worried over onco score

Options
2

Comments

  • voraciousreader
    voraciousreader Member Posts: 7,496
    edited February 2012

    PLJ...the link you provided I have read numerous times before because it really gives a very good explanation of how they designed the trial. And I also think the only way they could accrue enough participants was by being extremely conservative. It really was a well designed study because they met their quota. Many trials can't be completed because they lack enough participants.. Again, the heroes in all of this are the sisters who choose to participate in trials.

  • bgirl
    bgirl Member Posts: 538
    edited February 2012

    My understanding from my MO was that not only does it tell you how likely your cancer will recur within 10 years, providing you take tamox for 5 years, but how likely you are to benefit from receiveing chemo.  They know that they are now giving chemo to a lot of women who will have little benefit from it.  I think the test is to hopefully figure out who really needs it.

    At 18 - 11% chance of recurrence.  Only went down 2% if I did chemo.  Chemo was no guarantee that I won't get distant recur.  They say chemo is doable, but once they think you probably don't need it they are very clear about long term SEs and not just short term SEs  Like 1 in 500 people die from chemo.  My MO would have used cut off of 25, because I was 46 at dx, but not sure what he would have said if I was in my 30s.

    I am doing my rads for local recur.  Taking tamox to help prevent distant recur. Highly ER+ and not looking back.  Even if TailorX says something else, you just have to live with the decision you made with the info you have.  Can't change your mind.

  • LtotheK
    LtotheK Member Posts: 2,095
    edited February 2012

    Yes, PLJ, that is a good clarification.  I was offered entrance to Tailor X.  I had a 12, and also grade 3.  By NCI guidelines, a grade 3 tumor is one reason for chemo.  So I suppose Tailor X must be following a protocol in this manner.

    Oncotype is actually a definitive tool for many non NCI ranked hospitals.  I had one hospital opinion tell me it trumps all in their book.

    PLJ, there are times I wish I went for a BMX.  Well, truth is, we just don't know, you are right.  And we are here now!

  • sj29
    sj29 Member Posts: 68
    edited February 2012

    Hey ladies,

    I am definintely young for BC as I got diagnosed one month ago today. I had a UMX with SNB on 1/30. I came back stage 1, 1.4 cm, grade 11, her2 -, and ER/PR + 100% both. I had no lymph node involvement. I just got my oncotype back over the phone from the nurse and it was 14. My MO and the nurse talked briefly so I would have an answer for the weekend. The nurse said while she can not give me a DEFINITIVE answer because my MO hasn't looked over everything, she said it looked promising and my MO doesn't think I will need chemo. I guess I am curious if there is anyone out there with similiar cases? I will do anything i NEED to in order to live, however with being so young, I am fearful of jumping into chemo if I don't need to because I would LOVE to have children after my course of Tamoxifen.

     Another question, why do those of you say you weren't able to tolerate Tamoxifen? I haven't met with my MO, I meet with him Monday. We discussed it briefly before surgery, but was weeks ago now and have so much more information. Can anyone give me some insight?? 

  • edwards750
    edwards750 Member Posts: 3,761
    edited February 2012

    I for one am really thankful for the Oncotype test. I had a Stage 2, Grade 1 bc. I had a micromet in the SN. Since it was so small my Onc recommended the Oncotype test. She said women had been overtreated for years so these test was a good tool to determine what treatment, if any, would be beneficial and everything they needed to know about your particular tumor, i.e., aggressive vs non-aggressive. Mine came back at 11. Non aggressive and smaller than first thought. It made the difference between my having chemo, which my BS said I would have, and Rads. No longer is chemo a slam dunk for lymph node involvment. Having said that my Onc did say had it been more than a micromet in the SN I probably would have had chemo and of course my score would have been higher. This is not a one size, fits all decision. I think we can all agree we go with the best decision for ourselves based on what we know and believe.  diane

  • WK83
    WK83 Member Posts: 3
    edited February 2012

    Hi Ladies, I just joined the community today, 2/11/12.  I was diagnosed 1/17 and had a lumpectomy on 1/24.  Stage 1 IDC, tumor was 1.5 cm, grade 3, clear margins.  Micro metastisis in SN, .25mm.  4 other nodes removed, all negative.  Am waiting for onco score; meet with Oncologist on 2/22.  Appreciate reading all of the posts...makes me feel better to know I'm not alone in struggling with my decision once I get my score.  As so many women say, I want to do "everything humanly possible" to fight but I am so scared about the side effects of chemo.  One of my biggest fears is "chemo brain"...I'm 54 and already am forgetful.  Has anyone had this side effect?  I hear that you lose short term memory?

  • coraleliz
    coraleliz Member Posts: 1,523
    edited February 2012
    Positive nodes don't always correlate with higher oncotype scores. I had 2 positive nodes(3mm) & my oncotype score was 4. There is a stage III clinical trial in progress http://www.swog.org/Visitors/S1007/patients.asp  looking at this relationship in early stage BC.
  • marlenet
    marlenet Member Posts: 345
    edited February 2012
    My score was 25..a16% recurrence rate. My cancer was small...
    0.6..i decided to do chemo for several reasons...one being my age.
    I was 44 (one week before my 45th bday) I wanted to fight and give it my
    All. I did 4 rounds of T&C. It was doable for me. I worked f.t.. this
    is a tough decision. Good luck to you all. Sending healing vibes.
  • sj29
    sj29 Member Posts: 68
    edited February 2012

    So my oncotype came back today at 14. My MO suggestion was to do Tamoxifen for 5 years and did not think chemo was neccessary. My reoccurence rate with doing soley the hormone therapy was 9%. Doing chemotherapy combined would bring it down about 3-5% more. I want to do everything to bring it down to the lowest number without compromising my health. At this point it appears that chemo isn't in my favor. The side effects seem to risky, but I just feel like I want to do everything..I am so conflicted. I have no children and would like to someday. Doing chemo would obviously cause a huge road block in this. Fertility is my main reason for NOT wanting to do chemo..I don't know. I know the numbers are so low and they are in my favor, but it is hard to believe that when I got BC at such a young age and my risk for getting it was like 2%...

     It makes it hard for me see such "low numbers" as good when the numbers for having breast cancer were in my favor already. I don't know. I just keep going back and forth. I know the MO is saying it is safer not to, but how do I be sure? 

  • momand2kids
    momand2kids Member Posts: 1,508
    edited February 2012

    sjensen

    can you get a second opinion?  that can sometime help. There are also folks around who had babies after chemo or some even during chemo.... But I think before you even decide that, talking to another MO and also some fertility experts might help you out.

    best of luck-we all know what a hard decision this is...

  • marlenet
    marlenet Member Posts: 345
    edited February 2012

    sjensen- I agree with momand2kids... Maybe that will help... How old are you?  I am asking because sometime age my can help with your decision.

  • Califgirl12
    Califgirl12 Member Posts: 92
    edited February 2012

    Hi Ladies  ---I just received my Onco score today over the telephone--its 27.  I did not get any other info from the front office lady and will meet with my M.O. tomorrow.  I am in a daze.  I am 47.  I am not sure what this score will mean for me but reading all of your posts makes me think they might be recommending chemo.  I kind of feel like I was more afraid of chemo than anything else.  I have to say what really helps me put into perspective everything is so many of your comments.  I know I can do this now thanks to your support and comments.  I really needed to read these today.  I am so glad they gave me the info over the phone today.  I am going with my husband tomorrow to the appointment and don't want to freak out in front of him.  Poor guy he is very worried.  We have been married for 28 years, dated all thru out high school, and now are blessed with a little girl 6 years old.  How did this freakin happen to me?  I beat myself up everyday asking what could I had done to prevent this.  I am absolutely the only person in my gigantic family with BC. 

    Anyways thanks ladies, I appreciate your supportive comments.  I can do this.

  • sj29
    sj29 Member Posts: 68
    edited February 2012

    I am 26 and an goin to be getting a second opinion next week. My reoccurrence rate is 9% with doing just tamoxifen. It would go down by 3 to 5% with chemo..

  • Cherilynn64
    Cherilynn64 Member Posts: 342
    edited February 2012

    I can relate to a few of you. I was diagnosed with DCIS and IDS on 1/6/12 after mammogram and ultrasound on 12/27 (ultrasound b/c I have extremely dense breast tissue and mammo showed nothing even though I had felt this small marble in me since Aug 2010). Had core biopsy on 12/29 which was seriously the worst part of all treatments so far (OMG the pain from that). The biospy report showed ER+ and PR+ both very high at over 90%. Her2 test was not done and no one knows why. Biopsy was grade 2 for tumor then after the lumpectomy on 1/20/12 the final path report put it up to grade 3. There is no vascular involvement. Two sentinel nodes were removed, both negative. The margins were "highly clear" all by "at least 1cm" which they said was great. I had the twice a day for 5 days internal radiation done by the SAVI implant and finished that 2/9/12 (I take it back, having the SAVI put in and taken out was the worst pain of all the treatments, core biopsy goes to 2nd place LOL!). 

     I finally met with the medical oncologist yesterday 2/15/12 and he asked if I wanted Oncotype run and I said absolutely. Then I asked why was Her2 not done and he said, wtf, no idea, we'll do that too. Right now I will probably be put on tamoxifen since my receptors were so high for the hormones. I am 47. So I am awaiting the Oncotype score which I'm supposed to hopefully have when I meet him again on March 1. 

    As an aside, I've been a vegetarian since 1990 (I was 25, almost 26) and have zero family history of any kind of cancer whatsoever on either side of the family. I'm STILL in shock. I went from 1982-2007, 25 years exactly, without even seeing a doctor for anything. I take no meds, I have nothing else physically wrong with me, I am not overweight (I'm actually underweight), I never smoked, I only drank in college.....how I got cancer and no one else on either side of the family, including my living 99 yr old grandparents who have been married 77 years, I'll never know. I have two siblings, my parents are in their 70s, everyone lives to near 100, I've only had colds and the flu on occasion, otherwise I'm totally healthy. So....for me I don't even know if I'd risk chemo even if my score were middle range. I'm not married, have no children, have rarely had a boyfriend, and was diagnosed with PTSD from a horrible breakup with a guy who was a friend/more than a friend/back to friend looooooong story that happened in June....and all docs involved thing the stress fueled this cancer to grow in the last 7 months before I got diagnosed. I felt lump back in Aug 2010, but b/c I'm small breasted and dense tissue, all I have are lumps. So they don't know if my high grade 3 is due to me waiting so long to get this checked, or was it always grade 3 for a year and a half and I sat with it? Yet nothing in nodes and margins very clear.

    I'm looking at the fact that I'm single and work full time and have no one to help me.....so having chemo may be hard for me to do. But I see others on here who are single who have done it. But I also think, well what if there is a cure within 5 years? What if this was a one time thing, do I want to risk chemo? What if I do chemo and then the cure is in 3 mos after I'm done?

    I reckon I just have to sit tight and wait till March 1, but he wants to start chemo before 12 weeks is up from surgery, and that gives me 2 weeks max to decide yes or no. I want to get all info and opinions before March 1 so whatever my Onco score is, I can say with confidence "I have decided fill in the blank" and not regret it.

    At this point if I have a moderate score, I really don't know what I'd do. 

  • Kelleyod
    Kelleyod Member Posts: 150
    edited February 2012

    Hello ladies. . .

     I've been lurking tonight reading your forum as it may be applicable to me very soon so I'm trying to learn!   I wanted to give you a shout out for the amazing information / support you're providing to those of us new to the Oncotype world, implications, realword experiences with this tough decision.  I'm just amazed and in awe. . . and I know where I'll be coming when / if I get my score back.

     I just had a PMX after a UMX (stage 0, DCIS, 0/3, ER+, PR+, HER2-) . . . and shock!  They found a 6mm IDC tumor in my "healthy" breast with 2mm micromet in sentinel node. . . not sure what treatment they will recommend. . .  Oncotype is on the table. . .we'll see.   I am following the solid advice I read on page one - gather your information, converse with medical team, get research / info and make decisions you can sleep with. 

    So - a quick thank you for the wealth of information.  I'll be back as I find out more on my own situation.  Good luck on decisions to everyone.  My MO did tell me with first MX - when your heart is full, your recovery will be better. 

    Keep on fighting.

    Kelleyod

  • JennL
    JennL Member Posts: 78
    edited February 2012

    Hi ladies, I am waiting on my Oncotype score as well and the waiting is driving me nuts!!!  I am 37 years old and BS (who I love and trust completely) said if percentage is under 10% no chemo but if over yes to chemo because of my age.  I will also meet with MO when I have results!!  I have a very similiar diagnosis to RuthieG, 1.8cm IDC tumor, (originally thought it was 2 tumors 1.8 and 1.4 but hormone results ER/PR + and HER2- are identical so considered 1 tumor)  I had lymphascular invasion in tumor and I am Stage 1, grade 2 my Ki-67 is 21%.  I had a BLM January 31st and the cancer breast had no more cancer and the other breast was clean as well.  I did have a .3 mm micromet in sentinel lymph node but that is still considered negative node.  Did anyones ER/PR status change after Oncotype test?  I have read that it can happen sometimes.  My ER is 90% and PR is 24%.  Just curious:-)  Hopefully I will have results by end of next week so I can know what happens next and move on, I think not knowing what happens next is worse for me.  I guess I am very impatient:-)  

  • bangotti40
    bangotti40 Member Posts: 19
    edited February 2012

    I had 4 cm. IDC (two masses) removed (BMX) in August 2011.  The cancer was given an intermediate grade at biopsy, with a Ki67 score of 25.  My hormone receptor scores were in the 90s for both ER and PR.  I had no lymph node involvement.  My oncotype score was low (5).

    I was a bit frustrated at the no-chemo decision because of the amount of cancer (lots of people on this site have said that the chemo decision was made based on the fact that their cancer was greater than 2 cm, and that scares me!) and the fact that I'm (only) 50.  However, the more time that I've had to process the information, the more I'm able to believe that 5 years of AI alone will rid my body of any stray cells. 

  • JennL
    JennL Member Posts: 78
    edited February 2012

    Hi ladies, oncotype score is in it is 21 (14% recurrence rate).  BS is sending me to oncologist and says he would recommend chemo, he thinks it would be CMF.  Now just waiting to get oncologist appt. so I can start my healing!!  Good luck to all of you:-)

  • Cherilynn64
    Cherilynn64 Member Posts: 342
    edited February 2012

    Jenn I'm glad you got your score back so you were at least able to make a decision. I'm still waiting on mine, about another week. I will look at the cancer math and hopefully be able to make a decision I can live with. Right now I'm leaning towards no regardless of score. But it plays with my head a lot so I'm still trying to have a 2 week "cancer free" life to not think about it, but it's hard as I know you all know. So many things to think about...Bangotti I'm kinda thinking along the same lines as you. Not totally sure yet since I don't have my score.....but who knows, once I hear the number something may just blurt out of my mouth. 

    Good luck Jenn for when you start! 

  • JennL
    JennL Member Posts: 78
    edited February 2012

    Cherilynn, thank you for the good luck wishes:-)  The test didn't take as long as I thought if you call genomic health and give them your name they can look and see if they have received the sample and give you an estimated release date.  This way you know when your doc is going to receive it.  I'm very impatient when it comes to this stuff so I wanted to know when I would know LOL.  Good luck in whatever you choose, I'm praying low low scores for you!!!

  • Cherilynn64
    Cherilynn64 Member Posts: 342
    edited February 2012

    Oh thank you Jenn. Gemomics did call me last Monday to say my insurance would pay for the full testing and that I just needed to give them the ok to proceed. I have a tentative appt this Thurs 3/1 with the med onc, but he said they will call me to reschedule if results not in yet. Yikes, the waiting......I thought 9 days to wait on my biopsy result was bad enough. I keep reminding myself I waited that long to find out I had cancer, I can wait that long to find out this score. 

    And thanks - I'm praying for either a low score or the strength to get through chemo if I must. We'll see :-) 

  • JennL
    JennL Member Posts: 78
    edited March 2012
    Good luck with your oncotype results today Cherilynn!!!
  • RuthieG
    RuthieG Member Posts: 34
    edited March 2012

    Hi, just checking back in.  I'm doing round 2 of chemo today, and I am so happy with the decision that I made to do it.  I'm handling it well, and feel like I'm fighting hard.  (I had a 19 oncotype, but my MO's words were that while he could sleep at night if I said no to chemo, if it was anyone in his family with my numbers and age, he would say to do it).

    I'm wearing my Supergirl t-shirt to chemo today to show that I am strong and will keep fighting!

    Hope everyone has a beautiful day with peace of mind.

  • Cherilynn64
    Cherilynn64 Member Posts: 342
    edited March 2012

    Hi everyone - and thank you JennL, I can't believe you posted about my Oncotype score today! I just got off work as my results did come in so I lost 3 hrs commuting to MD office and back and my appt....done now, need to eat, but my news is Her2 is negative and Oncotype is 11. He said no chemo, I agree, and I'm starting tamoxifen. Crossing my fingers......I have heart disease on both sides of the family (and no cancer of course lol), but I do jazzercise dance aerobics/hand weights 3 to 6 days a week depending on schedule that week, I'm slender and now eat like a normal person should and not the sugary junk food diet I have been on my whole life....he thinks I should be ok, but will be getting the PET scans, CT scans, bone scans and multitudes of bloodwork that I know the rest of you are all too familiar with. I'm happy with the decision he made and I made, so for now, no chemo.

     I had this horrible feeling after he gave me the news and when I went out to make make my first follow up appt in a month to see how the tamoxifen is doing. The nurse who was took my vitals before the appt (I was so stressed, my BP and pulse were through the roof) said, well you look better now, and I said, I got good news so you can retake everything now, my numbers will have dropped! He said I'm very happy for you! And then as I was walking out with him to schedule the appt, I look up and there are all these people hooked up to their chemo. I started crying.....partly for relief that I didn't have to go through that, at least for now, and partly out of "survivor's guilt." I felt so awful......I sat in my car afterwards before I drove back to work and just cried. So I said a prayer to thank God for my 2nd chance and then asked for all those receiving chemo right then when I got that news to be blessed. They were all much older than me, and one guy even said to me "You shouldn't have to be here." But still.....having mixed chemo for my job in the past and watching what patients go through, I felt this sting of sadness.......I don't know if anyone else felt this way when they got their good news. I'm very grateful today....I feel like I got a new life. 

  • Cherilynn64
    Cherilynn64 Member Posts: 342
    edited March 2012

    Ruthie I'm glad to know that you are at peace with your decision and it was right for you. That's the most important thing! :-)

     BTW, I was born in Carrollton and lived in Plano once.....I'm 3rd generation Texan but my dad started moving us when I was 8 and we moved all over the country every year. But I'm still a Texan.  You know how it is Wink 

  • sj29
    sj29 Member Posts: 68
    edited March 2012

    Cherilyn64: quick question for you! First congrats on low oncoscore and no chemo! I have decided not to do chemo and will be starting tamoxifen with ovarian suppression next week. I am not sure if it is based on age, but why are yiundoing PET and CT scans? My dr said we wouldn't be doin these so I'm curious what your MO says? I am not getting a bone scan either..I am 26 no problems and will just be supplementing fir healthy bones. Thanks for any insight!

  • Cherilynn64
    Cherilynn64 Member Posts: 342
    edited March 2012

    Hi Sjensen - first thank you for the congrats, I'm pretty damn happy too :-)   My guess is that it's due to your very young age, however the scans are not just for testing bone density but also to confirm no cancer spread distantly. My tumor had very wide clean margins, surgeon said it was fantastic (yay!), but since it was IDC, she also told me she would be doing PET and CT scans if MO did not. However he is the MO she recommened, so they are working well together to not overdose me on radiation esp the first year. He's going to do CT scan first, then PET scan next, both 6 mos apart. The bone density scan is due to my age even though I'm still very much premenopausal (based on my blood work, my body isn't planning on going in to natural menopause ANYtime soon). I am overall very healthy and he is not expecting any problems. He also does ovarian supression with all women under 40 like you will be doing. He is considering it for me still even though I'm 47. I take 4000 IU of Vit D a day and calcium citrate.

    Have you had your Vit D levels run for at least a baseline figure to compare for the future? I'd just ask your MO do you have any plans to run any kind of scan on me within the year or due to my age do you feel these are unecessary? It's in all likelihood due to your age. I'm so sorry you have had to deal with this so young......I feel too young to be going through this!

    We were diagnosed exactly one week apart, so I'm glad to be going through this with you! I saw on your profile you are a peds nurse - I'm a pharmacist. I also saw your tumor was 1.4, mine was 1.5, my oncotype 11 yours 14, I also had no vascular involvement...wow, we have a pretty similar background save for the 20 year age difference! I have no family hx so no BRCA test is being done. 

    Cheri 

  • mkerwin
    mkerwin Member Posts: 4
    edited March 2012

    Hi.  I had a similiar experience.  I had a 1.6 cm IDC (the mammo showed only a 7 mm one--which by the way, had showed up three years earlier, but was so slow growing that it did't appear to be changing until I asked my technician, what's up with this dent in my breast?).  All the initial pathology reports showed I would not need chemo:  Stage One, 0/9 nodes, Grade 1, ER+,PR+, Her2-, low division rate, low grade, no vascular or lymph invasion.  The only thing weird was "perineural invasion," which I've read does't really mean all that much anyway.  Everyone told me I would NOT need chemo (I'm 57), just radiation and anastrozole after the lumpectomy. Then my Oncoptype score came back.  They expected around a 5, but it was a 19. I am like you.  I knew that I would not be able to rest unless I had done everything possible.  My doctor gave me a mild chemo called CMF. I was able to work, then take off about 5-7 days after each treatment.  There were 8 and they lasted around five months.  I didn't loose my hair and most people had no idea I was going through this (this is both good and bad, as no one feels sorry for you).  I started Oct. 4, but had tons of energy, could stll run, work out, host Christmas, give a baby shower, etc.  The only problem I had was a weird reaction to the F component. I have a very bad stomach and I started having a heart-attack like reaction the night of each treatment. They thought it was stomach related, but just to be sure, they stopped the F component from the "cocktail" for  the last four treatments.  I was bummed, but understood, and I've gotten over it.  My radiation oncologist said it probably made only about a .5 percent difference.  I am now on to radiation, which is easy, and I am very, very glad I did the chemo, as I will never have to ask, "What if."

  • Galsal
    Galsal Member Posts: 1,886
    edited March 2012

    I'm glad I found this particular thread.  Will be seeing Oncology 3/21 and am hoping they've already run Oncotype by then and have the results for discussion.  BS indicated the test would be done.

    I too am hoping for a very low score and am in a quandry which way I'll go if it's in the intermediate range.  Mother had BC at age 62, stage 1, and is still alive and well.  Am overweight, used to smoke for decades, eat healthy, am truly on the edge of being diabetic, have had arthritis since was 22, and so on.

  • Cherilynn64
    Cherilynn64 Member Posts: 342
    edited March 2012

    Because my IDC was 1.5cm and grade 3, the MO thought my Oncotype could come back in the middle range and I would have to make a tough decision. But since there's no genetic history of any kind of cancer either side of my family, he said I just a good a chance at it coming back low. He was very pleased at the score of 11. The entire chart was printed out with all the graphs, and looking at it from diffent angles, it's really good to see the percentages etc....He said how lucky I was to get this diagnosed at this time.....5 years ago with a grade 3 1.5cm tumor, he said he would have flat out put me on chemo. He says so far all his cases that have had low oncotype scores in the last 5 years and did not do chemo are all, so far, doing fine as long as they have stayed on tamoxifen. 

    Oh, the Oncotype report will also give you ER, PR, and Her2 status run with different numbers so you can compare them to the other reports you got. This is RNA based and it showed the scale for all 3 tests. On my pathology report it showed the tumor as both ER and PR + at over 90%. On this test they are again both high, but the PR was waaaay high near the end. Just really interesting stuff to get and look at.

    The waiting is HARD I know. The night before I couldn't sleep, and then the next day my appt wasn't till 220pm, so I had to work the first half of my shift knowing I would be getting that score soon....good luck waiting, it's hard but it's worth it. It cemented my decision for me, the doctor has had tons of experience and the first words out of his mouth were "Oh, nice a low number, no chemo, just tamoxifen for you" and I left to go back to work feeling a helluva lot better than leaving work to go there! Good luck........Oh, one more thing for Galsal: ask your MO about the clinical trial with metformin if you are close to typw 2 diabetes. May be worth looking in to especially in your case. I can't remember if it's also for ILC....but if you google it, it tells you. They have it running at 2 places close to me and even though I'm not type 2, my MO said he wouldn't stop me from doing it if I felt I wanted to take a shot at the 50% who get the med. 

Categories