Surgery or Chemo first?

Options
tangandchris
tangandchris Member Posts: 1,855
edited June 2014 in Just Diagnosed
Surgery or Chemo first?

Comments

  • tangandchris
    tangandchris Member Posts: 1,855
    edited November 2013

    Went to the oncologist yesterday for the 1st time. LOTS of information, but at the same time don't know that I know or understand anymore than I did before...if that makes sense.

    We go back to the surgeon today and hopefully they will have talked about what they think is the best route, surgery first or chemo first. The oncologist seemed to be saying she thought chemo first was good, but that there really was no real data to show that chemo vs surgery first made any real difference in fighting cancer. I personally feel like I want the surgery first, partly because I want this cancer out of my body and also because of insurance costs. (hate that we are reduced to that)

     

    Anyway, just wondered what some of ya'lls thoughts were on this and how some of ya'll might have done it. Chemo or surgery first.?

  • EstelaLorca
    EstelaLorca Member Posts: 98
    edited November 2013


    Hi,


    I hope you had a second pair of ears when you visited the oncologist, it can be hard to digest all of that information. If not, maybe in the future, I would recommend it. I was in South America when I first noticed a "hardness" in my left breast. Long story short, the surgeon gave this information. Chemo can shrink the tumour but it can not control how it shrinks...length wise or width. She also left me with a choice chemo first/surgery after and vice versa.


    I'm from Canada, and when I confirmed my diagnosis I headed back home as fast as possible. Like you, I wanted it out of my body. I think most doctors here prefer to do surgery first then treatment. But everyone is different, everyones cancer is different.


    I hope that helped.

  • LizzyinMI
    LizzyinMI Member Posts: 43
    edited November 2013


    Hi There -


    I had two tumors, one IDC and one DCIS and one lymph node that tested positive from my biopsy. I was given the choice of surgery or chemo first. My OC was leaning to the chemo first - one of her explanations: The chemo can shrink the tumor and the patient can see the results, with surgery first, you, the patient, really don't know if the chemo is working. Anyway, I did chemo first. Four A/C treatments every other week then twelve weekly taxol. After the first A/C treatment the tumor had shrunk. After the second, it was gone. My treatment didn't change. I had surgery on Oct.2 and the pre-surgery MRI I had showed nothing out of the ordinary - no tumors, no suspicious lymph nodes. My path report from surgery came back clean, no cancer. Even in the lymph node that tested positive in March.


    Saw my OC for follow-up two weeks ago. She said there was a 15 - 20% chance of the chemo completely obliterating the cancer. So, more likely it would shrink but in my case it disappeared. I am now into my second week of rads. I am excited by the outcome because it was unexpected and of course I'll probably be nervous about reoccurrence for the rest of my life.


    It's a hard decision but I based it on my age (49) and the fact I was in good health and the cancer was found early.

  • BikerLee
    BikerLee Member Posts: 355
    edited November 2013


    Depending on the details of your diagnosis, chemo first could offer some really big benefits...


    1 - you get to know whether the chemo works


    2 - earlier treatment of cells that might have wandered outside the surgical zone


    3 - TIME to make surgical decisions (e.g., mastectomy or lumpectomy ... recon decisions etc...)


    My health care team told me that there is a small but significant improvement in outcomes when chemo precedes surgery.


    Ask your health care team loads of questions so that you feel well equipped to make the decision about the order of treatment etc...


    Sorry you have to face this.


    Good luck.


    Lee

  • ali68
    ali68 Member Posts: 1,383
    edited November 2013


    I had chemo first and got to feel and see the cancer shrinking. I got a complete response so I was very happy.

  • dfwmom70
    dfwmom70 Member Posts: 14
    edited November 2013

    I also had chemo prior to surgery. In fact, I just finished my last chemo treatment on Oct 30 and have my MRI on Monday.  Both the breast surgeon and oncologist seem very positive about how the tumor responded to the treatments.  They believe the tumor is gone. I am glad I chose chemo first and got to feel and see changes.  I think it helped me at least psychologically.  Next step is surge

  • jbdayton
    jbdayton Member Posts: 700
    edited November 2013


    I also did chemo first. I had a 3 cm grade 3 tumor near the chest wall if not invading the chest wall. I was told chemo likes fast growing tumors and we tried for shrinkage and try to pull it away from the chest wall. I got the desired shrinkage results.


    Final path after surgery. Only a small 5mm residual IDC was identified with an area of 1.3 cm DCIS in the original tumor bed with narrow margin near chest wall so radiation was needed. Also one sentinel node showed fibrous scarring possibly related to prior lymph node metastasis with pathological complete response. Further immunostaining resulted in negative findings of micrometastes in the lymph node.


    I feel fortunate my results were a near pathological complete response. 2 more days of radiation and done with conventional treatments.


    Final path staging is ypT1a pN0. This means final tumor size 1a and no node involvement after chemo.


    Now to wait for a few months and begin the reconstruction process.


    Good luck in choosing the correct path for you.


    Remember each person's treatment has to be tailored for your tumor and health. By no means what worked for me might be your best option, just gave my details for food for thought. I wanted surgery first for the fear of leaving the tumor there to spread but was convinced otherwise. It worked for me.


    (((HUGS)))

  • christina0001
    christina0001 Member Posts: 1,491
    edited November 2013


    Just my two cents but if you are going with a lumpectomy, I'd do the chemo first. It will hopefully shrink the tumor so there is less to cut out.

  • encyclias
    encyclias Member Posts: 302
    edited November 2013


    I had chemo first also, A/C x 4, three weeks apart. I started with two solid lumps totalling 5cm and a few nodes with cancer. My MO could feel the two lumps shrinking by the 2nd infusion, and the two swollen nodes and the lumps were no longer palpable by the last. A couple months later, I had a SNB and a lumpectomy to check; one of the lumps was totally gone but I did have a 3mm residual bit of the other lump still there. The margins were wide and clean and the nodes were now clear of cancer. I went on to rads, which were completed in July.


    Just had a PET scan a few weeks ago, and I am clear of cancer for now. I just hope it stays that way.


    Sending prayers and healing thoughts to all here.


    Carol

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited November 2013


    I guess I'm in the minority. I had the surgery first, then the chemo after the pathology results. I don't know which is better, it seems that they are doing chemo first these days.

  • GeorgiaRai
    GeorgiaRai Member Posts: 175
    edited November 2013


    This may sound silly but in addition to all the reasons listed here, I found another little silver lining to neoadjuvant chemo: I got the hair loss over with early on. Then, after my BMX and throughout radiation, I didn't have hair to try to blow dry or style! That worked for me because I didn't have the time or energy to devote to it, and it would've driven me crazy. By the time I finished radiation, my hair was coming back in.


    I had no choice - my surgeon needed the tumor reduced before attempting to remove it. I didn't have a complete response but wasn't expecting to with a large ILC tumor, so I was happy with the order of treatment (SNB, then chemo, then BMX, then rads). I also liked having more time to consider my reconstruction options, and by the time I had to decide, I was 100% comfortable with my decision not to reconstruct at all.


    Good luck to you, tangandchris. ((hugs))

  • tangandchris
    tangandchris Member Posts: 1,855
    edited November 2013


    Well, I decided to do surgery first....and the surgeon agreed(imagine that). :)

    IDK though, I keep wondering if I'm doing the right thing. I will be having a BI-MX, but only the right side has cancer. I'm indecisive about all big decisions in life, so this is no different for me. Not to mention that I just don't see myself ever being completely okay with this. I guess there is a part of me that thinks I should have this "ah-ha" moment of being at peace with all of this. lol! Love to you all!

  • GeorgiaRai
    GeorgiaRai Member Posts: 175
    edited November 2013


    Good for you, tang! Sending you good wishes for your surgery and recovery.

Categories