Refusing Axillary Dissection: what is proper legal paperwork?

Options
13»

Comments

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited August 2012

    Yes, I understand that chest/axillary nodes are not stage IV.Imaging shows more than nodes. The trachea is involved and they are unable to biopsy.

    C

  • ali68
    ali68 Member Posts: 1,383
    edited August 2012

    Pip,

    I agree with you, I had many cancerous nodes and they were above my collar bone. They couldn't get to them with surgery so that's why I had chemo first.



    I had all my nodes removed (32) and two months later and my arm is doing great and I'm doing rads now. I would even say my arm is back to normal and I would tell anyone don't be put off having this done.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited August 2012

    A "trachea thing" suggests lymph nodes in the upper chest and neck could be involved.  I think it would be a strange, and very wrong, thing for a doctor to limit tx based on assumptions alone.  I expect the doctor said something like "There is something in the area of the trachea lighting up on the PET scan.  It could be cancer but we don't know.  If it has spread to there it may be in other places and she could be stage IV." 

    Very different statement from "She has cancer in her trachea and is stage IV and we now need to treat her as such."

    Again, this discussion is based on a great lack of information and the belief that, not only is lymphedema likely with ALND, but also that it would be worse to deal with than removing the cancerous nodes.

    Of course it is up to them what they want to do. I just worry that assumptions that are being made on less than pathological facts may cost this woman dearly. 

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited August 2012

    His wife is having neo-adjuvant chemo and he speaks to the results of it in his last post. The issue is imaging indicates spread to the trachea in an area that can't be biopsied. The assumption therefore is that she is stage IV. Stage IV women, who are dx as such prior to mastectomy, often do not have any mastectomy or node removal. This is sometimes hard for people to understand and although some docs disagree, it is common practice. The thinking is that since the horse is out of the barn and stage IV is not curable, just go with a systemic or palliative regimen and don't subject the patient to the trauma of surgery. This is part of the reason why many ER+ women, stage IV, go straight to hormonals and only do chemo after the hormonals fail, which they eventually do. I have never had chemo and the only reason I had a bmx was there was no reason to think I had mets (but I did). Caryn

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited August 2012

    Clearly I have missed were his wife was actually declared stage IV.  I definitely understand the protocal for that stage, as I was considered a very possible IV from the get go due to chest node involvement.

    I thought that it was only "suspected" that she may be stage IV AND that ALND would most likely result in lymphedema AND that that outcome would be tragic.

    Obviously I have missed a post or misread the change since the first couple of posts by the op.  

  • ali68
    ali68 Member Posts: 1,383
    edited August 2012

    I missed that too! I thought they still didn't know for sure.

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited August 2012

    The area of suspected mets, trachea, cannot be biopsied. Imaging is all they have to go on as is sometimes the case. This is also a recurrence. That's why he feels complete AND is not worth the risk of LE on top of mets. Truly, biopsies are sometimes not possible and you are dx with mets on the basis of imaging alone.

  • ali68
    ali68 Member Posts: 1,383
    edited August 2012

    I understand what you are saying! But what if it's not cancerous could that be?



  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited August 2012

    If they knew for sure that she was stage IV why would they do a mast?  This doesn't make sense to me.  Hmmm.

  • Stormynyte
    Stormynyte Member Posts: 650
    edited August 2012

    I'm stage IV and had a mast. Some onc's think it is the way to go.

    "Performing surgery on the breast in the setting of metastatic breast cancer is one of those things where people have said for years that the horse is already out of the barn, and what are you hoping to achieve? You're certainly not going to cure the patient," Dr. McGuire commented. "As others have shown, we found that in a fairly high-performing patient population [with] limited metastasis ... who tolerate chemotherapy well, surgery does increase their overall survival." 

    http://www.docguide.com/mastectomy-improves-survival-women-metastatic-breast-cancer

    "It doesn't cure them," Dr. McGuire added, "but it does give them time."

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited August 2012

    A lot of this doesn't make sense pip. First off, how could they know she is Stage IV? Apparently the trachea area, if it has mets, would not even make her Stage IV. No other areas have "lit up" on scans. I am baffled by this whole discussion.

  • pip57
    pip57 Member Posts: 12,401
    edited August 2012

    Yeah...something doesn't add up.  

     Best of luck to the op and his wife.

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited August 2012

    And I m going to bow out as I feel uncomfortable discussing someone who rarely posts. We don't know these people nor undoubtably all the details. BTW, I had only one tiny area light up on my PET. The docs were pretty sure it wasn't a met, but it was. Number is not relevant.

    Stormy, yes some doctor's do believe mx is appropriate for initial dx of stage IV but most still do not. I am glad that docs and researchers continue to evaluate their practice and explore changing tx protocol. C.

  • Natkat
    Natkat Member Posts: 75
    edited August 2012

    I have no legal expertise to help you - but perhaps change surgeon? I fired first surgeon who seemed too knife happy. Took a couple weeks of searching but found excellent female surgeon who was comfortable and respectful of conservative approach vis a vis lymph nodes. It took some efforts w/ insurance co. but i went under knife w/ full trust in my surgeon. Also had my bf in pre op w/ me and we confimed all instructions clearly.

  • melmcbee
    melmcbee Member Posts: 1,119
    edited August 2012

    I had a bmx and 3 nodes removed. They turned out positive with extra-capsular involvement. My BS was frank and told me she didnt want to do the ALND but couldnt medically support that as being my best survival. The z0011 report just didnt apply to me.  I researched myself and it all came down in my mind to doing the alnd to prevent recurrence and mets. I am going in 2 days to do this because in my mind the more cancer that is left will only grow or spread.  I will be happy with my decision whether the nodes come back positive or neg. In my mind lymphedema wont kill me but this invasive lobular will. Also did I miss what type of cancer she has. lobular or ductal? Lobular hides really well. Didnt show up on my mammo that I had 6 months earlier. Hugs to all

  • SccS
    SccS Member Posts: 78
    edited September 2012
    Ok, I'm back to report. I do want to thank everyone here, especially exbrnxgrl. Eventually, my wife had surgery 2 weeks ago. Doctor had finally agreed to remove only level one, if level two looks normal. Otherwise he would had it biopsied during surgery and removed all, if anything positive. So he said visually level two looked completely normal, so he left it in, following our request, and removed only level one. They did create a custom consent form for us prior surgery. Out of about 16 nodes removed, 8 were cancerous with MACRO metastasis, none with MICRO. He cut lots of skin as well, basically everything... They did immediate reconstruction with flap from stomach (don't remember exact name). At this point we are not sure if we made right decision as to leaving level two, but if we had it removed, we would still be unsure if that was right choice either. So what's done is done.... That part is done with......

       

    But now we have new challenges ahead..... Regarding further treatment. I'm not sure if I should post it to treatment forum.. I'll keep posting here because it's a continuation of this case:

    Prior to surgery she was given Taxol along. Please, do not criticize us for refusing standard ACT approach this was her choice. Taxol (10 weekly treatments) did shrink all tumors in that breast (except one) to not palpable level. The remaining tumor was measured after surgery as being over 5 cm. Because she had 8 nodes with cancer, now they are pushing for A+C chemo, 4 times, bi-weekly, followed by radiation. Looks like we can't avoid taking that chemo, although she tried to avoid it at all costs. Does anyone have any suggestions as to whether to take A+C together, or one by one: Adriamycin x 4, followed by Cytoxan x 4 ? We'd like one by one since that would be giving her less side effects, but would that be less effective? This is our main question at this point.

    She hasn't seen a radiation oncologist yet, but it's likely that she will receive chemo first, followed by radiation. The whole area is still painful after recent surgery, so she hates to have it irradiated now...

    Any advice on chemo?

  • Mardibra
    Mardibra Member Posts: 1,111
    edited September 2012

    I had AC x4 biweekly (dose dense) followed by Taxol x4 biweekly. I didn't find the AC bad at all. They gave me great drugs to ensure I had no nausea. The fatigue was bad but certainly doable. I worked every day throughout. The Adriamycin was a few large syringes pushed one right after the other. It took maybe 5 minutes to administer. The cytoxin was a slow drip over about 90-120 minutes. I've never heard of them being administered separately. But even if they could be, I would have opted to have them both at the same time. I did not enjoy hanging out at the cancer center. I wanted it over and done with as soon as possible. One tip....make sure your wife drinks lots of water the day before, day of, and day after AC. It helps get it out of your system faster. Also, I was given Emend for the primary nausea med. one pill on infusion day and two days following. I very rarely had to take anything else. However it's expensive. $700 for 3 pills. I hope your insurance will cover it. Good luck!

  • Rockym
    Rockym Member Posts: 1,261
    edited September 2012

    Sccs, just so you know, lymphedema is a LIFETIME risk.  There are many women who only have 1 node taken out and get it.  There are women who have had only surgery and still get it.  My understanding is that the percentage of breast and trunk LE is much higher then reported.

    As for chemo, I did TCx4 and yes it was doable as they say.  Rads was the pits.  Also, rads alone and rads of the axillary will increase the chance for LE too.  Hope you wife is doing well.

  • exbrnxgrl
    exbrnxgrl Member Posts: 12,424
    edited September 2012

    Sccs,

    Good to hear how things are going and no need for thanks. Without people willing to listen and lend support, cancer would stink worse than it already does. I'm glad they were able to keep the node dissection to level 1 and, of course, I know you're well aware that LE risks till exist. I've never had chemo so can't help you there. My mets are being kept at bay by Arimidex and Aredia. Wishing you both the best.

    Caryn

  • Sassa
    Sassa Member Posts: 1,588
    edited September 2012

    AC is given together as the drug are more effective in combination than when given separately.

    I did 4 AC.  It was not fun (had a difficult time with nausea), but I made it through.

    I am 5 1/2 years out from the AC and can tell you, I am doing great physically.

  • SccS
    SccS Member Posts: 78
    edited September 2012
    Yes, we know that risk of LE is there even if one node removed, etc...

                 

    So, had anyone else heard of, or received, Adriamycin separate from Cytoxan? Does that have any benefits/advantages? Trying to get some more feedback to help us decide...

    Thank you people!

    P.S. Someone asked if her cancer is lobular or ductal. It's ductal.  

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited September 2012

    Here is a thought... my onc described chemo like this - you have been shot in the shoulder.  Chemo is the bullet.  It makes a small hole going into the shoulder but if you look at that same shoulder from behind you will see all the wreckage the bullet created on the way out of your shoulder.  If you were to separate the Adriamycin from the Cytoxan it would be like being shot twice.  I would rather get the experience over with than drag it out and risk the potential of worse side effects from prolonging it by doubling the time.  Not to mention, the above post posits that the drugs work symbiotically.  My assumption is that is the reason they are prescribed together.  If there was a benefit to separating the drugs I think you would see more people doing it.

  • Lou10
    Lou10 Member Posts: 332
    edited September 2012

    I read an information sheet on AC and it said the two drugs attack cancer cells in different ways and therefore are more effective when given together.

    Whatever chemo your wife has, my advice would be to ask for the best side effect meds and take them "on schedule" rather than "as needed."  And if she still can't tolerate the side effects, there may be other options beside separating the drugs. With one of my chemo drugs (taxotere) the dose was reduced after the first cycle because of side effects (in my case, neurotoxicity). I don't know if dose reduction of AC is an effective option if necessary.

    Best wishes to you both. 

  • SccS
    SccS Member Posts: 78
    edited September 2012

    I see... Well, we will be aiming at taking them together then. What you say does make sense. Thank you for information, everyone.

  • cookiegal
    cookiegal Member Posts: 3,296
    edited September 2012

    I don't think you are crazy for doing everything you can to lower your LE risk. I have to say, I am constantly sad over the way LE has changed my life.

    I am early stage so for me cancer was not the tragedy, LE is. 

  • ESCORPION
    ESCORPION Member Posts: 102
    edited March 2018

    SccS/

    I am dealing with the same issue of removal of my lymb node, sorry to ask you... But your decition of taking them out ... It improve her outcome?


    Thankd

Categories