Herceptin Heart Attack

Options
12324252628

Comments

  • MemaSue56
    MemaSue56 Member Posts: 2,129
    edited March 2013

    Hi Arlene...I do remember now.  Sumtimes my I suffer from chronic 'mushmind'.  heehee.  Like...hey...I jes wrote a f'n journal on the TP thread.  I cwack meself up ALOT lately!!  If ever you get back this way....lemme kno...we'll try to get together...k?

    Past my 'get in bed time'...take care all!

  • ArleneA
    ArleneA Member Posts: 1,309
    edited March 2013

    Mema:  I asked you a question on the triple p blog.  I'll be in Vegas early June and want to see that cardio and would be great to meet for lunch if it works.  Realize you live outside of town.  :)

  • Ikari
    Ikari Member Posts: 40
    edited March 2013

    I had an early MUGA today (last Docetaxol yesterday) as MO said yesterday that she would hold off on Herceptin dose until I had a MUGA as I was experiencing shortness of breath.  EF has dropped from 67 to 55 and I was told today that they would not give me Herceptin and I need to see a cardiologist now.

    I have not read through all the posts on this thread so apologies if this question has already been answered.

    What is the risk of stopping Hercepton so early during the treatment (I have only had three (tri weekly))?

  • vballmom
    vballmom Member Posts: 426
    edited March 2013

    I got stopped even earlier - after my first tri-weekly.  After a 3-month holiday, I am back on. Here's what I have learned.  We are still in the beginning stages of developing "how long" people should be on Herceptin.  In the USA, one-year is the gold standard right now, although recent studies show that six months is "inconclusive" compared to one year, but leaning towards one year being better.  In some countries, the standard is 9 weeks.  Most of what I have read says that the biggest benefit comes in the weeks that you combined it with the chemo drugs.  That being said, welcome adding a cardiologist to your team!  These drugs are cardio-toxic and I think we would all benefit from having cardio care right from the start. I was put on Lisinopril after my EF dropped from 60% to 53%.  I also take CoQ10 with my MO's  permission.  Last ECHO was 63% and today I go for my 4th since restarting.  I will be at the halfway mark today and have settled with that being good enough  if my heart says enough.  I had no symptoms.  Please remember that our treatments are a delicate balance between going as aggressive as possible without creating permanent damage to our bodies. 

  • leftfootforward
    leftfootforward Member Posts: 1,726
    edited March 2013

    Vballmom- wow 63% that is wonderful. I am glad that you recovered during your holiday and that you are able to start again.  I hope that you will be able to continue with the Herceptin treatment. It is good news that your heart was able to bounce back after a rest.  

    Shikari- 55% is still considered normal. They might put you on an ace inhibitor (like lisinopril) and a beta blocker just to be proactive and to try to prevent any further fall in your EF.  I got almost all the way through my year of Herceptin treatment before I had to stop.  I still have a EF of 45% after over a year off of Herceptin.  Everyone is different.  It is good that you are getting a consult before things go south.  Hopefully your EF will remain stable.

  • Alicethecat
    Alicethecat Member Posts: 535
    edited March 2013

    Hi TonLee

    Thanks so much for starting this thread. It is extremely helpful!

    Interesting to see that you started the thread when you had 3 Herceptin infusions to go. I've had 12 (started in August 2012, one every three weeks) and the plan is I will have another 6 more, finishing in July 2012.

    An echo scan in March 2013 seemed OK when I first scanned it - LVEF 62% - but it did mention 'slight thickening' of the heart muscle. I've also got mitral valve regurgitation (slight - blood jumps back up into the first chamber) and the tricuspid valve was mentioned too, although I did not understand what was said (slight again I think).

    The thickening of the muscle does concern me as I've had a bit of shortness of breath but I do get this anyway if I need to take my asthma inhaler.

    To research, I came across the independent French study, PHARE, which seemed to suggest that Herceptin was 98% as effective if given over 6 months rather than 12 months as recommended by the Roche-funded study.

    I'm seeing the oncologist on Wed to ask if it's safe for me to continue or whether I could call it a day now.

    Do you - or any of the other ladies on Herceptin - have any suggestions re questions I can ask him?

    Best wishes and thanks

    Alice

  • TonLee
    TonLee Member Posts: 2,626
    edited March 2013

    Alice,

    Good luck.  My Onc doesn't feel that study shows 6 months is as beneficial as a year.  Many Oncs (from what I've read here) feel the same.  I don't think they're going to give you a pass.

    But, I'd be interested to hear what your Onc says...please share!

    I also had thickening (or enlarging) of the heart, but was told it resolved when I stopped tx at last chest xray.  I dunno...looked the same to me!  lol  But I did have pain with it while it was enlarged.

  • Alicethecat
    Alicethecat Member Posts: 535
    edited March 2013

    Hi TonLee

    Thank you so much for your response. I'll know what the onc is likely to say - very helpful!

    Was hoping, of course, that I could get a pass out now. Thoroughly fed up of having to go into the chemo lounge every three weeks. If I continue, from diagnosis to the end of treatment (hopefully) it will be 18 months.

    Trying to feel upbeat, positive and grateful for Herceptin but with a heart scare, it is difficult.

    How are you doing now?

    Best wishes

    Alice

  • Kay_G
    Kay_G Member Posts: 3,345
    edited April 2013

    TonLee, your photo is stunning!



    Alice, I went from 65 to 45 with six months to go, and I finished the full treatment. I went on an ace inhibitor and a beta blocker (am still on them). Six months after finishing treatment, I am at 50. The onc and cardiologist followed me closely, and were going to do all they could to get the full treatment in.

  • TonLee
    TonLee Member Posts: 2,626
    edited April 2013

    Alice,

    I am pretty much the same.  My legs stay swollen (unless I get a massage, and then they shrink for 24 hours, lol).  I am on Lisinipril....but so far no real improvement...they think maybe a few points up, but it's hard to say for sure since it's not an exact science.

    Thanks Kay.  :)

  • Alicethecat
    Alicethecat Member Posts: 535
    edited April 2013

    Hi TonLee and Kay

    Thank you so much for your feedback over the past few weeks when I have been worried about the effect of Herceptin on my heart muscle re slight thickening.

    I saw the onc today and he said that my LVEF is 68% and I have a strong heart - the heart of an ox! Neither was he worried about my kidney function (65. Top of range is 70 in the UK measurement scale). Said he thought would improve after the end of Herceptin. Dito lymphocytes.

    He is happy for me to continue Herceptin so 13/18 done. Just 5 more to go!

    Thank you again

    Alice

  • TonLee
    TonLee Member Posts: 2,626
    edited April 2013

    Alice!

    WOO HOO!!

    So happy for you!  Glad your heart is taking the Herceptin well.

    Thank you so much for keeping us in the loop on your progress :)

    Hope the last 5 are smooth!

    T

  • ArleneA
    ArleneA Member Posts: 1,309
    edited April 2013

    I talked to my sister in law (an MD in PA) who 10 years after chemo (not breast cancer), she developed an EF problem.  She is stable at 45%.  Now she says that the gold standard for EF is the MRI.  She has hers done at Cleveland Clinic...guess there are some excellent cardiologists with excellent backgrounds in heart toxicity from chemo.

    Why are we told the MUGA is the gold standard?

  • TonLee
    TonLee Member Posts: 2,626
    edited April 2013

    I don't know Arlene.  Maybe because there are so few radiologists who can read heart damage well?  I dunno.  But I have an Onc appt in two weeks....and I already know he's going to tell me MUGA is the gold.  He says it every time. 

    My cardio Dr said MUGA is gold for EF.

  • ArleneA
    ArleneA Member Posts: 1,309
    edited April 2013

    Now, my cardiologist says he(re) reads all of these tests!  I sure don't know!

  • TonLee
    TonLee Member Posts: 2,626
    edited April 2013

    Well maybe he is multi-talented ;)

  • ArleneA
    ArleneA Member Posts: 1,309
    edited April 2013

    What I meant by this was he doesn't rely on the radiologist but reads the tests himself. 

  • TonLee
    TonLee Member Posts: 2,626
    edited April 2013

    Right, that's why I said multi-talented.  An Onc and a radiologist specialist ;)

    I figure it this way.  So long as I'm getting something, MUGA, echo-wise then at least I know what I'm dealing with.  Didn't go through all this to just leave the heart issues in the dark.

    I feel bad for women who aren't monitored.  I do understand why some Oncs don't do it.  They figure there is nothing that can be done about it....but when the people who make Herceptin say we should now be monitored 5 years out...well, that tells you right there about the risk. 

    Sometimes I think getting this issue was a good thing.  I don't have to fight to monitor my heart like women who had no problems on Herceptin.  Though if one only ever had a baseline and one after, it is dishonest to claim no damage.  One simply doesn't know.  But I understand why they tell themselves that. :)

    Much the same way women say their cancer is gone.  Mayhap it is, and mayhap it ain't.  But sometimes just believing it makes a world of difference in quality of life.

  • ArleneA
    ArleneA Member Posts: 1,309
    edited April 2013

    Well, I am just glad he takes the time to read these tests after the radiologist does.  I had my Echo yesterday and will see what it shows next week.  My onco sees no need for Echos every 6 months.  She says once the numbers come back up from the Herceptin, they don't usually go back down unless there is something else wrong with the heart but not from the Herceptin.  If that is the case, why are they now saying to monitor us for 5 years. 

    I asked the technician about the MRI versus the other tests and he said he was always told MRI was gold.  I'll inquire of the cardio next week.

  • TonLee
    TonLee Member Posts: 2,626
    edited April 2013

    Arlene,

    Good questions!  Let me know what the cadio says!  Glad your heart went back up, and here's hoping it STAYED there...or improved!

    As an aside, exercise really doesn't help/hinder LVEF.  You can be really fit, or really fat, and have damage from Herceptin.  And exercise doesn't seem to help/hinder in recovery either.

  • ArleneA
    ArleneA Member Posts: 1,309
    edited April 2013

    I saw the cardio today and I'm still right at 65.  Not having another Echo for a year.  Now, he brought up the MRI before I could mention it and says it is definitely GOLD.  He says we have no facility in our area (and many areas) that do the heart MRIs.  He says they are a VERY detailed and precise test.  My SIL has hers done at Cleveland Clinic (a cardio with a specialty chemo heart toxicity).  Guess Cleveland is pretty tops too.

    Now, I mentioned that my last blood work showed a very slightly high Calcium level and he said this is an oncologist issue and something my onco should have addressed because it could be something serious.  I asked him if the HCTZ BP medicine I'm on could cause it and he said absolutely so guess I need to get it changed and see if in goes back down.  He hinted that elevated Calcium could be cancer but everything I've read says it is rare.  Goodness!


  • Alicethecat
    Alicethecat Member Posts: 535
    edited April 2013

    Hello Arlene

    Excellent news re your 65 LVEF. Congratulations!

    I asked my onc about elevated kidney levels recently. He said that we have so many blood tests that as an oncologist he expects results to go up some months and then go down again.

    Hope this helps until your next visit!

    Alice

  • ArleneA
    ArleneA Member Posts: 1,309
    edited April 2013
  • Ikari
    Ikari Member Posts: 40
    edited April 2013

    Was advised to post this here.

    I have been prescribed an ACE Inhibitor as my EF dropped >10 to 55 and Herceptin has been stopped after only 3 cycles.  Mentioned to MO that I had read AIs can increase recurrance - MO did not know of this.  This study or studies seem to be around April 2011 and discussions on this are old.

    Does anyone have any new/updated info or had reassurance from a trusted source that AIs dont cause recurrance?

    I have not yet taken my first dose

  • vballmom
    vballmom Member Posts: 426
    edited April 2013

    My MO said the study was too small for him to be concerned about.  I haven't seen anything new.  I've been on an ACE Inhibitor since December.  My EF went back up, higher than I started out, and I am back on Herceptin.  So many things to worry about, I know.  Hugs.

  • leftfootforward
    leftfootforward Member Posts: 1,726
    edited April 2013

    I read an article about this.  It was a small study.  It found Ace inhibitors increase risk, beta blockers decrease risk, and if you are on both they balance out. It is interesting however to see the different results.

  • ArleneA
    ArleneA Member Posts: 1,309
    edited April 2013

    Leftfoot:  I too read that Ace's increase risk of BC.  I was on it for years but no longer take it.  Most cardiologists love the Coreg to improve EF.  Betas provide protection for the heart.  I'm off the betas I didn't like the way they make me feel and after 6 months, my EF is still good.  There are a few of us here who didn't finish Herceptin (I made it through 10).  I've never heard about Al's increasing your risk for reoccurrence.  I'm at nearly 2 years on the AL. 

  • ArleneA
    ArleneA Member Posts: 1,309
    edited April 2013

    Shikari:  You might talk to them about slowing down your Herceptin....that seems to work for many in stopping the EF drop.  They waited until mine went to 50 before it was stopped.

    I saw my primary care doctor today and showed her my labs.  She gave me an A-.  We talked about the Calcium levels (which she didn't find an issue).  She noted my Vitamin D at 81 and said that would up the Calcium so she feels certain that now that I'm off the D, my Calcium should go back to normal. 

  • MemaSue56
    MemaSue56 Member Posts: 2,129
    edited April 2013

    Wow....lots here to comment on. 

    1st - Arlene I would love to meet you.  I will b in Vegas on June 4 for tx, then am leaving for TX the next day, coming back to Vegas the following Monday.  So guess it's Tues the 4th or Monday the 10th?  Let me kno if either works for you.

    Ref the LVEF, MUGA vs MRI.  1st, wow on the MRI being gold and the fact that not many places have tech to do the heart MRI.  Arlene - I have NO idea about Vegas and Dr LaMothe...sorry. 

    It's been 2 years for me...I started herceptin May 23, at 1st every week, and then/now every 3 weeks.  My onco wanted to keep me on it for 3 years.  Yes I kno...I have read and researched also and she even admits there is NO evidence of it working at 6 mos and on out.  My LVEF took a serious dip during my CTH chemo summer of '11. Enter Cardio, Dr LaMothe, after doing a few others tests, he was not concerned and gave OK for continued herceptin.  So, all these many months later and with MUGA's every 3 mos, my EF rate is down 12, but still over 50%.  Onco still not stopping herceptin yet.  Since EF improved on it's own in '11, she will wait til next scan (May29) and if no improvement will probably stop herceptin.  Which frankly, scares me to death with my dx.  BUT....I feel so blessed to have been able to tolerate it all this time as I kno so many of you have not been able to.  AND the fact that those of you who have stopped the herceptin seem to be doing really well...so that is very encouraging for me.  And even tho the EF is down, my 6mo PET this month shows NED.  WooHOO!!

    I too have been on AL's since Sept '11...I had not heard this latest about increase of recurrence.  Nor do I kno anything about ACE and BETA as I haven't been on either...I don't think anyway...will have to keep my eyes open on this topic.

    I am so amazed at all you beautiful ladies and the strength/knowledge you possess and how wonderful you are at sharing everything!

    Love, prayers, positive thoughts to all,

    Sue

  • PamelaKay
    PamelaKay Member Posts: 107
    edited May 2013

    I'm on track to start Herceptin/Taxol in June, dose dense for 2 months (4 x) then just the Herceptin for 10 months. I have high blood pressure and a family history of heart problems. My HER2/neu was 1.94 on a FISH done on the tumor after the surgery (after my biopsy, the IHC was strongly negative, the first FISH was strongly positive, so that's why the FISH was repeated after surgery). My MO said she didn't want to deprive me of herceptin just because I was a few points short of the cutoff (I have a very agressive grade of cancer). 

    I told the MO I was concerned about heart problems on the Herceptin, and she said don't worry, only a tiny fraction of people actually die on the stuff. However, after reading some of the posts on the HER2/neu forum, I'm really concerned about permanent damage to my heart. Also, with my family history and high BP, I'm wondering if that puts me at a higher risk for complications or being one of the "tiny fraction" who has a heart attack?

    Being borderline on the HER2/neu, I have to wonder if it is worth the risk. I'm scared of the cancer, but also scared of having a poorer quality of life as a result of the treatment.

    Those of you who had problems with Herceptin, would you do it again? Are there lots of you who just sail through with no problems? Am I right to be worried? Should I get a second opinion?

Categories