Prophylactic Mastectomy - Worth it?

Options
clperry
clperry Member Posts: 3

Hi All,

I am curious to know how many people opt for the prophylactic mastectomy after diagnosis and/or treatment...

I was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma at 30. I had a lumpectomy and node biopsy last October. My surgery was successful (clean margins) but there was cancer in 1 out of 3 nodes, with the other 2 showing signs of reaction to cancer. I am also estrogen positive. This makes me a high risk for re-occurence. My treatment plan is chemotherapy, further node surgery, radiation therapy and then hormone therapy. This will bring my chances of it coming back from 80% to 25-30%. I am also getting the genetic testing done ( my mother and maternal grandmother have had breast cancer). If my genetic testing comes back positive I will have the double mastectomy.

I am currently doing chemotherapy and considering having the surger done regardless of the genetic test results... 30% is still a big chance of it coming back and I would hate to do chemotherapy again. I also understand that the genetic testing can only tell so much and given my family's history of cancer there could be something there that testing hasnt been developed for. 

In a way, its a 'no-brainer' - bring my chances of re-occurence down to 1%! My questions to you are...

Would you or did you do it?

What kind of risks are there involved in mastectomies?

What kind of risks are involved in reconstruction?

And are those risks worth it?

Thank you!

Comments

  • StrongerThanAll
    StrongerThanAll Member Posts: 2
    edited February 2014

    Hi clperry.  I am 37 and was diagnosed with stage 1B IDC and DCIS in late Sept of 2013, which was 2 months after my younger sister was 32 was also diagnosed with DCIS.  My cancer was on the right side...2 small tumors of 6mm and 7mm which was the IDC and the whole lower half of my breast was DCIS.  After several biopsies and careful thought, I opted for a bilateral nipple sparing mastectomy with tissue expander reconstruction.  My sister also had a bilateral mastectomy with the tissue expanders, but she did not qualify for the nipple sparing.  After gradual expansion of the breast tissue, the expanders come out and breast implants go in.  It is a process of doing the expansion SLOWLY,  letting tissue heal correctly, and trying to end up with the best result possible.  you want it to last for 20 years+ so patience is key.  A great doctor will do this gradually over 6 months to a year, depending on your treatment and how that effects the plan.  My doctor says that the patients are their own worst enemy because they try to push the steps to happen fast b/c of work, family, etc. and it backfires in the end.  Believe me it is worth the wait to do it gradually to get the best result.  My surgery was 2 days before Thanksgiving of 2013, and we are trying for April of 2014 for my "exchange" surgery--if I am ready, if not we'll wait.  Mastectomy was a no brainer for me, but I also did my homework to make an informed decision.  #1 reason for me was that it gave me the best prognosis and not the CONSTANT worry about recurrence in my breast.  At least it's about a 99% chance.  Also I am young and strong enough to endure the surgery now.....radiation greatly effects the process of reconstruction as well so I know lumpectomy was not for me.  I look at it is as a chance to have a "rebirth"...eliminate the cancer and with the reconstruction, I am "upgrading" my figure Happy.  I am an A cup girl, so why not reward myself with some new curves!  I did not need Chemo and will start Tamoxifen soon, b/c my cancer is 97% positive for Estrogen and Progesterone.  I will also investigate removing my ovaries as part of my treatment, once I have had children.  I underwent fertility treatment to freeze embryos before I start the Tam b/c I have to take it for 2 years before I can try for a baby.  My family does not have a history of breast cancer and my sister and I do not carry the gene...doctor's don't understand how it happened.  My sister's cancer was hormonal too, and the surgery was her only treatment.  As far as risks, mastectomy with reconstruction is a major surgery, but most risks occur in people who are older, smoke, and are overweight.  I definitely say that the benefits outweigh the risks, b/c point blank the cancer is more threatening than the surgery itself.  Believe it or not my recovery went very well and was very manageable.  I was more upset that I couldn't have coffee for over 12 hours before my surgery than I was nervous about the surgery.  I went in on a Tues morning and was home by Wed afternoon.  You do much better in your own home.  That night after surgery I was up and walking around in the hallway.  I can describe the discomfort as a deep, dull, ache/ throbbing.  It was manageable and not severe as I thought, b/c you have to also remember that when the breast tissue is removed, the nerve endings come out too.  You will not have any more feeling on the skin surface of your breast, only internal muscle ache and things like that.  Over time I had some nerve regeneration that felt like a bee sting, but that was random and not often.  I was sent home with Percocet for pain, Diazepam for nighttime muscle spasms and Skelaxin for daytime muscle spasms. I would like to tell you more, but my computer says my post is too big already.  Let me know if you would like more info.  Good luck, you'll do great.

  • littlecalico
    littlecalico Member Posts: 28
    edited February 2014

    Hello clperry, hello strongerthanall, 

    Diagnosed at 25, HER positive, no history of BC in my family and no genetic alteration discovered, I'm going through the process of considering prophylactic contralateral mastectomy, having experience mastectomy of the cancer side already. 

    To answer your questions, clperry: I think I would do it. But I have 3 years before I decide (I'm barely 27 and the medical team will discuss it further after I'm 30), and I'm still thinking it over. I've been thinking about it ever since I was diagnosed, August 2012.

    Regarding risks: if you are talking surgery-wise: There are not a lot of risks involved in mastectomies, it's a relatively minimal procedure. Reconstruction, however, has more risks, but those depend greatly on the technique. For these questions, I advise you to talk to your oncologist or a surgeon.

    If you are talking recurrence risks, the difference between a mastecomy and a reconstruction is null: since the reconstruction follows a mastectomy. The same amount of breast tissue/mammal glands are removed. I've heard the risk of cancer goes down to 0.01% when you remove both breasts. So it means you still can get cancer, but it's very unlikely.

    My advise: take the time to think this through. You are about to embark on a hard journey, and you are also going to experience the joy of ending treatments. All these steps are roller-coaster rides, and each time casts a different perspective on everything; therefore, your decision regarding prophylaxy might vary. Mine was rock-solid through the whole treatment phase, and only a few months after treatment did I start having second thoughts about my decision. Until they told me I'd have to wait until 30 to decide. 

    So take the time to think. And listen to as many doctors as you can on this issue. They all have their opinion. Take a note book with you and write what they say: that way, you can read it again whenever you want.

    Good luck :)

  • kitpencil
    kitpencil Member Posts: 5
    edited April 2014

    Hi Littlecalico,

    I was wondering why you were advised to wait until 30 to consider a prophylactic mastectomy? 

    Thanks!

  • Cucho
    Cucho Member Posts: 42
    edited April 2014

    I was diagnosed at 32 and had a bilateral mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. I didn't have much of a choice as my cancer was more than could be removed w a lumpectomy and also becuz I tested brca1 positive. I got to do one step reconstruction w alloderm. This meant I woke up w my two new boobs in place and only needed one surgery. I found it to be a fantastic surgery actually in large part because I never had to go for many appointments or deal with being flat or have strange shaped breasts. My recovery was about 5 weeks. The aesthetic results are excellent. I don't have normal feeling in them which is odd for sure although I'm close to 2 yrs post surgery and some more feeling is returning now. It is scary to go through a bmx but for me it feels worth it. Overall it's scarier before than after your surgery because you don't know what to expect. In the end, recovery is relatively short, pain is manageable and it looks pretty good. Never mind the fact that cancer risk is seriously reduced. In my view, the cons of having fake breasts are wAy less than the cons of dealing w cancer again. That being said, some women encounter complications and we never know if we will be lucky in that respect. Good luck to you.

  • littlecalico
    littlecalico Member Posts: 28
    edited June 2014

    Hello, 

    kitpencil, sorry for the late answer. The doctors' argument was this: usually women who carry the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene do not get a prophylactic mastectomy before 30, so why should I, who doesn't carry (that they know of) any faulty gene, should do it before? 

    But it turns out medicine is changing as the world is changing: the average age at first diagnosis decreases, the proportion of women in their 20s and 30s w breast cancer increases, and perspectives change. 

    So today I'm happy to tell you all that the doctors accepted my request and did the prophylactic mastectomy. After many uncertainties on their side, and many on mine too (I didn't know the night before if I was taking the right decision), I realized just after the surgery how relief and peace of mine were sweet feelings, that I had not experienced for way too long. 

    All my love and strength to you all, 

    LC

Categories