KOMEN APOLOGIZES

pupmom
pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
edited June 2014 in Advocacy
Will restore funding for PP! WOOHOO!! Sisters, they heard us Loud and Clear!!!  LaughingLaughingLaughing
«13

Comments

  • painterly
    painterly Member Posts: 602
    edited February 2012

    Wow, women are so powerful in their numbers!!!

    I am convinced that women have the power to control where the money goes and to direct much more to research than what Komen is presently doing which is just a mere pittance.

  • barsco1963
    barsco1963 Member Posts: 2,119
    edited February 2012

    That is great news! Is good to know they are paying attention!

  • LuvRVing
    LuvRVing Member Posts: 4,516
    edited February 2012

    Awesome!!! 

    But the long term damage to them will likely be felt for a long time.

  • pupmom
    pupmom Member Posts: 5,068
    edited February 2012

    LuvRving, I agree. Personally I will still contribute to PP over SGK. For one thing, they have to get rid of that highly partisan anti-choice CEO. Then, they need to allocate at least half of their funds to actually finding a cure, instead of just talking about it.

  • sanbar8771
    sanbar8771 Member Posts: 281
    edited February 2012
  • prayrv
    prayrv Member Posts: 941
    edited February 2012

    Yorkimom,

    You took the words right out of my mouth.  Wish we could get a "firestorm/backlash" to convince Komen to do allocate $$ towards research.

    Trish

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

                 Too late.  Much too late.

                 The same people making bad judgments earlier in the week are still running the place.  And the reason given for restoration of funds tells me they are entirely tone deaf and out of touch with reality.  They are more worried about the impact of their stupidity upon their corporate partners than they ever were about the impact on thousands of women.

                 No second chances for selling out in the first place.  There are no acceptable excuses.  Going back does not erase history.  There's no undo or redo for bad judgment when the same people execising bad judgment earlier in the week are still running amock a few days later.

                  They didn't "hear us."  They didn't hear thousands of women who don't even have a place to voice their concerns and objections.  They heard their corporate partners who were getting squeezed by the public reaction.  Different from hearing any of "us".  We are small potatoes in comparison.

  • gardengumby
    gardengumby Member Posts: 7,305
    edited February 2012

    I laughed out loud (and I was not in a place that outloud laughing was exactly encouraged...) when I read the article.  However, the fact is that they (SGK) did it once, and if given the opportunity would probably joyfully do it again, so my dollars won't go there anymore.  I'll donate to Stand Up to Cancer, directly to Planned Parenthood, and to the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research center.  Maybe not in that order...  :)

  • LuvRVing
    LuvRVing Member Posts: 4,516
    edited February 2012

    And let's not forget breastcancer.org!  They can use the money, too!

  • Moderators
    Moderators Member Posts: 25,912
    edited February 2012
  • SAB
    SAB Member Posts: 1,498
    edited February 2012

    I'm with YorkieMom on this one.  Who is doing the research?  That's who I want to give money to!

  • NatsFan
    NatsFan Member Posts: 3,745
    edited February 2012

    Agreed that the damage is done.  They can put the pretty pink ribbon mask back on, but for a few days everyone saw the ugly reality of what SGK is.  It's too little too late.  

  • REKoz
    REKoz Member Posts: 590
    edited February 2012

    Sorry, I did not see this prior to starting a similar thread. This is awesome news for those in need. And I think that many have educated that things are not always as they seem over at SGK. Great decision but the damage to them has been done!

  • SAB
    SAB Member Posts: 1,498
    edited February 2012

    According to Huff Post Komen is fulfilling their obligations and making PP "eligible" to "apply" for future grants.

  • cbm
    cbm Member Posts: 475
    edited February 2012

    I thought this was an interesting and wonderful perspective on the collective power of the community of people touched by breast cancer:

    http://ideas.time.com/2012/02/03/susan-g-komen-apologizes-hoisted-by-its-own-pink-ribbon/?xid=gonewsedit

    In my community, Planned Parenhood teaches young women through educational programming to stand up for their personal beliefs, think for themselves, and make sure they are intentional in whatever they do.  That, and they provide a huge range of services to low income women.  I am so relieved that Komen saw how important all of these decisions are to all of us.  We are all connected in so many ways.

    Warmly,

    Cathy 

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited August 2012

    Too little, too late - but SO grateful for all the POSITIVE attention to PP.  YEAH, Women!!!!!

  • ckk
    ckk Member Posts: 270
    edited February 2012

    Sorry, SGK, you've lost my support and dollars forever.

  • Pompeed
    Pompeed Member Posts: 239
    edited February 2012

               The holes in the statement of intentions are so large the Golden Gate Bridge could fit in.

               And was there an announcement that any of the relevant heads rolled?  Or had the intelligence to pack and leave?  Nope.  Crickets on that.

                Poop on 'em. 

  • patti13
    patti13 Member Posts: 89
    edited February 2012

    pompeed - i so agree with you...this must be investigated..where's the money going.  let's can the pink ribbon s*** and find a cure.  sorry, hardly ever post but feeling like  i need to take my stand on this.

  • SoCalLisa
    SoCalLisa Member Posts: 13,961
    edited February 2012

    This was posted in the NY Times

    Cancer Group, Reversing Course, Says It Will Maintain Planned Parenthood
    Funding

    Susan G. Komen for the Cure said on Friday it was retreating from
    a decision to cut funding to Planned Parenthood, which provides abortion and
    birth control services, and apologized for a move that thrust the breast cancer
    charity into a deeply politicized controversy.

    Read More:
    http://www.nytimes.com/?emc=na

  • LuvRVing
    LuvRVing Member Posts: 4,516
    edited February 2012

    Perhaps we should lead an effort to return to the original color as presented to Estee Lauder...peach is the original color.  Out with pink, in with peach.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2012

    Pompseed- Well said!!!

    LuvRVing- I love that idea!!!! 

  • clariceak
    clariceak Member Posts: 752
    edited February 2012

    This whole Planned Parenthood debacle didn't really change my opinion of Komen because I don't have much respect for an organization that is supposedly "for the cure" yet spends less proportionally than many other cancer non-profits on research. The pink washing - approving kentucky fried chicken buckets - really? The lack of support and virtually no research for the women who are actually dying of this disease. My bc sisters who have gone on to Stage IV are virtually ignored in the happy pink survivorship lala land. I'm actually happy that this pr fiasco has opened people's eyes to what Komen is all about. There are many more organizations fighting cancer that deserve the same level of support.

    When I was young and uninsured I went to Planned Parenthood for pap smears.  When I had a suspicious result, they arranged for me to be seen at a teaching hospital for free. Many of the opponents say PP doesn't actually provide mammograms.  But they do provide referrals and resources for free and low cost health care.  When I was young and in need of health care I didn't have the ability to locate these resources for myself, and certainly wasn't even aware they were available.  Directing patients to health care they need is a valuable service.

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 1,376
    edited February 2012

    Susan G. Komen Foundation Elbows Out Charities Over Use Of The Word 'Cure'

    In addition to raising millions of dollars a year for breast cancer research, fundraising giant Susan G. Komen for the Cure has a lesser-known mission that eats up donor funds: patrolling the waters for other charities and events around the country that use any variation of "for the cure" in their names.

    So far, Komen has identified and filed legal trademark oppositions against more than a hundred of these Mom and Pop charities, including Kites for a Cure, Par for The Cure, Surfing for a Cure and Cupcakes for a Cure--and many of the organizations are too small and underfunded to hold their ground.

    "It happened to my family," said Roxanne Donovan, whose sister runs Kites for a Cure, a family kite-flying event that raises money for lung cancer research. "They came after us ferociously with a big law firm. They said they own 'cure' in a name and we had to stop using it, even though we were raising money for an entirely different cause."

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/07/komen-foundation-charities-cure_n_793176.html

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited February 2012

    Too much has been revealed about Komen's true nature and true agenda for me to ever trust them again. And while DH is a cop and I am used to firearms around the house, I find this disturbing and distasteful:



    http://www.discountgunsales.com/walther-p-22-hope-edition-34-pr-4228.html



    Sorry, can't make the link live. They have partnered with Komen on a .22 Walther handgun with a pink slide.



    Thanks, but no thanks.

  • LuvRVing
    LuvRVing Member Posts: 4,516
    edited February 2012

    Walther P-22 Hope Edition 3.4"

    Yeah, this...pathetic, isn't it?

  • Booboo2
    Booboo2 Member Posts: 59
    edited February 2012

    Clarice, why is it okay to support giving estrogen to 13-year olds, but not okay to support Kentucky Fried Chicken?  I see some inconsistency here.

    I am very disappointed in Komen.  All this proves is that Planned Parenthood and its supporters have enough political power to really kick people around.  It doesn't prove in any way that Komen did the right thing when they reversed their decision.

  • RetiredLibby
    RetiredLibby Member Posts: 1,992
    edited February 2012

    Thanks, LuvRVing. Stunning, isn't it? About as stunning as finding out that Komen hired Joe Lieberman's wife to lobby against the public option in the Affordable Care Act. I am so done with Komen I have no words to describe it!



    L

  • BaseballFan
    BaseballFan Member Posts: 859
    edited February 2012

    I will believe they are "sincere" with their apology when more money goes to actual "research for a cure" than advertising/promotions/salaries.  I have no problem with funding PP, awareness and administrative costs...but I do have a problem when so little of my dollar actually goes to finding a cure.  I'm not sure how they are able to call themselves  "Not for Profit". 

    Fact:  99% of Make A Wish donations go to an actual "Wish".  Now that's impressive.

  • Wabbit
    Wabbit Member Posts: 1,592
    edited February 2012

    I don't have to say anything because Pompeed said it all ...

    Smoke and mirrors in a phony apology.  Made because their corporate sponsors don't want anything to do with anything controversial.  It's all about the money.

Categories