously I did by using your heading. I wanted your heading to just be an example of a pattern here that does seem to be very upset with all celebrities with bc. I wish that stage iv forums were actually private. But they are VERY public. That is a disservice to all of you. I have read some of them because I have been inspired and moved by you. The header captured my attention and I did not even see who had written it. I extend my very sincere apology.
Maybe I should apologize for everything I have done and said. I know that I feel like crap, both for being completely misunderstood (where did I ever say that I was against swearing??). I swear like a sailor. Where did I ever say that I did not support differing opinions? I thrive on them. And now I have fueled a fire that I had been trying to address.
I do not live in an ideal world. I am a suicide prevention worker on a First Nation Community where I have learned many valuable lessons. I will not go into the details about the realities of my world, but do not assume it is stressful, as I am honored to be able to be there and make the difference that I can. My world is far from Utopia. We had three beautiful young ladies recently die by suicide (all hangings that I witnessed) due to cyber bullying. Perhaps I am too sensitive to that topic and that is why I have responded here the way I have. I have been spending countless hours with children and their families addressing this issue to prevent any further pain in this community. So maybe my radar is on high right now.
Maybe I am just not tough enough. My skin is obviously not thick enough. Because this is not very colorful to me.
But it has been a valuable learning experience for me as now I have some genuine feelings to take with me on my next presentation.
I did not want to hurt anyone or to have others get hurt in this process. I kept my comments general (except maybe for dear Kebab).
We are all coming from "some place" and I just wanted everyone's place to be understood.
-
Lovely post, TB. Thank you for clarifying you position. As for the stage IV forum being private, I suppose that if the majority of us and the mods felt that that was the way to go, it would happen. So far that hasn't been the case. As for a controversial thread being a disservice to us stage IV ladies, well, we're only human.
-
I think a concern with keeping Stage IV private is that it won't be searchable in broad internet searches for those looking for support, or for those who are not ready to register. Not everyone wants to register, for various reasons, but they may still find information and benefit in reading the Stage IV forums.
I see no reason to keep them private, unless the Stage IV women actually together wanted that. I respect that as their forum, to share their lives, their ups and downs, and so much that I cannot even comprehend from where I sit. I may review their threads sometimes, and read some of the heartbreaking news of losses, but I have only posted in there 1-2x when it has been a general topic...like this one on Amy Robach being one of them. I respect that it is a place Stage IV women to feel free to talk about whatever they want and need.
There will be controversial threads and opinions on every board at some time, do we make them all private? Is it not much easier for someone who is bothered by a topic to just stay out of it or block certain posters, than to put up barriers to access for everyone?
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team