Choosing AC/TH or TCH chemo regimens

Debbie675
Debbie675 Member Posts: 7
edited June 2014 in Stage III Breast Cancer

Hi everyone,

Just recently diagnosed with BC.  I had a lumpectomy with clear margins.  I met with two different medical onocologists. They are both recommending chemo, herceptin, radiation and the hormone blocker pill for 5 years.  However, the problem is they have recommended different chemo regimens so I am totally confused and don't know what to do.  The first MO recommends 4 cycles of AC (adriamycin/cytoxan) every 3 weeks and then 4 cycles of TH (taxotere/herceptin) every 3 weeks, followed by herceptin every 3 weeks for the remainder of the year.  The second MO recommends 6 cycles of TCH (taxotere, carboplatin with weekly herceptin), followed by herceptin every 3 weeks for the remainder of the year.  Apparently, both regimens are widely used and both correct. I'm told they are used 50/50.  I am aware of the heart issues with the adriamycin and herceptin and am concerned about this.  My breast cancer is on the left side and I will need radiation which could affect the heart as well. I like both oncologists, their staff and infusion centers.  I just don't know what to do.  I want what's best overall in aggressiveness and long term affects, and being cancer free.  Has anyone been faced with this decision?  Would love to hear from you. What have your medical oncologists recommended and why?

Comments

  • Debbie675
    Debbie675 Member Posts: 7
    edited March 2012

    Hi everyone,

    Just recently diagnosed with BC.  I had a lumpectomy with clear margins.  I met with two different medical onocologists. They are both recommending chemo, herceptin, radiation and the hormone blocker pill for 5 years.  However, the problem is they have recommended different chemo regimens so I am totally confused and don't know what to do.  The first MO recommends 4 cycles of AC (adriamycin/cytoxan) every 3 weeks and then 4 cycles of TH (taxotere/herceptin) every 3 weeks, followed by herceptin every 3 weeks for the remainder of the year.  The second MO recommends 6 cycles of TCH (taxotere, carboplatin with weekly herceptin), followed by herceptin every 3 weeks for the remainder of the year.  Apparently, both regimens are widely used and both correct. I'm told they are used 50/50.  I am aware of the heart issues with the adriamycin and herceptin and am concerned about this.  My breast cancer is on the left side and I will need radiation which could affect the heart as well. I like both oncologists, their staff and infusion centers.  I just don't know what to do.  I want what's best overall in aggressiveness and long term affects, and being cancer free.  Has anyone been faced with this decision?  Would love to hear from you. What have your medical oncologists recommended and why?

  • Karina121293
    Karina121293 Member Posts: 370
    edited March 2012

    Hi Debbie, sorry you haven't got any advice yet. I was not given a choice like you, but I did trust my onco and the regimen she would give me. Except Herceptin,( I am HER2 -), I received Adriamicin, Cytoxan for neoadjuvant and Taxotere for adjuvant. I tolerated most of them ok. My C was on the left side too, and neither Adriamicin, nor radiation affected my heart. Hopefully it will not cause you any trouble either. Yes, it's quite a choice to make, so let's see what other ladies will come up with.

    Wishing you good luck and lots of strength to go through the chemo. Whatever regimen you have, just remember, that you will get through it and one day it will be behind you. Concentrate on your treatment, take each day as it comes, rest, eat well and just be kind to yourself. 

    Hugs. 

  • Kelloggs
    Kelloggs Member Posts: 965
    edited March 2012

    Hi Debbie - so sorry you have to join us but you will find great support and information here.  I was given the choice between ACX4 with THX4 or TCH X6 by my MO.  She explained the heart issues with Adriamycin and basically told me that the TCH regimen was newer and was becoming the standard for triple positive.  She did say that both would be effective.  I chose TCH.  I will go in for treatment #6 on Thursday.  Everyone reacts differently to chemo and you may have side effects and you may not.  I don't think there is a wrong choice here.  I feel for you, at least the decision would be easier if you like one MO or infusion center over the other.

    Like Karina said, whichever you choose...you CAN do this!  Please don't stress too much over the first infusion, the anticipation is way worse than the treatment.  Be good to yourself!

     Hugs

  • kathleen1966
    kathleen1966 Member Posts: 793
    edited March 2012

    Hello, and sorry to meet you here!  If you want the most aggressive treatment then go with AC (adriamycin/cytoxan) every 3 weeks and then 4 cycles of TH with Herceptin.  THAT is the most aggressive regimen.  Now having said that, you are aware of the potential affects that adramycin can have on the heart, and that some oncologist are concerned that using it with Herceptin (which you know also can cause heart issues) is a double whammy for the heart.  Add radiation to this, and that will be three things that could potentially be bad for your heart. Adriamycin also can have the late effect of causing a secondary leukemia in the future, though this is rare.

    The TCH combo (which I did) is only slightly less effective than the ACTH combo. Taxotere also does not have the same effect on the heart as adriamycin does.I handled it very well with little side effects but others have had more of a hellish experience with Taxotere (not to deter you, but more to say that Taxotere is no walk in the park so you don't see it as less powerful than Adriamycin). I believe the difference is not significant in forms of one being better than the other. But one HAS been shown to be slightly better in terms of recurrence.  

     As Carboplatin is also an alkylating agent, I believe it could also rarely cause leukemia so doing the TCH does not get you out of this long term very rare occurrence.  

    I also read  that dose dense chemo is very affective.  I was never given this choice. I had orginally been set to receive the ACTH combo, as it was thought I was going to participate in a clinical trail being offered.  When I decided not to do the trial, I received the TCH combo. At the time, I did worry that I was not getting the most aggressive treatment. I was never included in the decision process.

    Studies also say that using Herceptin with chemo is most affective. 

    There are soo many factors to figure in!!! If you do the TCH combo, you will get Herceptin the entire time, if you do the first one, you will not get Herceptin with chemo for four cycles or you will get it in the second leg of your chemo treatments?

     When I received radiation at the mastectomy site, I asked about the heart.  They said that they are soo good now at aiming the beams (better equipment) that they are not concerned with the heart or lungs as they used to be.  Despite this, my ejection fraction went down to 45 during radiation.  I still got Herceptin.  I asked if it could have anything to do with the radiation and the oncologist wasn't really sure either way.  But....it went back up to 55 when radiation was over.....

    Good luck with your decision. How is your heart at the moment?  If you have a low normal ejection fraction, and treatment brings it lower, this could affect your getting Herceptin. I would factor that into your decision as well. Getting the Herceptin is very important in your treament plan. 

    I think any treatment we have can have a long term impact on our future health.  I have a friend who was treated with adriamycin for stage III breast cancer nine years ago.  She does have congestive heart failure due to this treatment.  She is no longer able to work, but otherwise is leading a full life and has survived her stage III cancer!!!. I have lymphedema which will be life long. The uncommon heart effects from Herceptin are thought to be temporary and go away after treatment. Herceptin is relatively new though and they really don't know the long term effects yet in my opinion (and I'm not a doctor). The uncommon heart effects from adriamycin are permanent but not common.

  • Debbie675
    Debbie675 Member Posts: 7
    edited March 2012

    Hi ladies and thank you for all the information. It sounds like a double edge sword -- the ACTH combo is the most aggressive but can cause heart problems, where as the TCH is slightly less effective but does not have the cardiac issues. Some even say the two regimens are the same, so I still don't know what to do.  I am leaning toward the TCH regimen because it is safer on the heart.  Does anyone know how many years this regimen has been used? Have you  heard anything on the recurrence rate between the two regimens?

    Got some GREAT news today -- PET scan and sono of the heart were all good.  I can take a deep breath now.  Did any of you do a whole body bone scan?  One doctor wants me to do it and the other doctor says it is not necessary.  Doctor says the PET does not show good ananomy.  Any thoughts? I got my port put in yesterday and doing well.  Will start chemo next week so I need to decide my chemo regimen soon.

    kathleen1966 -- I'm sorry to hear you have lymhedema.  Any thoughts on how to avoid getting it?

    Thank you ALL for the positive feedback.  Stay strong and be good to yourself!! 

  • lanagraves
    lanagraves Member Posts: 596
    edited March 2012

    I just PET scan a couple of weeks ago, got good results last week (YAY!!). I'm not sure what other "whole body" the doc may be suggesting, as I thought PET was the most sensitive. However, I'm pretty new to this too, so I may be wrong about that.

  • kathleen1966
    kathleen1966 Member Posts: 793
    edited March 2012

    Hello again, I don't think there is really any way of avoiding lymphedema. But not everyone gets it. There are plenty of women on here who had lots of nodes removed and don't have lymphedema.  You can avoid the lyphedema progressing by wearing a fitted sleeve and glove, but you usually only get these when you end up diagnosed with lymphedema. 

    I never had a whole body scan.  I assume this is because I had the PET scan initially and if cancer were in my bones, it would have showed up in the PET scan. As you are Her2+, I would also ask for an MRI of your brain for a baseline here.

  • Debbie675
    Debbie675 Member Posts: 7
    edited March 2012

    They did an MRI of my brain on Friday.  I am waiting on the results.

    Kathleen1966 -- Just curious -- why were you not included in the decision process for your treatment?  You seem pretty knowledgable about this stuff.  Given what you know now, would you have chosen the AC-TH or the TCH?  I am still floundering, such a big decision!!

Categories