Anyone have a small grade 1 tumor that was node + ?

Options
bahamamom3
bahamamom3 Member Posts: 285

I was diagnosed with BC in September and have gone through chemo, radiation, and now the hormone blocker pills, arimidex.  One thing that has always puzzled me is that they first told me that my cancer was stage 1 because it was small.  The official size determined at the time of the surgery to remove the tumor was 7 mm (or .7cm), although the mammogram and ultrasound before had shown about 1.1 cm.  I had a 3.5 mm (or .35cm) size tumor in my sentinel node, so they took out all of the other nodes.  No more of them had cancer, but the one node changed my stage to 2.  All this I understand, but they said it was grade 1 also.  And according to what they said and what I have read also, the grade has to do with how similar to regular breast cells the cancer cells appear.  Those that are very close to regular cells are grade 1, and they are supposed to be the slowest growing.  So what I don't understand is why are there so many women on these boards with 3+cm. size cancerous tumors that have not travelled to the nodes yet.  Many of them are grade 2 or 3 but they are not yet showing up in the nodes.  Please share with me if you had a small tumor also that was in at least one node and the doctors said it was grade 1.  I really feel like I need to understand this. 

«1

Comments

  • Lee7
    Lee7 Member Posts: 657
    edited July 2012

    I'll be interested to see what others post also. I had a stage 1 tumor but like you, I had just over a 2 mm tumor in my sentinel node and it bumped me up to Stage 2.  I also had all the other nodes out in a second surgery and they were negative.  My pathology report didn't show LVI , but like my Onc said, it still got over to the node.

  • coraleliz
    coraleliz Member Posts: 1,523
    edited July 2012

    I had 2 grade 1 tumors. Was was stage I & the other stage II. My understanding is that grade 1 tumor can "learn" to travel to nodes & beyond. Some tumors never develop the ability to travel. My grade 1 tumors went undiagnosed for "several" years. Three years before my diagnosis, I was evaluated for a lump in my armpit. I was told it was an isolated node. Three years later it was found to be a positive sentinal node.

    As for the sizing of tumors before surgery, I also got some discrepancies. The way it was explained to me is that, when you are standing getting your mamogram your breast hangs one direction. When you get an ultrasound, you are lying on your back & your breast hangs a different way. When you have an MRI, you are lying on your stomach & your breast hangs straight down. It seems that tumor tissue is pliable & that's why the variation in measurements. Mine(both) measured smaller on my final pathology.

  • jacee
    jacee Member Posts: 1,384
    edited July 2012

    I had a 6 mm IDC tumor that was grade 1 and had spread to 3 lymph nodes. One node was an internal mammary node. I too, have been confused about this "slow growing " cancer. Seems pretty aggressive to me.

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited July 2012

    Here's how my physician presented my tumor to me. Mind you, while Grade 1, it is a rare type of breast cancer, mucinous. He said that it was in my body for a very long time. Looking back at prior sonograms, it resembled a cyst. One of many in my breasts. So, like Coraliz, slow growing tumors can be in your body for some time before being diagnosed. Aggressive Grade 3 HER 2 + tumors usually develop quickly and travel quickly. In fact, they develop so quickly that there is very little research that helps dictate treatment for those sisters who have very small HER 2 + tumors because they are often diagnosed when they are bigger and often have node involvement.



    My physician also mentioned that because mine is so slow growing, I will need monitoring longer. He said if I got a recurrence it would likely occur after 20 years and then we could treat it for another 20 years. That should put me somewhere in my 90's and I am more likely to pass from something else before then....



    But getting back to the positive lymph node with a small Grade 1 tumor. At the end of the day, despite all the research, there is STILL no way of knowing WHY one person's tumor will metastize to the lymph nodes while another's tumor will not. And, until recently with the development of the Oncotype DX test, most Grade 3 ER+ tumors were thought to be aggressive and yet some of those tumors were found to have LOW recurrence scores putting those sisters in a quandary whether or not to have chemo. The bottom line is, while tumor grade has been a somewhat important characteristic in describing a tumor in the past, researchers are still learning about what makes a tumor active. Your situation describes perfectly how elusive cancer still is to researchers.

  • bahamamom3
    bahamamom3 Member Posts: 285
    edited July 2012

    Thanks to all of you who have responded to this post.  No matter how good my doctors are (and I really do like them all and think they are right on target with my treatment), I still seem to get my best information from other BC ladies.  The whole disease is so confusing anyway and so very different for so many people.  I always like to look at member's stats at the bottom of their posts and have just really been baffled sometimes when a particular lady will say something that seems to contradict what I have been told or doesn't appear to go with their stats.  This one thing, the grade 1 but somehow being aggressive enough to have travelled, is something I think about often.  I have actually asked my onc, and she just said that something about mine was aggressive even with the grade 1.  I guess this will just remain one of the many mysteries of BC for me.

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited July 2012

    See, this is what I don't understand. If there is no LVI how does the cancer travel to the nodes? My tumour was right behind the nipple, far away from the nodes, Grade 1, no LVI and it still got to 2 nodes. The size of mine wasn't that small, about 1.3 cm.

  • nora_az
    nora_az Member Posts: 720
    edited July 2012

    All this grading and staging can be mind boggling. I'm one of those that vora was referring to. I have grade three triple positive and it was so fast growing it's scary to look back on now.

    Now the part that confuses me. I had a smallish tumor and 2 dirty nodes that made me IIa. To me someone else who is IIa should have the same sort of chance of recurrence. In saying that, it really doeant work out that way.

    All things said IIa triple negative would be worse than IIa triple positive. Someone grade 1 and IIa i would think have better odds. Or am i not looking at this right? And granted I do realize there are no guarantees for any of us. Just hope.

  • Elizabeth1889
    Elizabeth1889 Member Posts: 1,036
    edited July 2012

    bahamamom3, Our stats are very similar. I had a 1cm, Grade 1 breast tumor, but I also had a 5mm tumor in one lymph node.  I, too, have wondered how a small Grade 1 tumor could get to a lymph node while some larger, more agressive tumors do not. I am glad to have thrown everything available at the tumor. Chemo was not nearly as bad as I feared and radiation was doable. Here's to many happy, healthy years for all of us.

  • bluepearl
    bluepearl Member Posts: 961
    edited July 2012

    When you look at grades, there are three components to it, the most important is mitotic score or proliferation rate that almost trumps the other two. While the numbers can add up to 5 or less, if the mitotic score is greater than 1, it is much more likely to travel. Someone can have a 3cm tumor with a low mitotic score, but the adding up can still be over 6 and are therefore a different grade while having a tumor that hasn't travelled. Do a search on mitotic score on pubmed.com...it's enlightening! Another factor is lymph-vascular invasion....whether it's present or not. I got a 1,2,2 score so was grade 1, somebody else could have a 3,1,1 score and present with node +.......and Her+ makes a huge difference too, even small. It's a strange thing that cancer is, but we just have to go on with hope in our hearts and enjoy the day we are given......a truck can come along and make your cancer fears go away....never know anything about when "our time" has come!

  • Lee7
    Lee7 Member Posts: 657
    edited July 2012

    Awhile back, someone posted that the Oncotype score gave a lot of weight to the miotic score in its formula calculation. That semed to make sense whe I looked at my path report and compared it to my score. 

    yorkiemom, My final path report said 'not found' for LVI, but he cancer still made it way to my node. That has been a mystery for me too.  The only thing I can think of (besides a report error) is the the biopsy took out the spot where the LVI connection was, so when they examined the tumor they didn't see any.

    bluepearl...so true.  When someone asks me if they 'got it all out' or am I 'cancer free now', I just tell I'll let ya know when I hit 80. And in the meantime, I'm just doing the best I can to avoid those trucks.

  • kyliet
    kyliet Member Posts: 687
    edited July 2012

    I am so glad I found this thread. I was originally told because I was low Grade 1 with a small,1.2cm, tumour it would not have spread. I was totally shocked when I came back with 3 positive nodes plus extra. cap extension and lymphatic channel spread,but no LVI.

    My mitotic score was only 1, and we don't usually get oncotype in Australia. It was mentioned that my Ki-67 score was borderline high which was thought to be unusual in Grade 1. 

    I have come to the conclusion that nothing is logical with this, but it has been suggested that because Grade 1's have been there so long they have had more time to travel. 

    I am finishing radio tomorrow, yipee, and after 10 months of treatment I hope that truck is well and truly gone. 

  • Elizabeth1889
    Elizabeth1889 Member Posts: 1,036
    edited August 2012

    Yes, I had a Grade 1 tumor that measured 1cm but managed to spread to one lymph node. There was no LVI or extracapular extension, but the lymph tumor was a macromet so I had four rounds of TC and 33 rads. I have no regrets. Good luck to you





































  • kyliet
    kyliet Member Posts: 687
    edited August 2012

    Hi everyone, I keep coming across info that Grade 1 cancer is less responsive to chemo, and also it is more likely to come back later down the track rather than within 5 years. Does anyone have any views on this? 

  • ek25
    ek25 Member Posts: 53
    edited August 2012

    I am kind of still in the process of being diagnosed.  I was diagnosed with DCIS on a biopsy.  I had two MRI's and there was a spot that lit up both times.  They did an US and couldn't find it and scheduled me for an MRI-guided biopsy.  I got the results of the pathology on that and they found both DCIS and IDC.  The IDC was very small, .5cm, grade 2, ER+/PR- and my HER2 score was a 2 which put me in the category of equivocal.  My results were automatically sent to a lab for FISH testing to ultimately determine whether I'm + or -.  The thing that scares me is that LVI was present.  I'm going for a lumpectomy and sentinel node biopsy next week, but am expecting the worst on the nodes.  I'm not sure how this happens with such small tumors either.  I read that positive LVI is positively correlated with larger tumors.  I have a tumor in the smallest category, a mitotic score of 1 and yet, LVI.  I have seen some posts here that said they had LVI, but no node involvement, which I think is scarier than having node involvement.  I'm guessing I will be somewhere in a Stage II diagnosis assuming my nodes are positive.  This is all so scary.

  • Lou746
    Lou746 Member Posts: 9
    edited May 2013

    I was diagnosed grade 1 tumour 1.3cm invasive ductal carcinoma. July 2011. I had a small lymph invasion 1.5 mm in 1 of 5 nodes. I was given a lumpectomy, radiotherapy and Tamoxifen. I have just been diagnosed with bone metastases. Can't quite get my head around it either. had I known this would happen I think I would have asked for a scan at time of diagnosis.

  • edwards750
    edwards750 Member Posts: 3,761
    edited December 2012

    kyliet - Have Stage 2(micromet in SN) and Grade 1 bc and never heard anything like that about recurrence.  diane

  • kyliet
    kyliet Member Posts: 687
    edited December 2012

    I asked my surgeon about Grade 1 and node positive. He said that because it was slow growing they often don't pick them up until they have been there for a long time and so have had time to travel.

    He didn't put much credence in the late recurrance which is good. 

  • Denise51
    Denise51 Member Posts: 65
    edited March 2013

    HI,

    I would like to get some more input on this thread. I was diagnosed with BC in Dec. 2012. Cells were classified as Grade 1. I hade a lumpectomy and sen. node removal  2/19/13. THe primary was about 1 cm, 3/4 lymph nodes were positive.

    Bone scan OK, but CT scan revealed  uterus and 1/2 adrenal glands enlarged.

    I am worried about adrenal gland involvement because I read that BC can metastasize to the adrenals. 

    I am concerned that this is the beginning of a downward spiral.

    I would appreciate any and all input. Especially would like to know how the previous posters are doing.

    Scheduled to start chemo on 3/22/13.

    Denise 51

  • kyliet
    kyliet Member Posts: 687
    edited March 2013

    Hi Denise, my stats are very similar to yours. When I had my CT scan I had a 13mm 'prominence' on my suprarenal (right adrenal) gland. I was told it should just be an adrenal adenoma which is b9. Onc said adrenals was not one of the main places mets went to.  I was also told the two 10mm nodes in my right axilla - non surgery side - are fine. I am placing my trust in them but would like another scan now 12 months is up.

    I hope you get some answers asap. I am 16months out now, yay. Sending giant hugs your way. x

  • Denise51
    Denise51 Member Posts: 65
    edited March 2013

    Hi,

    Thanks for the input. I will try and let you know the outcome of the scan. I am glad to hear you have finished your therapy. Congrats and hugs.

  • elleredux
    elleredux Member Posts: 45
    edited March 2013



    This is my story too. Before my first lumpectomy the surgeon said he'd be shocked to find anything in the lymph node. Then came the results of the sentinal node biopsy with a .7mm micromet in 1 of 3 nodes. I went along thinking (hoping) that was it. MO thought there would be nothing more in the nodes. I decided to go for the ALND at BMX since I hoped it would give me more confidence in forgoing rads after BMX for the micromet. But, another node (12 more out at ALND) came up with 5mm.



    I also have noticed that larger higher grade tumors are node negative where it seems like a fair number of us Grade 1's can have positive nodes. It is perplexing. I do believe that my tumor was there for a long time. When I got copies of my mammograms from several years back for a second opinion, I noticed the reports said that my breasts were dense and "may obscure small masses". I actually noticed a thickening (which turned out to be widespread DCIS sprinkled around the 1.7 cm invasive tumor), not a lump. In my imaging work up the doctor doing the ultrasound said she wasn't too concerned and pointed out ways that the area looked more like benign tissue versus cancer. Also, my mammograms only pointed out an area of architectural distortion, not a measurable lump. The biopsy obviously was malignant.



    So, perhaps along with being slower growing, these grade 1's can look somewhat more benign on imaging.

  • peki007
    peki007 Member Posts: 27
    edited March 2013

    11Momto3 - I read your post with much interest.  I am having my SNB in 2 weeks and my BS also said she thought she would not find anything in the nodes, but I can't imagine why she would say this.  I also had a lumpectomy with another surgeon who thought my "thickening" - not a lump would not be cancer and it turned out that it was.  Mine was not large, but I am having a hard time believing she won't find anything - how would they know?  It's annoying because I could have had both surgeries at the same time and now need to go back.  She said margins were clean, but would like to make sure and go back in again. (this was a different surgeon and I ended up going to Northwestern after that and dropped this doctor).  I don't want to get too comfortable with her "hunch" and end up being shocked.  Did you feel this way?

  • elleredux
    elleredux Member Posts: 45
    edited March 2013

    Peki007 - I think the size of your tumor makes it unlikely that there would be anything in the nodes. But I really understand how traumatic it is to be reassured and then deal with the shock when it isn't the outcome you were told to expect. That happened to me several times during this process...Finally I was a basket case when a CT scan found what was identified as most likely a benign growth on my vertebrae (a common bone island). They kept saying they weren't worried about it but I just couldn't believe it until after I had a Pet scan to confirm it. I totally believe in that recent study that says lots of women have post traumatic stress disorder after being diagnosed with breast cancer! I wish you could have this SNB sooner than 2 weeks so you can put this fear to rest and not have it weigh so heavily on you. I know it's really hard to go through. I had my surgery at Northwestern too, if its the one in Chicago. :-)

  • Denise51
    Denise51 Member Posts: 65
    edited March 2013

    Kyliet,

    Just found out that my enlarged adrenal gland is also due to a B9 adenoma. Not so lucky with the uterine scan. Have thickening and now have to have a uterine biopsy. If it is positive, a hysterectomy will follow and this will delay my BC chemo.

    Hate the waiting. I was mentally prepared for the chemo. 

    Thanks for your input, hope you are doing well.

    Denise51

  • kyliet
    kyliet Member Posts: 687
    edited March 2013

    Denise, glad to hear about adrenal gland.

    Fingers crossed on uterine biopsy. It is hard when you have psyched your self up for chemo, but chemo treats our whole body, so it will ease your mind to know the full situation.

    Hugs to you, xxx

  • aussieched
    aussieched Member Posts: 244
    edited March 2013

    kyliet - I have also read a lot about Grade 1 not being as responsive to chemo as Grade 2 & 3.  I was initially told my tumour was very small, however after lumpectomy it turned out to be 18mm and not with clear margins, and with micromet in sentinal node.

    Had further surgery for axillary clearance and more taken to attain clear margins and had total of 30 glands taken out, with no more positive glands.  The surgeorn told me that when looking at the stage and size of tumour, he estimates it had been there at least 8 years, however I had been having regular mammograms but nothing ever showed up.

    I have also read in various sites that there is a higher chance of late recurrence in low grade er+ pr+ breast cancer.

    Ched

  • kyliet
    kyliet Member Posts: 687
    edited March 2013

    I have moved area and have to find a new GP. I went to one to day who seemed ok, but WT... She said aren't you lucky it is only Grade 1?

    Not quite sure how to respond to that one, so I thought I would vent with the ladies who got the grade 1 and the nodes.

  • Denise51
    Denise51 Member Posts: 65
    edited March 2013

    How ignorant some smart people can be.

    Are you going to have chemo? I start today. A little nervous.

  • kyliet
    kyliet Member Posts: 687
    edited March 2013

    Denise, I hope the chemo treats you well. My son made me a silver 'pac-man' out of foil. I used to imagine them munching through my tumour as I sat there.

    It is natural to be nervous. Everyone has different reactions - but it really will be over before you know it. Hugs x

  • Maddie57
    Maddie57 Member Posts: 296
    edited March 2013

    Hi Ladies- found your thread by accident, and read some of your comments. I am no expert, but this is what I understand.

    Grade 3 tumours do respond more positively to chemo, as chemo works on rapidly dividing cells. That is the whole mechanics of chemotherapy. This is the reason your healthy cells get affected and your hair and skin more than anything else, as your skin and hair is constantly renewing itself. Normal cells get affected, these are the side effects you experience whilst on chemo. They get sick but the cells are not dividing rapidly enough to get killed, so they recover. On the plus side, if Grade1 tumours do spread they are growing much more slowly, so are easier to contain. The spread to the lymph nodes is probably governed by the time they have been there, and how close they are to a lymph vessel. Your lymph vessel is like a storm water drain, and your sentinel node is the mesh grating they put up to catch branches and leaves. Hopefully your "mesh" has stopped the cells from pushing past the grating. Grade 3 tumours are like "Special Forces" troops and Grade 1 are more like a slow foot soldier. Keep well ladies. 

    Denise - good luck with your uterine biopsy. Hope it turns out to be a fibroid or something else benign.

Categories