ACTH Vs. TCH

Options
Katnat
Katnat Member Posts: 13


Hi all,


I'm 30 years old and was diagnosed with IDC ER/PR/HER2 +3 almost 2 months ago.


Currently I'm in the middle of the egg harvesting process (I'm single).


I had a lumpectomy (thinking to do a mastectomy after the chemo instead of the radiation) and I suppose to start my chemo in a week.


Until now I'm not sure which regime to have...ACTH or TCH.


One oncologist suggested the TCH the other suggested the ACTH..


What to do?!?


Which protocol has the worst side effects? Which one one is more efficient?


Here are 2 links regarding this topic..


http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/30/18/2179


http://www.medscape.org/viewarticle/551428


I haven't decided yet..


Please help..


Thank you!!

Comments

  • suzieq60
    suzieq60 Member Posts: 6,059
    edited November 2013

    My oncologist recommended TCH since I was node negative (ie there is no cancer in your lymph nodes). He said he only does ACTH for node positive women. However, given your age, it might have some bearing on the treatment.

  • naiviv
    naiviv Member Posts: 535
    edited November 2013


    There is a study that compared the 2. I will try and get the name for you.(bcirg 006) I think is the name. I read it . I am on TCH. H is a necessity for her2+. H can be cardio toxic. So can A. In the study Cardiac incidents were higher in persons with ACTH regimen then TCH. recurrence rates in TCH were I believe 2% higher. You will be given an echo or a muga scan to check your heart, asked about family health in the heart area and those questions may help with decision.


    I had one onc recommend acth and another tch. I am receiving tch. PM if you have any questions


    Vivian

  • sduch1
    sduch1 Member Posts: 104
    edited November 2013


    Here is a link to the study mentioned above: http://www.cirg.org/NR/rdonlyres/eno7mvfpseiqi5g3pernz37zzeavin4f7o5hos4zwlu76clvwkfluhskusgcmnqvyqk7ksb4gdimpmt6xcmkxppnqce/945_GS5_02_+abst+62+Jan+10.pdf


    I refer to it a lot for reassurance. I was given ACTH by my onc at MGH but they reversed the order and did TH, surgery, then AC and I had a pathologic complete response with just TH. I'm still glad I did the ACTH though since the DFS incidents are slightly better in the study. A new drug has also been approved, Perjeta so that is an option too! It was not available when I had chemo.

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited November 2013


    Perjeta can only be used for early stage neoadjuvently (before surgery) so if this is a drug you are interested in receiving, in combination with other chemo drugs and Herceptin, you need arrange for chemo first, surgery afterward.

  • Katnat
    Katnat Member Posts: 13
    edited November 2013


    thank you all..


    I am still confused..


    What about the side effects ..?

  • hopeful123
    hopeful123 Member Posts: 191
    edited November 2013


    I did ACTH for the same reasons as listed by others. Even though it was just a few percent better DFS it made it worth it for me. There were a lot of people doing TCH in my monthly chemo group so based on their experiences I would say the side effects are not that different. The biggest difference is that the ACTH goes much longer compared to the TCH as the number of rounds are different. So it did make me a little sad during treatment that others were getting done while I still had a few more months to go. But having said that I would still choose ACTH as I was 45 and hormone receptor negative.





  • sduch1
    sduch1 Member Posts: 104
    edited November 2013


    Sorry, I know--it is confusing. I think it helps to have a doctor/institution that you trust. I started at a local hospital and then went to a major cancer center and trusted MGH's recommendation (both hospitals recommended ACTH but in different orders). I was of the mindset that I wanted the most aggressive treatment at the time and was worried I still wasn't getting enough with ACTH. I think what you end up deciding will depend on stage. For me, I wanted the highest DFS % which was ACTH regardless of side effects. I met a woman who was older than me and had a lower stage and she was given 3 options, TH, TCH, and ACTH. She ended up going with TCH. As far as side effects, my understanding is that the biggest risk with A and H is that they both can cause heart problems so TCH is less cardio toxic. So far, my heart function is fine. Also, ACTH does take longer to complete and I always thought the side effects with ACTH were worse but I don't know! My most notable side effects with TH were hair thinning/eventual loss, a lot of GI issues-mouth sores, UTI infections, throat issues. But, I still had energy and could do everything I normally did. My side effects with AC were brain fogginess, sluggishness, loss of appetite, constipation (stay on top of it!). I must have chemo brain because I really can't remember! I thought AC was the worst part but both AC and TH are doable and before you know it you won't even remember.

  • sduch1
    sduch1 Member Posts: 104
    edited November 2013


    In that BCIRG 006 study, after approximately 5 1/2 years:


    For patients who were lymph node negative, there was a 93% DFS for those on ACTH and 90% DFS for those on TCH.


    For patients who had 4 or less lymph nodes positive, there was an 85% DFS on ACTH and 81% on TCH.

  • JeninMichigan
    JeninMichigan Member Posts: 2,974
    edited November 2013


    I was stage IV from the start with liver and bone mets. I did TCH. My onc did not want to risk any possible heart issues with Adrimycin since I will need to be on Herceptin forever and Herceptin can affect your heart too. TCH did the trick for me as I was NED after three cycles and I have stayed NED now for over 5 years. Side effects for me were fatigue that hit about 4 day after chemo, stomach/gi issues, taste changes. I worked full time throughout and missed only a couple of days here and there mostly due to diarrhea.


    Jennifer

Categories