Coverage Under New Health Care Exchanges

Options
Coverage Under New Health Care Exchanges

Comments

  • TX_Grandma
    TX_Grandma Member Posts: 11
    edited March 2014

    I saw this in yesterday's Houston Chronicle and thought it might be of interest.

    Cancer coverage off-limits at some of the best hospitals

    By Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar ASSOCIATED PRESS

    WASHINGTON — Some of America’s best cancer hospitals are off-limits to many of the people now signing up for coverage under the nation’s new health care program.Doctors and administrators say they’re concerned. So are some state insurance regulators.An Associated Press survey found examples coast to coast. MD Anderson Cancer Center says it’s in less than half of the plans in the Houston area. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance is excluded by five out of eight insurers in Washington’s insurance exchange. Memorial Sloan-Kettering is included by two of nine insurers in New York City and has out-of-network agreements with two more.Focus is on costsIn all, only four of 19 nationally recognized comprehensive cancer centers that responded to AP’s survey said patients have access through all the insurance companies in their states’ exchanges.Not too long ago insurance companies would have been vying to offer access to renowned cancer centers, said Dan Mendelson, CEO of the market research firm Avalere Health. Now the focus is on costs.“This is a marked deterioration of access to the premier cancer centers for people who are signing up for these plans,” Mendel-son said.Those patients may not be able to get the most advanced treatment, including clinical trials of new medications.And there’s another problem: It’s not easy for consumers shopping online in the new insurance markets to tell if top-level institutions are included in a plan. That takes additional digging by the people applying.“The challenges of this are going to become evident ... as cancer cases start to arrive,” said Norman Hubbard, executive vice president of Seattle Cancer Care Alliance.Subtle obstaclesBefore President Barack Obama’s health care law, a cancer diagnosis could make you uninsurable. Now, insurers can’t turn away people with health problems or charge them more. Lifetime dollar limits on policies, once a financial trap-door for cancer patients, are also banned.The new obstacles are more subtle.To keep premiums low, insurers have designed narrow networks of hospitals and doctors. The government-subsidized private plans on the exchanges typically offer less choice than Medicare or employer plans.By not including a top cancer center an insurer can cut costs. It may also shield itself from risk, delivering an implicit message to cancer survivors or people with a strong family history of the disease that they should look elsewhere.For now, the issue seems to be limited to the new insurance exchanges. But it could become a concern for Americans with job-based coverage, too, if employers turn to narrow networks.

  • NatsFan
    NatsFan Member Posts: 3,745
    edited March 2014

    As I posted in the other thread about this topic:

    Agreed - it's a deplorable situation and the fault lies squarely with
    the individual states. Maryland has very tight controls on both the
    insurance and hospital industries. Top-rated Johns Hopkins, an
    NCI-designated Cancer Center, is required by state law to accept all
    insurance - they can't pick and choose. More states need to make such
    requirements. Maryland also requires that hospitals charge everyone the
    same - they can't negotiate better rates for favored insurance
    companies and worse rates for other insurance companies and the
    non-insured.

    Maryland tends to be a leader in health cost and
    hospital cost containment, with good results. Here's an article about
    the most recent cost-containment initiative Maryland is starting, where
    hospitals have financial incentives to reduce unnecessary
    hospitalizations. From the article: "Under the plan, each Maryland
    hospital will be given a budget, based on
    its historic revenue levels, to care for a defined number of people in
    its community, regardless of the number of actual admissions or the
    severity of the cases. . . .The hope is that hospitals will, for
    example, hire doctors to work in
    nearby nursing homes to prevent chronically ill residents from ending up
    in the emergency room. Hospitals also are expected to collaborate with
    independent physicians in their communities to help chronically ill
    patients manage their diseases, thereby avoiding hospitalization." If
    it works, it could provide a model for other states.

    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/01/...

Categories