Mastectomy for LCIS?

2

Comments

  • dobie
    dobie Member Posts: 424
    edited May 2012

    Crescent5, Beacon800 and all fellow travelers:

    You are absolutely right there certainly is no consenses, no long term data with LCIS and PLCIS.  However, my researching  is detecting a trend.  UpToDate is an evidence based, peer reviewed information source subscription website for health care providers.  It is considered highly reliable and respected and many physcians consult this source to learn of latest evidence and determine current standard of care. Below I copied a section from the enrty on LCIS dated June 14, 2011 with latest literature update March 2012, author Michael Sabel, MD.

    Pleomorphic subtype - The proper treatment for PLCIS is undefined, due largely to the small number of reported cases and lack of long-term follow-up data. However, the available evidence suggests that PLCIS represents biologically aggressive, high-grade disease that may predispose to pleomorphic infiltrating lobular carcinoma.

    Thus, while the treatment paradigm for classic LCIS is one of prevention, the treatment of PLCIS is more closely related to that of DCIS, which represents a true precursor lesion to invasive breast cancer. Complete excision of the lesion either via lumpectomy with tumor-free margins and no residual calcifications on mammography or mastectomy is recommended. If a pleomorphic invasive component is present, axillary staging should also be performed, followed by systemic therapy, if indicated.

    RT is clearly indicated after lumpectomy if DCIS or an invasive component is present. The exact role of whole breast RT after lumpectomy for pure PLCIS alone is unclear, because local recurrence rates after lumpectomy with or without RT are not known. However, we usually recommend whole breast RT in this setting because of the similarities in biologic behavior between PLCIS and DCIS.

    The benefit of a SERM in patients with PLCIS is also undefined, as subset analysis of patients with PLCIS is not possible from the major breast cancer chemoprevention trials [69]. However, even in the setting of DCIS, the benefit of a chemoprevention with a SERM is uncertain. The placebo-controlled NSABP B24 trial found that tamoxifen reduced local recurrence rates after lumpectomy and RT for DCIS, and reduced contralateral breast cancer rates as well. On the other hand, a smaller trial from the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand failed to show that tamoxifen decreased either ipsilateral or contralateral events in patients with DCIS [70].

    Nevertheless, despite the lack of data in PLCIS, our suggested approach to PLCIS (with or without an associated DCIS) parallels our recommendations for pure DCIS: lumpectomy plus RT or mastectomy followed by a SERM. There is no information on the utility of using ER status to select patients for a SERM, since LCIS is not typically tested for hormone receptor expression. Even in the setting of DCIS, whether ER expression should be a factor in selecting patients for chemoprevention with a SERM is unsettled.

  • beacon800
    beacon800 Member Posts: 922
    edited May 2012

    Yup, it was Sabel from Michigan whose paper I read on this subject in 2009 and it was the same idea, lump plus rads or MX. But he has no data on this and it is not standard of care.



    I don't disagree in principle, heck, I had a BMX, but this doctor is not typical in his comments as far as I know. When I have time I'll look for that paper. Stanford University medical library obtained it for me when I was doing research.

  • beacon800
    beacon800 Member Posts: 922
    edited May 2012

    Um, I would like to add that his comment at the end of the post, where he says that hormone status for LCIS/plcis is not typically done, is quite wrong in my experience. Pretty much everyone I've seen has the er/pr status done, I certainly did and it was standard. Not so sure about this guy really.

  • dobie
    dobie Member Posts: 424
    edited May 2012

    Talking with people in my health care specialty , which is not oncology, has made me realize that standards of care are very regional. What may standard in one place is not in another. When I went to breast tumor board, after they discussed my case, there was a even wide difference in opinions among the specialists within this one hospital (breast onc, rad onc, surgeons) on how, to manage PLCIS. The final consensus was to treat it like DCIS. And since this breast had been already radiated they advised mastectomy. So apparently this is now the standard of care for this condition in this hospital, right? However, I was told it would also be reasonable to just get an incisional biopsy to make sure there wasn't any invasive component. Or get a BMX to manage the risk to both breasts. My choice, toss the dice and take your chances, cause we just don't know. Geez!. So, Beacon800, again I agree, there is really no standard of care for PLCIS ' cause there is no data but right or wrong there is a trend to treat this entity more aggressively than classic LCIS.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited May 2012

    beacon-----testing for ER/PR status was not the "standard" when I was diagnosed with LCIS back in 2003. I asked about it, apparently mine was not tested due to my sample size being too small. But everything I've read strongly implies that LCIS is almost always estrogen ER positive. They  wanted me to take tamoxifen either way, since my risk is elevated further by family history of bc (mom had ILC). I took it for the full 5 years, have now been taking evista for 3 years and I'm doing fine, so the meds are working well for me.

    anne 

  • beacon800
    beacon800 Member Posts: 922
    edited May 2012

    That's interesting awb, maybe hormonal testing for LCIS is a more recent thing. I'll see if I can find Sabel's paper and when it was written. My dx was in 2009 and the hormonal status was done automatically, I never had heard of those things til then, but I did learn, as do we all.



    There's not much new about hormonal receptor testing though. I got my mom's records from her invasive bc in 1985 and they did her er/pr, but not her2 cause it was not yet invented. I too have heard most LCIS Is er+, mine was strongly er+/pr+.

  • leaf
    leaf Member Posts: 8,188
    edited May 2012

    I was diagnosed in 2005, and they did do ER/PR receptors on my core biopsy.  My sample was strongly ER+ and PR-.

    In this small study, ER+/PR- was associated with more synchronous LCIS +invasive bc. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19309393

  • dobie
    dobie Member Posts: 424
    edited May 2012

    Yeah, leaf, mine was Er+/PR- too. And I read the same thing about possible association with IBC. Another reason I opted for MX vs incisional bx. Don' t have a good feeling about this. Hoping its paranoia and not intuition. Trying not to get too far ahead in my thinking. Most of what I worry about never happens. Turns out to be total waste of energy.

  • SallyO
    SallyO Member Posts: 35
    edited May 2012

    hi texaslady.  I also had calcifications on a routine mamo at 53 yrs old.  biopsy showed DCIS.  Then had an open biopsy and that showed LCIS with extension into the duct. They could call it DCIS/Lcis?? I decided to also get a BXM with tram flap immediate reconstruction.  I also got a lot of flax from people in the medical field.  Thank goodness my Dr. did what I wanted.  I have never looked back.  No nodes were taken and no treatment.  I am now 72 yrs and happy I did what I did.  Everyone has to make up their own mind.  I am on site now because a friend was just diagnosed.  God Bless

  • SallyO
    SallyO Member Posts: 35
    edited May 2012

    Dobie, What is SERM, as quoted in yor post   tks

  • dobie
    dobie Member Posts: 424
    edited May 2012

    SERM = Selective Estrogen Recepter Modulator. Tamoxifen is a SERM.

  • Texaslady
    Texaslady Member Posts: 11
    edited May 2012

    Hi, SallyO - Thank you for the encouraging words!  It is wonderful that it's been almost 20 years since you had the BMX and that you have done well, with no recurrence.  This is great to hear!  Even though I have no regrets for choosing the BMX and I believe that I have done all that I can do (there's that control thing, again!), it still lurks in the back of my mind that this might crop up, again. You are a success story! You go, girl!

    I am sorry to hear about your friend, but I'm glad that she has you to walk through this with her.  We all have SO much value and can touch so many people for good.  Again, thanks! 

  • Texaslady
    Texaslady Member Posts: 11
    edited May 2012

    Hi, Leaf and Beacon - As mentioned in my first post, they found the LCIS in my left breast after the mastectomy on 11/2/11.  However, there is no mention of hormonal testing of the LCIS in the pathology report. So, they didn't test mine.  

    Dobie -  You sound as if you are being hard on yourself because you are worried.  I think being worried about this type of health issue is a normal reaction to a really, really stressful situation. I hope things go smoothly and that the next few months fly by as fast for you as they have for me!  It's hard for me to believe that I am already six months post-BMX!  I love my perky new foobs!  There are definite "perks" (pardon the pun) to this stressful situation.  Yahoo! 

  • beacon800
    beacon800 Member Posts: 922
    edited May 2012

    Texaslady, so glad you are feeling well after your surgery. I suspect the reason your hormone receptors were not tested was that the LCIS was discovered during mastectomy. Most times, when it is discovered on biopsy, the hormone tests reveal if a anti estrogen (the SERMs referred to here) therapy would be helpful. But when you have BMX and no invasive or DCIS, then you will not likely take a serm. For that reason, the hormone status might not be needed in your situation.

  • dobie
    dobie Member Posts: 424
    edited May 2012

    Ok Texaslady, I will ease up on myself. Thanks for your words of support. I sure will be glad when this is behind me as well. The not knowing is the worse part.

  • Texaslady
    Texaslady Member Posts: 11
    edited May 2012

    Thanks, Beacon!  You are probably right about the reason the hormone receptors were not tested.  Oh, well.  I am just so fortunate not to have DCIS or worse.  All is good!

    Dobie  - My thoughts and prayers are with you as your surgery date draws near.  I'll be thinking of you!!  Take care!

  • SallyO
    SallyO Member Posts: 35
    edited May 2012
    texaslady....bc is alwaysin the back of your mind, no matter how long it has been,type, stage or treatment. At times it is better, but aways there.  The control for me was the BXM.  At that time I DID NOT KNOW GRADE, ER/PE OR HR2.  I dont think they did it on LCIS. plus HR2 was not done at all then. regards and know that you took the safest route to avoid future problems.
  • Texaslady
    Texaslady Member Posts: 11
    edited May 2012

    SallyO - Even after 20 years, huh?  I thought that might be the case.  I really don't know how it could be any different since having even LCIS touches your mortality nerve.   I'm trying to see the good.  We have a 22 year old son and we are raising our niece (14) and nephew (13)---we've had them 8 years now.  We've tried to see the humor in this and we have been able to really laugh about things.  Better to laugh than cry, huh?  My youngest told me that I should ask my doctor to put helium instead of saline in the expanders so that they could just float and not hurt my back (10 of my disks are messed up).  Anyway, I believe I did take the safest route for me.  Thanks for the info!

    I hope all of you have a wonderful Mother's Day! 

  • Texaslady
    Texaslady Member Posts: 11
    edited May 2012

    Dobie - Just wanted to let you know that I'm thinking of you.  I hope everything goes well for you tomorrow!

  • dobie
    dobie Member Posts: 424
    edited May 2012

    Thanks for your thoughts Texaslady. I feel remarkably at peace today. I have gotten a lot of support from friends, coworkers and family and I have a massage scheduled today! I will check back in a few days and let you know how it goes

  • Texaslady
    Texaslady Member Posts: 11
    edited May 2012

    Dobie - I'll look forward to hearing from you!!!  

  • dobie
    dobie Member Posts: 424
    edited May 2012

    Texaslady and all-

    Rt NSMX went without a hitch yesterday. Got home around 1 pm today. Bruised, swollen but I still look amazingly like me. Direct implant with acellular dermis ( like alloderm). Took 3 nodes. Incision acoss my infra mammary fold (under breast). 2 drains. Vicodin and a muscle relaxer (soma) doing the trick for pain. I did take some IV Dilaudid last night and managed to get about 4-5 hrs sleep. I'm sure I will sleep better tonite in my own bed. About a week for pathology results. Feel better than I expected and releived that the surgery is behind me. So that's my story. Take care.

  • loriio
    loriio Member Posts: 247
    edited May 2012

    Dobie

    Glad all went well. Get lots of rest and take care of yourself.

  • annievan
    annievan Member Posts: 92
    edited May 2012

    Dobie -  Been thinking about you.  Glad all went well. . . you are amazing to already be on here sharing with us.  Glad you have lots of support.  Hope you get some good sleep tonight.  So happy that it's behind you. . .

  • Texaslady
    Texaslady Member Posts: 11
    edited May 2012

    Dobie - It's wonderful to hear from you so soon.  I had a hectic week/weekend, but I've been thinking about you. My 14 year old daughter had an 8th grade formal awards banquet/graduation dance last night that we were getting ready for (she and I had a girls' day out yesterday--nails, hair, etc.).  She looked beautiful (first pair of high heels!) and she had a great time.  I survived it with just a few sniffles...it hit me yesterday morning that she is growing up too soon.  

    I am SO glad to hear things went well for you.  Don't try to be superwoman and get off the meds too soon - they will help you heal faster, plus help you rest better.  Be sure and let us know the pathology results!!  I'll continue thinking about you!  Remember, six months from now will be here before you know it!!!

  • dobie
    dobie Member Posts: 424
    edited May 2012

    Loriio, Annievann and Texaslady- Thanks so much for your thoughts and wishes. My recovery continues to go well. Will see PS tomorrow and hopefully will get at least one drain out. I agree about the pain meds. I will definitely take if needed but I really don't have much pain now. Texaslady- So true about the daughter growing so fast. Mine will be 28 at the end of this month. She is now engaged to be married and we are starting to plan the wedding. Such joy but it seems like yesterday she was a tiny baby at my (now gone) breast. Things change. That we can always count on. Best wishes all.

  • dobie
    dobie Member Posts: 424
    edited May 2012

    Just got back from the PS s/p rt NSMX on 5/17. Surprised they already had the path report. And as feared they found invasive lobular cancer (ILC), 2 very small areas 0.2 cm each. The area of LCIS was >4 cm. 4 nodes negative. The most disappointing finding was LCIS in nipple tissue which means the nip will probably have to go. I am so not surprised about the ILC. That is exactly what happened to me 5 years ago. And now I am seriously rethinking the PMX for my left breast. How can they know what is lurking there? I am so grateful about the early dx but for the first time in 5 years I am really starting to feel sorry for myself, the first time I have shed tears mostly of frustraion. I thought I had this figured out All this time, I have somehow felt separate from all those other women who had Real breast cancer. Mine was early, and in-situ, mine was not life-threatening, mine was not life changing, didn't need chemo, so many worse off.... F***K!!! I'm tired and going to bed. Thanks for lending an ear.

  • msippiqueen
    msippiqueen Member Posts: 191
    edited May 2012

    Welcome Texaslady!



    Having a PBLM made perfect sense for me too.



    There is lots of push back at times about PBLM's, in favor of breast conservation. Serious anti-hormal meds, expensive tests, more biopsies, the time and mind commitment and the tests and pathology that get it wrong at times trump stepping away and having a near zero risk of breast cancer.



    Believe it or not, some Doctors do not offer the choice of a mastectomy for LCIS. They think it's not so bad to go for the monitoring even when the woman would rather not.



    The research boils down to this:



    LCIS may not be meaningful

    LCIS signals an increased chance of other cancers of either breast

    LCIS can grow into the invasive form of lobular cancer, ILC



    So while LCIS may sit and behave, when it doesn't it's a doozy. ILC is particularly hard to diagnose. This terrible fact needs to be considered. I wish it wasn't so, and LCIS was 'nothing worse' than an internal blemish.

























  • Texaslady
    Texaslady Member Posts: 11
    edited May 2012

    Dobie - I am so sorry to hear of the ILC and the additional LCIS in the nipple tissue.  You have every right to be disappointed, mad, etc.  I wish there was something I could do for you.  Please keep us posted as to what you decide to do now.  You have a lot of people thinking about you during this hard time.  

    Mssippiqueen - Thanks for the welcome.  I agree with your statements about LCIS especially after hearing from Dobie today.  When it's your life,  it feels very serious--no matter how anyone else feels about it.  

  • msippiqueen
    msippiqueen Member Posts: 191
    edited May 2012

    Omgosh, dobie, I just read you'd post and I'm so sorry!



    Please get some rest tonight and hold on tight. I will think of you often as you get a plan. Ladies who have gone before you will hold you up as you proceed.



    Sending you the very best wishes from the depth of my heart.



    Claudia

Categories