AC-TH, TSH or TH?

Options
Driftway
Driftway Member Posts: 20

Sorry, I meant TCH in title -----

 After a June 8 dx of ER- HER2+ 7mm grade 3 neg node, bilat mx it's now time to decide on the chemo..... 

The MO at Memorial in NY recommends just Taxol and Herceptin, I think it's a Dana Farber study ongoing. She also said if it's between ACTH vs TCH, ACTH is actually better tolerated.

Did anyone go for the TH? There are no long term numbers yet so not sure would want to try that.

TCH vs AC-TH, the cardiac risk of AC-TH is higher. My biggest fear is actually neuropathy. I assume most of us opt for a port, too....?
thanks

Comments

  • SpecialK
    SpecialK Member Posts: 16,486
    edited July 2012

    My onc does TCH for Her2+ patients to reduce the possibility of cardiotoxicity.  I used 30g of L-Glutamine, 1500mg cap of Acetyl L-Carnitine and a 50mg cap of B6 to ward off neuropathy.  I had finger and tongue tingling that resolved between tx, and by tx#5 had numbness on the soles of my feet.  Continuing these supplements through chemo that numbness resolved several months post-chemo.  I have no problems with it now, nor did I have any cardiac issues.  I had a baseline echocardiogram prior to the start of chemo, then quarterly echos until the end of Herceptin (Jan. '12).  A number of oncs use the TH for those with smaller masses - 7mm is relatively small.  What is the "S" in your TSH acronym?  My port was installed during my BMX, and yes it does make things easier!

  • Kelloggs
    Kelloggs Member Posts: 965
    edited July 2012

    Driftway - my onc gave me the choice between TCH and AC-TH but explained her preference is TCH because of the cardiotoxicity.  I did 6 TCH and did pretty well.  I also had an echo prior to starting treatment.  I was much more concerned with damage to my heart than neuropathy.  As it turns out I had neither.  I had slight neuropathy during treatment (started after tx #3) but it was minimal and resolved PFC.

  • hopeful123
    hopeful123 Member Posts: 191
    edited July 2012

    I had 8mm grade 3 her2 positive. Mine recommended ACTH. I did quite well with AC and now doing TH. I have had no cardiac issues upto now. AC-tH shows a few percentage points better disease free survival than TCH in a recent study (though it may not be significant), but ACTH has cardiac issues and slight risk of leukemia (.1%) (again small numbers so may not be significant). Your MO should take all these into account when recommending a specific protocol.

  • Driftway
    Driftway Member Posts: 20
    edited July 2012

    OK, now I see that this ac-th vs tch is a common and tough decision, but has anyone ever looked at it from the ER -,   HER + perspective?

    I did read somewhere that ER - are particulary anthracycline (the A) sensitive. Any ER - HER + can confirm this?

    and here is a recent article from Memorial in NY, who are pro-adriamycin, speaking against TCH: http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/30/18/2179.full

  • hopeful123
    hopeful123 Member Posts: 191
    edited July 2012

    Thanks for sharing this article , in all my research I felt ACTH seemed to always have a slight nudge. I am also ER/pr negative and felt more comfortable doing this. I am 44 another reason they chose the ACTH regimen. I got two consults MDA and Columbia both in agreement and I am being treated at MDA. I finished AC and my fourth TH. Side effects were bearable no cardiac issues unto now. I am on low beta blockers to make sure I don't have issues.

  • ccjj
    ccjj Member Posts: 128
    edited July 2012

    ditto to what hopeful123 stated.  I was 43 at dx and also had two consults.  One from Mayo Clinic and one from where treated at UW (wisconsin) Hospital.  Both said ACTH for me. I agree that ACTH always seems to have the slight nudge in studies whether statistically significant or not.  However, driftaway..you are node neg and only 7mm.  That would be a hard choice.  AC may give you a slight edge, but look at Robin Roberts from GMA show.  She had AC 5 years ago for her triple neg bc and is now being treated for leukemia.  Kinda stresses me out at times, but with my 1 pos node and larger tumor, I feel it was probably the right choice for me. I remember agonizing about it though.  Let us know what you decide. Good luck. 

  • RoulaG
    RoulaG Member Posts: 239
    edited July 2012

    I am er-/pr-, and her2+. My onc recommended TCH. I have tolerated it pretty well. I have heard the ACTH, has a higher rate of cardio toxicity and since herceptin also is cardio toxic, she felt TCH would be better. The cardio toxicity of herceptin is reversible however the effects of A are not. The benefit of either chemo is pretty much the same in terms of %, and even the dr who created herceptin tends to recommend TCH regimen over the ACTH.

  • Driftway
    Driftway Member Posts: 20
    edited July 2012

    Well, TCH OR AC-TH will start 7/30, and still struggling with the decision despite the editorial I linked above. 

    ER-  HER+, may be a bit more responsive to ACTH, however the cardiac risk is now my big concern.

    Mainly - as in another current thread in this group, if cardiac function is compromised by the Adriamycin, it would prevent any Herceptin or similar drugs in the future. That seems to be the biggest risk to AC-TH....closing the door on future Herceptin treatments. 

    I would accept a tiny increased recurrence risk for more a guarantee that Herceptin and newer similar drugs will be useful in the future.

    Does this make sense? 

  • RoulaG
    RoulaG Member Posts: 239
    edited July 2012

    Perfect sense.

  • Driftway
    Driftway Member Posts: 20
    edited July 2012

    just found out there is a 6% (one in 16) chance of permanent hair loss with TCH. This is a real issue with Taxotere. My MO mentioned it in discussing the two options but called it "rare".

    It may tip the scales back to AC-TH, since that uses Taxol/H x 12 as the second leg. Wow, choose between 6% permanent hair loss or 3-4% cardiac issues......

    The MO's I saw say "never saw" AC prevent H in younger/no hypertension patients like me.

    Interestingly, the Memorial SK doc is also suggesting TH (taxol/Herceptin weekly x 12) alone for me, but no data on that regimen yet. It's being done at Dana Farber and Memorial in NY. Anyone done just TH out there?

    I will post this as a new topic.......
  • hopeful123
    hopeful123 Member Posts: 191
    edited July 2012

    Driftway- I did want to add that they did put me on low levels of beta blockers before I started chemo. There is a study that showed the group on low levels of beta blockers had no issues with Herceptin but 30% of the control group had issues. Can't find that study, you might want to search for it. Not sure if it helps with AC related issues. But as I was doing AC-TH and had a few palpitations before they decided to be careful. I have done fine upto now, but I am just finished with AC and partway on TH. Only time will tell if I made the right choice.

  • Driftway
    Driftway Member Posts: 20
    edited July 2012

    Hopeful - thanks for the beta blocker info; please let me know dose/type. Is it coreg?

    I will most likely go for dose dense 4x, every 2 wks AC in 2 weeks. My onc told me today that ER - probably tips the scale toward AC-TH.

  • hopeful123
    hopeful123 Member Posts: 191
    edited July 2012

    Carvedilol and I think it is 5 mg twice a day. Will check the dosage. They will do a complete heart work up for you as you are going to be doing herceptin. If they are not planning on it, make sure your MO gets a cardiologist on your team. You will have echo, Muga scan etc one before you start, and for me I had another echo after AC prior to Herceptin. I will have one every three months for the next year. I was told the same, given it is ER- they felt ACTH was the way to go. But I do feel jeolous of all the people who started after me and are now done.

    My biggest problem right now is anemia. I still have 7 more Taxols. Looks like I will need transfusion :(

Categories