MIDDLE-AGED WOMEN 40-60ish

16406416436456461064

Comments

  • elimar86861
    elimar86861 Member Posts: 7,416
    edited March 2012

    They write extra in the "signature" part, I think.  I don't know becaue I have not tried it.

  • Dianarose
    Dianarose Member Posts: 2,407
    edited March 2012

    Ok, thanks. I will try it tomorrow. I am so tired, but can't sleep. I am going to work this weekend to try to feel normal again if that is even possible. I don't know if there is going to be enough room to put all the crap in from my report. It is 8 pages long and they said there was more coming that they hadn't finished yet next week. I feel so out of sorts. I have 4 different things going on in the same tissue. The MO and bs said they have never had anything like me before. That didn't make me feel warm and fuzzy.

  • YaYa5
    YaYa5 Member Posts: 667
    edited March 2012
    dianarose, on your profile page, there's a place called 'diagnosis.'  there is a list of questions about diagnosis that you answer.  just go to your profile page, click on 'edit my profile,' and you'll be able to fill in the answers.  hope that helps!
  • Jennt28
    Jennt28 Member Posts: 2,021
    edited March 2012

    Dianarlse: latest evidence shows that for women with micromets in the sentinal node there is no medical advantage (survival) to taking out more nodes so long as the surgery is followed up with chemo and radiotherapy to the axilla as well as the whole breast.



    I had cancer cells in my sentinal node in December and did not have any further surgery.



    The incidence of lymphodema after total removal of the axillary lymph nodes is above 30%, the incidence of lymphodema after just sentinal node biopsy and radiotherapy is somewhere between 7 to 10%.



    Jenn

  • cookiegal
    cookiegal Member Posts: 3,296
    edited March 2012

    Hey friends,,,hope everyone is enjoying spring, it came so early out east.

    Dianarose....I totally understand where you are coming from. 

    It is confusing.

    When you look at the stats for low oncotype even with a higher number of positive nodes, it does not look like the chemo has much of an impact. (They break it down into three groups).

    I can't remember how many nodes they went up to...I think it was 10 or maybe 12, It was a small study, and the group of women with low oncotype and high nodes was really small, but it's true, the chemo didn't help them much more than it did for the women with fewer nodes. 

    There is a study that suggests that there is a sub group with a high KI-67 but low oncotype, that may respond differently.

    I think one variable is that some research suggestes the cancer in the nodes actually may have different properties than the primary tumor.

    I hope some of this helps. You have found one of the most supportive groups on BCO.

    Love and cookies to all

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited March 2012

    Jenn, I've read the studies with your figures in it, but recent studies have shown that there is a 30% risk for lymphadema with a modified mastectomy AND lymph node disection. Removing the breast does remove some lymph nodes as well, as there are lymph nodes within the breast tissue itself. Of course, by removing the breast tissue it was assumed there was no longer a need for those lymph nodes, but the supraclavicular nodes drain to them, so once they are gone, there is no route.

    Then, when you add in the removal of all three tiers (I, II and III) of auxiliary lymph nodes, there is an almost guarantee of lymphadema. Remember, LE can occur much later in your life. It has been recorded as late as 20 years later, but there is no tracking of anyone earlier, so there are no earlier results than that.

    LE does not necessarily imply a large arm. I have mild truncal LE that I really don't have to treat unless I feel it and it's bugging me. Then some poor souls get full-blown LE where their arm doubles and triples in size! As in most things medical, there are all sorts of extremes and diagnoses. Some PTs may not even acknowledge my mild LE, but it was my Onc that spotted it!!

  • justmejanis
    justmejanis Member Posts: 1,847
    edited March 2012

    Dianarose I am so sorry about your crappy pathology!  Make sure to write down all the questions you have for your doctors.  I know you have a battle ahead, but you'll get through it.  You came to the right place that is for sure!

    Eli....you asked if anyone else had confusing pathology.  When I found out I had BC, the needle biopsy indicated I had Mucinous Carcinoma.  This is what I was told.  After my tumor was removed, it came back as IDC.  I asked my surgeon about it and he told me that the area they took the biopsy from had Mucinous cells but the tumor itself was IDC. 

    I have both truncal LE and some in the arm.  I had measurements taken for my sleeves last week.  I go back April 3rd to pick up the sleeves.  She also is going to try to get me into a program that provides financial assistance for some bras.  She said that they will be custom made for me which would be nice.  My LE therapist told me my BC breast probably will always be larger than the other breast.  I am very uneven.  The LE is graded scores 0-3 and mine was rated a 2. 

  • elimar86861
    elimar86861 Member Posts: 7,416
    edited March 2012

    Jennt28 (Welcome!) & Barbe, I am not too well versed in LE and the accompanying stats, but maybe one of you could post a link to the most recent studies if you have it.  I feel it is such an important factor to weigh and while getting all the cancer out is the first priority, I think avoiding the lifelong ailment of lymphedema is a high priority too.

    Dianarose, I bet Binney4 would know about the difference they are writing about.  She is an encyclopedia of all things lymphedema, so PM her about getting the nodes out if you want.  There are still A LOT of doctors that don't even consider lymphedema as part of the equation, but you really should check what your best odds are to NOT wind up with LE.

    janis,  exactly!  How does one part of the Dx just "disappear" from biopsy to surgery?  As if it all isn't confusing enough.  Thanks for responding.  It didn't seem like that big of a thing to create a thread over, and I was hoping someone here knew what "lobular features" actually means?

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited March 2012

    Again, your "worst" diagnosis becomes your only diagnosis. So if you have a lot of mixed crap and IDC, then your diagnosis is IDC. The other crap doesn't matter, it is just phases building up to IDC.

    I'll try to find those stats e, I think I found them here on bco.org!!

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited March 2012

    ps. about the above picture. I can NEVER wear beige pants!!! I look like a butch going golfing!!! AND I golf! But not in beige pants.....heheheheh

  • elimar86861
    elimar86861 Member Posts: 7,416
    edited March 2012
    I agree, the largest or most agressive component of a person's cancer is basically their Dx, and treatment for that component covers the rest along with it, but you would still think that in the final surgical pathology everything would be noted.  For example, my DCIS was noted.  I only had a tiny bit (like 5% of a 7mm tumor, so that is really quite tiny.)  If the "lobular features" were mentioned in the biopsy, it is just weird that "lobular features," or anything about "lobes" for that matter, was not in my final pathology.  Like on janis' report, the main "mucinous" description of her biopsy, doesn't even get any side mention on her final path. report.  The final pathology report IS supposedly comprehensive, so if anything, you would expect everything from the biopsy to be mentioned and possibly even more if more is found.  I get that "lobular features" was a description of my IDC (and probably nothing to do with actual ILC,) but I could not even get a doctor to explain exactly what lobular features were.  Is it a vague pathologist secret?  In janis' case, "mucinous" is an entirely different cancer, so although she ended up with IDC I would think the mucinous component would still be mentioned.  It makes you feel like the second set of eyes looking thru' the microscope is looking at something entirely different than the first ones.  When the wording of the Dx is not inclusive or does not agree, it is disturbing.  To me anyway.
  • Eph3_12
    Eph3_12 Member Posts: 4,781
    edited March 2012

    I wear tons of purple & TAN pants, but I don't golf & I think I've given up on what I think other people think, I think! 

  • Binney4
    Binney4 Member Posts: 8,609
    edited March 2012

    Hello, all!

    I love this thread -- it's so congenial!Kiss

    I just wanted to pop in and clarify a couple of points about lymphedema, which is probably the most confusing subject on the planet!Tongue out

    First of all, most important to keep in mind that lymphedema, nasty as it is, is not the enemy. The breast cancer beast is. Do everything you need to in order to make this go-round with it the last you'll ever have to face. And after that plan's in place, there are lots of options to help reduce your risk of lymphedema or deal with it promptly, when it's easiest to manage.

    Unfortunately, getting accurate statistics about lymphedema occurrence is impossible, since there's no one standard for diagnosing it. The best we can come up with is a range, which is very, very wide and fuzzy. So, basically useless. Better to know that there is absolutely no reason to feel lymphedema is guaranteed, no matter how many nodes are removed. Some women with 30 or more nodes gone never develop lymphedema even if they buck hay bales for a hobby. Number of nodes removed is only one risk factor, and not a guarantee. Others include previous trauma to the chest or axilla (including previous surgeries), overweight (though being thin is no guarantee you'll avoid LE either), and post-surgical complications like infection or seroma (or cording, for that matter). Beyond that, there are other factors affecting it that nobody yet understands, some of them likely inborn or genetic. 

    Also, just as there's no such thing as being "a little pregnant", there really is no such thing as "mild" lymphedema, though the term gets thrown around a lot. Lymphedema is staged, just like breast cancer is, and left untreated it will progress. The arm may get huge, or there may only be tissue changes caused by the presence of stagnant lymph fluid (fibrosis, abnormal fat accumulation, skin changes, increased risk of serious systemic infection, leakage of lymph fluid through the pores, etc.)

    The good news is, lymphedema can be treated. If treatment is started early and you maintain good self-care, it can be kept from progressing. If it has already progressed it can be reduced and controlled. The scary pictures we sometimes see of women with arms the size of old-growth tree limbs are NOT inevitable -- those women were not treated properly at an early stage. None of that needs to happen to any of you!

    Lymphedema risk reduction can start before surgery, with a pre-treatment visit to a well-trained lymphedema therapist for base-line arm measurements and individual risk assessment. Risk reduction information here:

    http://www.lymphnet.org  (See their position papers on risk reduction, exercise, air travel, and breast cancer treatment)

    http://www.stepup-speakout.org/riskreduction_for_lymphedema.htm

    I hope some of that helps. Hopefully we'll one day know enough about the lymph system to prevent it from developing after cancer treatment. But for now, knowledge and risk reduction are our smartest tools for getting our lives back in control after this breast cancer detour.

    Be well, and may you never have a "swell" day ever!
    Binney

  • kira66715
    kira66715 Member Posts: 4,681
    edited March 2012

     Dianarose:

    As another woman who developed lymphedema--with only 3 negative nodes out, I have to strongly agree with Binney (who is amazingly wise)

    The greatest threat is the cancer: and ILC with 4+ nodes is likely, depending on the size of the tumor a T?2N2--so it's already a IIIA stage and requires intensive treatment to get rid of this beast

    http://www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/DetailedGuide/breast-cancer-staging

    I work in rad onc--but am NOT a rad onc--and I do staging forms and read path reports all day at work:

    In my experience, ILC is sneaky and often not seen on imaging.

    The Guiliano study on limiting ALND set the standard that the primary tumor was T2 and 1-2 nodes were positive. It did not say that a woman with 4 positive nodes got no survival benefit from ALND.

    The rad onc I work for feels LICS rarely needs treatment, he treats DCIS, IDC and ILC.

    The bottom line is that you'll need to be discussing your treatment with your treating doctors and you can bring up, right from the start, your concern about lymphedema, and some centers are sending women to lymphedema therapists pre-op to measure them and guide them on risk reduction.

    http://www.stepup-speakout.org/Finding_a_Qualified_Lymphedema_Therapist.htm

    Lymphedema is no fun, but it's not life-threatening (except for infections).

    Dianerose, I'm sure you're on an emotional roller coaster right now, but I hope as you move ahead with treatment, you'll be able to raise your concerns and feel comfortable with your treatment.

    Hoping you never, ever join the "swell sorority"

    Kira

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited March 2012

    I got this quote off the Susan G. Komen from 2010:

    Roughly one-third of women who undergo axillary lymph node dissection develop lymphedema. Tools to help manage lymphedema include manual lymphatic drainage, use of compression bandages and garments, training in skin and nail care (in order to reduce the risk of infection), and instruction in exercises.  

    Of course, my comment above should have said "after surgery" not "with breast cancer". That was implied.

  • Dianarose
    Dianarose Member Posts: 2,407
    edited March 2012

    HI Everyone, you are all so helpful. Thank you all !!! I went back to work today. It felt great and almost normal. I am really tired now though, plus I woke up with an eye infection that really hurts. I only get them when I cry, so I am done crying.Cry My path report is so confusing. It is 8 pages long and is not completed yet. I will get the rest next week.

    I do have another question though. Does anyone know if rads after a mx is the same duration. I know there is some tissue left, but it seems like they would be radiating my bones.

  • kira66715
    kira66715 Member Posts: 4,681
    edited March 2012

    Barbe, recently Binney and I were reseaching the literature on the incidence/prevelence of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment, and as there is no single diagnostic definition of lymphedema, the range is 6-60%, you really can't predict.

    There is a prediction tool at the top of the LE forum, for women with ALND and it just gives a percentage chance.

    I recently met with Jane Armer PhD who has studied 300 women for 84 months: she's used the perometer, measurements, symptoms, and she has found, depending on how she measures, the incidence varies hugely. What she told me was that most cases showed up in the first 5 years.

    I feel like when a woman is facing breast cancer treatment, she should be aware of lymphedema, and preventable risk factors, and advocate for good, sound treatment that minimizes her risk, but I sure don't want to be scaring women or scaring them off from getting the treatment they need because of the risk of lymphedema.

    I was low risk. Go figure.

    I see women all the time, in my office, who "should" have lymphedema--all the nodes out, chemo, lots of radiation, and they don't. And I "shouldn't" and I do.

     The modifable risk reductions are: 1) not stretching through the axilla for 10 days post op, 2) treating axillary seromas promptly, 3) avoid overuse of the arm

    On the LE forum, there's lots of good information about risk reduction.

    Priorities are key: treat the life threatening illness. 

    As more of us survive, we deal with a lot of treatment related side effects: but we're surviving and that's the key.

    Kira

  • elimar86861
    elimar86861 Member Posts: 7,416
    edited March 2012

    Kira,  Not knowing any better, I started stretching my axila by the third day.  My treatment side is my dominant hand and I haven't shifted anything to the other side.  Luckily, maybe with thinness going for me, I escaped LE (just having some edema around the surgery/rads area til rads finished up and then I got a few PT sessions for edema and to break up scar tissue (which in itself might help lymph drainage.)  You are right, there is no surefire method to avoid it, so I just consider myself lucky.

    Thanks to you and Binney4 for providing great info.  

  • kira66715
    kira66715 Member Posts: 4,681
    edited March 2012

    Elimar, I was doing overhead stretches by the second day, and got a whopping axillary seroma and tons of cords. And then early LE--three weeks out.

    And I heard a lecture from Jodi Winicour at Klose Training about how the little lymph connectors connect best in the first week, so don't stretch them away from each other.

    More and more it looks like there's two kind of women who get LE: those with genetic predisposition and those who have a more robust lymphatic system and get an overwhelming insult to it.

    I figure I'm in the first category. There was a genetic study showing that women with LE tend to share a gene with people with hereditary LE.

    Elimar, based on what Jane Armer told me, she's not seeing a lot of new cases at 84 months.

    I always say the odds are always in your favor, NOT to get LE.

    Glad you didn't.

    Kira

  • elimar86861
    elimar86861 Member Posts: 7,416
    edited March 2012

    re:  those with genetic predisposition

    I wonder if it might be tied in with the genetic (or individual) disposition of how one creates scar tissue.  You know, like how some get keloids.  I am just imagining that a person that healed with a lot of extra scar tissue, or like you said had greater area of surgery, therefore more scar tissue, would be at a disadvantage because as scar tissue does not get good blood flow,it probably does not get good lymph flow either.  The blood and lymph vessels must be more disjointed as they try to form and regrow in that type tissue.

    Just advancing a theory.

  • Binney4
    Binney4 Member Posts: 8,609
    edited March 2012

    Good theory, Elimar!Laughing And there is some evidence that when surgeons treat the tissue gently and don't "rearrange" things too much, lymphedema is less likely. Which I think ties in with your theory too.

    Fortunately there's lots of new research being done, so more answers will be available with time.Smile

    Be well,
    Binney

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited March 2012

    Yikes Kira!! I'd rather go with 30% than 6-60%!!! It's still all a crap shoot anyway...sigh.

    My LE is on my back just where the inicision ended. My DH has to do a massage motion that directs the lymph up and over the scar line. I only do it when my underarm feels full. If I had known about LE I don't think I'd let a doc touch my lymph nodes! Either give me chemo and rads or don't, but please don't screw up something else while trying to fix my breast cancer!!! The logic of the sentinel node made sense at the time, but even the surgeons now are questioning whether it's worth the risk or not!

  • YaYa5
    YaYa5 Member Posts: 667
    edited March 2012

    can someone explain to me why i have so much scar tissue UNDER my breast when the lumpectomy was on the SIDE?  and i had two nodes removed under my arm.  my breast hurts, especially underneath it.  i saw the PA last week and she said the lumpiness and pain under my breast was only scar tissue.  i don't understand that.  anyone?

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited March 2012

    Kira, wise words. By the way, my surgeon told me not to stretch the first two weeks, and several other docs commented that this was silly, but I am guessing it is not after all.

    I do have lymphedema, but thanks to a good friend and info here, I got quick intervention from a good therapist. As a result, my arm is now back to very close to normal. It does still have some slight edema, but as long as I wear my sleeve and am careful, it does not seem to be getting any worse. So, it is a pain obviously, but manageable. 

  • Dianarose
    Dianarose Member Posts: 2,407
    edited March 2012

    HI- Help!!  the incision site under my arm is getting more swollen. When I saw the doc's on Friday they said it was normal from the surgery, but it's getting worse. I can't put my arm down by my side. It is about the size of 2 golf balls put together side by side. My surgery was on the 15th. Is this normal or do I have an issue here. Too add to this I woke up with my eye almost swollen shut. I am sitting here with a warm pack on my eye, but I don't know what to do about the other and I have to leave soon for work.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited March 2012

    Diana, it is within normal, unfortunately, but do call your surgeon's office, because it needs to be dealt with.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited March 2012

    Diana, also try this meanwhile http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9FP6AHj9Eo&feature=related and make sure you are hydrated.

  • Dianarose
    Dianarose Member Posts: 2,407
    edited March 2012

    Momine- I am going to see the MO tomorrow. I wish they would drain it so I can have some relief. I am stage llla, grade 2, and ER+PR+, HER 2- with so far 4/4 nodes. Did you have chemo? Can I PM you when I get home from work. You diagnosis is the closest I have see to mine.

  • Momine
    Momine Member Posts: 7,859
    edited March 2012

    Diana, yes, feel free to PM, of course. They may well drain it for you and that should give you relief. That is what I mean by "dealing with it."

    I would also urge you to get a referral to a PT who specializes in mastectomy patients and knows about lymphedema. It can help prevent or minimize any swelling problems.

    I got to try all the rides in the park. Like you I also had all manner of cancer discovered after the BMX. Because my tumor was large, I had chemo both before and after the BMX, total of 8 chemos, then  radiation, 30 treatments, then a hysterectomy (2 weeks ago). It has been quite the year, but I am still here, beginning to feel human again and planning to stick around. I am 48 years old, by the way, DXed at 47.

  • barbe1958
    barbe1958 Member Posts: 19,757
    edited March 2012

    YaYa, you get a scar tissue build up from an underwire bra!!! My build up was as thick as my fingers and sat on top of my ribs. Very sore to try to massage away!!

    Dianarose, let us know what your onc says! Thank goodness that Momine was able to step in to advise you. See what we mean when we say "you are not alone"??

Categories