Age 33 got final path and stage IIB...need advice

Options
JennaJMU
JennaJMU Member Posts: 97
edited June 2014 in Stage II Breast Cancer

Hi ladies!! I'm 33 years old and was diagnosed in February with IDC/DCIS and had a bilateral mastectomy on 3/22. After surgery the surgeon reported to my family that everything went well, and the sentinel node tested clean in the OR pathology testing. She said she removed a few more but they were really tiny and soft, too small to be tested in the OR but will be sent away. She felt good about everything. I woke up over the moon and have been happy...until Friday when she called with my pathology report.



Some background: on the ultrasound prior to biopsy my tumor measured 2 cms. I went to Johns Hopkins for a 2nd opinion and they thought 2.5 judging by feeling it. In the mammogram after the biopsy it showed widespread calcifications in the quadrant as the tumor so the radiologist expected a larger area of disease than the tumor. In the biopsy of the tumor 5% of it came back DCIS so I know it's there. Then the MRI showed a "non mass" enhancement from 3-6 o'clock and my tumor was as 6 o'clock. So I knew there was a big area of involvement but everything estimated the tumor at 2 something so I assumed the rest was DCIS based on the fact that it was in the biopsy, calcifications, "non-mass" enhancement, etc.



The surgeon calls and says the cancer removed was 4.5 cm. I about fell over. I asked if this was all invasive tumor or if some was in situ. She couldn't tell from the path but said it was a good question and she will find out when they discuss my case at the tumor board on Thursday. Then she said there were micromets in the sentinel node. Shit. WAs kind of prepared as that seems common after a clean OR report but still, shit. She staged me 2b and said its early stage most people do well. She's not warm and fuzzy but a damn good and highly respected surgeon. Anyway I know it won't change my stage as I was always positive my tumor was around 2cm or a little bigger (felt like a walnut) but then she comes out and says 4.5, no way was it almost lime sized!! But I'd just feel like I'd be more at ease knowing my tumor was 2.9 cm or something like that vs. 4.5. Doesn't the DCIS kind of "not count" in the staging of tumor size? Ahhhh I'm just freaking. Coming out of surgery I was sure I was IIA and now I'm IIb. I know it's not much difference except a 5-6% survival rate. I fell into the 0.44% of people who get cancer at my age so every 10th of a % really matters to me now. Any thoughts on this or encouraging stories?? I have a 1 year old daughter, am an only child and my dad died in July. I need to be there for my mom, daughter, and husband, there is no choice. I HAVE to survive this for a long long time and will do any treatment it takes!

Comments

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited April 2013

    Jenna....What your physician told you is TRUE.  You have early stage breast cancer and like all of us early stagers, you SHOULD plan on a long life.  Right now you are wrapping your mind around the size of your tumor.  What's more important is the biology of the tumor and what treatments are available to you.  There are many patients with advanced cancer doing well after many, many years and sadly, there are some like our dear Marybe (may she RIP) who recently succumbed after being diagnosed with DCIS nearly 20 years ago!  Now I'm going to tell you the BEST news from what you've described so far.  First off,with younger women like yourself, it is more likely with a tumor as large as yours to be lymph node positive.  Although you are technically lymph node positive, having "micromets" and having a 4.5 cm tumor, tells us that it might not be too aggressive.  When I was diagnosed with my type of rare breast cancer, I looked through the literature and found a patient who had a 17 cm mucinous tumor and was lymph node negative and did well.

    While you are waiting to hear what the tumor board recommends, I suggest that you go to the NCCN's website and look at the professionals version of the 2013 breast cancer treatment guidelines.  When you register (it only takes a moment) look for the professionals version...NOT the patients version.  The professionals version has way more information!

    I wish you well!

    http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp

  • argynis
    argynis Member Posts: 123
    edited April 2013

    Hi Jenna,

    I was just diagnosed with a 4.5cm IDC tumor at age 28 with 2/26 nodes postivie (one macro and one micro metastasis) - with IIb staging. Do you already know about your hormone receptor status?

    I wish you good luck - we can make it!

  • bluepearl
    bluepearl Member Posts: 961
    edited April 2013

    Only the invasive part of a tumor is considered...NOT DCIS. The invasive part may indeed be smaller. Mine was supposed to be 2.5 cm but after surgery  the INVASIVE part was 1 cm. Tend to agree that your tumor doesn't sound "aggressive" but look for LVI in the details, ER/PR, Ki67, Her2 (+ or -) which should give you the whole picture...

  • heartnsoul76
    heartnsoul76 Member Posts: 1,648
    edited April 2013

    Also, grade is important.  My MO recommended chemo because of the size (2.5 cm) combined with Grade 3.  I had no lymph node or LVI involvement, but the grade was the tipping point for her.

    And I've heard younger women should treat this crap more aggressively.  I hate that you are even in this position, but if you have to do chemo at least youth is on your side to help you bounce back more quickly.

  • JennaJMU
    JennaJMU Member Posts: 97
    edited April 2013

    Thanks for your input ladies! Originally based on clinical exam my doc said I might not need chemo based on what the Oncotype recommends. I'm highly hormone positive (100% ER and 80% PR) and Her2 negative. So she thought that the hormone therapy would be the big ticket for me. I was still prepared for chemo because I know they hit young people with everything they've got. But now based on size she says they may not even listen to oncotype and do chemo and possibly rads! I wasn't expecting rads! It's my left breast so I worry about the effects to my heart, risk of skin or lung cancer, etc. Are these legit fears? Like I said I will do the whole damn trifecta to make this go away forever.



    Oh and it's grade 3. 8/9 on whatever that scale is called. So micromets on a grade 3 4.5 cm tumor is surprising right? That's why I think half of the 4.5 is non invasive.

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited April 2013

    Jenna... Regardless of whether or not you do chemo, you should still go forward and have the Oncotype DX test so you can get a better idea on how aggressive it is. Yes, for a 4.5 cm tumor that is Grade 3 and only have micromets, is uncommon and great news. So far, with highly ER +, you should do well. My tumor was on the left side. I had radiation. You need to discuss with your team all of the risks and benefits to all of your proposed treatments. I wish you well.

  • farmerlucy
    farmerlucy Member Posts: 3,985
    edited April 2013

    Jenna - I'm so sorry . I know how disappointing and devastating a "reversal" of opinion can be. My good friend found a lump "as big as a peach pit", had Mx, full chemo and is cancer free 16 years later. She was 35 at diagnosis. Don't go anywhere in your mind you don't need to go. Big hugs to you.

  • JennaJMU
    JennaJMU Member Posts: 97
    edited April 2013

    Voracious, I am pretty sure the Oncotype is being done because I think they sent it away right away after surgery when my sentinel node was negative in the OR. When she called on Friday it was 2 weeks after my surgery and my in person follow up is 4/10 so I really hope the test is back by then because I'm so curious. Praying For low!! Not because I want out of chemo, more so my mind can stop being crazy!



    Farmer, thank you for the story of your friend! Those are exactly the things I need to hear!



    Argynnis, wth is up with us dealing with this so young. I've been put in touch with a bunch of young women with bc, just friends of friends. I always worried for my mom at her annual mammograms and here it was growing in me and I never knew.

  • 1Athena1
    1Athena1 Member Posts: 6,696
    edited April 2013

    Jenna, hello. Fellow stage IIB-er.

    Size is scary - I have "been there." 3.4 cms in breast and one of my nodes as 2.5 cms - I still have the image in my mind of my onc giving me that piece of data in his unsuccessful attempt to get me to do chemo.  

    You may want to consult a second opinion regarding chemo if you are 100 percent er-positive. Hormone therapy may be better indicated. Chemo in your case is more of  "just in case" systemic treatment. You should bear in mind that "throwing everything at it" is not necessarily the best course and may -or may not-- be more damaging than healing. "Throwing everything at it" is old thinking in cancer that the evidence is increasingly calling into question. Increasingly, targeted, personalized approaches are preferred when possible.

    The size of your tumor and the role it plays in staging does not necessarily indicate prognosis; staging is not the panacea. Rather, tumor GRADE is important; the higher the grade, the faster growing the cancer and the better the argument for "quicker therapies" (and this could argue in favor of chemo in the minds of many oncs).

    Radiation: you may be a borderline case, and the risks you mention are absolutely there, though technology has improved and most people experience no long term lung or heart side effects. I suggest you find out how close to the chest wall your tumor was before making a decision. It might not be worth your while and could complicate reconstruction efforts.

    There may be a recommendation of aggressive hormone therapy - such as the removal of your ovaries plus therapy with an aromatase inhibitor for about a decade. I strongly recommend that you try reversible, shot-term estrogen suppression first to see how you do. An option is Lupron. If you do well and can tolerate the side effects, then you may be considered a good candidate for ovary removal.

    My final bit of advice - read my signature - don't make too much of statistics. They are a valuable tool and have a place in your decision-making, but remember this: your chances of getting bc in the first place were minute - why on earth would you be in the majority of other statistical considerations? Remember, too, that statistics cannot be used to say anything about individual cases - they are intended to make epidemiological statements about groups of people who may or may not share key characteristics with you. What is best for you, the patient, is more likely than statistics to be what is worst for the cancer cells in your body.

    Remember: the good physician treats the cancer. The great physician treats the patient.

    Best of luck!

  • prgirl2
    prgirl2 Member Posts: 6
    edited January 2014

    Jenna.  When I was first diagnosed It brought comfort to me hearing successful stories from others that have walked before me. Here's my story. I hope it helps. I was diagnosed 3/29/11. Had lumpectomy, Axillary dissection & reexcision due to positive margins. My stage is IIB, grade 3, ER/PR positive. My treatment plan included 4 rounds of Adriamycin & cyclophosphamide, 12 rounds paclitaxel (Taxol), 33 rounds of rads and now taking Arimidex for the next 5 years. I was able to work Mon-Thursdays during my chemo treatment which were always done on Fridays. I rested & recovered during the weekends. You'll need a good family support system at home as nausea & fatigue will prevent you from doing what you normally do. My daughters were 15 & 20 at the time so they helped out a lot as well as my husband. The port for the meds wasn't difficult and overall chemo went well for me. The only difficult was coping with the fatigue. Radiation was vert eady the first 15 rounds. After that & up to round 33 was very painful on my left breast. I experienced burns & unbelievable pain. I had to take a couple of days off of work the last days of treatment as I wasn't able to wear my bra. Once my breast began to heal ( it's been 2 years post treatment ) I have been doing great!  I'm scheduled to have an MRI of my left breast tomorrow dye to pain & redness but am praying its nothing more than an infection. Right now I take it one day at a time and try to enjoy my life and my family & friends. I get blood work, mammo & US every 6 months. I hope this helps. Best wishes!  

  • mjm1
    mjm1 Member Posts: 139
    edited April 2014

    Hi Jenna, did you ever get an answer about how much was DCIS vs IDC?

    As you and others have said, the DCIS part 'doesn't count' for staging. I did not know this initially, so Mum's scan results of a 5.8cm tumour were very scary to us, even though she knew part of it was DCIS. The little booklet we were given on early breast cancer only talked about <2cm, 2-5cm, or 5cm (no 5cm+), so I assumed she was off the scale! 

    Was such a good day when the surgeon explained that it was actually considered a 2.8cm IDC and or whatever the scans indicated .

    Ended up being 2.2 of IDC and 6cm DCIS on surgery path results. So a little smaller again.

    Another thing that surprised me was that it wasn't a round lump. More like a stick with a knob on the end, so she actually had no idea how big it was, and was probably just feeling the invasive part, not the DCIS part. 

    A lot of it is psychological rather than anything else (sounds like it wouldn't affect your staging), but these little bits of "good" new are comforting. Can't believe your surgeon didn't check and you had to chase up this info yourself! Maybe cos it doesn't affect her treatment plan, but still!

    Anyway, I hope you are doing well now the treatment is underway. xo

  • JennaJMU
    JennaJMU Member Posts: 97
    edited April 2014

    So in my case, the 4.5 cm was all invasive tumor. I was really devastated to find that out since they originally estimated it at 2 cm. I had DCIS too but that wasn't measured on my path report, but I assume it was about 2 cm since my MRI had shown a 6 cm non mass enhancement- was hoping since it said non-mass that it was DCIS! But you're right, whether it was 4.5 or 2 didn't change my stage or treatment, just my mind set. And I blasted the hell out of those rouge cancer cells with 4 AC's 12 Taxols, a year of Herceptin in a clinical trial and now 10 years of tamoxifen. I'm on the other side and hope to stay here. Mjm, awesome news that your mom had a little IDC, big DCIS-I read a study that having both, especially a larger DCIS Component, makes for a less biologically aggressive cancer. 

  • mjm1
    mjm1 Member Posts: 139
    edited April 2014

    Oh sorry - Mum's chemo brain must be contagious - I didn't notice your April post was a year ago!

    Glad to hear you're out the other side of chemo, and blasting any little sneaky cells with the big guns!

    Thanks about the DCIS IDC combo info- that's comforting. It's grade 3, HER2+, so I look for all the reassurance we can get - like how awesome herceptin is.

    All the best!!!

Categories