Node Positive and NO chemo...any of you ladies have input?

123457»

Comments

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2012

    I was diagnosed 2 years ago.  Stage 11B, Grade 3, 1 pos node.  I didn't have chemo, radiation or hormones.  I did have a lumpectomy with unclean margins resulting in small lump.  Decided on mastectomy and reconstruction but nothing else.  I'm very happy with my decision

  • bluepearl
    bluepearl Member Posts: 961
    edited July 2012

    There's a prognostic factore YB-1 that crosses all types and stages and grades of breast cancer and its presence signifies a poorer prognosis. After reading several journals about this, YB-1 tends to occur in higher grades, higher Ki67 and PR- breast tumors, the last one being particularly important. Yours was low grade, low Ki67 and PR+ so even this rogue item is still in your favor! I am surprised that such a low Ki67 ended up in three nodes....was there any vascular-lymphatic invasion seen? In any case, such a slow growing cancer would not likely benefit from Chemo, with the risks of chemo being worse than any of its benefits. There are so many factors involved in bc treatment, I would be very comfortable if 11 oncologists were in agreedment. Rest easy and delight in the coming years!!!!

  • BethBV
    BethBV Member Posts: 49
    edited October 2012

    Is this thread still active?  If so, I've got a decision to make!  I'm 51 years old, dx with Stage IIA Grade 2 IDC (x3 multifocal, largest 1.8 cm) and multiple DCIS (largest 1.0 cm).  I had lymph node dissection and they only got 5 nodes total of which 3 were positive (largest 3.2 cm with extra capsular extension, other two were macro - not micro).  I am ER+ (99%) PR+ (31%) HER2- (0%).  There is a study looking at gals with 1 to 3 positive nodes and Oncotype Score of less than 25 (my score is pending) to see if Oncotype is useful in determining if node positive women and low Oncotype do just as well without chemo as they do with chemo.

     I am leaning toward not participating in the study unless my Oncotype score is super low since the nodes are so involved.  My guess is that if he'd gotten more nodes out then I would probably have had more than 3 positive nodes but the oncologist has to take things at face value and says I qualify for the study with 3 positive nodes.

    Any thoughts would be helpful! (if anyone is still out there reading this thread!)

  • ruthbru
    ruthbru Member Posts: 57,235
    edited October 2012

    I would do the chemo no matter what the oncotype says; you don't want to mess around with positive nodes!

  • mgdsmc
    mgdsmc Member Posts: 332
    edited October 2012

    Wow I didn't know there was an option once nodes were involved but I'm not an expert. I know about radiation being needed if one node is positive with mastectomy for premenopausal women to the node area. That's a hard question that you will need to research don't want to regret anything. Once node involvement better safe than sorry.

    That's a hard decision but I'm sure you will make the one best for you ;)

  • ALittleBitBritish
    ALittleBitBritish Member Posts: 627
    edited October 2012

    I would wait for your oncotype score personally.

    mgdsmc, I didn't need rads and I am premenopausal, with a positive node with a mastectomy. Where is it documented that I should have had radiation?

    Anyway, listen to your oncologist's advice, and if you don't feel comfortable - get a second opinion....or a third. 

    Best wishes,

    Ali 

      

  • mgdsmc
    mgdsmc Member Posts: 332
    edited October 2012

    I read it on this site I think under new research studies. I will try to find it and let you know. Of course you know there would be other factors involved I just remember that one because it made me need nodal radiation after my mastectomy.

  • curveball
    curveball Member Posts: 3,040
    edited October 2012

    @BethBV, I was going to be in a clinical trial and I'm pretty sure it's the same one you are considering. Since you've already decided you are willing to participate, may I suggest that in addition to getting your Oncotype score (which may answer the question for you--I got disqualified from the trial because my score was outside the eligibility range, and the same thing could happen to you), you might wait and see which arm of the study you are randomized to. If you don't like the treatment you are assigned to, you can withdraw from the trial at that point, but if you get assigned to the one you had already decided on, you can have the treatment of your choice and contribute to increased knowledge of how to treat breast cancer in the future. Just a thought.

    By the way, the graph I got with my Oncotype results shows survival data out to five years post treatment for 1-3 positive nodes and 4 or more positive nodes,. Even with over four affected nodes, chemo may be of questionable value for people with very low scores. Up to a certain point (and I don't recall exactly what score it is) the survival rate for those who received tamoxifen only was actually higher than for those who also did chemo. So when you get your results, review them with your doctor, then make your decision about treatment, and whether to continue with the clinical trial.

  • Rose_d
    Rose_d Member Posts: 144
    edited October 2012

    Beth, I had a similar diagnosis (multifocal IDC with largest being 1.7cm) and 1 positive node (2.5mm).  I had initially been hoping to not do chemo but my doc said given my young age (39 at diagnosis) she would absolutely recommend chemo.  When I asked her about the oncotype score she said "that looks at recurrence within 10 years, I am more worried about 20 and 30 years for you".  That made me feel SO much better.

    I'm actually glad I didn't get the oncotype test done - if it had been low I would have had a harder time getting through chemo wondering if it was even helping and if it had been high I would be probably even more obsessive about recurrance than I already am.

     I think you need to decide whether or not you will be ok not having chemo.  As much as I didn't want to do it, I know that I would have always been looking over my shoulder waiting for it to come back, or really beating myself up if/when it does.

    Best of luck on a tough decision.


    Ali, I had 4 opinoins about radiation and really struggled with that decision.  One doc (at CHOP in Philly) spent over an hour going through all of the different studies on local recurrance rates for women with 1-3 positive nodes.  The studies show anywhere from 6% - 30% which is why there is no perfect answer on whether or not radiation makes sense.  If you believe 6% you would NOT do radiation (not worth the side effect risks and would only give you 1-2% benefit).  If you believe 30% you would definitely do it.  The consensus from 3 of the 4 docs I spoke to was that they believe the recurrance rate is likely 15-20% given my age and diagnosis.  But none of those studies take into account things like the skill of the mastectomy surgeon in removing all breast tissue.  So again it's a really unclear decision with some real implications.

    At the end of the day I decided to do the radiation, mostly because I need to be able to sleep at night knowing I did everything possible to keep this from coming back.  I'm only 15 sessions through my 28 so don't know how my skin and implant will do but I'm feeling better about the decision than I was when I started.  In terms of the side effects, my doc says I have a 2% higher chance of developing lymphedema post radiation (she is not radiating my axilla since I already had 18 nodes removed) and up to 50% chance of my implant being impacted (which could mean anything from it being slightly higher than the other one to it needing to be removed and replaced). Keeping my fingers crossed.

    These are really difficult decisions we have to make.  Wishing you all the best of luck!

    Rose

  • BlueLily
    BlueLily Member Posts: 60
    edited October 2012

    @mgdsmc ... Research is changing treatment constantly, and treatment is becoming very personalized based on the information provided by your scores.  My oncoscore was low but I was node positive and premeno at age 46.. I sought several opinions and they concurred that my survival rate would only increase by 4% with chemo ... which was a very low benefit when considering the damaging side effects of chemo.  If I had been dx just a few months earlier, I would not have been given the option.  I was offered the clinical trial as well but was also disqualified with my score.  I am taking tamoxifen and my oncologist (who is on ASCO board) feels that tamoxifen with ER+/premeno is a must....  

    As I understand, chemo only attacks active cells not dormant... a PET will show activity  (mine was clear).  A dormant cell will survive chemo and could float around your body forever or someday attach and become active.  Roll of the dice...   The higher the oncoscore ... the more likely the cell will become active. 

    Get more MD opinions ... more research will help, but ultimately you have to do what feels right for you.    You will get thru this.... 

  • mgdsmc
    mgdsmc Member Posts: 332
    edited October 2012

    I know each treatment is individualized and no one treatment fits everyone that's why I said there are other factors that plays in to the decision. I wasn't trying to say anyone was getting wrong treatment, I'm not a doctor.

    For me the tumor board woth multiple MO, BS and RO all said I would need chemo and radiation with 1 node positive but other factors were part of it. The oncotype was cancelled after my lumpectomy.

    The doctors gives us options but its up to us to do more research and make a decision we can live with. I'm sure in time you will make the right decision for you. :)

  • mgdsmc
    mgdsmc Member Posts: 332
    edited October 2012

    Oh I forgot to add t was thought to be stage 0-1 before lumpectomy but came out being stage 3a.

  • Rockym
    Rockym Member Posts: 1,261
    edited October 2012

    BethBV, just my 2 cents here... the 3 types of positive nodes you mentioned would make it a no brainer for me.  Macro is "real" while micro is now falling into the not a real positive situation.  I had no intention of letting anyone pump chemo crap into me, but that is what I decided in the end.  My Oncotype was 22 and although there is a long story to go with my positive nodes, I did the chemo.  I was 46 when dxed and have young children.  Those factors also played a role. 

    If your gut tells you that more nodes would have been positive, then why the heck would you want the chance of one floating around only to come back and get you later?  Was this dx in August a recurrence?  That's what your stats look like.  I have to also say that in retrospect, I am glad I did the chemo because I really couldn't tolerate Tamoxifen.  Now I feel that I had some protection besides surgery and rads.

  • BethBV
    BethBV Member Posts: 49
    edited October 2012

    Thanks for all the thoughts, gals!  I really appreciate it!

    Rockym - The lumpectomy in 2009 was a Phyllodes tumor.  It's a very, very rare type of breast tumor that, if not removed, will become malignant in time.  Mine was considered "borderline" so not cancer but not benign, either.  They grow fast and the only treatment is WLE (Wide Local Excision which means lumpectomy with extra wide clean margins).  The oncologist insists this IDC is totally unrelated to the Phyllodes.  It is not a recurrance since it is an entirely different animal.

    My husband is on the "no brainer" bandwagon so, unless the oncotype comes back super low, I'll have the chemo.  Even it does come back super low I will probably do the chemo or maybe enter the study and have a 50/50 chance of doing chemo.

  • bdavis
    bdavis Member Posts: 6,201
    edited October 2012

    Beth.. I had a 1.9cm lump and one positive node (only a micromet) and was given 6 rounds of chemo. There was no question as to whether I needed it or not. No oncotype test... my MO said no point.

  • BethBV
    BethBV Member Posts: 49
    edited October 2012

    Thank you, Betsy!  My stats are so similar to yours (IDC 1.8 cm, ER+/PR+, HER2-) but with 3 of 5 positive nodes (2 macro + 1 extra capsular, 3.2 cm).  My oncotype came back as 5!  Yes, five!  The MO said that I could go without chemo but that "If it were my wife I'd strongly suggest she do chemo anyway."  After much hemming and hawing, he did changed from his original plan of ACx4 + Tx12 to six rounds of Cytoxan + Taxotere (same regimin as you had).  He said that might be tolerated better and that there was less risk of heart damage (I have a bad family history and risk factors for heart issues).

    I go to chemo education on Monday afternoon and have my first round of chemo on Thursday.

  • bdavis
    bdavis Member Posts: 6,201
    edited October 2012
    Beth... I think you are making the right choice. Everyone handles chemo differently, so I can only speak for myself... Follow the preventative course...look at Taxotere is a Nighmare and Taxotere Toolbox threads for suggestions. And don't be scared off by the name of the thread. Key things I suggest are rinsing your mouth with Biotene twice daily, paint your nails with Sally Hanson nail hardener, ice all your nails with frozen peas during your taxotere infusion, drink LOTS of water day before, of, and after infusion and take your steroids as prescribed. I also went to get my wig well before I lost my hair, which was almost exactly 2 weeks after starting. I vacationed in St John for 10 days between tx 3 and tx4... and worked full time... yes I did take some time off work, day of infusion, half a day for Neulasta shot and then one other day for feeling weak, tired and blah... always 3 days post chemo.  You'll be fine. Positive thinking helps a lot I believe.
  • Eileen0417
    Eileen0417 Member Posts: 16
    edited November 2012

    I agree with amoccia, if it made it to the nodes then it developed the ability to do that. It could have traveled elsewhere. My first tumor was only 1.5cm with neg nodes and highly hormone sensitive and I got 4 cycles of AC and 4 cycles of T. We didn't do the oncotype but my oncologist thought there could have been seed cells that escaped even though clear nodes. That says something.

  • Eileen0417
    Eileen0417 Member Posts: 16
    edited November 2012

    I agree with bdavis. I had 4 rounds of Taxol and I had fatigue and some minor bone ain, none of the other SEs and I didn't do any of the preventatives that bdavis mentioned, although I know many who do.  You will do fine!

  • Linda-n3
    Linda-n3 Member Posts: 2,439
    edited November 2012

    Just had to toss my 2 cents in here.  I was not eligible for Oncotype 2 years ago, so don't know what my score was.  However, my MO gave me lots of scary numbers and persuaded me to do chemo, even though I was ER+ and tamoxifen may be the better treatment.  Chemo has serious risks.  You need to be sure you understand those risks in relation to the benefits.  For example, if the risk of recurrence with chemo is 5% and the risk without it is 8%, that is a 3% absolute risk reduction, but a 30% relative risk reduction (this is just an example - you need to know YOUR specific numbers, which you MO can provide).  If the risk of permanent adverse effects is high (and it is high!), is it worth the tradeoff?  Is tamoxifen a better option?  It also has side effects and its own set of adverse reactions.  This is not an easy decision, and I don't mean to offend those who say "do the chemo for the best outcome", but for some people this is just not true.  Sometimes it does more harm than good, and doesn't prevent recurrence anyway (it did not prevent me from recurrence within 1 year, and I have permanent neuropathy from it, cannot work in my profession, may not be able to return to work at all).  You cannot reduce your risk of recurrence to 0, despite using the most aggressive therapy available.  But you can guarantee increased risks of adverse effects by using ALL therapies available.  So the best option is to listen to your own inner voice, think about YOUR values, how much risk you are willing to take for recurrence, how much risk you are willing to take for adverse effects.  And don't be swayed by anyone who thinks the path they chose is the best path for everyone.  I would support you in either choosing or rejecting chemo, based on YOUR needs and situation.

    Sending you wishes for peace in your decisions, a little joy in each day, and much love from your family, friends, and supporters here.

  • Chris13
    Chris13 Member Posts: 254
    edited November 2012

    Hi, seconding Linda here....absolutely everyone needs to choose their own path with the facts of each unique diagnosis.

    With 2 nodes and higher grade, even with the low oncoscore, I think Beth is doing the right thing.

    But keeping in mind everyone is different--

    I had one involved node...just a tad over the 2mm that would have kept it in the low risk category. I also had ILC, which is less agressive, albeit long-term risks are similar to IDC. After one oncotest score of 6 I had the 2nd tumor tested and that was a 16. These are both in the low category of nonbeneficial chemo. So I decided against it considering the serious side effects, including the chemobrain. (I'm a writer and my mother died of Alzheimers--not her breast cancer. Not chemobrain but how would I know for sure about myself?) Also, the chemo is less effective in tumors of my genetic composition, per their oncotype.

    The MO treats the cancer--and IMHO is going to opt for chemo. Mine did, even after the 6 oncotype. We went to the tumor board for a second opinion--which was testing the 2nd tumor.

    Now I'm doing the AI to reduce risk, and the many other options that might help such as daily aspirin, exercise, weight loss etc. Just my path....but every path is different and you need to listen to your own heart as well as the facts of your own situation.

    Good luck with your choice.....there is no 100% confirmation in what we do, so we can only do what we believe is the best route for a long, healthy life.

  • Lee7
    Lee7 Member Posts: 657
    edited March 2013

    I have to jump back in here as well...we have to make our own decisions based on what we believe our bodies can tolerate.  I did not have chemo. Considering the SE's I am living with from surgeries, rads, now LE and the AI I'm on, I don't think I'd be here if I had thrown chemo into the mix.  

    What hurts most is the friends and family who have walked away because 'not doing chemo' was wrong in their eyes.  I am thankful that there are others here that can understand.

  • Rockym
    Rockym Member Posts: 1,261
    edited November 2012

    Lee, we have all gone through the people "walking away" situation.  Heck, I did the whole nine yards after a lot of soul searching (surgery, chemo and rads) and still had those who "walked."  I think those friends were not real friends and surely not capable of being supportive.  While I miss some of them now, I have made some new friends who I wouldn't trade for the world.  I am emotionally back to my old self and these new friends are much more fun anyway!

  • cookiegal
    cookiegal Member Posts: 3,296
    edited November 2012

    Lee, that is awful and ignorant that people abandonded you.

    Beth I think you are doing the right thing.

  • btrflynaia
    btrflynaia Member Posts: 43
    edited November 2012

    Linda-n3-----Very well said.  To do or not to chemo is a very personal decision with many factors involved.  Information is power and having a medical team that you trust and can have open communication is a must.  My decision to have a double masectomy was very easy.  I do have one node positive and am waiting on my oncotype score to decide about chemo.  If it is low, then I will be on tamoxofen for  5yrs without chemo.  If it's in the gray area my MO and I are going to have to go over all the risk/benefit analysis/data and I will decide if I want to be part of a clinical trial.  If it's high, I will do chemo.  I'm more scared of chemo and it's side effects than my decision to have a BMX.  I'm a young 42 with a whole lot of life that I want to live and a lot of the world I want to see and love I want to give and receive.  I am also a nurse and the side effects of chemo are real and can be life lasting.  Yes, some people tolerate it will with little side effects.  But, I know someone who was very fit before cancer and has had horrible side effects from chemo and and radiation (ironically he was/is a pediatric ICU/oncology nurse).  His type of cancer he definitely had to go the chemo/radiation route.  I will definitely be picking his brain also once I have all of my information.  

    Cancer just sucks!  But, it doesn't define me! 

  • Justme0116
    Justme0116 Member Posts: 2
    edited August 2017

    hello sereena,

    How r u doing these days?


  • BCMets41
    BCMets41 Member Posts: 1
    edited October 2017

    Hi, how did this decision work out for you? I am really nervous about "the red devil" and the chemo they are offering. I am 39 years young and I don't like the side effects of the chemo, but I don't want to die.

  • cookiegal
    cookiegal Member Posts: 3,296
    edited November 2017

    Hey under 40 in NY. I'm still here. It all depends on your type of cancer. It all depends on your personal numbers but my chance of doing the chemo and dying anyway was 4-7 times greater than the chance of the chemo saving me.

Categories