Malpractice Lawsuits for Misdiagnosis?

sirenator
sirenator Member Posts: 26

Hello All

Anyone out there dealing with a malpractice case regarding undiagnosed bc? I was 35 when I discovered my lump (my "nugget" I called it) and it was diagnosed benign fibroid. When I chose six months later to have it removed, I found out it was cancer all along. I'm looking into filing a suit against the doctor and pathologist who made the mistake... not a firm answer yet on whether or not this firm will take my case. Anyone with experience? This mistake could cost me my fertility and or my life...

- Sad in D.C.  

«1

Comments

  • Hattie
    Hattie Member Posts: 414
    edited January 2010

    i am so sorry.  not sure what to say.  bc is not that simple to diagnose, especially in young women.  i had a missed diagnosis, and signed up for a lot of public speaking gigs and advocacy work to make sure this didn't happen to others.  i do know in my case, a lot of people went back thru my records to see if there were errors, and my lump actually was not seen on mammos, even tho it could be felt.  i felt good that the medical community was making sure, as best they could, that no other woman had a missed case like mine.

     will pursuing this help you or others?  do you want to spend your time this way?  sounds like you might have a really good case.

    whatever you decide, take care.

    --hattie 

  • LisaAlissa
    LisaAlissa Member Posts: 1,092
    edited January 2010

    Hi sirenator,

    I'm so sorry to hear about your experience, but what you've said doesn't necessarily suggest malpractice (at least not yet).  For instance, when you say they "diagnosed benign fibroid" how did they reach that conclusion?  Was it based solely on your age?  Did your doctor do imaging?  Was there a biopsy and a pathology report?  Unfortunately, a misdiagnoses doesn't necessarily mean malpractice... 

    Your first hurdle is "was their conduct negligent"? in some places, gross negligence is required (rather than simple negligence)--I don't know about Virginia. You'll need to compare the care you got to the "standard of care" for other women who present as you did.  And you'll need to ID a specifically negligent act or acts by particular practitioners.

    Your second hurdle is proving your damages (that is, that the result would have been different somehow, had the negligence not occurred).  BC is (often) a relatively slow-growing cancer...I suspect you'll hear that no one knows whether the 6-months would have made a difference in either your treatment or your outcome.

    In some jurisdictions, additionally, the damages must be "foreseeable" to the the doctor or practitioner who was negligent.

    Those are fine lines to draw, and you'll need a skilled attorney to help you sort out whether you have a viable case in your jurisdiction. 

    If you decide (after reviewing the facts with a lawyer in Virginia) that you don't have a malpractice case, you may still have a complaint to file with the hospital(s) where the doctor has privleges and /or with the state medical licensing authorities.

    I'm so sorry that you're having to deal with this, on top of the many details thrown at you with a new bc diagnoses.  I would not discuss lawsuits with your doctors at this point.  Leave that to later.

    But do a couple of things.  First, everyone who ends up here is told to compile and keep her own medical file.  So you should ask for copies of your pathology reports, surgical reports, imaging reports, etc, as well as your chart from each of the doctors/pracitioners who treated you.  This won't surprise them at all.  Cancer patients do this all the time.

    Second, decide who you want on your medical team now.  Suround yourself with doctors in whom you have confidence.  There is no reason to discuss a potential lawsuit with either your new or your old doctors at this point.  (The only exception would be if a new doctor brings it up on his or her own (without questions on your part)--and if they do, ask their advice and record it carefully.  If your care represents (in their view) egregious malpractice, they may well reccomend you to a local lawyer or other resource.)

    At any rate, if your lawyer decides you may have a case, let them sort out how to proceed.  Please, please concentrate on your own care. 

    We're sorry to see you here...but glad you found us!

    LisaAlissa

  • sirenator
    sirenator Member Posts: 26
    edited January 2010

    Hi Hattie & Thanks for writing.

    Yes, of course it would be nice to pay off my medical bills (especially IVF) but ultimately this does become an issue of advocacy. The surgeon I initially went to performed a FNA (not as definitive as a core biopsy). While the pathologist saw fibroid, the ultrasound dr. said "suspicious for malignancy".  That was never revealed to me. Looking back I should not have just accepted what that surgeon told me, I should have insisted on seeing *all* the test results.  What groups did you speak for? I'm interested in this sort of thing... tell me more!  - Regina 

  • sirenator
    sirenator Member Posts: 26
    edited January 2010

    Hi LisaAllisa (pretty name)

    Thanks for such a thoughtful response. Sounds like you know quite a bit about this. I do know some of what you mean. It was cancer, and they did miss it. This was in New Jersey which has different laws. We do know that much to be true. The item in question is whether or not the delay in diagnosis (as you said) 'cost' me anything. Its hard to believe it wouldn't since it was a very aggressive cancer, quite nasty. As you'll see from an earlier post the FNA pathologist said "benign" (although we have since proven it was in fact cancer). So he was wrong. The doctor reading a concurrent ultrasound was not so pleased, however. He called the lesion "BiRads IV" which means suspicious for malignancy. Instead of letting me know that one of those tests was suspicious, the doctor simply concluded that the pathologist was right.

    The other thing this brings up is I think we have a responsibility when its all said & done to go back to the doctors who misdiagnosed us!  Otherwise, how do they learn?  I was on vacation when I was in NJ. When I found out it was bc, I was treated at Johns Hopkins (great place). I don't think any of those health professionals in NJ even know they made a mistake!  I'm not going to say anything now, in the event that a case is filed, but down the line, those people need to know, so that this sort of mishap does not happen to someone else.


    So do you have experience with this?

    Regina 

  • konakat
    konakat Member Posts: 6,085
    edited January 2010

    Which came first?  If the ultrasound dr. dx-ed the suspicion of malignancy and then ordered the biopsy I don't see what the ultrasound dr did wrong -- he took the next step, ordering the biopsy.  If the biopsy/tissue slide can be analysed again and is found to be malignant you may have a case for negligence.  If it was indeed benign I don't see a case.  I think we've all pondered previous clear tests and then wonder if something was missed.  Sometimes you just have to let it go and focus on getting better.

  • sirenator
    sirenator Member Posts: 26
    edited January 2010

    No, surgeon ordered both tests to be done the same day: she did the FNA in her office (I have a family history so I think she sped things up) and then i walked over to the hospital to do the ultrasound. The ultrasound dr. was right; it was cancer. The legal team I'm working with has determined that the pathologist was wrong; the slides with cell samples clearly show cancer and not anything resembling a fibroid. I'm guessing the pathologist probably looked at my age, looked at what the surgeon thought and that was it. The pathologist doesn't see the ultrasound dr.'s report and vice-versa.

    So there was malpractice - that isn't in question - but in order for a case to stand in the state of NJ, one also has to prove that the misdiagnosis cost me something - pain & suffering-wise. That's where they are getting hung up. It surprises me though since my cancer was very fast growing. 

    Yes its not healthy for me to get caught up in all of this... I guess I feel as if somehow if a case is made, it would help me get over some of my anger and sadness... but in the end, you're right, getting better is the main priority! 

     Thanks for writing... 

  • konakat
    konakat Member Posts: 6,085
    edited January 2010

    Wow -- terrible that the pathologist missed it!  Sounds like you could have a case.  Pursue it if you think it's worth it, but take care of your health first.  Maybe check out the statute of limitations on this -- you could get all your BC treatments done and then go after them.  Good luck!!

  • bambers88
    bambers88 Member Posts: 35
    edited July 2010

    I have questioned my original diagnosis throughout my 2 years of ongoing treatment. Although I suspect it's the other way around for me. Especially after the pathology report from my bi lat. No signs or evidence of a tumor, nothing except normal healthy breast tissue. Both sides. And I had a 5.8 cm mass. My case has been riddled with inconsistencies and questionable information from the get go. I've considered further investigating, but at this point, to find out otherwise would be waaaay to much to handle... My suggestion - make damn sure you HAVE cancer before you do anything!

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2526983/?tool=pubmed

  • texasrose361
    texasrose361 Member Posts: 1,829
    edited July 2010

    my case is a little different- i went to 1 dr in AZ, who gave me a birads of 3- prob b9, with instructions to follow up. i had moved shortly after to TX, tried following up with a dr in a clinic but she really didnt take my concerns seriously. the last visit (6 mo ago) she didnt look at or feel my breast at ALL and said it was a breastfeeding issue! now did she drop the ball? suing her is not what i want to do- i wanna go 2 her office and warn ppl going if they take their health seriously find another dr!

  • texasrose361
    texasrose361 Member Posts: 1,829
    edited July 2010

    my case is a little different- i went to 1 dr in AZ, who gave me a birads of 3- prob b9, with instructions to follow up. i had moved shortly after to TX, tried following up with a dr in a clinic but she really didnt take my concerns seriously. the last visit (6 mo ago) she didnt look at or feel my breast at ALL and said it was a breastfeeding issue! now did she drop the ball? suing her is not what i want to do- i wanna go 2 her office and warn ppl going if they take their health seriously find another dr!

  • Janeluvsdogs
    Janeluvsdogs Member Posts: 242
    edited July 2010

    You mean you were never biopsied? You need to get all the documentation from the very first contact with the office.

    If the doc's peers would have also made the same decision/diagnosis, you have no case.

    If you can show actual loss (damages), you may have a case. Damages can be emotional, physical or financial.

    Keep in mind, if you invest time and anxiety in a legal action it will gobble up your time and emotions. Lawyers generally don't tell you this when you consult them.

  • texasrose361
    texasrose361 Member Posts: 1,829
    edited August 2010

    jane- my 1st drs said to follow up and the new dr didnt see the need. (because i was breastfeeding @ the time of 1st visit they said i can do biopsy later) but later never came. would you think that i could show damages that the cancer has spread and i am stage 4? i think any lay person could make the connection that waiting for so long could have directly given the cancer time to spread right? i mean it was almost a freakin YEAR! could you imagin not getting treatment til a yr after your dx?

  • sirenator
    sirenator Member Posts: 26
    edited September 2010

    Hello TexasRose;

     I'm so sorry to hear of your situation. You absolutely need to seek action. Ask around - ask anyone you trust who is a lawyer (any kind of lawyer) to help you find the right med mal lawyer for your case. You will need someone who practices in the state where the mistake was made. The rules are different in every case, so  you have a limited amount of time to file a claim (for me in NJ it was 2 years from the time of the correct diagnosis).

     At very least, you should investigate this. Keep in mind that firms can sit on a case and just watch the time go by.. they will wait until they have to do something. If I could do it again I would agree to hand over my records and sign a contingency agreement only if the agreement included a clause about how much time the firm can have to come to a decision either way. The first firm I spoke with had my stuff for 9 months - then decided to drop my case - even though they told me before I signed that I would know in 3 months.

    Feel free to send me a private message if you like.

    I wish this forum were easier to navigate through - I would check more often!

    Best, Sirenator 

  • sarah081599
    sarah081599 Member Posts: 1
    edited December 2010

    this is such a sad story. we are dealing with life here. we must enforce the law to its full extent.

    auto insurance quotes 

  • SoCalLisa
    SoCalLisa Member Posts: 13,961
    edited December 2010

    I had five different series of core biopsies showing no cancer to a lump which turned out

    to be cancer all along...and one tumor they missed all together...but I did not sue anyone..

  • Beesie
    Beesie Member Posts: 12,240
    edited December 2010

    I think that the spammers that write something to make you think that they are legit, and then post their links to some totally irrelevant website (auto insurance quotes, really????) are among the worst.  Not that any spammers are good. 

    I reported the post too.  One or two more reports and we'll be rid of this garbage.

  • huntreiter3
    huntreiter3 Member Posts: 40
    edited January 2011

    I was 37 when I found my lump. Made an appointment for that week to be seen by a physician at my family clinic. They determined due to my age & no family history it was just lumpy boobs. No mammo. referal. Went in for my yearly a bit later, questioned the lump again. That Dr. told me it was noted in my chart from the 1st physician that I had an anxiety issue about cancer, he prescribed me zanex and sent me on my way. I didn't want to chase a cancer diagnosis so I was happy to trust them. In June of 10' when I went for my yearly I was again examined & diagnosised with lumpy boobs. Luckily my cousin talked me into going to a new clinic which sent me for a mammo. & then an ultrasound and here I am with IDC/ER & PR + & HER2+ / Stage IIA & a 4.5cm. tumor. Now my cousin is telling me I should sue the clinic for not even referring me out for a mammo. even after palpating a well defined lump that they let go for 1 year and 3 different exams. PS - I need the Anxiety meds now! Any opinions on what I should do? I did call their office & request copies of my records for the last 3 years.

  • Amy_T
    Amy_T Member Posts: 12
    edited January 2011

    I looked into it myself.  I was also misdiagnosed.  I went in with a lump and they did a mammogram and ultrasound and told me it was just a benign cyst.. 10 months later it was twice the size.  I went in and requested they remove the "benign cyst".  The surgeon requested a new mammogram/ultrasound.  Again the same facility insisted it was nothing to worry about.  I had them attempt to drain it anyways.. turns out it was a solid stage 2 cyst. 

    When I checked with the lawyers using the free legal resources available through the ACS, they told me it wasn't worth pursuing in Texas.  The lawyers I spoke to sent me an article about a man who had all 4 limbs mistakenly cut off when he went in for a gall bladder removal... He won his case and got less than $100,000 due to the limitations the malpractice laws have here.

  • lrr4993
    lrr4993 Member Posts: 937
    edited January 2011

    I am very sorry for all of you, as I am sure the misdiagnosis leaves you with a lot of "what ifs."  

    I can only speak generally on this subject as I know only a little about a med mal law and then, only in my state.  However, it strikes me that, assuming you can prove malpractice (and fyi - error does not necessarily mean malpractice), you would have a very difficult time with damages except in extreme cases.  Someone stated above that any  layman can tell the delay made things worse (or something to that effect).  The problem is that causation is not a lay question.  It is one that requires the backing of medical science.  You would have to prove to a degree of scientific certainty that the delay caused you harm; something that would be very difficult given the uncertain science surrounding this disease and the lack of information on what type of progression you had at misdiagnosis.   

  • weerah
    weerah Member Posts: 20
    edited September 2011

    I am suing the doctor I saw a year ago when my family doctor referred me after an ultrasound of a palpable lump showed a 1 cm mass. She referred me to a renowned breast centre in downtown Toronto. The doctor called me in, palpated my breast, told me he knew exactly what it was: a benign fibroadenoma. He said it would fluctuate in size, and eventually go away. He gave me a pamphlet on benign breast disease and sent me on my way. He was the expert, why would I question it? He did none of his own imaging. He did nothing more than feel my breast. I trusted him because he was a specialist and he'd know, right? He said it would fluctuate in size, so I didn't notice the growth really.

    Several months later, I started bleeding from my nipple. That led to a mastectomy with a 10.5 cm lump, stage 3 IDC (one node positive). I start chemo on Friday. Because of the percentage of DCIS in the mass, my surgeon believes that if this had been found sooner, I would have had 1 cm of DCIS, meaning a lumpectomy alone, maybe rads. 

    I've also discovered that he's done this to many other women. At least one woman died. That's why I'm suing and my lawyer thinks I have a good case.

    What did you decide? I'd like to hear an update. 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited September 2011

    I think you may be right weerah. You should speak with a lawyer about this and see what they can do. The later you wait though, the less of a chance you have.

     Fred

    Florida Malpractice Insurance

  • Jewels1964
    Jewels1964 Member Posts: 1
    edited January 2013

    Hello,



    I went to my doctor in March 2011 for a lump in my right breast. My dr sent me for a mammogram and an ultrasound which was done too just because were the lump was located it was hard to see it on the X-rays.



    After no news from my doctor I assumed that it was just a cyst which my dr kept telling me it was. After a year later my lump was starting to bother me when it was supposed to be my monthly period (had a hysterectomy 3 years ago). I made an appointment to see my dr for my yearly physical, and while he was going through my file he turn to me and says " oops I should have sent you for a biopsy". I was stunned. I was scheduled pretty fast for the biopsy.



    After a month of waiting and waiting for the dr to call me regarding my results, I finally called and asked the nurse if my results came in. After telling me she can't tell me over the phone the dr came on to the line to tell me that I have breast cancer. I was referred to a breast cancer surgeon and she told me that I had stage 3 breast cancer. I was given the option of a lumpectomy or a mastectomy. After telling me that the chance of the cancer coming back was greater I have decided to go with the mastectomy with reconstruction surgery with a tummy tuck. During my surgery they removed 17 lymphoids and 12 of them were cancer. They also found another lump right behind the first one I found. After 2 months of recovery from surgery I had to have 6 rounds of fecd chemo and 28 radiation treatments. I am on number 8 of my radiation treatment and it is a walk in the park compared to the chemo.



    After spending so much time at home alone I decided that I should try calling a lawyer to see if maybe I have a case. It isn't the money that I am going after, its the fact that he neglected to tell me a year ago that I needed a biopsy. Would I have had to go through the extreme if he had just sent me for the biopsy. So after telling the lawyer my story he had me in his office to tell me how he has to proceed with my lawsuit. He must think I have a case since he has not asked me for a dime. I know I will have to give him a percentage but like I said money isn't the issue.

  • christina0001
    christina0001 Member Posts: 1,491
    edited January 2013

    I am not a sue-happy person and I do not personally agree with the OP's decision to pursue a lawsuit. But jewels, that is awful, completely negligent. I don't think you are being unreasonable at all.

  • pnut166
    pnut166 Member Posts: 9
    edited March 2013

    We are also not "sue-happy" as we work in the medical field ourselves. We realize it`s called "practicing" medicine - there are few absolutes, but I feel my wife`s diagnosis goes beyond that, and it`s a mistake that is ultimately going to take her life. In `08, after biopsy & mastectomy w / sentinel node biopsy, she was diagnosed with DCIS. You were lucky, no further treatment or follow-up necessary - have a good life, she was told. Then in Nov 2011, she began having back pain. A spine specialist ruled it "arthritis" after an MRI, and none of his treatments were working. Keep in mind, that by this point she was walking on a cane, could not drive, work, or care for our children. In Jan 2012 I took her to the ED where we work, and a repeat MRI was done = metastatic bone disease & compression fractures throughout her spine & pelvis. Further imaging showed a large lymph node mass on her mastectomy side, as well as lung / chest wall mets. Treatment began immediately, of course, with a biopsy being obtained from one of the bone sites. We go for an appt. one day, about two weeks after the diagnosis, and the surgeon who did the mastectomy is in the oncologist`s office. They proceed to tell us that the original slides from the mastectomy were pulled for comparison to the bone biopsy, and that it was discovered that her cancer in `08 was mistakenly ruled in situ, when in fact there was a 3mm invasion. We were told that the pathologist responsible had been gone for some time from the hospital. We were focused on the treatment, and put this on the back burner. About a week later, we got a registered letter from the pathologist; he was working at another area hospital, had been informed of our situation, and offered to meet with us. We did not respond, but it was obvious everyone that spoke to us about this was scared. Throughout 2012 my wife went through treatment, and in August was declared in remission. But in January 2013, brain mets were discovered. Facing this, my wife has told me that if / when something happens to her, for me to explore filing a suit. Not as a retaliatory measure, but to ensure future care for our autistic son (we have a 7 & 5yo). She is receiving her care at the same hospital, and we have nothing against her current team, nor the surgeon - it`s the pathologist, and to a lesser extent, the spine specialist who delayed her treatment by three months.  I don`t know what to do. I feel like I should be angry about this, but right now I`m just heartbroken and not sure I have it in me to fight. But I do want to honor her wishes, not let this be in vain, or let statute of limitations run out. Any insight, perspective, or advice you ladies could provide would be greatly appreciated.

  • new_direction
    new_direction Member Posts: 449
    edited March 2013

    I dont think its the possible financial gain that makes it worth pursuing or not pursuing- in my case it's been as a way to feel like i have done something. Ive felt a lot of anger, better turn it into action. But I didnt have the energy because the shock from the diagnosis, chemotherapy etc was so overwhelming. I spoke to a lawyer who adviced me not to wait - the sooner the better. So he took over from there after we had spoken, runs the case (whatever that actually means in detail) and will notify me when something new happens.
    My story was not so much as overlooking things - more like not even wanting to look at things. Im not a F hypocondriac. I go to see my doctor when somethings wrong - which was the second time or so in my life. She didnt take me seriously and unfortunately I chose to believe her (felt good at the time).

    I know its only human to make mistakes. This is what I try to say to myself. Even though this felt more like disrespect/disbelief than an actual mistake. She didnt even leave a window open - no discussion - this was NOTHING! It feels like the talent show clips where the whole audience and the judges almost roll their eyes by the mere sight of a contestant. Not being open to the possible however maybe unlikely.

    I have felt a relief by trying to forgive her even though its hard. When I do so the matter disappears from my mind for a while and i feel like its better that way. I see a psychologist also.

    I dont like to see others in the same situation but its nice to feel understood. Im sorry for all of you. I hope you and I will find peace with this. Any advice how to do so are welcome.

    We dont choose all of the circumstances in our life but we choose how to deal with them.

  • grover
    grover Member Posts: 44
    edited March 2013

    Obviously there is a serious & significant problem with proper (and timely!) diagnosis. I too have considered legal consult after I get through treatment, but realize in terms of time, especially for those of us with young families,and mental health,it may not be worth it. I would be more interested in helping with awareness training (for med. pros. as much as for patients) so maybe we can start "catching it early" which is what WE all seem to try to do, only to be "shot down" by one or more docs. I am very new to all this, but appreciate this forum as I'm usually feeling SO alone. Forgive me if I get the abbreviations wrong! In August 2012 a small spot was seen on yearly mammo so I got call back for deep comp. Mammo & sonogram. Sounds like a logical choice for a 42 year old. After radiologist reviewed images he recommended I wait 6 mts then have another mammo. He was sure it was nothing. then I asked about the risk of waiting if it WAS to be cancer, he said chance of it even being cancer was no more than 1 percent. I told him I tended to be worrisome but didn't that mean 1 in 100 would be cancer & what if I was that 1?? He said, "I probably shouldn't tell you this, but if I'm wrong you can sue me," then quickly turned on his heels and walked out! I consulted my obgyn, my primary, and the gen surgeon my primary told me "specialized" in breasts. (I now know there is really no such thing). All of them agreed waiting was reasonable, so I decided to control my worry & wait. I made it only 4 mts. before returning to surgeon w a lump that had grown very palpable to me! He agreed it had grown but assured me that it felt perfectly round and cancer wouldn't grow that fast. Regardless, we agreed it didn't belong so he did a lumpectomy. (W/o any more imaging and unguided, which I thought nothing of at that uneducated time!) He assured my husband as I was in recovery that he got it all, it was perfectly round, it wasn't cancer. 2 weeks later I sat in his office as he told me he was as shocked as me, but it was cancer. That was the end of January. Here I sit (after going immediately to breast center at a renowned university hospital) recovering from BMX with expanders for reconstruction after I complete 5 mts. of chemo & about same of radiation. Turns out right breast had more extensive tumor, triple negative IDC grade 3, & left had hormone responsive IDC very close to chest wall.thankfully,only 1 lymph node was involved. Although the pain & discomfort are all too real, it's all happened so fast, I keep waiting to wake up from a bad dream. I'm sorry to have gone on so long, and thank all of you for posting and allowing me to feel I'm not so alone!

  • lmcclure4477
    lmcclure4477 Member Posts: 180
    edited March 2013

    I also considered if I could sue the breast center that misdiagnosed my breast lump. But I don't feel like going through the process. I would rather educate other women out there. I was weaning from breast feeding when I found my lump and it hurt so my GYNO sent me for an ultrasound. The radiologist said it was probably a clogged duct and the lump was benign and to come back in 6 months. They said it appeared to be normal but couldn't tell me what the lump was. They totally brushed off my concerns. It took me almost a month to see a breast surgeon since my report read normal benign lump. They did a biopsy and low and behold it was cancer. Triple negative. So I had a BMX within two weeks and thank god the margins were clear with no lymph node involvement. I was lucky but I still have to get chemo since I am triple negative. The tumor was aggressive so if I would've waited it would've spread. Thank god I was persistent. I want to teach other women to push until they get answers!!!

  • new_direction
    new_direction Member Posts: 449
    edited March 2013

    I would like to help others as well.
    The choice was not so hard for me but maybe it's easier where I live. I don't know if it works the same way in your country. In Denmark everyone can complain of both the healthcare provider and of the treatment. It is free and is not taking place in court.

    Grover - you are not alone feeling alone. I know the feeling so much. But I feel it gets better. For me the feeling was also much worse at the time when I felt physically ill because of the treatment. It will get better.

  • kianich
    kianich Member Posts: 5
    edited April 2013

    Hi Pnut,

    I'm so sorry to hear about your wife's current diagnosis. I was diagnosed in October 2012 with an 8 cm tumor in my right breast. I had dense dose 12 weeks of chemo and just had a double mastectomy March 21, 2013 with tissue expanders.  I was told by my surgeon my lymphnodes were clear and I had clear margins and this is excellent news. I still need daily rads for 6 weeks and that is because of the size of the tumor and I am triple negative. She told me she wants to see me every 3 mths for the next 2 years. I asked why so frequent and she explained to me that within the next 3 years if the cancer should return it would be within that time frame but I know as well as anyone who has been on these discussion boards that nobody knows for sure IF this will be the case in 3 years, 13 years or 23 years. I guess what I am trying to say is this disease has a will of it's own. At the time your wife was first treated that was the best advice for the situation at the time. Thank God you decided to take her to get another MRI! Then they tell you a mistake was made ruling it in situ when they pulled the slides from the mastectomy and they made a comparison?! Wow, I am sad for you both after reading your post! I am not an angry or revengeful person but if I were in your situation I would contact an attorney and take that letter from the pathologist with you. At least talk to the attorney to see what their professional opinion would be and then take it from there. You want to find out all you can now before the statute runs out and then see if the fight can wait until you are strong enough. If your wife is asking you to pursue the lawsuit it will give her some piece of mind as well. I will keep you, your wife and family in my prayers. Take care and God Bless you all.  

  • fredntan
    fredntan Member Posts: 1,821
    edited April 2013

    I havnt read all the responses. I spoke to a lawyer. He agreed that I had beenscrewed by a dr. He looked at all myrecords, he sent my to a radiologistand had them review it. Ultimatley it wasnt awinnablecase. Yes I suffered but I wasnt near death due to drs negligence.

    Backin2009 i was sent backfordiagnostic mammo and US. I still clearly remember him having his US wand onmy right upper breast. He said it was nothing. Thenext year I went to different facility. Got postcard backthatmammowas negative. Fast forward to july 2011 Ifound lump in samespot hehadhisUS wand.



    I contacted lawyer. A paralegal took my info down. Later a nurse called meback. Shegot my records and films. Then I met with lawyer. He specialized inmalpractice. He gotbacktome in about a month. Since I wasnt near death, it would behard towin.

    I got through my treatments. I was angry.

    Last fall I filed a complaint against the two radiologists who hadevery chance to diagnose mybc. Took sixmonths, but theyfinally gotbackto me. No action wouldbe taken, but thankedme for making them aware.



    It was goodfor me to know these docs knew they screwed up. I wasnt about to go to there office to tell them.

    Will pm you name of one of my docs

Categories