Luminal B IDC on Hormonal Therapy - Worried

Options
jojo2373
jojo2373 Member Posts: 662

I hope I am not repeating a topic, but I am wondering if any others are worried about recurrence on Tamoxifen with Luminal B?  All I have read is Luminal B presents as ER+ but has other characteristics which are not responsive to hormone therapies. This is primarily seen when PR is low or negative.   I had ER+ 100%, PR+ less than 10%, HER2-, grade 3, high proliferation rate.  What other info do you guys have?

Comments

  • doxie
    doxie Member Posts: 1,455
    edited July 2013

    I did some research on this when it looked like I may have to switch from AIs to Tamoxifen because of serious eye SEs.  My % are similar to yours making mine a Luminal B tumor.  After reading, I decided to try hard to stay on AIs because of possible tam resistance and uterine polyps.  There are other things you need to consider if you are still pre-meno, I am not.  

    Here are some articles to read that may help.

    http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/97/17/1254.long

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3163848/

    http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/21/10/1973.long

  • new_direction
    new_direction Member Posts: 449
    edited August 2013

    I don't think it's particularly in luminal B IDC but to add to this discussion about effectiveness of Tamoxifen Ive read that decreasing breast density was an indication of better prognosis.

    I just found this http://www.breastcancer.org/research-news/20121217-5 "Of all the women diagnosed with luminal B breast cancer, women treated with tamoxifen had worse outcomes than women treated with Femara no matter if they had ductal or lobular breast cancer."

    Some other articles:
    http://breast-cancer-research.com/content/13/6/221 - possible ways to target luminal b
    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090623215852.htm - GF signaling pathway in luminal B
    http://medicine.missouri.edu/imed/docs/gr_102810_kardinal.pdf - suggests AI instead

  • new_direction
    new_direction Member Posts: 449
    edited August 2013

    Im starting to worry too! Is it ineffective for luminal B, really? should I switch to something else? has anyone done anything "natural" like grape seed extract or other things????

    this is really like being your own advocate all the time.

  • doxie
    doxie Member Posts: 1,455
    edited August 2013

    I think it is important to understand that AIs may be more effective for treating Luminal B cancer, but that doesn't mean that Tamoxifen is ineffective.  Only slightly less than AIs.  

    There are so many things you can do to reduce the risk of recurrence that have been well researched and validated as effective - exercise, nutrition, weight loss, Vitamin D.  Unfortunately "natural" supplements and foods don't have the research behind them.  Personally, if I was pre-meno, I would stay on Tamoxifen and make sure I got losts of excercise, ate healthy food, stayed at a healthy weight and made sure that my Vit D stayed at 70+.  Reducing stress and living life to it's fullest would also be high on my list.  Doing well with the first four.  Working on the latter two.

  • new_direction
    new_direction Member Posts: 449
    edited August 2013

    doxie thanks you are right. Its not the only option we/I have to prevent the disease from coming back.

    Some places luminal B is referred to as tamoxifen-resistant. I would like to learn more about this because whats the point in taking it if it doesnt work? It would also be nice to avoid possible serious sideeffects if it doesn't work on my cancer type anyway...

  • NancyHB
    NancyHB Member Posts: 1,512
    edited August 2013

    Thanks for starting this topic - I hadn't heard anything about this before.  I'm Luminal B (very low ER+, PR-, Oncotype score 42 but no ki67 tested).  I started on Tamoxifen but gave it up because of SEs, then tried Aromasin, gave that up after 2 months because of the pain. After a second try of Tamoxifen I gave up on all meds and am now simply hoping.  I'm going to have to do some more research.

  • doxie
    doxie Member Posts: 1,455
    edited August 2013

    NancyHB,

    I know you have given up all meds, but you might give arimidex or femara a try.  Sometimes you can find an AI that doesn't bother you that much.  I had pain on both arimidex and aromasin, but can live with the latter.  After 9 months on aromasin, my pain is completely managed by OTC NSAIDs.  I only have to take 1 or 2 pills a day, and not every day.  42 is a high risk oncotype score, AIs may help a great deal in lowering you recurrence risk.  

    Did you try anything to manage the pain?

  • NancyHB
    NancyHB Member Posts: 1,512
    edited August 2013

    doxie,

    Great suggestions, thank you.  My MO seemed to think that I'd tolerate Aromasin better than Arimidex, and hasn't offered either Arimidex or Femara now that I've stopped.  The joint pain was so bad that I was struggling to walk, and sleeping required medication.  OTCs weren't touching it, and I cannot live on Rx pain meds. We talked extensively; my MO acknowledges that these meds only have about a 45% compliance rate because of the SEs, and while she didn't give me permission to quit, supports my decision.  As you point out, I understand the increased risk for recurrence given my Oncotype score; I'm trying to see the 77% chance of non-recurrence, rather than the 23% chance of recurrence.  :-)  Even my MO noted that those who take AIs have recurrence.  I think I've made my peace with whatever the outcome will be.

  • new_direction
    new_direction Member Posts: 449
    edited August 2013

    I found some new information and wanted to share. It's not about luminal B cancer in particular but it states that
    - Tamoxifen improves survival especially in lymph node positive patients.
    - ovarian ablation is better at improving survival than Tamoxifen.
    - the results are similar no matter if the Tamoxifen dosage is 20 og 40 mg (thats what I have been looking for also).
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217212/#BMJ_0102_I12

    bone mineral density and cardiovascular risk should be considered also though. Guess its still not very simple...

  • WifeWBC
    WifeWBC Member Posts: 53
    edited July 2014

    I think this thread is another reason why people's ages should be included alongside their cancer characteristics.  Hard to tell if a women is post or pre menopausal on this thread, so difficult to determine those who might be in a similar situation to my wife.  The study posted above talks only about post menopausal women.  I always thought tamoxifen was only given to premenopausal women.  I am obviously misinformed.  Some posters have suggested they stopped using tamoxifen.  Was this on the advice of their OMs?  Are these ladies pre or post menopausal?  Be nice to know.

    While you cannot use these boards to diagnose, it is still a very useful tool to be educated when you get to see your OM.  Not knowing all posters ages and / or menopausal status makes it difficult to get the complete picture of status, and draw comparisons.  If these boards are to assist people in coping with the disease, then I think posters age or menopausal status is a valuable piece of information that is currently omitted.

    As for me, even though my wife is a nurse, I find that I pretty much advocate for her when we see the doctors or OM.  I've educated myself enough to be a pain in the ass for my wife's OM.  If I had a dime for the number of times her OM has said "that's a very good question".  Since my wife is due to begin her tamoxifen regime on Monday, I am now quite concerned about this luminal B and potential for tamoxifen ineffectiveness.  We don't get to see the OM for another 3 months.  I'm thinking I should request a special meeting to discuss this particular subject.

    My wife is high ER + 90% low PR + 10, which I understand is deemed negative.  Based on this alone, and without any ki67 testing, her OM has characterized my wife as having luminal B cancer.  I am a little concerned with how she arrived at this conclusion, but I am also concerned about the dearth of information around the subject of tamoxifen effectiveness for luminal B or even PR negative cancers.

    Would appreciate anyone's feedback in this matter.

    Are their premenopausal ladies on this forum who's OMs have taken the off tamoxifen because their OMs believe it to be inneffective?

    If I find out more from our OM, online, or whatever, then I will post my findings.

    Tony

  • new_direction
    new_direction Member Posts: 449
    edited July 2014

    Hi WifeWBC

    I've been concerned as well because the prognosis is worse. I'm Luminal B - premenopausal. So I started searching for information.
    I have not been taken off tamoxifen. They don't even distinguish between the diff types when choosing hormonal therapy. Its just the standard of care for premenopausal. The breast density might decrease after you've begun treatment, this should be a good prognostic sign. Also not having periods return should be a good prognostic sign. Symptoms of menopause a good sign.

    I guess the reason for not distinguishing is - what's the alternative?
    The prognosis might be worse but I don't think it means it doesn't work on anybody. Just like chemo - good for some and not for others. Impossible to say but I don't dare not go through with it.

    I know some patients with BRCA mutations are advised to have their ovaries removed. So I think prognosis IS better with an oophorectomy but it might not outweigh the risks if you are not high risk BRCA. Also I was told increasing dose to 40 mg if periods returned. So far they have only been irregular/rarely so I take that as a good sign.

    Maybe they had another measure to see how many cells were in division - otherwise it does sounds strange they were able to say luminal B just from ER+.

    good luck with everything

Categories