Stanislaw Burzynski: Slapped Down by the FDA Once Again!

Options

It's tragic and incomprehensible how Burzynski continues to get away with his illegal and fraudulent quackery.

"Basically, the FDA is calling out Dr. Burzynski for his promotion of antineoplaston therapy because his antineoplastons are considered investigational and it is illegal to advertise and promote investigational agents as being effective."

Stanislaw Burzynski:  Slapped Down by the FDA Once Again!

Direct link to the FDA Letter of Violation:  Notice of Burzynski FDA Violation

Comments

  • Mardibra
    Mardibra Member Posts: 1,111
    edited November 2012

    Clap, clap, clap!  Finally, something.

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited November 2012

    I'm clapping too, Mardibra!  It's another step toward shutting him down, we can hope, but I won't hold my breath!   For reasons that escape me (understaffing? jurisdiction? loopholes? red tape? or ????), he hasn't been shut down long before now.  His infamous antineoplaston "research" Institutional Review Board was riddled with errors, omissions, and legal issues when he started his trial back in 2009.  These are MAJOR issues, and I'm astounded that he's still able to do what he's doing!  How can this be?

    A few excerpts from FDA's Warning letter Re: Burzynski Research Institutional Review Board from 2009:

    "The IRB approved research without determining that the following criteria were met: that risks to subjects were minimized ...and risks to subjects were reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits, if any, to subjects, and the importance of the knowledge that may be expected to result ..."

    "It is unclear why the IRB allowed the study to go forward in humans when additional toxicity studies in animals were requested. In addition, it is unclear why the IRB allowed Dr. (b)(4) to continue (b)(4) the study when it appears that he initiated this research study, i.e., began dosing subjects, prior to obtaining IRB approval."

    "The IRB failed to prepare, maintain, and follow written procedures for conducting its initial and continuing review of research .... Specifically, the IRB has no written procedures for conducting reviews of device studies to determine whether they involve a significant risk device and had no evidence that it had in fact conducted such reviews ..."

    "The IRB failed to ensure that informed consent would be sought from each prospective subject or the subject's legally authorized representative in accordance with and to the extent required ...and that informed consent would be appropriately documented in accordance with and to the extent required..."

    "The IRB failed to ensure that no member participated in the initial or continuing review of a project in which the member had a conflicting interest, except to provide information requested by the IRB..."

    "The IRB failed to conduct continuing reviews for the following IRB approved studies..."

    "The IRB failed to maintain copies of all research proposals reviewed, scientific evaluations, if any, that accompany the proposals, approved sample consent documents, progress reports submitted by investigators and reports of injuries to subjects, and correspondence with investigators..."

    "The IRB failed to maintain copies of all research proposals reviewed, scientific evaluations, if any, that accompany the proposals, approved sample consent documents, progress reports submitted by investigators and reports of injuries to subjects, and correspondence with investigators..."

    "Each IRB is required to have at least five members, with varying backgrounds to promote complete and adequate review of research activities commonly conducted by the institution... Our inspection revealed that, in some instances, when an IRB member had a conflict of interest for a particular study, another person, who was not an IRB member, was allowed to take the place of the conflicted member and participate in the IRB's action. There is no provision in FDA regulations for this type of action..."

    Yikes. 

  • Mardibra
    Mardibra Member Posts: 1,111
    edited November 2012

    As I understand it, the FDA cant do much other than sanction him for marketing his "cure" while still in trial or they can shut down the trial.  Phase III was supposed to start in 2009 and it hasnt yet so not sure why that alone wouldnt shut down his trial.  So, for me, the question is about the state of Texas.  Why are they not doing anything?  They have the jurisdiction to shut him down and dont.  Hmmm...something smells with this quack.

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited November 2012

    It's maddening, isn't it?

    Between the FDA (illegal marketing), the FTC (fraudulent advertising), state medical board (malpractice, negligence, etc.), and legal agencies (murder, manslaughter, etc.), it seems unbelievable that he remains free to practice after all this time.

    It's hard to imagine anyone supporting and/or defending him but as we've seen, he does have some fans.  Even here on BCO.  Shameful, if you ask me.

  • Mardibra
    Mardibra Member Posts: 1,111
    edited November 2012

    Rachael Mackey was from my neck of the woods. A tragedy.

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited November 2012

    Tragedy, for sure.  Sadly, she was one in a long (and ever increasing) list of Burzynski victims.  I feel such sorrow and outrage for their families for being victims of fraud, on top of the devastating loss of loved ones. 

    I wish there was something more "we" could do. 

  • Jomama2
    Jomama2 Member Posts: 96
    edited November 2012

    I'd like to know how and why the FDA approved his so-called "clinical trial" in the first place.  Mardibra is correct -- something smells fishy! His scam needs to be shut down before more desperate people lose their money and lives!

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited November 2012

    I think one of the networks should do a documentary about all this. That would spread the word, maybe light a fire under the PTB, and send out an alarm to all potential future victims.

  • Mardibra
    Mardibra Member Posts: 1,111
    edited November 2012

    The following is an excerpt from a response to a blog entry on Burzynski....captures my feelings exactly!

    I should also mention his clinical trials (http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=antineoplastons&pg=1). Of his 61 clinical trials 60 are Phase II trials, 11 are actively recruiting, one of which is a Phase III trial. No data has been submitted for any trial (withdrawn, active non-recruiting, or active recruiting) to date. A Phase I FDA trial is not a test for efficacy, it is a test for toxicity. This, so far, is the sole milestone Burzynski has passed. Burzynski’s phase II trials are all “open label”, indicating that there is no control group (which there doesn’t seem to be), so advancement to the next phase is not terribly meaningful (since we have no idea how the Phase II patients would have responded had they not received the drug). In short, the mere existence of the 60 on-going Phase II trials is only evidence that his drugs are not toxic and the mere existence of a Phase III means nothing.

    So where is the data for efficacy? 

    So why is Burzynski doing clinical trials at all? It’s because he can’t dispense non-FDA approved drugs unless they’re part of a clinical trial. For Burzynski, FDA trials are not a mechanism for drug approval, they’re a business model. In legitimate trials, patients are seldom expected to pay, which is why trials are so very, very expensive for drug companies. However, there seems to be no rule preventing the trial clinic from charging patients – who would pay to be part of experiment after all? Burzynski has now turned an expensive endeavor into a profitable endeavor by charging patients for his “experiment”, one which is not recorded and results from which will never be reported. In reality, it’s not an experiment at all, it’s a loophole in the drug laws. You can charge for snake oil if you first write it up as a clinical trial.

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited November 2012

    Burzynski's scammy and fraudulent history with this goes WAY back.  For the life of me, I just can't understand why he's still free to continue!

    The following quotes are from almost 20 YEARS ago (and this is just one of many lawsuits against him!), yet it seems nothing has changed and he's still practicing medicine, treating cancer patients.  How is that??  And more importantly, how can we make a difference?  Yorkiemom, do you have any ideas about spreading the word and/or getting attention from one of the networks? 

    Source: 1994 US Court of Appeals Upholds Burzynski Fraud Conviction

    "...The antineoplastons treatments administered...were illegal, and Dr. Burzynski knew or should have known it. To uphold the district court's judgment on the Fund's claim of fraud, we must additionally decide that Dr. Burzynski had a duty to disclose to the Fund the illegality of the antineoplastons treatments. For three reasons, we conclude that he did."

    "...Because we conclude that Dr. Burzynski failed to disclose the illegality of his antineoplastons treatment to the Fund when he had a duty to do so, we uphold the district court's judgment on the Fund's claim of fraud."

    "...Today we write the latest chapter in a medical iconoclast's long history of litigation over an unorthodox cancer treatment. The district court granted summary judgment for the plaintiff/appellee, the Northwest Laundry and Dry Cleaners Health & Welfare Trust Fund, an ERISA health insurance fund, after finding that the defendant/appellant, Dr. Stanislaw R. Burzynski, had defrauded the plaintiff and violated the terms of the health plan. We agree that the defendant may not trick the plaintiff into paying for an unlawful, unapproved drug."

    Quackwatch on Burzynski has lots more reading material, including applicable references and source citations. 

  • thenewme
    thenewme Member Posts: 1,611
    edited November 2012

    Mardibra, I missed your post, but totally agree.

    "For Burzynski, FDA trials are not a mechanism for drug approval, they’re a business model.

    A despicable business model of enormous financial profit from cheating and scamming desperate and critically ill cancer patients.  Sick, just so very sick.

  • Mardibra
    Mardibra Member Posts: 1,111
    edited November 2012

    Desperate people will do desperate things.  Unfortunately, Burzynski is waiting for them.  Dispicable.

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited November 2012

    Thenewme, I've never done it, but there are networks who report about crime and scam artists. Some that come to mind are: 60 Minutes (CBS); CNBC (does several specials every week about cons); A&E. Maybe others can come up with some more.

    These networks want to air scoops and fascinating programs about crimes. Somebody with a lot of information about this creep would need to contact them and present a case for producing a program on him. He seems to be pretty well known, so maybe it wouldn't be too difficult. 

Categories