Taxol before AC, rather than the usual AC, then Taxol?

Options
megomendy
megomendy Member Posts: 141

Another forum I'm on, a woman said that her MO is giving her the Taxol first, because he follows the MD Anderson protocol. I found an article from 2011 on the TN website, but don't really understand all of it. And was wondering if anyone has heard anything else in the past 2/3 years.

http://forum.tnbcfoundation.org/attention-newbies-important-new-chemo-study_topic7771_page8.html

Comments

  • Luah
    Luah Member Posts: 1,541
    edited February 2014

    I have heard of a recent study that showed taxol first had better results. Can't lay my hands on it right now though.

  • Nettie1964
    Nettie1964 Member Posts: 759
    edited February 2014

    Well, I went to MD Anderson for second opinion and they told me 4 DD AC then 12 weekly taxol, then 33 rads!  So that's what I had!  And this was last year, started chemo in March 2013.

  • jbdayton
    jbdayton Member Posts: 700
    edited February 2014
    Here is the article on taxol before a/c from the MD Anderson study.  

    Chemotherapy Sequence Affects Early Breast Cancer Outcomes

    Elsevier Global Medical News. 2011 Jan 7, B Jancin

    SAN ANTONIO (EGMN) — The sequence in which paclitaxel and anthracyclines are given for treatment of early breast cancer makes a big difference in long-term outcomes.

    That's the conclusion reached in what is believed to be the largest-ever retrospective study of the clinical impact of the sequencing of taxanes and anthracyclines. The study involved 3,010 early breast cancer patients who were treated during 1994-2009 and entered into the prospective online database at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

    The clear winner was paclitaxel, followed by anthracycline-based therapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cyclophosphamide or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide, Dr. Ricardo H. Alvarez reported at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium.

    Starting with paclitaxel rather than an anthracycline-first regimen led to better long-term results in the settings of adjuvant chemotherapy and primary systemic (or neoadjuvant) therapy.

    The adjuvant chemotherapy analysis included 1,596 women, three-quarters of whom received paclitaxel followed by anthracyclines. The 5-year relapse-free survival rate with this regimen was 88.8%, compared with 79.5% when anthracyclines were followed by paclitaxel. The 10-year relapse-free survival rates were 81.8% and 73.5%, respectively.

    Five-year overall survival was 93.1% with paclitaxel followed by anthracyclines, compared with 83.2% for the reverse. The 10-year overall survival rates were 83.9% and 65.6%, respectively.

    In a multivariate analysis that was stratified for potential confounders, including age, clinical stage, hormone receptor status, tumor grade, and era of diagnosis, the anthracyclines-first sequence was associated with a 67% increased risk of relapse (P less than .0001) and a 2.5-fold greater risk of mortality (P = .001), according to Dr. Alvarez, a medical oncologist at M.D. Anderson.

    Among 1,414 patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy, the 5-year relapse-free survival rate was 79.0% with the paclitaxel-first regimen vs. 61.2% with the anthracyclines-first regimen. Ten-year relapse-free survival occurred in 61.7% and 50.5%, respectively, of these patients.

    Overall survival was 84.2% and 66.2% at 5 and 10 years, respectively, in patients who received paclitaxel followed by anthracyclines, compared with 71.3% and 53.4% in those who got anthracyclines first.

    In a multivariate analysis, the anthracyclines-followed-by-paclitaxel sequence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with an adjusted 49% higher risk of relapse (P = .01) and a nonsignificant 28% increase in risk of all-cause mortality (P = .17), compared with the paclitaxel-first strategy.

    The mechanism that accounts for the increased efficacy of taxane-first regimens for treatment of breast cancer is unclear, according to Dr. Alvarez.

  • Luah
    Luah Member Posts: 1,541
    edited February 2014

    Thanks Jeannine, that's the study I was thinking of. Granted, it's only one study and there may be other things at work, but the results are quite significant; if I were going through chemo today (and thank god I'm not), I'd push for taxol first.  

  • houtex
    houtex Member Posts: 2
    edited April 2014

    I'm a current patient of Dr Alvarez at MD Anderson and I am receiving 12 weekly Taxol and then I will receive 4 FAC, one every 21 days.  

  • alycallie
    alycallie Member Posts: 32
    edited May 2014

    Me too, houtex. What week are you on? Monday will be #10 Taxol for me!

  • houtex
    houtex Member Posts: 2
    edited May 2014

    I just finished Taxol #3 on Thursday which will be followed by 4 FAC and then surgery and radiation.   You are way ahead of me- stay strong!

Categories