How can we make this truly safe, supportive, judgement-free?
Comments
-
Sweetbean, that is my approach too - keeping to a low-glycemic diet, getting adequate exercise and staying thin may well help against the cancer, but it is in any event a good idea and should generally improve my health and well- being. Therefore I can't see any good reason not to try it. There is no downside.
This is my approach in general, I guess, and why I want to know about possible downsides to any given therapy or supplement. -
"like, like, like" what Momine said: "By the way, thanks to everyone for engaging in this discussion frankly and respectfully. Hopefully it will help to understand everyone's views better."
I don't want to "speak" for Caryn - but it feels to me like she's trying to say that being respectful, not critical of someone's choice based on one's OWN criteria, is what this Forum, all the Forums really, should be. We learn from asking questions, but DEMANDING PROOF to meet one's own criteria, isn't appropriate.
I don't think there is an accurate comparison for the Alternative Forum with other Forums, the example of another Forum, is that, an example. I would not feel supported if someone consistently posted in the AI SE thread about how "dangerous" or inappropriate, or not good for us, taking an AI is. Or asked me to PROVE why I put up with some SE's in order to continue taking the medication I take. Yes, there are some clinical trials, but nothing, YET, definitive.
This seems like a continuation of the "either/or" - "you're wrong/I'm right" - bilateral choice, "argument" about "conventional an alternative treatments for bc. We aren't going to "solve" that one - and hopefully ALL OF US will live long enough to see the edges blur even more than Dr.David Servan Schreiber saw. ( Anti Cancer" A New Way of Life) which must have seemed "radical" to many whenhe wrote it.
Just thinking too - how many of our now accepted medications came from plant sources: digitalis ( foxglove), and can't remember what tree (?) was the original source of Tamoxifen, but do rememer how "RADICAL" it was in the 1970's.
-
I think that we should all be able to ask questions of alt treatments, without worrying that we are going to offend someone's beliefs. I certainly have had the experience of questioning an alt treatment only to be yelled at that I am a skeptic or unsupportive, or some such nonsense.
I think, regardless of what type of treatment you choose, the concept of bioindividuality should be recognized. That is, we are all different, our cancers are different, and our bodies (and cancers) will probably react differently to different treatments. I think that is why I am such a fan of integrative treatments - like combining acupuncture, Reiki, massage therapy, diet, excercise with surgery, chemo (if needed), and radiation (if needed.) I think hitting it from every angle gives you the best quality of life and a better response to treatment. I have to say, all of my doctors, from conv to alt, say they've never seen anyone get through treatment like me. My MO said, "I wish we could study people like you." My naturopath said, "I've never seen anyone heal themselves the way you did."
Anyway, my point (and I do have one
) is that sometimes people post solely from their perspective of their choices and their experience. I think we should allow some space around our beliefs to recognize that others can and do have other factors to consider and that they can and will have different experiences with treatment. -
Sweetbean, that is pretty much where I am coming from as well.
A small example was that I demanded LE therapy early on and then went weekly all through treatment. The docs thought it was overkill, but I told my onc that it might be from his perspective, but for me this was the only treatment in a sea of unpleasantness that gave me relief and some peace. As such it helped mme get through the treatment and was worth every penny just for that. The onc got my point. -
YES Sweetbean, YES, YES....I think we should allow some space around our beliefs to recognize that others can and do have other factors to consider and that they can and will have different experiences with treatment.
That's how I feel, think in allowing that space, we can also withhold criticism in questions. It's possible to ask questions in a way that doesn't threaten, or criticize someone else's choice. Most, MOST especially when we know, each of us, how terrifying bc is, and all the different issues each of us is dealing with. A question ( demand?) for "proof" feels very critical to me. Pushing on someone going through treatment for "answers" ("proof") to questions we might have about her treatment, beyond her willingness to describe her personal experience, seems inappropriate. There's a whole world of information available to us now -any person can do further research to learn more about a particular type of treatment and make a personal decision based on her own criteria if it's something she wants to try or not.
My oncologists and acupuncturist say the same thing about me as yours do about you. I was so fortunate to have an oncologist who SUGGESTED acupuncture to deal with SE's of Arimidex.
-
Yes, Sunflowers, I agree - the posts where someone comes on and just says, "Please post the double blind studies that prove this works" feel critical to me as well. There are definitely ways to investigate treatments without putting someone on the defensive.
Momine, I also did PT after surgery with an LE specialist. Never got LE, healed well, and have complete range of motion. I think everyone who has an ALND should get PT immediately before symptoms start.
-
This is getting a bit off topic but I attended a pt/LE prevention class three weeks post bmx with node dissection on one side. Developed frozen shoulder after hospitalization for pneumothorax . Went back to pt as soon as I could. Frozen shoulder is just about gone and no LE. My pt has discharged me from regular care but wants me to call at even the slightest suspicion of LE. Very grateful that my HMO, Kaiser Permanente, is so pro-active about this. Caryn
-
Caryn, that is really great. I told my onc that he should encourage all his MX patients to get PT, even if just for the psychological benefit. But it can also be really helpful in warding off or at least minimzing problems. Definitely an area where being proactive is a good idea. Oh, and MLD is a true alt treatment, in the sense that there isn't much hard science behind it, mostly some intuition and a lot of experience.
-
What is MLD?
-
Manual Lymph Drainage, invented by a slightly crazy Dane, name of Vodder, about a hundred years ago. He thought it could cure all manner of disease, but it has proved very useful in the treatment and prevention of lymphedema.
-
Wow, what a great conversation this has turned into. I was expecting this type of conversation at the start so the early release of pent up emotions was a bit of a shock.
Momine, by belief I mean people believe in the principles and values behind a subject, so if they hold a political view then often they agree with all or most policies from that party. I've seen many who believe strongly that if a treatment is recommended by their health team then it must be right. Or that if it's "natural" then it must be good. Of course those who are critical thinkers realise that many treatments from the past have gone out of favour for good reason and today's standard of care may be tomorrow's mistake, just as many natural substances are poisonous.
Personally I can't understand why anyone wouldn't question everything, which is what I do. But others have the right to stick to what they feel comfortable with. We seem to be stuck in an era where formal education is seen as the ultimate answer. We believe the "experts", and often for good reason. But in medicine I think we're still in the early years and a lot has to change. Surgery can achieve much, but outside surgery, cures are sadly lacking.
All these conditions are treatable or manageable but can't be cured... Lymphedema, Arthritis in all it's forms, asthma, both types of diabetes, Aids, the common cold, Cerebral Palsy, Hay Fever, facial breakouts, MS, Parkinsons, Dementia in all it's forms, Dermatitis in all it's forms, Herpes, IBS, epilepsy, high blood pressure, Hypo/Hyperthyroidism, ALS, depression, psychiatric illnesses, Fibromyalgia... and literally hundreds of other conditions. Unless surgery can help, we are stuck on medications for life or till our body deals with it.
Conditions that are curable with medicine are infections, mostly bacterial and fungal but possibly some viral, and some childhood and a few other rarer cancers. Parasitic diseases can be cured by killing the parasite. I'm not sure if Malaria is actually cured. There may be others but I can't think of any. I'd love to add to the cure list if anyone can think of anything.
Vaccines have been our greatest breakthroughs. That's where I hope our cancer cures will come from but research is constantly pushing the envelope in many areas.
So when we put our trust in medicine we should realise that most of the time we can treat but not cure and that's why so many turn to alternatives, in the hope of relief. I doubt alternatives are any better but at least there is some chance.
And that's why it seems crazy to put all our trust in medicine and not look further afield.
Edited to clarify some list items, but this is just a rough list and could be much longer.
PS, If anyone suggests diabetes is curable they clearly have little medical knowledge unless they found the cure last night while I was sleeping. Insulin is a treatment only and diabetics have a shortened lifespan thanks to complications.
-
Mardibra -
In your previous post you used the term evidence. The fact that some of Chillis tumors have fallen off is evidence that the treatment makes tumors fall off (pretty strong evidence in my opinion, since you never hear of skin mets falling off by themselves). Of course its not proven fact, I never claimed it to be. There is a difference between proven fact and evidence.
Also, in case I was not clear, I am talking about the treatment's effectiveness in making tumors fall off. I didn't say cure, just fall off. This is important because it's one of Chilli's goals - to get the tumors off her chest.
Another one of Chilli's goals is to be cured. I haven't heard of any evidence that the treatment will cure her, but at this point, she feels its worth a shot and and she seems to be aware of the risks. Even if its a long shot doing something is of value to her verus doing nothing and waiting around to die.
Because some women wouldn't value having tumors fall off without much (any?) evidence of a potential cure, and taking action to have hope of a cure, they shouldn't discount Chilli's desire for these things.
-
JoyLiesWithin I believe the word you are searching for is MORES. pronounced morays.
I like how this thread has taken a more philosophical turn. Sometimes that is what is important. For people to put their belief systems out there, not to try to change other people's beliefs, but to explain where they are coming from.
-
Mores certainly seems to cover it, thanks Kay. Cultural groups, aboriginals, sects, they all have their way of life and we know better than to interfere unless they are breaking the law.
Orange, one point I made earlier that I think was deleted, was that Black Salve may eat away a woman's breast, but that would leave her with one breast more than I have after surgery. Maybe if the salve takes care of all Chilli's tumours she will be in the same position as anyone else who had surgery at that same stage.
The downside would be the same as with surgery, and that's the risk of a bleed which would require emergency treatment, and infection. Damage to the chest wall could be serious too. But none of these things may happen. I hope Chilli is able to come back to post and not feel intimidated. Her opponents have been the catalyst for some debate and now some open discussion which I hope will lead to a more civilised Alternative section.
Way past bedtime for me. Enjoy the discussion while I'm sleeping.
-
Stormy, I'm not comparing alternative to the stage IV forum. I just think it would be nice to have the same consideration in being sensitive to those who choose alternative medicine. All stages come here looking for alternatives ways to deal with cancer. The bco threads are for support. We are not here to police or play doctor to anyone here on the bco threads. We are asking for a safe place to share alternative meds or approaches to holistic health. We don't want all the drama or have to constantly defend our choices. We don't want to be afraid to share what is working for us outside of "standard" care.
And there are a lot of women, who have tried the conventional approach without any success; and there are those like myself who are very sensitive to a lot of drugs, who can't deal with the side effects of hard drugs that are looking for other ways to treat estrogen, bone loss and ways to stay cancer free. We all try many things until we find that one or two things that work for us. What is strange alternative cure for one person might be a miracle drug for someone else.
-
I want to add that arguments happen on many of BCO's forums, including the radiation, chemo, hormonal and reconstruction ones. Should we ban all who don't have or agree with those treatments from participating in the discussions? Just sayin'.
-
I also want to say that someone like maud, should be supported by her alternative bc sisters because she has dedicated so much time to the alternative threads with the intent to help. Sometimes, it feels like we are more sensitive to the naysayers than to the hard core alternative ladies. Maud is rightfully angry in that she is working so hard to make this a good and safe forum, and she's angry with those who make the alternative ladies uncomfortable here. She may have a harsh tone, but with understanding I can see why. She's had enough of this madness and circle conversation. Some of us tip toe through the tulips, but she comes in with her knife swinging, saying STOP IT.
(((hugs to you maud))) And thank you for all your bring to the alternative forum.
-
Yorkiemom, I don't believe bc ladies on the other forums call other bc treatments quacks. Discussion is one thing, but name calling and put downs is what I see happening more on the alternative threads. Also, one liners that are a note of scarcasm of disapproval of our choices should not be allowed on any forum. Those who don't believe in alternative med or holistic approach to cancer shouldn't come here because they are not open to discussion. It's just to push their agenda or medicne on those who chose alternative.
Women coming here are those who are researching outside of "standard" care for a reason.
-
I agree with your comment about name calling, put downs, sarcasm etc. being inappropriate but the door swings both ways. Just because someone is upset or angry over those types of comments made with respect to alt tx, does not give them the right to fire back in a similar fashion. That behavior is unacceptable, period. I work very hard to make sure my elementary school students learn this ( "she called me stupid first!") and I know there is a learning curve but I have little respect for adults who still operate this way. BTW, I understand how anyone can have an emotional outburst but real adults apologize and then we all move on. Kat,for instance, is such a person! Caryn
-
Hugs to you Eve, I'm sure I've become the poster girl around here
but I cannot just stand by and watch when one of my sisters is being targetedexbrnxgrl, with all due respect, I am not the one who should be apologizing and as a teacher you should be reprimanding those who are disturbing the class, not the other way around. How specifically do you deal with bullies in your class ?
Maybe - and I am sure we are all hoping - Chilli would come back if sincere apologies were sent her way, but I am not seeing this happening
-
We all know that the same "opponents" frequent the alternative forum only to push mainstream treatments on everybody and insult and abuse those who choose to go the alternative route. In fact, they only post here. What's up with that? What's more, you don't have to be a descendent of Einstein to know that Orac, Quackwatch and all their so-called reliable sources have no real place on an alternative medicine forum. It's just spam.
Because the moderators close their eyes and do not ban these anti-alternative medicine campaigners who repeatedly cross the line, others then feel that it's totally acceptable to jump in and "straighten out the alties" to the point where they can't take the unrelenting hounding and circular adolescent debates, so they end up leaving. Maybe that's the goal? If that's the case, then maybe don't have an alternative forum. Only provide a complementary medicine forum. Then serious alties (like the dozens who have recently left) will immediately see that this community is not for them. Also, the hard core pro-treatment oldies will feel more secure being only among those who share their views, and enjoy chit chat and small talk about random herbs and vitamins. Besides, the alternative forum does not agree with BCO's business model, so it really makes no sense to keep it.
I believe that it's just wrong to mislead unsuspecting new members to think that BCO provides a safe environment for those seeking alternatives treatments, when in fact it does not. I also think that it's too soon to encourage Chilli to come back to this judgmental forum when she's literally fighting for her life. Like she said, she doesn't have anything to prove to anybody. However, I agree a sincere public apology would be the right thing to do in this case.
Karma is a bitch. It's only a matter of time before someone files a lawsuit after suffering at the hands of one these tyrannical women. That wouldn't be too good for business. Corporate sponsors are shrewd and they know that awful news travels fast on the internet. Therefore, they wouldn't care to continue partnering with any recognized nonprofit organization that poses a threat to their reputation and bottom line.
Thanks for listening to my rant/suggestions and most of all thanks Maud, wornoutmom and the rest of you brave alties who contributed so much to this forum.
z
-
Hey Zuvart, I'm sooo glad I'm not the only poster girl around here, but sadly and regrettably, too many have been scorched, wounded and damaged and have left with no intention of returning.
You are right, of course, that Chilli should not return yet, if ever. I really really hope she was able to pick herself up and dust herself off and continue on her healing journey. We are all very privileged to have known her.
I totally agree that BCO should retire the Alternative Forum (which btw stands on its own and IS NOT a subset of the complementary forum) if they cannot get a grip and deal with this crisis - too many women are getting badly hurt, WOMEN WITH BREAST CANCER for God's sake !!!
I'm back out, just wanted to hug Eve and Zuvart
-
Interesting, how Zuvart's post above changed the whole tone of this thread. I don't choose to be one of the "we all know." Sorry this thread is taking this tone now, maybe it's a good thing Joy is sleeping...feel like going back and deleting my earlier posts, but it's not worth the effort...
-
Actually, Sunflower, it was exbrngrnl's post that changed the tone of this thread.
-
exbrngrnl's post was spot on.
-
I don't agree with you Maud, I feel very much the same as what Caryn is saying. I look for information on the Complementary and Alternative threads, and put people who attack other choices I've made on ignore. No attack is justified, and "we all know" is not where I want to be. I won't be posting on this thread again.
-
Maud, the only way I can see the alternative forum working is if it's totally seperate. It needs a responsible sub-committee of NDs and a different set of moderators too. I don't see them doing that though. It might work too well.
And I'm not worried about Chilli. That woman is strong!
-
I agree with Sunflowers. Zuvart, you are deliberately trying to change the tone of this thread in self-serving ways. The topic here was heading towards inclusion and tolerance - not exclusion. Or conspiracy theories.
Let's get back on track please - to EVERYONE's interests.
-
yes, you're right Zuvart, Chilli is very strong
-
Neither conspiracies nor theories thereof are on point.
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team