How can we make this truly safe, supportive, judgement-free?
Comments
-
Now that we are discussing rights, laws, may I briefly digress to the topic of rules?
Rules by BCO. The terms and conditions read, in part:
You acknowledge that all members are permitted only one verified member identification, and that operating multiple accounts, even with unique email addresses, or a unique computer, is not permitted. If a user is banned from the Discussion Boards, s/he is prohibited from creating a different account.
For more on the community rules, go here:
-
That's Life, Impositive is fine and Eve just stated they are in touch.
-
Athena, I didn't think the rule had changed. Are you saying that if those who are causing problems now are banned then they can't return? So we should all be careful?
-
Thats life, it was not my argument, and my comment was not related to your comment about prayer. If you read back over the thread, you will see that the point has been made several times by others that belief in alternative therapies is like religious belief and should be respected in the same way, i.e. not questioned. I really am just trying to take people at their word, because I have zero desire to upset or disrupt anyone, yet would like to be able to read about and discuss pros and cons of alternative approaches.
It has also been suggested a couple of times that there are no facts, as in, for example:
"This years facts are nexts year's ineffective treatment. It's really hard to enforce facts when they don't exist. "
-
athena, are you meaning me? I changed my pic because when i was writing to chillipaddi i felt that my pic of my daughter and i laughing on the beach in bikinis was inappropriate. I dont have any pics of me that are nice, i look sick and tired, so im hard pressed to find one that suits. edited to add: only have one membership!
-
momine, sorry if i misinterpreted your comments.
Thank god impositive is ok
-
Not aimed at you at all, that's-life.
Glad impositive is ok.....now if only we could hear back from chilli.
-
I called it "magical relativism" earlier, but "impositive" is cute, and a new word for me.
I am simply trying to find a way for everyone to be accomodated here.
-
Not sure if this thread is going anywhere. Shall we just close the thread?
-
Momine, I was one who said that alternatives compared to religion, but I didn't mean that it couldn't be questioned, though some don't seem to like being questioned from what you've said. I'm sorry if anyone was so defensive and rude with your questions. I meant that their belief in say, acupuncture for example, was based on some principle on which the treatment was built. Now there may not be physical meridian lines that can be scientifically proven, yet the practice can cause pain to be relieved and I've heard that many surgical procedures are performed using acupuncture alone for pain relief. In fact there was one such operation filmed where the patient was chatting with the interviewer while being cut open with no anaesthetic in a documentary. Maybe one day we'll find out why this works, just as we found out how aspirin works long after it had been widely used. And many mysteries remain to be solved about the human body at many levels.
Which brings me to facts. I'll start a new post for that.
-
Momine: I really want to question all the alt therapies too! I have wanted to for 2 years, get our teeth stuck into dissecting the studies, share any successes or failures without fear of 'i told you so's'...but most of our PRECIOUS time has been spent defending the right to discuss them!..I have been driven into a quiet corner, sometimes i try to open discussion on a study, or a therapy, but only a couple of members are willing to openly discuss these alt therapies. You will see that many, many people read the information, or posts, all hoping (as they say) to find info that may help, but not many get involved in the discussion. It can be isolating to be branded an 'alt' person. Its crazy, because so far i have done the conventional route. Much time has been wasted. I admire chillipaddi greatly, for standing tall, loving us all enough to share her journey despite probable ridicule. I wish people would understand that conventional therapy doesnt offer us much and we need to discuss helping ourselves as much as possible. How to get the message across that this forum is not a threat to conventional wisdom, but a potential help for our health, is the million dollar question.
-
Moderators, it would be nice if we could sort things out by letting everyone have their say. It saddens me to see some who aren't able to come together with an open mind, willing to see the other person's viewpoint. If we want peace than we have to BE peaceful.
I'll let the decision be by consensus.
-
Mods: closing threads merely leads to new ones. Better get it all out here, IMO. These topics/issues are longstanding and won't just go away. Closing a thread is childish and does not solve anything. It just leads to more bad feelings and unresolved issues. The adult thing is to work through this.
-
I think the decision should be Joy's. I've had my say and won't be posting on this thread anymore.
-
That's Life, I so admire your attitude. I'm saddenend that you feel you can't participate openly. I too prefer to ask lots of question, research and check everything, conventional or otherwise. I thought you had moved house and that's why you were busy or not online. You're another examole of why we need to clean up this forum.
As a "moderate" who has no preference except for what works, I feel caught in the middle. I do still get many ideas from the alternative forum and enjoy it for the most part.
-
I agree with you Athena. I was thinking it would just move to another thread. Maybe we need a better title for the thread. Would that help?
Yes, let's keep going, and sorry mods that we're keeping you on your toes.
-
I am out of this thread as stated before, unless someone addresses me personally. I will then have the courtesy to reply as I did yesterday
-
Thatslife, that is to bad. I am relatively new to BCO and gave up on message board drama years ago anyway, so I have no idea of the history of the various forums here.
From other boards though, I have learned that if you find a poster disruptive, it is usualy best to ignore said poster and carry on with your business. In other words, don't let a few trolls derail you.
-
Here's an excerpt from Ralph Marston ~ The Daily Motivator. I thought we could all use it
Stop waiting for everything to be perfect. Start making good and meaningful use of all you have.
Let yourself be driven forward by your highest dreams. Feel the fears and learn from them, but don't let yourself be held back by them.
Let go of your need to control those around you. Experience the power and effectiveness that come from controlling and disciplining yourself.
Live intentionally, on purpose, with the utmost sincerity and authenticity. Live this day and every day with the excellence you know you deserve.
Ralph Marston - The Daily Motivator -
I feel very moderate too and would like to keep my mind open. However regardless of who is commenting in a less than civil manner, it's still uncivil. And yes, I would feel this way about any thread that devolved in that manner and am aware that that has happened. For now, I'm going to enjoy my summer off, play around my house and patio and enjoy my new grandchild! Wish you all the best. Caryn
PS: Joy, thank you so much for trying to bring things together with maturity, grace and fairness . -
I think as long as the people who participate in a discussion are interested in the issue at hand and in being supportive without ulterior motives or handles, this can be productive. I think this thread has already been helpful.
I am very science-based in my medical decisions. I prefer to phrase it thus than to say "conventional" or "alt." I think science-based is the best way I can describe myself especially in the world of cancer. The problem is that I doubt the science of some conventional bc therapies (so do researchers - so I am not alone), and believe that some approaches which are alt. do have some science, although it remains unstudied.
However, my personal alt. choices wouldn't really involve what is discussed (such as herbs and diet, or yoga or prayer). I tend to think of things like immunotherapy, hyperthermia and other procedures whose efficacy for bc is still unknown as alt. measures I would consider if I reached stage IV.
I consider exercise complementary for me - not alt. I don't follow any dietary plan. I do take supplements (Vit. D3, co-enzyme Q 10).
My main therapy for cancer consisted of (1) surgery (very conventional), (2) hormone therapy as far as I was able to tolerate it -which was not very far because I almost lost my life thanks to Tamox. and Lupron- and (3) stopping smoking. There is great science to the benefits surgery for bc. There is less science available tying smoking and BC, but stopping smoking has a lot of science to recommend it generally.
I thin the black/white distinction between what is "conventional" and what is not is slowly disappearing.
Most people use "alt." therapies including prayer (as defined by researchers, that is one alt. therapy - and we should remember that all treatment is partly belief-based) along with conventional. I think the definition of alt. being INSTEAD of conventional needs to be seriously revised. Most people, when faced with deadly illnesses, will try to have their fingers in as many pots as possible, using a complex set of algorithms. For some, it goes like this: "I will have chemo and if that fails, I will pray." For others, "I will do the Budwig protocol and, if that fails, surgery."
I challenge anyone here to say they don't have "Plan B" that is somewhat "alt." That is human, understandable, and it's what we are all doing. Hey, I resigned from a recent job partly because I was afraid the immense stress would cause my cancer to come back! Where's the science in that? I don't know, but it resonated with me nonetheless.
-
"I challenge anyone here to say they don't have "Plan B" that is somewhat "alt.""
LOL, nice observation, and I am sure quite true.
-
Hi everyone, I think whatever treatment or "alt " you have if you don't believe it will work it won't. Call me stupid but I believe our mind plays a big part in what happen's to our body.
I'm not saying the mind can cure Cancer but it plays a big part in it. Many times I have read people giving up and others fighting for many years.
A doctor told me " never give up hope that's when shit happens" -
Maud and Patty - go ahead and point out any dangers of any treatment you want, on any thread you like. I wouldn't jump on you about it in the way any criticism here is jumped on. I don't think you could argue that surgery would be all that dangerous.
-
Yes you could. Any treatment modality that requires you to submit to a drug induced 'state of not being' while people, albeit skilled, remove large amounts of your tissue, cauterize, stitch or staple you closed and then requires you to take Rx analgesics is probably reasonably construed as dangerous. The first risk, while remote, is not regaining consciousness, either dead or vegetative, the second is damage to you larynx because of the induction of the anesthesia and intubation, sometimes anesthesia doesn't work. There are apocryphal stories of those who wake up during surgery, but because they are incubated and sedated cannot cry out. Then there is surgeon skill levels. They did not all graduate at the top of their classes. You have had surgery or thought about it. You could probably figure out many more risks, some of them are as horrific as what Chillipadi has had to go through.
My point is all contemplated treatmentsfor CANCER carry both risks and benefits. The natural history of the disease, untreated, quite often is worse than the treatments. But not always, sometimes the best course for an individual is no treatment. Each one of us has to determine what kinds of risks for what benefit we are willing to take. -
Yes you could. Any treatment modality that requires you to submit to a drug induced 'state of not being' while people, albeit skilled, remove large amounts of your tissue, cauterize, stitch or staple you closed and then requires you to take Rx analgesics is probably reasonably construed as dangerous. The first risk, while remote, is not regaining consciousness, either dead or vegetative, the second is damage to you larynx because of the induction of the anesthesia and intubation, sometimes anesthesia doesn't work. There are apocryphal stories of those who wake up during surgery, but because they are incubated and sedated cannot cry out. Then there is surgeon skill levels. They did not all graduate at the top of their classes. You have had surgery or thought about it. You could probably figure out many more risks, some of them are as horrific as what Chillipadi has had to go through.
My point is all contemplated treatmentsfor CANCER carry both risks and benefits. The natural history of the disease, untreated, quite often is worse than the treatments. But not always, sometimes the best course for an individual is no treatment. Each one of us has to determine what kinds of risks for what benefit we are willing to take. -
Yes you could. Any treatment modality that requires you to submit to a drug induced 'state of not being' while people, albeit skilled, remove large amounts of your tissue, cauterize, stitch or staple you closed and then requires you to take Rx analgesics is probably reasonably construed as dangerous. The first risk, while remote, is not regaining consciousness, either dead or vegetative, the second is damage to you larynx because of the induction of the anesthesia and intubation, sometimes anesthesia doesn't work. There are apocryphal stories of those who wake up during surgery, but because they are incubated and sedated cannot cry out. Then there is surgeon skill levels. They did not all graduate at the top of their classes. You have had surgery or thought about it. You could probably figure out many more risks, some of them are as horrific as what Chillipadi has had to go through.
My point is all contemplated treatmentsfor CANCER carry both risks and benefits. The natural history of the disease, untreated, quite often is worse than the treatments. But not always, sometimes the best course for an individual is no treatment. Each one of us has to determine what kinds of risks for what benefit we are willing to take. -
I got too excited and posted three times. Sorry!
-
Kay, I so agree with you about not all surgeons graduating at the top of their class. Thank gawd I have a family doctor that is in the know about who's a good surgeon and who's not. When my son needed hand surgery, he advised we would have to wait a while for the best, but highly recommended we do. I was willing to wait "for the best". Nobody's touching me or any member of my family who got a "C" in medical school. Lots of horrible surgeons and anesthesiologists out there. One must be careful in their choices.
Ed for sp
-
Kay - I know there are risks having surgery, but the risk of not having surgery for bc would far outweigh them.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team