Choosing nonreconstruction on the BCO web site?
Comments
-
"The second paragraph states; "It's very normal to feel anxious, uncertain, sad, and mournful about giving up a part of your body that was one of the hallmarks of becoming a woman: a significant part of your sexuality, what made you look good in clothes, how you fed your babies". Can someone please do something about "what made you look good in clothes"?"
Couldn't agree more. I mean, my boobs were kinda cute and all, but I am able to look perfectly fine without them, in clothes and out of clothes.
It is emotional in many ways, but I think any amputation would probably be. It is not nice to lose body parts. At the same time, I was glad it was boobs and not a leg, for example. Yes, there is loss of sexual function, and that is not great obviously, but I can still walk, talk and do everything I used to do.
-
Linda, very good point that it does not have to be an immediate descision. When I was in hosp an Irish Cancer Society volunteer came to visit. She had chosen to get recon 19 years after her surgery.
I too would like to see the "issue" prominent in the general info on the site.
2 days ago I decided to wear a pretty, flowery, close fitting top. I am UMX, so asymmetrical. I would also add that I am an artist, by profession graphic designer, and very visually oriented, and yes I like symmetry. However my body is now not symmetrical, and I would like to wear pretty clothes. Up to now I have worn big shirts and tracksuits. Possibly 'cos we got a bit of decent weather after a very cold, sunless spring I just put on something I would have worn before mastectomy. The first person to call to my door told me how pretty I looked. As I am going back to full time education shortly this was something I wanted to do before going to college, as I want to know for sure that I am comfortable doing it before I meet a new crowd of classmates.
I too would like to see it acknowledged in the general info that not only do plenty of women choose not to undergo recon, but also that while many choose prosthesis, equally many choose not, or only choose it sometimes.
Good thread!
-
I think there should be some information about how for many women the emotioal reactions changes over time. In other words, when I made the decision and for a few months after, I was struggling with feelings of loss. I remember feeling incredibly self conscious on the beach, even just walking around. Now, it not only doesn't bother me, I'm pleased. I don't have to worry about bc; i can wear little tank tops that I would have fallen out of before, I don't have bras.
Also, mods, don't forget that there are many ways that women choose to live after not having recon. Completely flat - 24/7 - which is me. Occasional foobs - for work or special occasions. Foobs for work and outside the house. And some choose to wear foobs even at home.
-
LOVE LOVE LOVE this thread and the points it raises. Because symmetry is paramount to me, I insisted on BMX once the decision for MX had been made (many many factors but avoiding radiation top of the list). I chose no recon and no prostheses thinking I would be alone in the world on this one, but in the back of my mind knowing I could fall back on forms. Then the center dog ears made that impossible. It was flat period until further surgery which brings me to something I find critical. Looking around the last year or two, there is a concerted effort in the professional and related fields, to push for reconstruction, to stop MX as much as possible and push for LX with radiation. There is even more gnashing of teeth over contralateral proph MX. I have the very deepest respect and regard for those whose motto is "Symmetry is overrated". I am not that girl. For me to live happily and with optimism, I personally need symmetry. We are all individuals, and there is no one size fits all that will ever work. Contralateral proph MX was a critical option for me. WHRCA provides for surgery on the contralateral side for symmetry. In my mind there should be no difference whether that means recon with contralateral adjustment or MX and contralateral proph MX with no recon to achieve symmetry. I am frankly alarmed by the push I see to stop or limit our choices. We hear doctors and others say to patients who choose no recon, Do you want to be mutilated? What does it say to that woman if A, she chooses no reconstruction, B, medical reasons prevent reconstruction, C, she reconstructs but then for whatever reasons ends up deconstructing? That the professional world thinks she is ugly or unworthy? How dare they even entertain that thought. By the way, the same doctors who were so bloody gung ho to get her into reconstruction, are often too ready to shove her out the door without a second thought when it all goes horribly wrong and they have no more surgical fixes. They have so poisoned the waters that I do not know how they expect women to pick themselves up from that? Especially when they just toss them out the door with no support, no nothing. I REFUSE to consider myself mutilated. I AM NOT MUTILATED!! I didn't choose no recon because I didn't care any more or that I had given up. I chose it because I do care, I have certainly not given up and I respect and love my body as it is. I am STILL an attractive woman, as much a woman as I have ever been. And surprise surprise, that thought is shared by my friends, family and co-workers. I am at the point where I could just about punch someone's lights out who dares to call one of my sisters in scars "mutilated." NOT HAVING IT!!! Many on the Rant thread and now part of the FB Flat & Fabulous group are determined to make no reconstruction and flat, not better than, but certainly equal to all of the other available options. That this option will be normal with no apologies. We are vibrant strong amazing women and it is about time we were recognized as such. We are so much more than a throw away afterthought at the end of a sentence.
Barbara
-
Thank you, Barbara, for clearly stating those points. When I was making my decision, it seemed reconstruction was presented to me as a "silver lining" to having my breasts removed. No reconstruction somehow was identified as "settling". There is no silver lining to having breast cancer and having your breasts removed. It is life altering. However, choosing not to reconstruct can be a positive, life affirming decision. Reconstructions pose numerous risks, and many suffer from the side effects of such procedures. In contrast, a simple mastectomy with tidy incisions is probably the easiest on one's body. Faster healing, less mobility issues, less pain or no recon procedures to put additional stress on the body. Not choosing reconstruction isn't just a boring non-choice; it is a healthy and natural choice that can lead to a speedier recovery. It is a positive choice that speaks volumes about one's self confidence, self knowledge and pride of body.
-
Mods,
Thank you for your responsiveness. I think your original list is excellent and there have been many great additional suggestions. I couldn't agree more with Tina's point that choosing not to reconstruct is a positive, healthy, life-affirming decision. And I certainly second Starak's (Barbara's) point that I have never felt mutilated, disfigured, less womanly, or any of the other pejorative terms some people apply to women who have not had reconstruction. I think doctors sometimes pressure women by assuming they will feel this way about themselves, so your idea of addressing this pressure from physicians (and others) is a good one. Despite not feeling that a mastectomy would be disfiguring, I did want the best cosmetic result possible, so your intention to include discussion of dog ears, etc., is also a good one.
I particularly like the comment of alexandria58: don't forget that there are many ways that women choose to live after not having recon. Completely flat - 24/7 - which is me. Occasional foobs - for work or special occasions. Foobs for work and outside the house. And some choose to wear foobs even at home.
I think it would be great if these options could be described in a balanced way in your informational section (maybe with a definition of terms--breast forms, prostheses, foobs). Beyond that, I think it would be an excellent idea to provide a link in that section directly to this "Living Without Reconstruction" forum, since some women might not immediately find it otherwise. Here on the forum, women can ask further questions and engage in spirited discussion.
-
It was brought up but bears repeating, there is an appalling lack of photos available anywhere on the web and even then difficult to find when looking for mastectomy without reconstruction. If you search for dog ears related to mastectomy or what a skin sparing mastectomy looks like if you do not follow through with reconstruction, they are virtually impossible to find. You would think they were national security issues, the way they are so carefully hidden from the public. Again as mentioned, many surgeons are guilty of ignoring their patients wishes and leaving a bunch of extra skin in a fit of "what if they change their minds" without a moments consideration for "what if they don't change their minds?" For the surgeons, more surgery to fix the mess is no big deal, where to us as the patients, it is enormous and may influence many to live with something they never would have chosen and would have done anything to prevent if only they had any idea beforehand of what they would wake up with. When we choose no reconstruction, we still require their best efforts. I often think they give their worst which may be a different subject but I want to know why there is not better oversight and standards as to what should be expected as acceptable results. Some of the worst should have lost their licenses years ago and some, in my opinion, should be sitting in prison.
-
I am willing to photograph my chest and allow BCO to use it as an example of The Gold Star Standard of bilateral mastectomy without reconstruction. I do hope that some other women who might not have had as stellar a result might consider doing the same. I will provide a discreet photo that is anonymous. It is just that I feel we need to alert women of good, bad and terrible results.
Also linking to http://www.breastfree.org
would help quite a bit, but even still, IF BCO could cover these topics while providing images, AND linking to Breast Free, that would be the best.
-
Yes I would be willing to provide anonymous photos as well.
-
Wow, I love this group of women! I also agree with what is being said here - don't feel mutilated, it was my choice. I chose BMX when I could have had lumpectomy and radiation in just one breast and carefully monitored the other one which had some stuff going on. I didn't want radiation to the chest and none of the reconstruction options appealed to me. Since there were questionable things going on in my non-cancerous breast I took the opportunity to have symmetry. I felt I would feel better flat, and I do. It would be great to see this presented as an active, healthy, affirmative choice.
-
Love the word affirmative, River_Rat.
-
MT1, you are a hero. I am facing my meeting with the BS on Wednesday. Have been looking for three photos -- as you suggest -- but haven't found ones that are appropriate.
I never thought of having a PS do my 'close,' that is an excellent idea. I have feared the 'dog tags' and I have begun to make my feelings known very clearly. Still, I can see that some can't or won't understand. Also having some trouble with my partner of 17 years.
I plan to 'rock' clothes when I am flat. There are so many things better suited to a flat chest. I am a DD now. I plan to be very proud. I don't understand -- but I do support -- wearing forms, or wearing them sometimes, and then going flat other times, or wearing them to dress-up functions. I support the women who do it, but none of that makes sense to me personally.
I am going to show my seven-year-old daughter what a real woman is. I am going to show her what love is. I choose to stick around through all of these surgeries, to be proud, to show her what a proud woman is. And I am looking forward to doing so. Those who can't get supportive of that are going to fall by the wayside.
-
Bobogirl,
My doctors didn't understand and they asked me to speak with a psychologist, as if wanting to be flat is a negative psychological problem. I was made to feel as if I were putting my gender perception at risk. I made the appointment and met the woman with rage and deep seeded anger. Luckily, I kept myself in check, but also told both her and my surgeon that they were wrong to require the interview.
if you want a picture of my chest PM me. I will also check to see if I have the other two photos I used.
I am like you. I understand, I accept the use and need to breast forms and sometimes I think it would be a good idea of have a pair (for the top shelf), but it does not work for me either. For me, wearing breast forms would be trying to fit in or please someone else. I would feel fake wearing them. For me, my body is enough. It is gorgeous. My scars are not for hiding because I have nothing to hide. I much rather think society needs to get used to me, and to my sisters who also embrace this approach and path. This is one more version of survivorship and it is a beautiful one.
Be strong. This is a money making industry. Not everyone will understand, but they don't need to, you do.
-
Bobogirl, do a Google search for a book called "Show Me." You can't buy the book but there might be a medical library near you that has it. My daughter is in the medical profession and was able to borrow a copy for me before my surgery. I did as MT1 mentioned and took a picture of what I would like, what was acceptable, and what I would cry non-stop for two weeks over. I don't know if they loan the book out to those not in the profession but hopefully you should be able to at least view and copy some of the pictures. I believe there was also a second book put out.
Scroll down at this link and you will see a front and side view of a very nice BMX with straight scars. I wanted, and got diagonal because I do like V-necks:
http://www.breastcancer.org/pictures/treatment/mastectomy_photo
MT1, I really like what you've done around here. A bit of a shake up and re-evaluation is a good thing.
-
Bobogirl, perhaps these pictures will also be helpful: BreastFree Photographs. Each gold link represents a set of photos--there are ten sets in all. Once you open a set, you can click on individual photos to enlarge them.
I'm always interested in receiving more photographs. BreastFree.org is a completely non-profit website, created by me entirely to advocate for the same thing we've been discussing here--that not having reconstruction be considered as a positive alternative to reconstruction.
Barbara
-
Gosh Barbara, that photo of the lady with the Peacock tatoo - beautiful!
-
feelingfeline,
I agree. I was so glad she contacted me to ask whether I wanted to post her photo, since a lot of women think about having a tatoo and I think hers is such a beautiful example. I asked her if she would also be interested in telling her personal story and she was, so you can read about how her tatoo came about at this link: Denise's Story.
-
Hi Barbara, thanks for that. Read also about you and your MIL. She sounds like an inspiring presence in your life. You and MT1 who started this thread might be interested to know that there is no pressure to reconstruct here in Ireland. The BS lets you know that you can get a referral to a PS if you want one. End of. I don't imagine Irish women are psychologically and physiologically so very different to women in the US, or women anywhere else. Reconstruction is not a necessity, but rather an option, and should feel like that.
Well done on creating and running the website.
-
Erica (Barbara) (which is your name? Confusion abounds)
I think yours is The Web Site about living Breast Free. Having two rescources complimenting and redirecting to one another would be optimal. I am glad I found your site when I needed it.
Thank you for doing such a great job.
-
Yes, Erica, I like your website too, and I really appreciate it very much.
-
MT1, thank you for your kind words about BreastFree.org. I know my name thing is ridiculously confusing. When I first joined, many years ago now (almost ten, yikes!, after my first diagnosis and lumpectomy/radiation), I wanted to be anonymous. Not sure why, just that I'm naturally reserved, I guess. The day I joined, I had recently met a woman I liked a lot, whose name was Erica, so I chose that as a screen name. My real name is Barbara, which is why I often sign that way. At some point, I would have liked to ditch Erica, but by then I felt people knew me here by that name, so it was too late to change.
The avatar really is me, though!

When I created BreastFree.org (in 2007, after my second diagnosis and bilateral mastectomy in 2006), I considered having a forum group on that site but felt that bc.org does such a great job here with this Discussion Board, that I didn't want to "compete" with them. The moderators have always been very tolerant of my letting people here know about BreastFree.org and I always mention that it's a non-profit site because I want to make sure people know that I'm not selling anything--my mission is to contribute information and to advocate for women who choose not to have reconstruction. So, I love the idea of my site and this one "complimenting and redirecting to one another."
It's very exciting to see women speaking up here (the threads you've started have been a big part of that)--I feel we really have the potential to change attitudes about post-mastectomy options and to empower women to feel comfortable choosing not to reconstruct and to go flat if they wish.
Barbara
-
I too wouldn't mind photos of my chest being out there. It is different from the few I've seen in that my scars are lower.
I am so incredibly lucky that my surgeon did such a good job. I had no idea I could have scars that run under my pecs and I'm so pleased to have them. They're slightly uneven, but so are my pecs now - that's a result of losing a little one to the goal of a clear margin. I had told her I didn't care about my appearance, which was true at the time of surgery when I was so scared I was going to die, but is not true now that I'm back to participating in life. I'm very glad to have the thoughtfully flat chest I have.
Somebody would have to remind how to load them onto this site. I remember seeing the process described before, but not where.
-
Ditto Outfield. I have a "beautiful" umx if any umx photos needed. Had a very good BS. But would not have a clue how to upload photo.
-
For the last year I've been contemplating a prophylactic MX, I had a UMX 3 years ago, but couldn't justify, at that time, taking off the perfectly healthy breast. Mostly, I've worn a prosthesis when out and about, at home and when swimming I'm usually 1/2 flat. I decided around Christmas to have the prophylactic MX sometime this spring, tired of either being lopsided, or having to wear a bra w/prosthesis, it causes a fair amount of neck and shoulder pain, as well as makes my LE worse.
For the last couple of months I've been experimenting with going 1/2 flat at least half of the time. I wear a tight cami (my remaing breast is a DD, so pretty large, can't just let it flop around). I'm much more comfortable w/o the prosthetic. Hardly anyone notices either. I do layer and use scarves, but even when I don't .... it seems to go mostly un-noticed. I still think it would be more comfortable to have the MX, but am afraid that I'll regret it after, though I hang out on Flat and Fab FB page alot and they all seem really happy. I still believe I would get prosthetics to wear now and then, but mostly go flat.
But now that I've been sporting the 1/2 flat, I've been having doubts about the prophylactic MX. There will be loss of feeling, which I hate on the MX side, it could trigger LE on that side (rare, but it does happen), I'd be lopping off a perfectly healthy body part (not sure I like that idea). I probably need to start a pros and cons list. I see my BS next month for follow up and want to talk to him about this. I'd love all of your opinons - worry I'll regret it after, but I'm pretty sure I'd like the freedom.
Thoughts, ideas, opinions - Please! and thanks!
Linda
-
Linda, I think if you're unsure, then perhaps it isn't quite the right time yet. You can always opt for the MX in the fall, or next spring, or even 10 years from now... but once that breast is removed, you can't get it back.
That being said, I don't regret having a bilteral and I can't imagine myself ever regretting it. But I was 100% positive of my decision at the time I made it. There's no use rushing into something you're not sure of. It does seem easier to be totally flat... I would struggle with having one breast, was worried I'd have back problems etc. and it is easier to dress when both sides are the same. Most clothes fit just as well or better. V-necks can be an issue but I'm sure they are with UMX too.
It's a tough decision!!
-
Thanks indenial for the input - I was so sure for 6 months, then the last month or so the doubts have set in.

-
LindaKR
I knew from the start that I would feel the need for symmetry if I were to have had UMX and would feel it necessary to wear prosthesis to achieve this. If you have doubts, I would suggest putting the decision off. I agree that dressing might be easier when symmetrical, but I wonder what benefits you may experience in having a healthy breast, perhaps an emotional connection to your breast, maybe you might like being asymmetrical and could give yourself time to really experience life while not focusing on wearing breast forms all the time. You can always wear them, no saying otherwise, as we keep saying on these boards, WE have options. From my position it seems like it might be really satisfying to have the one breast, to be able to cup it, hold it and to remember the breast you lost. Maybe this is the time to really bond with and experience your remaining breast, no matter if you wear forms.
It isn't necessarily easier to be bilaterally flat. -
Thanks Melanie! A lot of good points!
-
Linda,
My "prophylactic" mastectomy turned out in retrospect not to be so prophylactic so I don't second guess my decision and I don't mind being flat. Being symmetrical was a small part of my decision - I have to say that was an advantage to what I chose, but it wasn't the primary reason. I just didn't think I could live with a remaining breast having had a stage III cancer really ambush me in the other one. My cancer was entirely invisible on a screening mammogram 8 months before I found my lump, at which time it was there on mammogram and big. So although I think it might bug me being a uni, it's only what I imagine, not my experience.
I do miss my breasts. The loss of the nipples and sensation isn't reconstructable, but I guess it matters more to some women than others. It has mattered a lot to me. If a good fairie were to offer me a guaranteed-healthy breast now, I would consider it. If I took it, I would probably feel a deep love for it. Maybe it would annoy me, but it would also give me a nipple and something soft on my chest. I do feel like I have a chest now, not an absence, because when I put my hand there I still feel myself, my skin, not a void, but it's a very different me. But as there are no fairies, I don't ask myself this question often.
If I were you, I would wait and hopefully you will feel a decision in your gut. Right before my surgery, I cried and cried and kissed my breasts good-bye, but I was certain I was doing the right thing for myself. For such a major and irreversible choice, I think you need to be that certain.
-
I ditto the other responses. I am one of the happy ones you mention who never looked back at the bilateral with one proph. Symmetry is of paramount importance to me. I would do it all the same again tomorrow if given a do over. But even with all of that said, this needs to be a decision that you are totally comfortable you are making the right decision. From the sounds of it there is no good medical reason to make this decision now and with doubts, I would really advise that you step back and wait.
Barbara
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team