Chemo or No Chemo?
Comments
-
Epg, you are a real trooper, wow! My chemo was a total breeze compared to all you went through. But, as you say, you got through it.
-
Hope I am not breaching etiquette by posting on this thread
I was stage IIIC at diagnosis. Took all treatments offered. Had 5 years of excellent quality life. Unfortunately I am now stage IV. I have absolutely no regrets about taking chemo. At least I know I did everything I could. Back on treatment, still good quality of life, hopefully for a bunch of years left.
But I was 20 years younger than you at the time, with wee kids at home. So that obviously affects
priorities.
I guess a question to help you may be - whichever choice you make, if you had a recurrence, how would you feel?
If you took chemo, then recurred, would you feel glad you did everything you could, or regret that you had to go thru treatment and still recurred?
And if you didn't take chemo, and recurred - would you feel at peace with your past decisions, or wonder if it could have been prevented?
Hope you find the info you need to make a decision that is true to yourself, and not based on fear. -
Again, thanks to all for all your wonderful comments and your courageous choices!
epgnyc - You truly are amazing! I would have to sincerely agree with Momine...you are a real trooper. Thanks for living through it all to tell us about it.
learnin - You pose the key questions...how would I feel with a recurrence with either choice? I think that if I had a recurrence, I would prefer to fight it with the big guns ACT then...not now. But I don't even know if I have that choice. My onc makes me feel like if I don't do chemo now, I would definitely slip into a Stage IV. But I've heard of so many people who have still kept it at bay even in a Stage IV with their chemo treatments. Anybody know if I would be taking too big a risk to postpone the therapy?
And, last, but not least...I would sincerely be very happy with five good years left, feeling healthy enough to travel with my husband and attend to my bucket list without the wigs and scarves. It seems to me like the combo chemo, radiation and recovery times would pretty much eat up the rest of 2012 and I'd actually like to get on with things while I still have a body that feels like it.
It is a very hard decision. Each of us are individuals. We must make our own informed decisions. I pray nightly for my answers. But all I am receiving is that it really doesn't matter either way which decision I make for myself with this chemo vs. no chemo. Either way I believe God will take me in His timing, not mine. The best I can do is live each day to the highest and best use and full of love for everything, doing everything with love, including how I treat my body. All our time is limited. I just ask for enough time to take care of first things first and then surrender to God's will either way.
The only thing I know for sure is that love is the answer. How that translates for me is the big question. Is doing chemo love? Or is not doing chemo love? There just doesn't seem to be enough information out there to help me make an informed decision. Remember, the ones who didn't make it through the treatments aren't here to talk about it. And there are thousands every year.
I just don't want to feel forced into taking something that I see as poisonous and dangerous if I'm going to die in five years anyway....and, especially, if chemo hasn't been proven to work due to its own set of recurrences.
But, I am, at least, gettng a second opinion next week. It's another medical oncologist, in the top 1% of the country I hear; but, hopefully, he will be able to give me a better idea as to the risks I'm taking either way. I have some big questions for him, but he is a nationally recognized oncologist, so he should be able to handle it!
Thanks again! Every bit of information here is accepted and treasured as you have all lived it!
God bless!
-
You could always try chemo, dose dense, that means taxol once a week for 12 weeks . much easier to handle. the A/C is the tough one, but there are only 4 of them...................They will always give you breaks in between if you are not able to do it.............................praying for you, it's a hard decision................. you know back in the day my husbands grandma had BC she had a radical mast.
no chemo, or rads back then, I am not sure about her node situation, this was like 65 years ago. she got BC at 39, and died of old age at 91..............................
-
WOW!!! How great for you grandma! Thats what I like to hear! And how are you doing faithfulheart?
-
Kathy, just last weekend I was on a panel for a women's service club, whose topic was about women's health issues ('women's' cancers in particular).....I thought you might want to hear the take of one of my fellow panelists, who is in treatment with a IIIA diagnosis. She is throwing everything at the cancer and said, "When people tell me they are so sorry that I have to go through such grueling treatments, I tell them that I am thrilled to have a CHANCE to BEAT this diease". Another perspective to consider.
-
Kathys7- I think you should try everything and anything you can to do the chemo in my opinion. Awoman in my support group is 74 and has had some difficulties through chemo but not as many as she thought she would have is through it and fine now. She decided she wanted to live as long as possible and tryed everything to do it and is sooo happy she did.
I am ER+ and am starting chemo next week my onc said that it is needed and will work. You have a lots of nodes like me i am sure you would be better to do the chemo. I think there is a HUGE chance you may not end up with the quality of life you think you will get. And that makes me worry for you.
-
Kathy, have you thought about what you will do if you don't do chemo? I have been thinking about this for the past few days. If you pass on traditional chemo, I would recommend talking to the onc about the following: Your MX then rads and then adding metformin with your AI. There is a trial for metformin, but I am not sure you would be eligable without doing chemo first. Most oncs won't RX it because the data is too preliminary
so they say, but from reading the studies myself and peoples responses on here, I think it would be worht seeing if your onc or PCP could put you on it. It does have some GI side effects from what I heard, but it might be worth trying out. Good luck! -
Kathy, I too was very fearful of SE's from ACT chemo. The idea of severe nausea was in fhe front of my mind. I must say that my onc had me on everything to prevent this SE. Let me tell you my experience. I went to my first chemo TERRIFIED. They sat me in a comfy lounge chair gave me a heated blanket and EXPLAINED EVERYTHING. The first thing was the IV hook up. NO port was given. Then the added ATIVAN to calm me prior to the Adrimycin drip, Then they added BENADRYL to prevent any allergic reaction, then added EMEND to prevent Nausea. All these pre meds were given first in my IV BEFORE they even started the AC. The warmed blanket along witht the Ativan, Benadryl and Emend, made me very relaxed and without nausea, during the whole process. My hubby sat their next to me watching TV while I dozed during chemo. I promise you Chemo is doable and you will not be nauseaous if you are given these meds. MY onc also gave me emend prescirption to take 2 days after chemo to prevent nausea and also another script for a med to take in case I got any breakthru nausea during the week. The SE's I did experience were a feeling of coming down with the flu and achy tired ness and of course the loss of hair. But you can do it girl. You have 3C and 12 positive nodes. Think of your positive nodes as a dandelion on your front lawn ready to blow it's seeds all over your lawn. Even if you pick that dadelion you cannot be sure that some of those seeds blew somewhere on your lawn, only to appear in other spots. After you pick the dandelion, to ensure they don't sprout somewhere else you have to treat your lawn. Well this is what chemo does, it is given to get those turmor cells that may have sprouted from your lymph nodes spreading to your other parts of your body, like bone, brain, liver, and lung. Do the ACT girl.

Barb
-
Wow! Shanagirl! You present quite a convincing case for me! You do make it sound doable.
Although a concern, I am actually more concerned with things like...
1) Will I be doing more harm to my immune system than if I don't do chemo? Wouldn't I have a better fighting chance of keeping the immune system up with supplemental megadoses and strict nutrition?
2) Will I have permanent damage such as chemo brain, liver damage, painful neuropathy, lymphedema, etc?
3) I have read that cancer cells can spread to weaker areas and form new colonies and occur somewhere else in the body actually as a result of chemo at a more rapid rate shortly after chemo treatments end.
4) And worse, I have read that it doesn't actually kill the originating, parent, stem cells.
5) An even larger concern is having read studies that have shown that Taxol or any of the taxane family have absolutely no effect on estrogen-receptor positive breast cancers!
6) A good percentage of people are hospitalized, near death and dying and even die from complications as a result of chemo.
I could go on, but I think you may get my drift. I sincerely appreciate all the positive and encouraging words. I guess I'm just not convinced it would benefit me greatly to do the chemo.
I would love to find some graphs or charts that could help point me in the right direction here. I just feel like I still don't have enough reliable information to draw upon.
Does anybody know what it's like to die from metastasized cancer...or what it's like to die from chemotherapy treatments?
Or does anyone know just exactly how many people actually do die per year from chemo or complications following chemo?
Thanks again! You are all lovely and most helpful.
-
Hi, Kathy--
Those are excellent questions to ask at your appointment(s). You may not get a chart or graph, but should be able to have enough facts to do a cost/benefit analysis.
You really have to weigh two sets of risks. Most of the SEs from chemo are temporary, but, yes, there is the rare occasion when SEs do not go away. Stage IV cancer also does not go away. It is also true that chemo is not 100% effective. Then again, nothing is 100% effective with this disease, and based on evidence it is more effective than any other treatment available (particularly when combined with hormonals).
I'm curious...what do you think would convince you that it would benefit you greatly to do chemo?
-
Again, for me, at 98% ER pos and 8% PR positive, had measurable shrinking of my lymphnodes after 12 weekly taxol. I did taxol first and now am on FAC. I always ask for the same Radiologist during my ultrasounds and she was sooo pleased with the results of just the taxol. I had my primary tumor removed before chemo. I had residual disease left in lymphnodes that weren't part of the 12 that were removed. Do you have a reference article for the taxol and ER positive. T-FAC is the primary chemo for MDAnderson, the number 1 cancer center in the country. I don't remember Sloan ketterings (#2) but I am pretty sure they use taxanes also. Good luck at your appts and thanks for keeping us updated.
-
Ohmygosh...you are all so wonderful!
Great question, Kadia! I think Life Expectancy tables would. But I don't know how reliable those are. I know they are skewed not to show actual deaths from chemo, because they are listed as the complications that arise from them, such as cardiomyopathy, etc.
MiniMacsMom - Also great questions. I don't have the articles real handy now, but if you Google Taxol and breast cancer, a few should show up.
Have any of you read the "Alternative Treatment" sections here?
They are quite thought-provoking and every time I read them, I think: "I'll never do chemo/rads."
Then I read what you girls have to say and I think: "I must be missing something here."
To Do or Not To Do Chemo...that is STILL the question!!!
-
Thank you, Sherri! Wow, with over 6,000 posts, you obviously have a good grasp on this!
I really appreciated reading your story. It is encouraging. Perhaps I should also mention, if I have not already, that I am also taking AI's in the form of anastrazole every day. I am actually pretty much counting on that to work on me systemically. And, it did decrease the size of my tumor prior to surgery by nearly one-half from 5cm to 2.5cm, which is why I'm figuring that should be able to take care of any errant, roving cells.
Also, it was really the Taxol or taxane family of chemo drugs that I read DOES NOT WORK on ER+ breast cancers, not so much chemo in general. In fact, if I do this at all, it will be with the request for the CMF's, not the ACT.
-
Try this calculator - it will show you your mortality risk with and without chemo.
http://lifemath.net/cancer/breastcancer/therapy/index.php
You can check out the Stage IV forums to learn about dealing with metasticized breast cancer.
I know of one person who died from leukemia caused by chemotherapy. I know hundreds of people who made it through chemo and have lived a normal lifespan. There are tens of thousands of women who participate here on BCO who make it through chemo relatively unscathed. Some have long-term side effects, true. But the overwhelming majority do OK.
-
Thank you, LuvRVing! You have certainly been around a while with over 2,500 posts!
What do you think about what you have read on the "Alternative Treatments" thread?
Does any of it sound viable to you as an alternative to chemo?
-
Kathy, definitely try the Cancer Math link LuvRVing posted. It will give you the kind of chart you seem to be looking for. I had forgotten all about that site...it can be very useful.
-
Kathy you are getting lots of good advice here and I will add my two cents also. I do understand the fear of chemo and feeling like why would anyone let "poison" into their body. I believed all the horror stories I had heard and was so fearful right before starting my first chemo in 2000 that I sat in the waiting room in tears. A patient there who noticed my distress walked over and handed me a beautiful crochet angel. She told me someone had given it to her at her first chemo and she wanted to pass it on to me. That wonderful gesture made me think about all the women who had gone on before me who successfully completed treatments and were living a wonderful, full and active life.
I made it through my first chemo which was Adriamycin/Cytoxin (AC) and was amazed that the things I had feared so much, never came true. After 4 rounds of AC and then 4 rounds of Taxol over an 8 month period, I never got nauseated or threw up, I never ended up in a hospital, I continued to work both at home and for my job. Yes I lost my hair, and yes there were a few days every cycle where I felt fatigued and "icky". Somedays I had a sore mouth, some days I had diarrhea, but for every discomfort there was a medication to lessen the symptoms or it resolved on its own. Right before starting chemo, I thought spending 6-9 months in treatments seemed like an eternity, but those months went so much faster than I would have ever imagined! Now I realize that the time we spend in treatment is an investment in our future. 6 months, 9 months, a year spent in treatment are well worth the return of many years of a cancer free future.
Strange as it may seem to you now, I say this even though I have had cancer twice. My first cancer, a Stage II IDC never returned after the AC/Taxol chemo and 7 weeks radiation. I am a 12 year survivor of that IDC cancer. I am now a 6.5 year survivor of a Stage IIIC ILC with 23/23 positive nodes. This was a new primary cancer in the other breast and unrelated to the first diagnosis. 5% of women with breast cancer may have a new primary cancer sometime in their life so I guess I am a member of an exclusive club.
I again had chemo for this second diagnosis, this time Taxotere and Xeloda chemo since you can't do the AC/T twice. I had 6 rounds of chemo over a 6 month period. Both my cancers were strongly ER positive 98% and 94%. The second time around for me was even easier than the first as far as chemo SE's were concerned. The use of pre-meds, anti-nausea meds as so many others have mentioned truly work wonders at keeping patients functional with very little discomfort during treatment.
Did chemo ruin my immune system? Well the truth is that chemo does temporarily lower our immune systems ability to protect us from disease. A patient does need to avoid exposure to illness and be proactive during the treatment period to eat well, sleep well and conserve their energy whenever possible. But even before I ever had my first cancer I had already had a serious case of mono in 1992, 3 episodes of viral meningitis from 1995 to 1998 and a kidney stone in 1999. Now after going through 2 separate BC diagnosis and a total of 14 months chemo and ongoing hormonal medications, my body has returned to good health. I am active, strong, staying busy taking up new hobbies, loving my family and enjoying life in general. I also have not had a cold, the flu or any illness for over the last 3 years so I guess my immune system has fully recovered!
SO in spite of some of the things you have read elsewhere or been told, I at least am someone who has had their strongly ER positive cancers successfully treated with both the AC and Taxol/Taxotere chemos. My immune system is back to protecting me and keeping me strong. I am living an extremely fullfilling life and have every hope of a long and healthy one. I am afraid that would not be the case, however, if I had not aggressively treated my cancers with the current best treatment modalities available.
There is no reason you cannot combine certain alternative therapies along with the tried and tested gold standards also if you want. You will find many oncologists open to the idea if you keep them aware of what you are taking so they can be sure there are no unsafe interactions. You say quality of life is more important to you than long term survival, but why not have BOTH? You are 62 which is way too young to be settling for less. Leave the bucket list and 5 good years left for when you truly have no viable alternatives.
I know that at this early stage in your diagnosis it is so normal to be focused only on the possibility of dying. We all do it, especially when we have a less favorable diagnosis with large tumors or many positive nodes. I hear it in your posts when you wonder which is the worse way to die, from chemo or metastasis. Getting a cancer diagnosis can very rapidly push us into a dark place ruled by fear. It is normal and understandable, but we have to make a decision that if our life is worth anything at all, it is worth fighting for the best chance we can get at a full and long life.
Sorry my two cents are so long, but I will make 2 more comments. Remember that you will always be more likely to hear the negative stories from the small percentage of cases that did not turn out well than you will the vast majority of successfully treated patients who have left cancer behind to go on and live their lives. Do not let that mislead you into believing an inaccurate representation of the true effectiveness of the current standards of treatment.
And second, remember that none of us ever have a guarantee we will be alive tomorrow. Life is fleeting and fragile for each of us, but when you look for God's will don't overlook God's ability to also work through and guide the physicians who are recommending your treatment plan to you.
I truly wish the best for your treatment choices and outcomes. Getting a second opinion is a great idea. Just know that you have lots of women here who have taken this path ahead of you and are willing to help anyway they can. We will hold you up during those times of panic and dread and help you see that there is still a light at the end of the tunnel. Yes Kathy, your cancer is serious but it is fully TREATABLE! Look at the ladies here who are living proof of that fact. If I seem insistent it is only because I feel you need to BELIEVE that there is still a whole lot of life out there for you!
-
Kathy, chemo does work. It does not work perfectly. It will not kill ALL cancer ALL the time, but it most surely works. My tumor measured 8 by 8 centimeters. After 4 chemo treatments nobody could find it and the one enlarged node could not be felt either. There was still some cancer left by the time we operated, but the chemo had killed 90% of it.
It is possible to die from chemo, yes. But usually only because you are already very, very sick, and/or have been on chemo for a long time and are not receiving careful monitoring. Also, chemo has come a long way in the last 20 years. Doctors have become much better at dosing, managing side effects etc.
And no, I really don't think you would be better off with supplements and a careful diet, although I think you will have a much easier time with chemo and general recovery if you switch to a healthy diet, get exercise etc.
-
Kathy - I'm glad you find the calculator helpful. As for the Alternative Treatments forum, I don't hang out much there. There are lots of quacks in this world selling snake oil, and I have a lot more faith in modern medicine. That said, there are certainly some alternatives or "complementary" treatments/lifestyles/whatever that can accompany standard treatments and make you feel like you're doing good things for your body. Eating healthy, exercising...all good stuff. But when people start talking about coffee enemas and crazy stuff like that, my brain turns off.
The reality is that if you look hard enough, you may find someone who has survived your advanced stage of cancer without standard treatment. There are always a few "miracles" or "lucky ones" in this world. But statistically, there are far more survivors who have accepted standard treatment and then gone on to live long lives and died of something other than breast cancer.
Regarding quality of life, I have to say that dying of complications from breast cancer can be slow and painful. Bone mets, liver mets, brain mets... statistically, you are more likely to suffer from any or all of these than to have lasting side effects from chemo.
I am your age. I was first diagnosed with breast cancer in June 2010. Every oncologist urged me to do the chemo. I was scared, just as you are, that the side effects would kill me. I am diabetic and everything I read suggested that diabetics don't do well with chemo. I had horrible morning sickness and still have motion sickness. I was sure I'd do nothing but puke. So I passed on it. But by March 2011, the cancer was back, it was in my axillary nodes and my intermammary nodes. I did the chemo because I really had no choice. I do believe it saved my life. I took every pill to counteract side effects. At one point I was taking about 10 a day and I felt like a chemical waste dump. But you know what, by October I was in full remission. I have no long-lasting side effects. I have grandchildren who seem to always have some bug. I NEVER caught a single thing they exposed me to. I didn't get neuropathy from the Taxol because I took the supplements that are being clinically trialed to prevent it. I didn't lose a toenail or fingernail. I didn't have excessive pain, or excessive fatigue. I never puked once from chemo - the anti-nausea drugs are incredibly effective. I did my best to eat as healthy as possible, I took a pre-natal vitamin to help keep my iron levels close to normal. And today, I am 6 months post-chemo and I have a full head of healthy-looking curly hair.
You might want to check out my blog to see what going through chemo was like, for me. Maybe it will help you. www.mch-breastcancer.blogspot.com
It's normal to be frightened. Just don't be frightened to death.
Hugs,
Michelle
-
I chose to have chemo even with 0 positive nodes, just in case there was something microscopic floating around my body. I cannot imagine not having chemo with 1, much less 12 positive nodes.
Other than the hair loss, chemo was not all that bad. The medicines they give you prior and during the infusions are really amazing in how well they control the side effects - plus they were always asking if I needed anything more than Iwhat I had. You don't feel perfectly healthy, but I know that I managed to drag myself to the gym, even if I was only able to do 1 mile on the bike each day. The more you build it up in your mind, the bigger chance you have of it becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy.
It's your decision, but I honestly don't understand how you could risk the cells that are already in your lymphatic system attaching themselves somewhere else, even if it might be years down the road. . Please consider doing the chemo...
-
Hey, Kathy, I'd like to tell you about a conversation I had with my onc last week. But first a little background.
When I had my punch biopsy at a local hospital, the path report came back strongly ER+ and strongly PR+.
Then I went to a big cancer center for my mastectomy and after surgery the path report said ER+ greater than 10% and PR+ greater than 10%. That's all it said. I thought it was strange that I didn't get the actual percentage number for ER and PR like most other women, but I was going for a second opinion at a different big cancer center so I decided to wait and see if the second opinion would give me some more and different info.
Sure enough, the second-opinion path lab at the second big cancer center looked at my slides and came back with moderately ER+ 80% and moderately PR+ 100%. I was pretty happy, though of course I had wished for strongly 100% and strongly 100% but anyway....
So recently I was at my onc visit and I asked him about these numbers.
ME: What exactly does 80% ER+ mean? Does that mean 80% of the cells in the tumor had ER receptors and 20% didn't?
ONC: Yes.
ME: Why does the path lab here not give an exact percentage ER+ and PR+? I had to have my slides sent to another lab to get those numbers.
ONC: Because it doesn't matter. It's meaningless except we want to know that it's at least 10%.
ME: Why is it meaningless? I thought it was a predictor of how effective treatments would be.
ONC: It's meaningless because the percentage of cells with hormone receptors depends on the cell cycle. It changes throughout the cell cycle.
(Here I was stunned - I had never heard this or read this.)
ME: So the percentage of hormone receptors doesn't predict how well we'll do on various treatments such as Tamoxifen?
ONC: No. What does predict the effectiveness of the hormonal drugs is the intensity of the hormone receptors, which is specified as either weak, moderate, or strong. But most labs estimate the intensity by visual examination. There are new tests that actually quantify the intensity. But few labs do those tests yet. That's why one hospital might say strongly positive and one might say moderately positive.
(Here I was stunned to learn that intensity of receptors does not equal percentage of receptors - two different things.)
ME: So you're saying that at the time of my surgery 20% of the cells in the tumor were ER-?
ONC: Yes.
ME: So Tamoxifen won't kill those cells if they are circulating in my blood already.
ONC: Correct, but chemo will.
(I will mention here my onc also has a phD in molecular biology.)
(Later I was thinking about this conversation and I realized this must be why BC sometimes flips from ER+ to triple negative or vice versa in a recurrence. Because most tumors have both hormone-positive and hormone-negative cells in them, at least for part of the cell cycle, and either type of cell can escape and take root and grow elsewhere.)
The point of this story is that your tumor likely has at least some triple-negative BC cells, as do the tumors of most BC patients. So if you have any BC cells circulating in your blood they might be cells WITHOUT hormone receptors. And chemo is effective against hormone-negative BC but aromatase inhibitors are not. That might be a more compelling reason to give chemo a try.
One more thing. There is evidence that fasting before and after chemo might boost the effectiveness of chemo. Personally I did fast before and after my last three Taxol treatments. They haven't done formal human trials yet so it's considered "alternative" I guess, but I did it. The science makes sense to me and personalIy I believe that someday they will announce it DOES help make chemo more effective. Here is the article explaining it: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=fasting-might-boost-chemo
Good luck whatever you decide!
-
Kathy
this is a hard decision--- and I think you are wise to take the time to think about it. You asked should you or shouldn't you do chemo? I think you have gotten some very good answers. I think Posy's comments are really critical... chemo is like an insurance. Because they cannot know for sure that some of the cells have not slipped out, chemo goes after them. I agree that it does not work for everyone and that it comes with some risk. But, there are many,many people who go through it and come out the other side.
I was stage 2, grade 2 ILC with no nodes and an intermediate oncotype score. It took me 1 minute to decide on chemo. I had young children and consider myself on the edge of the prime of my life and I wanted to do what I could now to really prevent this from ever happening again.
As Shana laid out, they literally have everything under the sun to prevent nauseau, low blood counts, etc. I work at a university and worked through chemo-and was just careful and washed my hands all the time. I had a few low days each cycle, but it was manageable.
You asked should you or shouldn't you... I don't think any one of us can tell you what to do, but I know for sure if I had had node involvement, it would have taken 30 seconds for me to decide to do it.....
There can be implications, there can be chemo brain or other secondary cancers, but I don't think that is the rule (although the chemo brain is an issue, and I often wonder was it the chemo or that I am getting older!!!!)
You can always try and quit. one treatment is better than none..... two is better than one---
only you and your family can really decide this... I wish you the best of luck in that decision.
-
We are each unique!
I knew from the day I was DX'd that I would do everything offerd to me to fight with. If I hadn't and had a reoccurance I could not have faced my Hubby, Son or Granddaughter if I hadn't done everything possible.
I was 63 when DX'd IBC ER+/PR-, HER2-. I was DX'd 1 week after finding the enlarged node under arm and 17 days after DX started A/C to try to shrink and get margins. It worked and 2 weeks after last A/C had a mod. rad. mast. followed 3 later with 12 weekly Taxol. A week after last Tatarted 25 rad and started Femara. All of us do not have the luxury of time.
You mentioned God. My faith took me through a lot and played a part in my determination to do all that could be done. I do know that I will go when it is the time my Heavenly Father call me home. BUT until that time, I am here to learn what I need to return and my Drs were given to me and given the knowledge/talent to do all that they can for me. As I said - I'm IBC and I am 2+ yrs out of TX and still riding NED which is great. I can do anything I want - I'm very active. There are some minor inconviences that have developed but I'm still here and kicking.
Like I said - we're all different and our cancers are different. -
LindaLou - You are amazing! You should definitely write a column. I would read it every day. You could call it "My Two Cents". It would be worth A Million Dollars!
Last night, I prayed so hard to find some direction. And when I awoke this morning, I saw your message, sent with so much compassion that I literally wept, especially at the part about "leaving the bucket list" behind. It occured to me that I have indeed "settled" for a shorter life.
Thank you for taking so much time out of your day to write me your two cents. You have added so much to helping me through my inner struggle that I cannot even say.
Momine - Thank you for being realistic with me. I need facts to make decisions and you have added an accurate perspective. I need that.
LuvRVing - What a story you have to tell...and quite a convincing one at that!
Itsjustme10 - I will take your words to heart.
SherriG - Yes, I was part of a nationwide clinical trial Z1031. Although discovering the 12 nodes came 6 mos after 1st dx, it has given me a long time to research chemo and rads after 6 mos of Arimidex.
posy1 - I love your phD in molecular biology onc. I wish I could have a discussion with him to explain these things to me. As you can see, I am a doubting Thomas and need real evidence to believe in this chemo thing. What you/he say(s) makes sense to my doubting mind. Thank you for taking the time to write this.
momand2kids - I love your approach at this being a no brainer for you because of your kids. Perhaps I just don't understand the full implications of the 12/12 nodes yet. I think because there is no evidence of mets that I can just wipe out whatever is left through Arimidex and nutritional therapy.
But you have all definitely got me rethinking this...
FYI - I had a CTC Blood Test done today. After some research, I decided this would help me in my decision. If the score comes back with more than 5 Circulating Tumor Cells, it will likely change my outlook on this. If the score is 0-5, I will still be avidly searching for my answer.
But I will be 3 months out from surgery on April 30th and I will have to reach a decision one way or the other by then.
Thank you, dear, sweet, courageous women! I have taken every one of your words into my heart and will ponder them.
Much Love and Appreciation to You All!
Kathy
-
I would do chemo AGAIN if I had to. I was 49 during treatment. I am so glad there is strong medicine to kill cancer. I know it shrunk my tumor. And I believe it killed any stray cancer cells that might have gotten beyone my lymph nodes. I'm two years past chemo now and feeling very healthy. Chemo is unpleasant, but doable.I did mine over 6 months and it took another 6 months until I felt pretty much back to normal again. But I enjoyed life the whole time I was in treatment. I did fun things with friends and watched movies I loved. I believe I will enjoy life a lot longer since I did chemo, rads, surgery. My hair grew back quickly. I plan to live another 30 years happy and healthy. I hope you have many happy decades in your future!
-
Kicks - Thank you also for your story! What are the "minor inconveniences" that you have?
-
Well put Linda!!!! You really are an insperation to all of us, and your words were so beautifully said.
I really was personally blessed by your post. Hi to sherri, Miss you.
Love to all my siter's, stay strong, this is a disiease we do not have to die from. I know women in stage IV living long lives.........My prayers are with us all who are faced with these hard decisions..... The problem is, there is always new info coming out, what works better on certian cancers. We need to throw the book at it I say, personal opinion, but I was only 41 when dx, and this does make a difference, for sure............That I understand, but still 12 nodes is alot, I had ten, one node was over 2cm!!!! I felt I had no choice, funny I did not even think about it. I went to battle, but, my kids were 4 and 8 at the time. I believe that can also take part in your treatment plans. I still agree with Linda Lou, at the end of the day only God knows if we will have tommorow...........................Blessings to you my sister, make the choice that brings you peace.
There really is so much hope, and life after cancer teatment............I promise.
Steph
-
Dear Faithfulheart - Thank you for your input. You prompted me to look up my pathology report.
It seems a bit contradictory to me:
"Number of lymph nodes with macrometastases (>0.2cm):12
Size of largest metastatic deposit: 1.4cm
Regional Lymph Nodes: pN3a: Metastases in 10 or more axillary lymph nodes (at least 1 tumor deposit greater than 2.0mm)
Should I worry?
-
Well - before TX I was osteopenia and was for close to 1 1/2 yrs after TX but now am osteoporosis. Did the TX make it worse - maybe but I have a strong family HX of it so who knows. So on Fosamax.
I have had arthritis in my upper back for many years but never a problem. About 1 1/2 yrs out of Tx, I started having more pain but Etodolac keeps it totally under control (unless I do to much). Perhaps TX had something to do with that - don't know it might have gotten worse in that time anyway.
Thyroid has decided it doesn't like working as good as it could. A synthroid a day takes care of that. Again something that might have happened anyway. When I was a bit over a year old my tonsilis were taken out and as was common way back then - my throat was radiated to keep tonsis from growing back (wrong y they grew back and I still have them). So because of the radiation to that area att such a young age, my thyroid has always been checked. So what caused it to decide it doesn't like working good - don't know. - could be the old radiation or the new.
I developed cataracts thhis past fall. Had surgery in Feb for them. Could TX have been involved/contributed sure but I've spent a lot of time outside and have very light green eyes - so who knows.
About 3 mths ago found out I'm hypoglycemic. Diet is managing it.
This is one all my Dr agree is Chemo caused - gall stones. I've never had any problems with them. Scan did not show them before A/C. Had another CAT the day of last Taxol and it showed gall bladder sludge (yes sludge is a medical term). About a year later I had another scan for something else and the sludge had turned to stones. I would not know I had them except for the scans.
Think that's it . As you can see - all are easily handlable. I can do anything I want - not as much as I did as a lot younger but still doable if I want to. Any/All of these things could have happen even without TX (well maybe not the gall stones). I know without TX I would not be here today. My Heavenly Father has other plans for me as HE gave me the Drs and ability to stay here til HE decides it's time for me to go home. I believe this with all my being. That said I know that not everyone will. That is how it should - we are each unique and tha is what makes us who we are. You asked - so I replied. You and only you can know what you believe is right for you just as only I can know what I believe is right for me.
Take care!
Categories
- All Categories
- 679 Advocacy and Fund-Raising
- 289 Advocacy
- 68 I've Donated to Breastcancer.org in honor of....
- Test
- 322 Walks, Runs and Fundraising Events for Breastcancer.org
- 5.6K Community Connections
- 282 Middle Age 40-60(ish) Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 53 Australians and New Zealanders Affected by Breast Cancer
- 208 Black Women or Men With Breast Cancer
- 684 Canadians Affected by Breast Cancer
- 1.5K Caring for Someone with Breast cancer
- 455 Caring for Someone with Stage IV or Mets
- 260 High Risk of Recurrence or Second Breast Cancer
- 22 International, Non-English Speakers With Breast Cancer
- 16 Latinas/Hispanics With Breast Cancer
- 189 LGBTQA+ With Breast Cancer
- 152 May Their Memory Live On
- 85 Member Matchup & Virtual Support Meetups
- 375 Members by Location
- 291 Older Than 60 Years Old With Breast Cancer
- 177 Singles With Breast Cancer
- 869 Young With Breast Cancer
- 50.4K Connecting With Others Who Have a Similar Diagnosis
- 204 Breast Cancer with Another Diagnosis or Comorbidity
- 4K DCIS (Ductal Carcinoma In Situ)
- 79 DCIS plus HER2-positive Microinvasion
- 529 Genetic Testing
- 2.2K HER2+ (Positive) Breast Cancer
- 1.5K IBC (Inflammatory Breast Cancer)
- 3.4K IDC (Invasive Ductal Carcinoma)
- 1.5K ILC (Invasive Lobular Carcinoma)
- 999 Just Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastasis
- 652 LCIS (Lobular Carcinoma In Situ)
- 193 Less Common Types of Breast Cancer
- 252 Male Breast Cancer
- 86 Mixed Type Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Not Diagnosed With a Recurrence or Metastases but Concerned
- 189 Palliative Therapy/Hospice Care
- 488 Second or Third Breast Cancer
- 1.2K Stage I Breast Cancer
- 313 Stage II Breast Cancer
- 3.8K Stage III Breast Cancer
- 2.5K Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
- 13.1K Day-to-Day Matters
- 132 All things COVID-19 or coronavirus
- 87 BCO Free-Cycle: Give or Trade Items Related to Breast Cancer
- 5.9K Clinical Trials, Research News, Podcasts, and Study Results
- 86 Coping with Holidays, Special Days and Anniversaries
- 828 Employment, Insurance, and Other Financial Issues
- 101 Family and Family Planning Matters
- Family Issues for Those Who Have Breast Cancer
- 26 Furry friends
- 1.8K Humor and Games
- 1.6K Mental Health: Because Cancer Doesn't Just Affect Your Breasts
- 706 Recipe Swap for Healthy Living
- 704 Recommend Your Resources
- 171 Sex & Relationship Matters
- 9 The Political Corner
- 874 Working on Your Fitness
- 4.5K Moving On & Finding Inspiration After Breast Cancer
- 394 Bonded by Breast Cancer
- 3.1K Life After Breast Cancer
- 806 Prayers and Spiritual Support
- 285 Who or What Inspires You?
- 28.7K Not Diagnosed But Concerned
- 1K Benign Breast Conditions
- 2.3K High Risk for Breast Cancer
- 18K Not Diagnosed But Worried
- 7.4K Waiting for Test Results
- 603 Site News and Announcements
- 560 Comments, Suggestions, Feature Requests
- 39 Mod Announcements, Breastcancer.org News, Blog Entries, Podcasts
- 4 Survey, Interview and Participant Requests: Need your Help!
- 61.9K Tests, Treatments & Side Effects
- 586 Alternative Medicine
- 255 Bone Health and Bone Loss
- 11.4K Breast Reconstruction
- 7.9K Chemotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 2.7K Complementary and Holistic Medicine and Treatment
- 775 Diagnosed and Waiting for Test Results
- 7.8K Hormonal Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 50 Immunotherapy - Before, During, and After
- 7.4K Just Diagnosed
- 1.4K Living Without Reconstruction After a Mastectomy
- 5.2K Lymphedema
- 3.6K Managing Side Effects of Breast Cancer and Its Treatment
- 591 Pain
- 3.9K Radiation Therapy - Before, During, and After
- 8.4K Surgery - Before, During, and After
- 109 Welcome to Breastcancer.org
- 98 Acknowledging and honoring our Community
- 11 Info & Resources for New Patients & Members From the Team